Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Arsenic, iron and nitrate removal from groundwater by mixed bacterial culture and fate of arsenic-laden biosolids

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Arsenic, iron and nitrate coexist in groundwater at a wide range of concentrations in various regions of the world. This study aims at investigating the concurrent arsenic and iron removal by combining the advantages of nitrate removal in a sulphidogenic bioreactor. A laboratory-scale suspended growth reactor was used to assess the performance of mixed bacterial culture at different arsenic, iron and nitrate concentrations. A semi-batch reactor (SmBR) was operated for more than 400 days in anoxic conditions at 30 ± 4 °C with different influent arsenate (250–1000 µg/L as arsenic), iron (2.0 mg/L) and nitrate (100–250 mg/L) concentrations in simulated groundwater and HRT of 3–6 days. Effects of different electron donors to deliver removing power on arsenic, iron and nitrate were also investigated. Nitrate was completely removed at all tested concentrations, while concentration of arsenic and iron met drinking water standards. The reactor was also charged with actual groundwater containing arsenic (up to 226 µg/L) as well as iron (up to 8.3 mg/L) and was able to remove both the contaminants below drinking water standards after addition of sufficient amount of sulphate. Toxicity characteristics leaching procedure results indicated that leachate arsenic concentrations were below the maximum United States Environmental Protection Agency guideline value for arsenic and biosolids which did not impose any environmental hazard.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abass OK, Teng Ma, Kong S, Wang Z, Mpinda MT (2016) A novel MD-ZVI integrated approach for high arsenic groundwater decontamination and effluent immobilization. Process Saf Environ 102:190–203

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Akunna JC, Bizeau C, Moletta R (1993) Nitrate and nitrite reductions with anaerobic sludge using various carbon sources: glucose, glycerol, acetic acid, lactic acid and methanol. Water Res 27:1303–1312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altun M, Sahinkaya E, Durukan I, Bektas S, Komnitsas K (2014) Arsenic removal in a sulfidogenic fixed-bed column bioreactor. J Hazard Mater 269:31–37

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Amburgey JE, Amirtharajah A (2005) Strategic filter backwashing techniques and resulting particle passage. J Environ Eng 131:535–547

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • APHA (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21st edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC

  • ATSDR (2000) Toxicological profile for arsenic. US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, p 428

  • Attinti R, Sarkar D, Barrett K, Datta R (2015) Adsorption of arsenic (V) from aqueous solutions by goethite/silica nanocomposite. Int J Environ Sci Technol 12:3905–3914

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baig JA, Kazi TG, Arain MB, Afridi HI, Kandhro GA, Sarfraz RA, Jamal MK, Shah AQ (2009) Evaluation of arsenic and other physico-chemical parameters of surface and ground water of Jamshoro, Pakistan. J Hazard Mater 166(2):662–669

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barringer JL, Reilly PA (2013) Arsenic in groundwater: a summary of sources and the biogeochemical and hydrogeologic factors affecting arsenic occurrence and mobility. In: Current perspectives in contaminant hydrology and water resources sustainability. InTech

  • Battaglia-Brunet F, Crouzet C, Burnol A, Coulon S, Morin D, Joulian C (2012) Precipitation of arsenic sulphide from acidic water in a fixed-film bioreactor. Water Res 46:3923–3933

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Behari JR, Prakash R (2006) Determination of total arsenic content in water by atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) using vapour generation assembly (VGA). Chemosphere 63(1):17–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bhatnagar A, Sillanpaa M (2011) A review of emerging adsorbents for nitrate removal from water. Chem Eng J 168:493–504

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • BIS:10500 (2012) Indian standard: drinking water: specification, 2nd revision. Bureau of Indian standard, New Delhi

  • Brahmacharimayum B (2014) Studies on sulfate reduction to elemental sulfur under anaerobic/microaerobic conditions. Ph.D. Thesis, Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati

  • Briones-Gallardo R, Escot-Espinoza V, Cervantes-González E (2017) Removing arsenic and hydrogen sulfide production using arsenic-tolerant sulfate-reducing bacteria. Int J Environ Sci Technol 14:609–622

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chaturvedi R, Banerjee S, Chattopadhyay P, Bhattacharjee CR, Raul P, Borah K (2014) High iron accumulation in hair and nail of people living in iron affected areas of Assam, India. Ecotoxicol Environ Safe 110:216–220

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clancy TM, Hayes KF, Raskin L (2013) Arsenic waste management: a critical review of testing and disposal of arsenic-bearing solid wastes generated during arsenic removal from drinking water. Environ Sci Technol 47:10799–10812

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DeSantis TZ, Hugenholtz P, Larsen N, Rojas M, Brodie EL, Keller K, Huber T, Dalevi D, Hu P, Andersen GL (2006) Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:5069–5072

