Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An overview of particulate dry deposition: measuring methods, deposition velocity and controlling factors

  • Review
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Much importance was given to dry deposition over the past few decades as it deteriorated the environmental conditions and resulted in subsequent health effects. This paper starts with an overall scenario of dry deposition research; it focuses on: various particulate dry deposition flux measurement methods, comparison of various published numerical values on dry deposition velocity and factors controlling dry deposition velocity. This work provides a technical overview to research studies on the current state of dry deposition and limitations of various measurement methods. Relationship between dry deposition flux and particle concentration is discussed with the help of previous works. Various mathematical models used to predict dry deposition velocity are discussed. Dry deposition velocity of particulates around the world is compared to gain perspective on factors influencing dry deposition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brewer R, Belzer W (2001) Assessment of metal concentrations in atmospheric particles from Burnaby Lake, British Columbia, Canada. Atmos Environ 35:5223–5233

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Caffery PF, Ondov JM, Zufall MJ (1998) Determination of size-dependant dry particle deposition velocities with multiple intrinsic tracers. Environ Sci Technol 32(11):1615–1622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang CN, Fang G-C, Chang S-Y (1994) Comparison of dry deposition fluxes among three different places near Taichung city. Tunghai J 35:107–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson CI, Lindberg SE, Schmidt JA, Cartwright LG, Landis LR (1985) Dry deposition of sulphate onto surrogate surfaces. J Geophys Res 90(D1):2123–2130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dloske DA (1995) Deposition of atmospheric pollutants to monuments, statues and buildings. Sci Total Environ 167:15–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolske DA, Gatz DF (1985) A field comparison of methods for the measurement of particle and gas deposition. J Geophys Res 90:2076–2084

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dullac F, Buat-Menard P, Ezat U, Melki S, Bergametti G (1989) Atmospheric input of trace metals to the Western Mediterranean: uncertainties in modeling dry deposition from cascade impactor data. Tellus 41B:362–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairall CW, Larsen SE (1984) Dry deposition surface production and dynamics of aerosols in the marine boundary layer. Atmos Environ 18:69–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang GC, Cheng M-T, Chang C-N (1997) Monitoring and modeling the mass, heavy metals and ion species dry deposition in Central Taiwan. J Environ Sci Health A 32(8):2183–2199

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang GC, Wu YS, Chang CN, Chang KF, Yang DG (1999) Modeling dry deposition of total particle mass in trafficked and rural sites of Central Taiwan. Environ Int 25(5–25):625–633. doi:10.1016/S0160-4120(99)00021-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang F, Wang Q, Li J (2001) Atmospheric particulate mercury concentration and its dry deposition flux in Chanchun city, China. Sci Total Environ 281:229–236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fang GC, Chang S-C, Chen Y-C, Zhuang Y-J (2014) Measuring metallic elements of total suspended particulates(TSPs), dry deposition flux and dry deposition velocity for seasonal variation in central Taiwan. Atmos Res 143:107–117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Finlayson-Pitts BJ, Pitts JN (1986) Atmospheric chemistry: fundamental and experimental techniques. Willey, New york

    Google Scholar 

  • Flechard CR, Nemitz E, Smith RI, Fowler D, Vermeulen AT, Bleeker A, Erisman JW, Simpson D, Zhang L, Tang YS, Sutton MA (2011) Dry deposition of reactive nitrogen to European ecosystems: a comparison of inferential models across the NitroEurope network. Atmos Chem Phys 11:2703–2728. doi:10.5194/acp-11-2703-2011

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goss NR, Mladenov N, Seibold CM, Chowanski K, Seitz L, Wellemeyer TB, Williams MW (2013) Quantifying particulate matter deposition in Niwot Ridge, Colorado: collection of dry deposition using marble inserts and particle imaging using the FlowCAM. Atmos Environ 80:549–598

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison RM, Abdalmogith SS, Derwent RG (2006) Particulate sulphate and nitrate in Southern England and Northern Ireland during 2002/3 and its formation in a photochemical trajectory model. Sci Total Environ 368:769–780

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holsen TM, Noll KE (1992) Dry deposition of atmospheric particles: application of current models to ambient data. Environ Sci Technol 26(9):1807–1814

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holsen TM, Noll KE, Liu SP, Lee WJ (1991) Dry deposition of polychlorinated biphenyls in urban areas. Environ Sci Technol 25:1075–1081

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman YJ, Tanre D, Boucher O (2002) A satellite view of aerosols in the climate system. Nature 419(6903):215–223

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg RB (1992) Standard operating procedure for the source apportionment research branch LBL energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometer. Contract report 68-DO-0106, Atmospheric research and assessment laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC

  • Lee WJ, Chun-Ching S, Sheu H-L, Fan Y-C, Chao H-R, Fang G-C (1996) Monitoring and modeling of PCB dry deposition in urban area. J Hazard Mater 49:57–88

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lestari P, Oskouie AK, Noll KE (2003) Size distribution and dry deposition of particulate mass, sulphate and nitrate in an urban area. Atmos Environ 37:2507–2516

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin JM, Fang G-C, Holsen TM, Noll KE (1993) A comparison of dry deposition modeled from size distribution data and measured with a smooth surface for total particle mass, lead and calcium in Chicago. Atmos Environ 27A(7):1131–1138

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin JJ, Noll KE, Holsen TM (1994) Dry deposition velocities as a function of particle size in the ambient atmosphere. Aerosol Sci Technol 20:239–252

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu F, Xu Y, Liu J, Liu D, Li J, Zhang G, Li X, Zou S, Lai S (2013) Atmospheric deposition of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAHs) to a coastal site of Hong Kong, South China. Atmos Environ 69:265–272

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mariraj Mohan S, Rajagoal K (2012) Development of dry deposition velocity model for a typical medium level Indian city Karaikudi. Int J Environ Eng 4(1/2):145–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maro D, Boulaud D, Copalie A, Germain P, Hebert D, Tenailleau L (2004) Validation of dry deposition models for submicronic and micronic aerosols. In: Proceeding of the 9th international conference on harmonization within atmospheric dispersion modeling for regulatory purposes, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, 1–4 June 2004, pp 89–94

  • Maro D, Connan O, Flori JP, Hebert D, Mestayer P, Olive F, Rosant JM, Rozet M, Sini JF, Solier L (2014) Aerosol dry deposition in urban environment: assessment of deposition velocity on building facades. J Aerosol Sci 69:113–131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Noll KE, Fang KYP (1989) Development of a dry deposition model for atmospheric coarse particles. Atmos Environ 23(3):585–594

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Noll KE, Fang KYP, Watkins LA (1988) Characterization of the deposition of particles from the atmosphere to a flat plate. Atmos Environ 22(7):1461–1468

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Noll KE, Jackson MM, Oskouie AK (2001) Development of an atmospheric particles dry deposition model. Aerosol Sci Technol 35:627–636

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Odabassi M, Muezzinuglu A, Bozlaker A (2002) Ambient concentration and dry deposition fluxes of trace elements in Izmir, Turkey. Atmos Environ 36(38):5841–5851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ould-Dada Z, Copplestone D, Joal M, Shaw G (2002) Effect of forest edges on dry deposition of radioactive aerosols. Atmos Environ 36:5595–5601

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paode RD, Holsen TM (1996) Standard operating procedure for preparation, handling and extraction of dry deposition plates: dry deposition of atmospheric particles. Revision 2

  • Petroff A, Zhang L (2010) Development and validation of a size-resolved particle dry deposition scheme for application in aerosol transport models. Geosci Model Dev 3:753–769. doi:10.5194/gmd-3-753-2010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poor N, Tremblay R, Kay H, Bhethanabotla V, Swartz E, Luther M, Campbell S (2004) Atmospheric concentrations and dry deposition rates of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons(PAHs) for Tampa Bay, Florida, USA. Atmos Environ 38:6005–6015

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Qi J, Li P, Li X, Feng L, Zhang M (2005) Estimation of dry deposition fluxes of particulate species to the water surface in the Qingdao area, using a model and surrogate surfaces. Atmos Environ 39:2081–2088

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ruijgrok W, Davidson CI, Nicholson KW (1995) Dry deposition of particles: implications and recommendations for mapping of deposition over Europe. Tellus 47B(5):587–601

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sataka S, Uno I, Takemura T, Carmichael GR, Tang YH, Streets D, Sugimoto N, Shimizu A, Uematsu M, Han JS, Ohta S (2004) Characteristics of Asian aerosol transport simulated with a regional-scale chemical transport model during the ACE-Asia observation. J Geophys Res. 109(D19):1–16. doi:10.1029/2003JD003997

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwede DB, Zhang L, Vet R, Lear G (2011) An intercomparison of the deposition models used in the CASTNET and CAPMoN networks. Atmos Environ 45:1337–1346

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sehmel GA (1980) Particle and gas dry deposition: a review. Atmos Environ 14:983–1011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sehmel GA, Hodgson WH (1978) A model for predicting dry deposition of particles and gases to environmental surface, DOE report PNLSA-6721. Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, WA

    Google Scholar 

  • Seinfeld J, Pandis SN (1997) Atmospheric chemistry and physics. Wiley-Interscience Publication, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahin U, Yi SM, Paode RD, Holsen TM (2000) Long term elemental dry deposition fluxes measured around Lake Michigan with an automated dry deposition sampler. Environ Sci Technol 34(10):1887–1892

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shahin UM, Holsen TM, Odabasi M (2002) Dry deposition measured with a water surface sampler: a comparison to modeled results. Atmos Environ 36:3267–3276

