Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Heuristic Evaluation of Groundwater in Arid Zones Using Remote Sensing and Geographic Information System

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify potential areas of groundwater using remote sensing and GIS. Therefore, some of the effective layers were extracted such as geology, fractures and faults, geomorphology, slope, land use and regional drainage density using ETM sensing imagery processes such as producing various feature class codes, edge detection filters, regulated classification and imposing vegetation indices conducted by topographic maps of 1:50,000, geology and DEM. All layers were classified depending on their effectiveness based on the expert opinions, using analytic hierarchy process. They were also weighted in different classes. After modeling in GIS, groundwater’s potential of Semnan plains was determined in Iran. The results showed that the existence of fractures and fault in sandstone formations of Shemshak and gunpowder as well as thick limestone of the layer-formation of Lar have led to name these areas as highly well potential areas of groundwater. Then after, alluvial valleys, Stream sediments, foothills alluvial fans and alluvial plains have formed the well potential areas. Using the discharge of the 54 fountains, aqueduct and wells; the accuracy of the map was estimated through an error matrix method with an overall accuracy of 79.63 and Kappa coefficient of 0.702, which implies the good accuracy of this model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aliabad FA, Shojaei S, Zare M, Ekhtesasi MR (2018) Assessment of the fuzzy ARTMAP neural network method performance in geological mapping using satellite images and Boolean logic. Int J Environ Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-1795-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asgharpour MJ (2008) Multiple criteria decision making. Tehran University, Tehran

    Google Scholar 

  • Ataee M (2010) Multi-criteria decision. Shahrood University Press, Shahrood

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbeih SF (2014) An overview of integrated remote sensing and GIS for groundwater mapping in Egypt. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 6, pp 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetter CW (1994) Applied hydrogeology, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, pp 543–591

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganapuram S, Kumar GV, Krishna IM, Kahya E, Demirel MC (2009) Mapping of groundwater potential zones in the Musi basin using remote sensing data and GIS. Adv Eng Softw 40(7):506–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geymen A, Baz I (2008) Monitoring urban growth and detecting land-cover changes on the Istanbul metropolitan area. Environ Monit Assess 1:449–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-9699-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghodsipoor H (2009) AHP. Amir Kabir University Press, Tehran

    Google Scholar 

  • Habibi AR, Shadfar S, Sadeghi M (2014) Investigating the severity of desertification on geo-morphological faces using GIS in Khuzestan. J Appl Res Geogr Sci 32:141–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashemi SN, Taghipoor N, Ghoshei M, Zareh Raeesabadi H (2010) The first conference of applied research of water resources in Iran

  • Ishizaka A, Labib A (2009) Analytic hierarchy process and expert choice: benefits and limitations. OR Insight 22(4):201–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jha MK, Peiffer S (2006) Applications of remote sensing and GIS technologies in groundwater hydrology: past, present and future. Bayreuth University Press, Bayreuth

    Google Scholar 

  • Jha MK, Chowdhury A, Chowdary VM, Peiffer S (2007) Groundwater management and development by integrated remote sensing and geographic information systems: prospects and constraints. Water Resour Manage 21(2):427–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalantari N, Khubyari A, Doraninejad S (2012) The investigation of fractures in discharging the springs ‘Cham mill’ located in the north-east of Kuzestan. Q Appl Geol 1:65–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Karanth KR (1987) Ground water assessment, development and management. Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Kheirkhah Zarkesh M (2005) DSS for floodwater site selection in Iran. Ph.D. thesis, Wageningen University

  • Khanamani A, Fathizad H, Karimi H, Shojaei S (2017) Assessing desertification by using soil indices. Arab J Geosci 10(13):287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurthy J, Mani A, Jayaraman V, Manive M (2000) Groundwater resources development in hard rock terrain an approach using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 2(3/4):204–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Kim YS, Oh HJ (2012) Application of a weights-of-evidence method and GIS to regional groundwater productivity potential mapping. J Environ Manage 96(1):91–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maden KJ, Chowdary VM, Chowdary A (2010) Groundwater assessment in Salboni Block, West Bengal (India) using remote sensing, geographical information system and multi-criteria decision analysis techniques. Hydrogeol J 18:1713–1728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madi K, Zhao B (2013) Neotectonic belts, remote sensing and groundwater potentials in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Int J Water Resour Environ Eng 5(6):332–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Malczewski J (2006) GIS-based multi criteria decision analysis: a survey of the literature. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 20(7):703–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehdipoor F (2007) A model for positioning based on multi-criteria decision-making methods in GIS. J Surv 87:20–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Nampak H, Pradhan B, Manap MA (2014) Application of GIS based data driven evidential belief function model to predict groundwater potential zonation. J Hydrol 513:283–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oikonomidis D, Dimogianni S, Kazakis N, Voudouris K (2015) A GIS/remote sensing-based methodology for groundwater potentiality assessment in Tirnavos area, Greece. J Hydrol 525:197–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oswald M (2004) Implementation of the analytical hierarchy process with VBA in ArcGIS. Comput Geosci 30:637–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman A (2008) A GIS based DRASTIC model for assessing groundwater vulnerability in shallow aquifer in Aligarh, India. Appl Geogr 28:32–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranganai RT, Ebinger CJ (2008) Aeromagnetic and Landsat TM structural interpretation for identifying regional groundwater exploration targets, south-central Zimbabwe Craton. J Appl Geophys 65:73–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roscoe, Moss Co. (1990) Handbook of ground water development. Wiley, New York, pp 34–51

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1980) The analytical hierarchy process. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (2000) Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory, 2nd edn. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, p 11

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (2002) Decision-making with the AHP: why is the principal eigenvector necessary. Eur J Oper Res 145:85–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saberi A, Rangzan K, Mahjori R, Keshavarzi MR (2012) Potential mapping of groundwater resources by the integration of composing the sensing remote and GIS using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in Kamestan anticline of Khozestan. J Adv Appl Geol 6:11–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Sander P, Chesley M, Minor T (1996) Groundwater assessment using remote sensing and GIS in a rural groundwater project in Ghana: lessons learned. Hydrogeol J 4:78–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shojaei S, Alipur H, Ardakani AHH, Nasab SNH, Khosravi H (2018) Locating Astragalus hypsogeton Bunge appropriate site using AHP and GIS. Spat Inf Res 26(2):223–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh AK, Prakash SR (2002) An integrated approach of remote sensing, geophysics and GIS to evaluation of groundwater potentiality of Ojhalasub watershed, Mirjapur District, UP, India. In: Asian conference on GIS, GPS, aerial photography and remote sensing, Bangkok, Thailand

  • Singh P, Gupta A, Singh M (2014) Hydrological inferences from watershed analysis for water resource management using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Egypt J Remote Sens Space Sci 17(2):111–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasa Rao Y, Jugran KD (2003) Delineation of groundwater potential zones and zones of groundwater quality suitable for domestic purposes using remote sensing and GIS. Hydrogeol Sci J 48(5):821–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teeuw R (1995) Groundwater exploration using remote sensing and a low cost geographic information system. Hydrogeol J 3:21–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors are grateful of university of Semnan for their unending effort to provide financial support to undertake this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Shojaei.

Additional information

Editorial responsibility: Parveen Fatemeh Rupani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ardakani, A.H.H., Shojaei, S., Siasar, H. et al. Heuristic Evaluation of Groundwater in Arid Zones Using Remote Sensing and Geographic Information System. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 17, 633–644 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-2104-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-2104-1

Keywords

Navigation