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • EA (2002) Guidance on whether wastes containing metals or metal compounds are regulated under the Hazaradous Waste Act, 2nd edn. In: Information paper, no. 5, Department of Environment and Heritage, Australia, Environment Australia (EA), pp 1–22

  • Frunzo L, Esposito G, Pirozzi F, Lens P (2012) Dynamic mathematical modeling of sulfate reducing gas-lift reactors. Process Biochem 47:2172–2181

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ghanbari F, Moradi M, Mohseni-Bandpei A, Gohari F, Abkenar TM, Aghayani E (2014) Simultaneous application of iron and aluminum anodes for nitrate removal: a comprehensive parametric study. Int J Environ Sci Technol 11:1653–1660

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh A (2013) Studies on microbial reduction of perchlorate in batch and continuous system. Ph.D. Thesis, Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati

  • Giménez MC, Blanes PS, Buchhamer EE, Osicka RM, Morisio Y, Farías SS (2013) Assessment of heavy metals concentration in arsenic contaminated groundwater of the Chaco Plain, Argentina. Environ Chem 2013:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Hao OJ, Chen JM, Huang L, Buglass RL (1996) Sulfate-reducing bacteria. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 26:155–187

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Henke K (2009) Arsenic: environmental chemistry, health threats and waste treatment. Wiley, Chichester. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470741122.ch2

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hooper K et al (1998) Toxicity characteristic leaching procedure fails to extract oxoanion-forming elements that are extracted by municipal solid waste leachates. Environ Sci Technol 32:3825–3830

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jadhav SV, Bringas E, Yadav GD, Rathod VK, Ortiz I, Marathe KV (2015) Arsenic and Fluoride contaminated groundwaters: a review of current technologies or contaminant removal. J Environ Manag 162:306–325

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jong T, Parry DL (2005) Evaluation of the stability of arsenic immobilized by microbial sulfate reduction using TCLP extractions and long-term leaching techniques. Chemosphere 60:254–265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kirk MF, Roden EE, Crossey LJ, Brealey AJ, Spilde MN (2010) Experimental analysis of arsenic precipitation during microbial sulfate and iron reduction in model aquifer sediment reactors. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 74:2538–2555

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kleerebezem R, van Loosdrecht MCM (2007) Mixed culture biotechnology for bioenergy production. Curr Opin Biotechnol 18:207–212

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee J, Ahn W-Y, Lee C-H (2001) Comparison of the filtration characteristics between attached and suspended growth microorganisms in submerged membrane bioreactor. Water Res 35:2435–2445

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Zhang L, Wang G (2014) Genomic evidence reveals the extreme diversity and wide distribution of the arsenic-related genes in Burkholderiales. PLoS ONE 9:e92236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li B, Pan X, Zhang D, Lee D-J, Al-Misned FA, Mortuza MG (2015) Anaerobic nitrate reduction with oxidation of Fe(II) by Citrobacter freundii strain PXL1: a potential candidate for simultaneous removal of As and nitrate from groundwater. Ecol Eng 77:196–201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liamleam W, Annachhatre AP (2007) Electron donors for biological sulfate reduction. Biotechnol Adv 25:452–463

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Gao C, Zhang A, Jin P, Wang L, Feng L (2008) The nos gene cluster from gram-positive bacterium Geobacillus thermodenitrificans NG80-2 and functional characterization of the recombinant NosZ. FEMS Microbiol Lett 289:46–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu F, Zhang G, Liu S, Fu Z, Chen J, Ma C (2018) Bioremoval of arsenic and antimony from wastewater by a mixed culture of sulfate-reducing bacteria using lactate and ethanol as carbon sources. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 126:152–159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lovley DR, Chapelle FH (1995) Deep subsurface microbial processes. Rev Geophys 33(3):365–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayorga P, Moyano A, Anawar HM, García-Sánchez A (2013) Temporal variation of arsenic and nitrate content in groundwater of the Duero River Basin (Spain). Phys Chem Earth, Parts A/B/C 58–60:22–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng X, Korfiatis GP, Jing C, Christodoulatos C (2001) Redox transformations of arsenic and iron in water treatment sludge during aging and TCLP extraction. Environ Sci Technol 35:3476–3481

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mohseni-Bandpi A, Elliott DJ, Zazouli MA (2013) Biological nitrate removal processes from drinking water supply-a review. J Environ Health Sci Eng 11:35

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Onstott T, Chan E, Polizzotto M, Lanzon J, DeFlaun M (2011) Precipitation of arsenic under sulfate reducing conditions and subsequent leaching under aerobic conditions. Appl Geochem 26:269–285

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Postgate J (2013) The sulfate-reducing bacteria: contemporary perspectives. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramamoorthy S et al (2006) Desulfosporosinus lacus sp. nov., a sulfate-reducing bacterium isolated from pristine freshwater lake sediments. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56:2729–2736

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar A, Paul B (2016) The global menace of arsenic and its conventional remediation: a critical review. Chemosphere 158:37–49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shafiquzzaman M, Azam MS, Nakajima J, Bari QH (2010) Arsenic leaching characteristics of the sludges from iron based removal process. Desalination 261:41–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shakya AK, Ghosh PK (2018a) Simultaneous removal of arsenic and nitrate in absence of iron in an attached growth bioreactor to meet drinking water standards: importance of sulphate and empty bed contact time. J Clean Prod 186:304–312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shakya AK, Ghosh PK (2018b) Simultaneous removal of arsenic, iron and nitrate in an attached growth bioreactor to meet drinking water standards: importance of sulphate and empty bed contact time. J Clean Prod 186:1011–1020

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shakya AK, Rajput P, Ghosh PK (2018) Investigation on stability and leaching characteristics of mixtures of biogenic arsenosulphides and iron sulphides formed under reduced conditions. J Hazard Mater 353:320–328

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sima J, Cao X, Zhao L, Luo Q (2015) Toxicity characteristic leaching procedure over-or under-estimates leachability of lead in phosphate-amended contaminated soils. Chemosphere 138:744–750

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder KV, Webster TM, Upadhyaya G, Hayes KF, Raskin L (2016) Vinegar-amended anaerobic biosand filter for the removal of arsenic and nitrate from groundwater. J Environ Manag 171:21–28

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spain AM, Krumholz LR (2011) Nitrate-reducing bacteria at the nitrate and radionuclide contaminated Oak Ridge Integrated Field research challenge site: a review. Geomicrobiol J 28:418–429

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tabelin C, Igarashi T (2009) Mechanisms of arsenic and lead release from hydrothermally altered rock. J Hazard Mater 169:980–990

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tabelin CB, Hashimoto A, Igarashi T, Yoneda T (2014) Leaching of boron, arsenic and selenium from sedimentary rocks: II. pH dependence, speciation and mechanisms of release. Sci Total Environ 473:244–253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Teunissen K, Abrahamse A, Leijssen H, Rietveld L, Dijk HV (2008) Removal of both dissolved and particulate iron from groundwater. Drink Water Eng Sci Discuss 1:87–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Upadhyaya G, Jackson J, Clancy TM, Hyun SP, Brown J, Hayes KF, Raskin L (2010) Simultaneous removal of nitrate and arsenic from drinking water sources utilizing a fixed-bed bioreactor system. Water Res 44:4958–4969

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (1986) Hazardous waste management system; land disposal restriction. In: Appendix I to part 268: toxicity characteristics leaching procedure (TCLP), pp 40643–40654

  • USEPA (1992) Test methods for evaluating solid waste, physical/chemical methods, 3rd edn. In: SW-846, Method 1311. U S Government Printing Office, Washington, DC

  • USEPA (1996) Acid digestion of sediments, sludges and soils. Method 3050B. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-06/documents/epa-3050b.pdf. Accessed 23 Aug 2018

  • USEPA (2002) Office of ground water and drinking water implementation guidance for the arsenic rule EPA Report-816-D-02-005 (I3–I4) USEPA, Cincinnati, USA, 2002

  • USEPA (2004) SW-846 test method 9045D: soil and waste pH. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-12/documents/9045d.pdf. Accessed 23 Aug 2018

  • Venkataraman K, Uddameri V (2012) Modeling simultaneous exceedance of drinking-water standards of arsenic and nitrate in the Southern Ogallala aquifer using multinomial logistic regression. J Hydrol 458–459:16–27

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Ma T, Zhu Y, Abass OK, Liu L, Su C, Shan H (2018) Application of siderite tailings in water-supply well for As removal: experiments and field tests. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 128:85–93

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wrighton KC et al (2010) Bacterial community structure corresponds to performance during cathodic nitrate reduction. ISME J 4:1443–1455

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation (MDWS), India [Project No. W-11017/44/2011-WQ], for partially supporting purchase of consumables, minor equipment and scholarship to the first author for certain period of time. The authors also highly acknowledge the help from the Central Instrument Facility (CIF), Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati, for providing man power, various instrumental facilities, etc. Mr. L. Rahman, Mr. A. Das and other staff members of PHED, Bongaigaon, Assam, are duly acknowledged for helping in the collection of actual groundwater.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, 781039, India

    A. K. Shakya & P. K. Ghosh

Authors
  1. A. K. Shakya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. P. K. Ghosh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. K. Ghosh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. The help in any form received from any party has been acknowledged.

Additional information

Editorial responsibility: J Aravind.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shakya, A.K., Ghosh, P.K. Arsenic, iron and nitrate removal from groundwater by mixed bacterial culture and fate of arsenic-laden biosolids. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 16, 5901–5916 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-1978-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-1978-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation