Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Role of the Food Industry in Obesity Prevention

  • Obesity Prevention (A Must, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Obesity Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Obesity is a complex disease of diverse etiology. Among the potential influences in the development of obesity, the food supply chain remains an important influence. We provide a conceptual overview related to the food industry’s role in obesity prevention. We first discuss some limitations of current public health efforts. We then describe how a model that attends to personal autonomy in the context of supportive policy intervention can empower individuals in their efforts to navigate the food supply chain. We then provide an evidence informed overview of key areas where continued efforts to collaboratively engage the food industry, through solution-focused dialogue and action, have the potential to contribute to obesity prevention. While challenging, appropriately transparent, well-governed public-private partnerships have the demonstrated potential to benefit the communities we serve.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. Clarke TC, Ward BW, Freeman G, Schiller JS. Early release of selected estimates based on data from the January–September 2015 National Health Interview Survey. National Center for Health Statistics; 2016. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis.htm.

  2. The Obesity Society. Potential Contributors to Obesity Infographic. 2015 [cited 2016 February 28]. Accessed March 7 2016 http://www.obesity.org/obesity/resources/facts-about-obesity/infographics/potential-contributors-to-obesity. This is very important as all too often the public health dialogue is singularly focused on the food chain to the exclusion of the many other modifiable (and unmodifiable) potential contributors to obesity.

  3. Lowe MR. Self-regulation of energy intake in the prevention and treatment of obesity: is it feasible? Obes Res. 2003;Suppl:44s–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Smith BG. Developing sustainable food supply chains. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008;363(1492):849–61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Coelho M, Oliveira T, Fernandes R. Biochemistry of adipose tissue: an endocrine organ. Arch Med Sci. 2013;9(2):191–200. doi:10.5114/aoms.2013.33181. Published online 2013 Feb 10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Downey M, Still C. Survey of antiobesity legislation: are these laws working? Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2012;19(5):375–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Roberto CA, Swinburn B, Hawkes C, Huang T, Costa SA, Ashe M, et al. Patchy progress on obesity prevention: emerging examples, entrenched barriers, and new thinking. Lancet. 2015;385:2400–9. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61744-X.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brownell KD, Kersh R, Ludwig DS, Post RC, Puhl RM, Schwartz MB, et al. Personal responsibility and obesity: a constructive approach to a controversial issue. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29(3):379–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kersh R. Of nannies and nudges: the current state of U.S. obesity policymaking. Public Health. 2015;129(8):1083–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brownell KD. Thinking forward: the quicksand of appeasing the food industry. PLoS Med. 2012;9(7):e1001254. This reference (in combination with reference #17) is essential in understanding the 2 sides of the often highly emotional and polarizing debates surrounding collaborations with the food industry.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Rappaport J, Swift C, Hess R. Studies in empowerment: steps toward understanding and action. New York: Haworth; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Seligman ME. Learned helplessness. Annu Rev Med. 1972;23:407–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;2:191–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Griffiths PE, West C. A balanced intervention ladder: promoting autonomy through public health action. Public Health. 2015;129(8):1092–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yach D. Food industry: friend or foe? Obes Rev. 2014;15(1):2–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kraak VI, Story M. Guiding principles and a decision-making framework for stakeholders pursuing healthy food environments. Health Aff (Millwood). 2015;34(11):1972–8. By providing an ethical and transparent framework for engaging the food industry in public private partnerships and further identifying several instances where such a framework has been successful (including ref # 18 and #19 below) this paper establishes and unemotional approach towards progress and away from unproductive adversarial hyperbole.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ng SW, Slining MM, Popkin BM. The healthy weight commitment foundation pledge: calories sold from U.S. consumer packaged goods, 2007-2012. Am J Prev Med. 2014;47(4):508–19.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Slining MM, Ng SW, Popkin BM. Food companies’ calorie-reduction pledges to improve U.S. diet. Am J Prev Med. 2013;44(2):174–84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Vermeer WM, Steenhuis IH, Poelman MP. Small, medium, large or supersize? the development and evaluation of interventions targeted at portion size. Int J Obes (Lond). 2014;38 Suppl 1:S13–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cecchini M, Warin L. Impact of food labelling systems on food choices and eating behaviours: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized studies. Obes Rev. 2016;17(3):201–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. VanEpps EM, Roberto CA, Park S, Economos CD, Bleich SN. Restaurant menu labeling policy: review of evidence and controversies. Curr Obes Rep. 2016;15.

  22. Green JE, Brown AG, Ohri-Vachaspati P. Sociodemographic disparities among fast-food restaurant customers who notice and use calorie menu labels. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015;115(7):1093–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Boyland EJ, Nolan S, Kelly B, Tudur-Smith C, Jones A, Halford JC, et al. Advertising as a cue to consume: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of acute exposure to unhealthy food and nonalcoholic beverage advertising on intake in children and adults. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016;103(2):519–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jenkin G, Madhvani N, Signal L, Bowers S. A systematic review of persuasive marketing techniques to promote food to children on television. Obes Rev. 2014;15(4):281–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kraak VI, Story M. Influence of food companies’ brand mascots and entertainment companies’ cartoon media characters on children’s diet and health: a systematic review and research needs. Obes Rev. 2015;16(2):107–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Glanz K, Bader MD, Iyer S. Retail grocery store marketing strategies and obesity: an integrative review. Am J Prev Med. 2012;42(5):503–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Halford JC, Harrold JA. Satiety-enhancing products for appetite control: science and regulation of functional foods for weight management. Proc Nutr Soc. 2012;71(2):350–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Van Kleef E, Van Trijp JC, Van Den Borne JJ, Zondervan C. Successful development of satiety enhancing food products: towards a multidisciplinary agenda of research challenges. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2012;52(7):611–28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Trigueros L, Pena S, Ugidos AV, Sayas-Barbera E, Perez-Alvarez JA, Sendra E. Food ingredients as anti-obesity agents: a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2013;53(9):929–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. The Obesity Society. Obesity society position statement. Consumption of foods low in energy density may facilitate healthy eating & weight loss. 2016;28.

Download references

Acknowledgments

Dr. Binks would like to acknowledge the assistance provided by doctoral student Shao Hua Chin in conducting PubMed searches and providing editorial support in the production of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Binks.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Martin Binks reports no direct potential conflicts of interest associated with the production of this manuscript; reports that he has non-financial relationships with the following organizations: International Food Information Council, the Obesity Society-Secretary Treasurer; and reports that he serves as social media consultant to the Obesity Society, on speaker’s bureaus for Takeda and Novo Nordisk, who produce obesity medicines, has received an unrestricted educational grant from Coca Cola Company for student travel, received research funding from Nestle Health Science, and consulting fees from WorldCare Inc. and Binks Health.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Obesity Prevention

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Binks, M. The Role of the Food Industry in Obesity Prevention. Curr Obes Rep 5, 201–207 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13679-016-0212-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13679-016-0212-0

Keywords

Navigation