Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Grading of proximal internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis by Doppler/duplex ultrasound (DUS) and computed tomographic angiography (CTA): correlation and interrater reliability in real-life practice

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Acta Neurologica Belgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Doppler/duplex ultrasound (DUS) and computed tomographic angiography (CTA) are frequently applied methods to assess the degree of proximal internal carotid artery (ICA) stenoses in patients with acute ischemic stroke. This study evaluated the agreement and interrater reliability (IR) of both methods using a revised DUS grading system as well as different criteria (ECST/NASCET) under real-life conditions. CTA and DUS data of 281 proximal ICA stenoses [143 patients; 65.7 % male; age (mean (years) ± SD, range) 72.2 ± 11.1, 40–99] were retrospectively analyzed. For both methods, two independent raters estimated the degree of stenosis according to NASCET and ECST criteria. DUS raters applied revised German DUS criteria. For agreement and IR assessment, the linear weighted Kappa statistic was used. Correlation between DUS and CTA was substantial irrespective of the applied classification [weighted Kappa: 0.77 (NASCET)/0.79 (ECST)]. IR for DUS was almost perfect (weighted Kappa: 0.94) and better than for CTA [weighted Kappa: 0.78 (NASCET)/0.78 (ECST)]. In a real-life setting, CTA and DUS assessments of the degree of proximal ICA stenoses agreed substantially irrespective of the criteria applied (ECST/NASCET). For DUS, IR was better than for CTA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hill AB (1998) Should patients be screened for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis? Can J Surg 41:208–2013

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Jacobowitz GR, Rockman CB, Gagne PJ et al (2003) A model for predicting occult carotid artery stenosis: screening is justified in a selected population. J Vasc Surg 38:705–709

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kiechl S, Willeit J, Rungger G, Egger G et al (1994) Quantitative assessment of carotid atherosclerosis in a healthy population. Neuroepidemiology 13:314–317

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Willeit J, Kiechl S (1993) Prevalence and risk factors of asymptomatic extracranial carotid artery atherosclerosis. A population-based study. Arterioscler Thromb 13:661–668

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hillen T, Nieczaj R, Munzberg H et al (2000) Carotid atherosclerosis, vascular risk profile and mortality in a population-based sample of functionally healthy elderly subjects: the Berlin ageing study. J Intern Med 247:679–688

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hankey GJ, Warlow CP, Molyneux AJ (1990) Complications of cerebral angiography for patients with mild carotid territory ischaemia being considered for carotid endarterectomy. J Neurol Neuro surg Psychiatry 53:542–548

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wardlaw JM, von Kummer R, Carpenter T (2015) Protocol for the perfusion and angiography imaging sub-study of the Third International Stroke Trial (IST-3) of alteplase treatment within six-hours of acute ischemic stroke. Int J Stroke 10:956–968

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Widder B, von Reutern GM, Neuerburg-Heusler D (1986) Morphologic and Doppler sonographic criteria for determining the degree of stenosis of the internal carotid artery. Ultraschall Med 7:70–75

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Arning C, Widder B, von Reutern GM et al (2010) Revision of DEGUM ultrasound criteria for grading internal carotid artery stenoses and transfer to NASCET measurement. Ultraschall Med 31:251–257

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Carpenter JP, Lexa FJ, Davis JT (1996) Determination of duplex Doppler ultrasound criteria appropriate to the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. Stroke 27:695–699

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Oates CP, Naylor AR, Hartshorne T, Charles SM, Fail T, Humphries K, Aslam M, Khodabakhsh P (2009) Joint recommendations for reporting carotid ultrasound investigations in the United Kingdom. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 37:251–261

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zavanone C, Ragone E, Samson Y (2012) Concordance rates of Doppler ultrasound and CT angiography in the grading of carotid artery stenosis: a systematic literature review. J Neurol 259:1015–1018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. von Reutern GM, Goertler MW, Bornstein NM, Del Sette M, Evans DH, Hetzel A, Kaps M, Perren F, Razumovky A, von Reutern M, Shiogai T, Titianova E, Traubner P, Venketasubramanian N, Wong LK, Yasaka M, Neurosonology Research Group of the World Federation of Neurology (2012) Grading carotid stenosis using ultrasonic methods. Stroke 43:916–921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Alexandrov AV, Bladin CF, Maggisano R, Norris JW (1993) Measuring carotid stenosis. Time for a reappraisal. Stroke 24:1292–1296

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. de Bray JM, Glatt B (1995) Quantification of atheromatous stenosis in the extracranial internal carotid artery. Cerebrovasc Dis 5:414–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Prof. M. Wiesmann reports grants and personal fees from Stryker Neurovascular, grants and personal fees from SilkRoad Medical, grants from Covidien, grants from Microvention, grants and personal fees from Bracco, grants and personal fees from Siemens, grants from AB Medica, grants from Acandis, grants from Codman Neurovascular, grants from Penumbra, grants from Phenox, grants from Abbott, grants from St. Jude, from B. Braun, outside the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oliver Matz.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

All other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Our study has been approved by the local ethics commission.

Informed consent

For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Matz, O., Nikoubashman, O., Rajkumar, P. et al. Grading of proximal internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis by Doppler/duplex ultrasound (DUS) and computed tomographic angiography (CTA): correlation and interrater reliability in real-life practice. Acta Neurol Belg 117, 183–188 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-016-0676-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-016-0676-4

Keywords

Navigation