Skip to main content
Log in

Aedeagal Divergence in Sympatric Populations of Two Sibling Species of Cactophilic Drosophila (Diptera: Drosophilidae): Evidence of Character Displacement?

  • Systematics, Morphology and Physiology
  • Published:
Neotropical Entomology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aedeagal morphology of two sibling cactophilic species, Drosophila buzzatii Patterson & Wheeler and Drosophila koepferae Fontdevila & Wasserman, was analyzed in nine allopatric and three sympatric locations throughout South America. Morphological differences were detected for both aedeagus size and shape between sympatric and allopatric populations of D. buzzatii, despite the significant variability within both groups. Populations of D. buzzatii sympatric with D. koepferae displayed smaller aedeagus than the allopatric ones as well as more differentiated aedeagus shape. The shape differences were non-allometric and mainly consisted in a change of curvature of the dorsal margin of the aedeagus being more pronounced in males from populations sympatric with D. koepferae. It is concluded that aedeagal morphology presented some degree of character displacement in both size and shape in populations of D. buzzatii in sympatry with D. koepferae. These results might suggest the existence of mechanisms of interspecific recognition and hybridization prevention between these species that include the morphology of the male genitalia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig 1
Fig 2
Fig 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Burke JM, Arnold ML (2001) Genetics and the fitness of hybrids. Annu Rev Genet 35:31–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carreira VP, Soto IM, Fanara JJ, Hasson E (2006) Patterns of variation in wing morphology in the cactophilic Drosophila buzzatii and its sibling D. koepferae. J Evol Biol 9(4):1275–1282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coyne JA, Orr HA (2004) Speciation. Sinauer, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanara JJ, Fontdevila A, Hasson E (1999) Oviposition preference and life history traits in the cactophilic Drosophila koepferae and D. buzzatii in association to their natural hosts. Evol Ecol 13:173–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez GA, Hasson E (2003) Transpecific polymorphisms in an inversion linked esterase locus in Drosophila buzzatii. Mol Biol Evol 20:410–423

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hood GM (2010) PopTools version 3.2.5. Available at: http://www.poptools.org

  • Iwata H, Ukai Y (2002) SHAPE: a computer program package for quantitative evaluation of biological shapes based on elliptic Fourier descriptors. J Hered 93:384–385

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jagadeeshan S, Singh RS (2006) A time-sequence functional analysis of mating behaviour and genital coupling in Drosophila: role of cryptic female choice and male sex-drive in the evolution of male genitalia. J Evol Biol 19:1058–1070

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl FP, Giardina CR (1982) Elliptic Fourier features of a closed contour. Comp Graph Image Proc 18:236–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machado LPB, Madi-Ravazzi L, Castro JP (2002) Evaluation of the courtship and of the hybrid male sterility among Drosophila buzzatii cluster species (Diptera, Drosophilidae). Rev Brasil Biol 62:601–608

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manfrin MH, DeBrito ROA, Sene FM (2001) Systematics and evolution of Drosophila buzzatii cluster using mtDNA. Ann Entomol Soc Am 94:333–346

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manfrin MH, Sene FM (2006) Cactophilic Drosophila in South America: a model for evolutionary studies. Genetica 126:57–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marín I, Ruiz A, Pla C, Fontdevila A (1993) Reproductive relationships among ten species of the Drosophila repleta group from South America and the West Indies. Evolution 47:1616–1624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marín I, Fontdevila A (1998) Stable Drosophila buzzatii Drosophila koepferae hybrids. J Hered 89:336–339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moraes EM, Sene FM (2002) Breeding structure of an isolated cactophilic Drosophila population on a sandstone table hill. J Zool Syst Evol Res 40:123–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naveira H, Fontdevila A (1986) The evolutionary history of Drosophila buzzatii: XII. The genetic basis of sterility in hybrids between D. buzzatii its sibling D. serido from Argentina. Genetics 114:841–857

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Piccinali R, Aguadé M, Hasson E (2004) Comparative molecular population genetics of the Xdh locus in the cactophilic sibling species Drosophila buzzatii and D. koepferae. Mol Biol Evol 21:141–152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Piccinali R, Mascord LJ, Barker JSF, Oakeshott JG, Hasson E (2007) Molecular population genetics of the ∝-esterase 5 gene locus in original and colonized populations of Drosophila buzzatii and its sibling Drosophila koepferae. J Mol Evol 64:158–170

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez C, Piccinali R, Levy E, Hasson E (2000) Contrasting population genetic structures using allozymes and the inversion polymorphism in Drosophila buzzatii. J Evol Biol 13:976–984

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohlf FJ (2001). TPSDig. Dep. Ecol. Evol. New York University, Stony Brook, NY

  • Sánchez A (1986) Phylogenetic relationships in Drosophila martensis and D. buzzatii clusters. PhD dissertation. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, in Spanish

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos M, Ruiz A, Barbadilla A, Quezada-Díaz JE, Hasson E, Fontdevila A (1988) The evolutionary history of Drosophila buzzatii: XlV. Larger flies mate more often in nature. Heredity 61:255–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva AFG, Sene FM (1991) Morphological geographic variability in Drosophila serido (Diptera, Drosophilidae). Rev Bras Entomol 35:455–468

    Google Scholar 

  • Soto IM (2005) Use of elliptic Fourier descriptors for quantification of male genitalia morphology. Dros Inf Serv 88:42–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Soto IM, Carreira VP, Fanara JJ, Hasson E (2007) Evolution of male genitalia: environmental and genetic factors affecting genital morphology in two Drosophila sibling species and their hybrids. BMC Evol Biol 7:77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soto EM, Soto IM, Carreira VP, Fanara JJ, Hasson E (2008) Host-related life history traits in interspecific hybrids of cactophilic Drosophila. Entomol Exp Appl 126:18–27

    Google Scholar 

  • StatSoft Inc. (2007) STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 8.0. www.statsoft.com

  • Vilela CR (1983) A revision of the Drosophila repleta species group (Diptera, Drosophilidae). Rev Bras Entomol 27:1–114

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks are extended to VP Carreira, E Hasson, N Lavagnino and JJ Fanara for sample collection. I also thank E Soto, VP Carreira and E Hasson for insightful comments during the elaboration of this manuscript. I am also grateful to the three anonymous reviewers for their comments and constructive criticisms that helped to improve the previous version of this paper. This work was supported by CONICET and grants of Universidad de Buenos Aires and Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Técnica (ANPCyT).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ignacio M Soto.

Additional information

Edited by Roberto A Zucchi – ESALQ/USP

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Soto, I.M. Aedeagal Divergence in Sympatric Populations of Two Sibling Species of Cactophilic Drosophila (Diptera: Drosophilidae): Evidence of Character Displacement?. Neotrop Entomol 41, 207–213 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-012-0028-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-012-0028-x

Keywords

Navigation