Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Lepidoptera Associated with Forestry Crop Species in Brazil: a Historical Approach

  • Forum
  • Published:
Neotropical Entomology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite the long history of forestry activity in Brazil and its importance to the national economy, there is still much disorder in the information regarding pests of forestry species. Considering the importance of the entomological knowledge for the viability of silvicultural management, this work aimed to gather information on the species of Lepidoptera associated with forestry crops within Brazil using a historical approach. Through a literature review, all registered species of Lepidoptera related to forestry crops in Brazil from 1896 to 2010 were identified. The historical evaluation was based on the comparison of the number of published articles, species richness, and community similarities of the Lepidoptera and their associated forest crops, grouped in 10-year samples. A total of 417 occurrences of Lepidoptera associated with forestry species were recorded, from which 84 species are related with 40 different forestry crops. The nocturnal Lepidoptera were dominant on the records, with Eacles imperialis magnifica Walker as the most frequent pest species cited. Myrtaceae was the most frequent plant family, with Cedrela fissilis as the most cited forestry crop species. A successional change in both Lepidoptera species and their host plants was observed over the decades. The richness of lepidopteran pest species increased over the years, unlike the richness of forestry crop species. This increase could be related to the inefficient enforcement of sanitary barriers, to the increase of monoculture areas, and to the adaptability of native pests to exotic forestry species used in monoculture stands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig 1
Fig 2
Fig 3
Fig 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Batista MF, Fonseca JNL, Tenente RCV, Mendes MAS, Oliveira MRV, Ferreira DN (1998) Intercâmbio e quarentena de germoplasma vegetal. Biotech Ciênc Des 6:32–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabral DC, Cesco S (2008) Notas para uma história de exploração madeireira na Mata Atlântica do sul-sudeste. Amb Soc 11:33–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso H (2010) Pinus e Eucalipto - Plantação florestal é um bom negócio para diversificar a renda no campo. Bol Inf Sis FAEP 1115:2–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpezzani AA (1995) Cultura do mate no Brasil: conflitos e lacunas p.43-47 In: Winge H, Ferreira AG, Mariath JEA, Tarasconi LC (eds) Erva-Mate: biologia e cultura no Cone Sul. Porto Alegre, Ed. Universidade, 356p

  • Carvalho PER (1994) Espécies florestais brasileiras: recomendações silviculturais, potencialidades e uso da madeira. EMBRAPA-CNPF, Colombo, p 640

    Google Scholar 

  • Corrêa Costa E, D’Avila M, Cantarelli EB, Murari AB, Manzoni CG (2008) Entomologia Florestal. UFSM, Santa Maria, 240p

    Google Scholar 

  • da Costa Lima AM (1936) Terceiro catálogo de insetos que vivem nas plantas do Brasil. Escola Nacional de Agronomia, Rio de Janeiro, 460p

    Google Scholar 

  • da Costa Lima AM (1950) Insetos do Brasil: Lepidópteros, 2ª parte. Escola Nacional de Agronomia, Rio de Janeiro

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis DR (1964) Bagworm Moths of the Western Hemisphere. Smithsonian Institution, Bull Unit Stat Nac Mus 244. 14

  • Dean W (1989) A Botânica e a Política Imperial: Introdução e Adaptação de Plantas no Brasil Colonial e Imperial. Conferência feita no Instituto de Estudos Avançados da USP no dia 21 de junho de 1989: http://www.iea.usp.br/artigos/deanbotanicaimperial.pdf (último acesso em 30/v/2011)

  • Diniz IR, Morais HC, Botelho AMF, Venturoli F, Cabral BC (1999) Lepidopteran caterpillar fauna on lactiferous host plants in the central Brazilian cerrado. Rev Bras Biol 59:627–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca M (1950) Sôbre pragas do eucalipto, especialmente lagartas. Chácaras e Quint 82:37–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Freyre G (2004) Nordeste: aspectos da influência da cana sobre a vida e a paisagem do Nordeste do Brasil, 7ªth edn. Global, São Paulo, 183p

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallo D, Nakano O, Silveira Neto S, Carvalho RPL, Batista GC, Berti Filho E, Parra JRP, Zucchi RA, Alves SB, Vendramim JD, Marchini LC, Lopes JRS, Omoto C (2002) Entomologia agrícola, 3rd edn. FEALQ, Piracicaba, 920p

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimaldi DA, Engel MS (2005) Evolution of the insects. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 755p

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001) PAST: Palaeontological Statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electron 4:9p

    Google Scholar 

  • Heppner JB (ed) (1984) Checklist: Part I, Micropterigoidea—Immoidea In Heppner, XXVIII + 112p. In Heppner, JB (ed) Atlas of Neotropical Lepidoptera. The Hague, Junk Publishers, vol 2

  • Heppner JB (ed) (1995) Checklist: Part 2, Hyblaeoidea—Pyraloidea—Tortricoidea, LIV + 243p. In Heppner, JB (ed) Atlas of Neotropical Lepidoptera. Gainsville, Scientific Publishers, vol 3

  • Heppner JB (ed) (1996) Checklist: Part 4B, Drepanoidea—Bombycoidea—Sphingoidea, L + 87p. In Heppner, JB (ed) Atlas of Neotropical Lepidoptera. Gainsville, Scientific Publishers, vol 5B

  • Heppner JB (ed) (2004) Checklist: Part 4A, Hesperioidea—Papilionoidea, XXV + 439p. In Heppner, JB (ed) Atlas of Neotropical Lepidoptera. Gainsville, Scientific Publishers, vol 5A

  • Lafontaine JD, Fibiger M (2006) Revised higher classification of the Noctuoidea (Lepidoptera). Can Entomol 138:610–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langellotto GA, Denno RF (2004) Responses of invertebrate natural enemies to complex structured habitats: a meta-analytical synthesis. Oecologia 139:1–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzi H (1996) Árvores Brasileiras: manual de identificação e cultivo de plantas arbóreas nativas do Brasil, vol 1. Plantarum, São Paulo, 384p

    Google Scholar 

  • Martins AJ, Pedrosa-Macedo JH (1983) Surto de geometrídeos desaciculadores em Pinus. Floresta 15:64–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Martins AJ, Pedrosa-Macedo JH, Santos HR, Cordeiro L (1984) Melanolophia apicalis (Warren, 1900) em Pinus patula no Paraná. Floresta 15:1–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson K (1900) On the criterion that a given system of deviations from the probable in the case of a correlated system of variables is such that it can be reasonably supposed to have arisen from random sampling. Philos Mag Ser 5(50):157–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedrosa Macedo JH (1993) Manual de Pragas em Florestas vol 2—Pragas Florestais do Sul do Brasil. Folha de Viçosa, Viçosa, 112p

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitkin LM (2002) Neotropical ennomine moths: a review of the genera (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). Zool J Linn Soc-Lond 135:121–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodigheri HR, Iede ET, Penteado SRC, Reis Filho W (2006) Avaliação dos Impactos do Programa de Manejo Integrado de Pragas para o Controle da Vespa-da- Madeira em Plantios de Pinus no Sul do Brasil. EMBRAPA Comunicado Técnico 158: 5 p

  • Savio GM (2008) Controle biológico da lagarta-da-soja (Anticarsia gemmatalis) por Baculovirus anticarsia. Rev Cienc Eletron Agron 13:7p

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanavaca L Jr, Garcia JN (2003) Rendimento em madeira serrada de Eucalyptus urophylla. Sci For 63:32–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider PR, Finger CAG, Klein JEM, Totti JA, Bazzo JL (1996) Forma de tronco e sortimentos de madeira de Eucalyptus grandis Maiden para o estado do Rio Grande do Sul. Cienc Florest 6:79–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Secchi VA (2002) Baculovírus, mais do que uma grande descoberta: uma revolucionária alternativa aos agrotóxicos. Agroecol Desenv Rur Sustent 3:49–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva AGC, Gonçalves C, Galvão DM, Gonçalves AJL, Gomes J, Silva MN, Simoni ML (1968) Quarto catálogo dos insetos que vivem nas plantas do Brasil; seus parasitos e predadores. Parte 2, Tomo 1. Ministério da Agricultura, Rio de Janeiro, 622 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Sociedade Brasileira de Silvicultura (2008) Fatos e números do Brasil florestal. Sociedade Brasileira de Silvicultura 92p : http://www.sbs.org.br/FatoseNumerosdoBrasilFlorestal.pdf. (último acesso em 15/xii/2010)

  • Sousa EP, Soares NS, Silva ML, Valverde SR (2010) Desempenho do setor florestal para a economia brasileira: uma abordagem da matriz insumo-produto. Rev Arvore 34:1129–1138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tribunal de Contas da União (2006) Relatório de avaliação de programa: Ações de Vigilância e Fiscalização no Trânsito Internacional de Produtos Agropecuários/Tribunal de Contas da União; Relator Ministro Benjamin Zymler. TCU, Secretaria de Fiscalização e Avaliação de Programas de Governo, Brasília

    Google Scholar 

  • Viana TMB, Costa EC (2001) Lepidóperos associados a duas comunidades florestais em Itaára, RS. Cienc Florest 11:67–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Xavier A, Santos GA, Wendlign I, Oliveira Lelis M (2003) Propagação vegetativa de cedro-rosa por miniestaquia. Rev Arvore 27:139–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zanuncio JE (1993) Lepidoptera desfolhadores de eucalipto: Biologia, ecologia e controle. IPEF/SIF, Viçosa, 141 p

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Alfred Moser, for the identification of the Noctuidae subfamilies, and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, for granting the masters (M. K.), doctoral (E.C.), and research productivity fellowships (M.M.C. e O.H.H.M.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manoela Kowalczuck.

Additional information

Edited by Wesley AC Godoy—ESALQ/USP

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kowalczuck, M., Carneiro, E., Casagrande, M.M. et al. The Lepidoptera Associated with Forestry Crop Species in Brazil: a Historical Approach. Neotrop Entomol 41, 345–354 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-012-0056-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-012-0056-6

Keywords

Navigation