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sheu HL, Lee W-J, Chun-Ching S, Chao H-R, Fan Y-C (1996) Dry deposition of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon in ambient air. J Environ Eng 122(12):1101–1109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shi JH, Zhang J, Gao H-W, Tan S-C, Yao X-H, Ren J-L (2013) Concentration, solubility and deposition flux of atmospheric particulate nutrients over Yellow Sea. Deep Sea Res II 97:43–50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slinn SA, Slinn WGN (1980) Predictions for particle deposition on natural waters. Atmos Environ 14:1013–1016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slinn SA, Slinn WGN, Eisenreich SJ (eds) (1981) Modeling of atmospheric particulate deposition to natural waters. Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Ann Arbor, p 23

    Google Scholar 

  • Sofuoglu SC, Paode RD, Sivadechathep J, Noll KE, Holsen TM, Keelar GJ (1998) Dry deposition fluxes and atmospheric size distributions of mass, Al, and Mg measured in Southern Lake Michigan during AEOLOS. Aerosol Sci Technol 29:281–293

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tasdemir Y, Odabasi M, Vardar N, Sofuoglu A, Murphy TJ, Holsen TM (2004) Dry deposition fluxes and velocities of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) associated with particles. Atmos Environ 38:2447–2456

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (1996) Compilation of air pollutant emission factors. Volume 1: Stationary point and area sources AP-42,5th edn

  • Van Aalst RM (1988) Input from the atmosphere. In: Salomons W et al (eds) Pollution of the North Sea: an assessment. Springer, Berlin, pp 275–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Vardar N, Odabasi M, Holsen TM (2002) Particulate dry deposition and overall deposition velocities of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. J Environ Eng 128(3):269–274

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wesley ML, Hicks BB (2000) A review of the current status of knowledge on dry deposition. Atmos Environ 34:2261–2282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams RM (1982) A model for dry deposition of particles to natural water surfaces. Atmos Environ 16:1933–1938

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu YL, Davidson CI, Dolske DA, Sherwood SI (1992) Dry deposition of atmospheric contaminant: the relative importance of aerodynamic, boundary layer and surface resistance. Aerosol Sci Technol 16:65–81

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yan H, Liu X, Qi J, Gao H (2014) Dry deposition of PM10 over the Yellow Sea during Asian dust events from 2001 to 2007. J Environ Sci 26:54–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang HH, Chiang C-F, Lee W-J, Hwang KP, Wu EMY (1999) Size distribution and dry deposition of road dust PAHs. Environ Int 25(5):585–597

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yi SM, Holsen TM, Noll KE (1997) Comparison of dry deposition predicted from models and measured with a water surface sampler. Environ Sci Technol 31(1):272–278

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yi SM, Shahin U, Sivadechathep J, Sofuoglu SC, Holsen TM (2001a) Overall elemental dry deposition velocities measured around lake Michigan. Atmos Environ 35:113–1140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yi SM, Lee E-Y, Holsen TM (2001b) Dry deposition fluxes and size distributions of heavy metals in Seoul, Korea during Yellow-sand events. Aerosol Sci Technol 35:569–576

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yi SM, Totten LA, Thota S, Yan S, Offenberg JH, Eisenreich SJ, Garney J, Holsen TM (2006) Atmospheric dry deposition of trace elements measured around the urban and industrially impacted NY–NJ harbor. Atmos Environ 40:6626–6637

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yun HJ, Yi S-M, Kim YP (2002) Dry deposition fluxes of ambient particulate heavy metals in a small city, Korea. Atmos Environ 36:5449–5458

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zannetti P (1990) Air pollution modeling, theories, computational methods and available software, computational mechanics. Southampton and Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York

  • Zhang L, Vet R (2006) A review of current knowledge concerning size-dependent aerosol removal. China Particuol 4(6):272–282

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Gong S, Padro J, Barrie L (2001) A size-segregated particle dry deposition scheme for an atmospheric aerosol module. Atmos Environ 35:549–560

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Fang GC, Liu CK, Huang YL, Huang JH, Huang CS (2012) Dry deposition fluxes and deposition velocities of seven trace metal species at five sites in Central Taiwan—a summary of surrogate surface measurements and a comparison with model estimation. Atmos Chem Phys 12:3405–3417

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng M, Guo Z, Fang M, Rahn KA, Kester DR (2005) Dry and wet deposition of elements in Hong Kong. Mar Chem 97:124–139

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zufall MJ, Davidson CI, Caffery PF, Ondov JM (1998) Airborne concentrations and dry deposition fluxes of particulate species to surrogate surfaces deployed in Southern Lake Michgan. Environ Sci Technol 32:1623–1628

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank reviewers who offered valuable suggestions to improve the manuscript. The author also extends his thanks to Dr. S. Madhu, for his advice and sharing his experience.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Alagappa Chettiar College of Engineering and Technology, Karaikudi, Tamil Nadu, 630 004, India

    S. Mariraj Mohan

Authors
  1. S. Mariraj Mohan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Mariraj Mohan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mariraj Mohan, S. An overview of particulate dry deposition: measuring methods, deposition velocity and controlling factors. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 13, 387–402 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-015-0898-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-015-0898-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation