Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The influence of the extraction mode on three coumarin compounds yield from Prangos ferulacea (L.) Lindl roots

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Iranian Chemical Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated the use of ultrasound-assisted extraction (USAE) to improve the extraction efficiency of the classical solvent extraction techniques such as maceration and Soxhlet extraction to extract three coumarin compounds (osthol, isoimperatorin and oxypeucedanin) from dried roots of Prangos ferulacea (L.) Lindl. Separation was accomplished on a reverse-phase C18 column with the mobile phase of methanol–water (70:30) and detection of the analytes was performed with UV variable detector at a wavelength of 322 nm. Under the optimum conditions, the extracted amounts of osthol, isoimperatorin and oxypeucedanin were 157.66, 172.54 and 79.27 mg g−1 dry herb, respectively. The results also indicated that compared with Soxhlet at 8 h and maceration extraction method at 3 days, ultrasound-assisted extraction increased the extraction yield of the total coumarin compounds about 17 and 31 %, respectively, at only 30 min. Therefore, USAE was preferred as the most efficient method which consumed less amount of a nontoxic solvent at a short time in comparison with conventional methods for extraction of coumarin compounds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. V.A. Mozaffarian, Dictionary of Iranian plant names (Farhang Moaser, Tehran, 1996), pp. 56–78

    Google Scholar 

  2. Y. Shikishima, Y. Takaishi, G. Honda, M. Ito, Y. Takfda, O.K. Kodzhimotov, O. Ashurmetov, K.H. Lee, Chem. Pharm. Bull. 49, 877 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Ghahraman, Iran Color Flora (Forest Res Institute, Tehran, 1985) (Persian), p. 845

  4. S. Gholamzadeh, M. Behbahani, A. Fattahi, S.E. Sajjadi, Y. Shokoohinia, RPS 7, S783 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. S.Y. Chou, C.S. Hsu, K.T. Wang, M.C. Wang, C.C. Wang, Phytother. Res. 21, 226 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. H. Matsuda, N. Tomohiro, Y. Ido, M. Kubo, Biol. Pharm. Bull. 25, 809 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. H. Sadraei, Y. Shokoohinia, S.E. Sajjadi, M. Mozafari, RPS 8, 137 (2013)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. S.E. Sajjadi, H. Zeinvand, Y. Shokoohinia, RPS 4, 19 (2009)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. H. Sadraei, Y. Shokoohinia, S.E. Sajjadi, B. Ghadirian, RPS 7, 141 (2012)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. J. Kang, S.Y. Lee, R.P. Singh, R. Agarwal, D.S. Yim, Acta Oncol. 48, 895 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Y.R. Pokharel, E.H. Han, J.Y. Kim, S.J. Oh, S.K. Kim, E.R. Woo, H.G. Jeong, K.W. Kang, J. Carcinog. 27, 2483 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. A. Tosun, M. Baba, T. Okuyama, J. Nat. Med. 61, 402 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. L. Hui, O. Etsuzo, I. Masao, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 33, 3085 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Romdhane, C. Gourdon, Chem. Eng. J. 87, 11 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. S. Hemwimol, P. Pavasant, A. Shotipruk, Ultrason. Sonochem. 13, 543 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. E.Q. Xia, H.L. Li, X.R. Xu, F. Li, G.F. Deng, S. Li, S. Wu, H.B. Li, J. Med. Plants. Res. 6, 1991 (2012)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. E. Martino, I. Ramaiol, M. Urbano, F. Bracco, S. Collina, J. Chromatogr. A 1125, 147 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. R. Liu, L. Feng, A. Sun, L. Kong, J. Chromatogr. A 1055, 71 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Z. Pan, W. Qu, H. Ma, G.G. Atungulu, T.H. Mc, Hugha. Ultrason. Sonochem. 18, 1249 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. M. Ahn, M. Lee, Y.C. Kim, S.H. Sung, Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 46, 258 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. W. Vongsangnak, J. Gua, S. Chauvatcharin, J.J. Zhong, Biochem. Eng. J. 18, 115 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. M.H. Entezari, S.H. Nazary, M.H.H. Khodaparast, Ultrason. Sonochem. 11, 379 (2004)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. M.H. Entezari, P. Kruus, Ultrason. Sonochem. 3, 19 (1996)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. J. Raso, P. Manas, R. Pagan, F.J. Sala, Ultrason. Sonochem. 5, 157 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support for this work by the Research Center of Razi University and Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Bagher Gholivand.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gholivand, M.B., Yamini, Y., Dayeni, M. et al. The influence of the extraction mode on three coumarin compounds yield from Prangos ferulacea (L.) Lindl roots. J IRAN CHEM SOC 12, 707–714 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13738-014-0529-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13738-014-0529-0

Keywords

Navigation