Skip to main content
Log in

Gender Differences in American Jewish Identity: Testing the Power Control Theory Explanation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Review of Religious Research

Abstract

This paper addresses discrepancies in previous research about whether there are gender differences in Jewish identity. Four factors of Jewish identity are examined: multifaceted Jewish engagement, social Jewish identity, communal religious identity, and cultural Jewish identity. Using the 2011 New York Jewish Community Survey, gender differences in Jewish identity in seven denominational groups of American Jews are examined. The power control theory (PCT) is tested as an explanation for the gender differences, and found to be lacking. Measures of power imbalance in current family situations are used, in addition to measures related to socialization; the rationale for this variation is discussed. According to PCT, the Orthodox would exhibit greater gender differences in Jewish identity, but the opposite is true: significant gender differences are found for non-Orthodox denominations more than are found for the Orthodox. Being raised Orthodox does not contribute to the gender differences. Measures of power imbalance within families do not contribute to the explanation of variance in any of the Jewish identity factors. Possible generalization of the findings is discussed, as well as directions for further research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Household weights were provided to make the sample more representative of the population. For simple cross-tabulations, frequencies and means presented in this paper, weights are used. For factor analyses, correlations, regression analysis, and tests of significance, however, weights are not used, as it is the relationship between variables which is at issue rather than the actual representativeness of the population.

  2. This could happen if they were responding to the survey because someone else in the household identified as Jewish.

  3. There were an additional 7 indicators of Jewish identity, but they were only asked of a portion of the sample so they were not used in the construction of the identity factors we describe below.

  4. These two variables were belonging to an online Jewish group, and an index of how connected the respondent was to Jewish social networks (both friends and family). The single variable of how many of the respondent’s closest friends were Jewish fit into the factor analysis better.

  5. After the four-factor solution was determined, each factor was run as a separate factor analysis to verify that it was only one factor. The factor scores from that separate factor analysis were used for the indicator. In this way, scores from each of the factors were determined independently of each other.

References

  • Avishai, Orit. 2008. “Doing religion” in a secular world: Women in conservative religions and the question of agency. Gender and Society 22(4): 409–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiswick, C. 2014. Judaism in transition: How economic choices shape religious tradition. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A.B., J.I. Siegel, and P. Rozin. 2003. Faith vs. practice: Different bases for religiosity judgments by Jews and Protestants. European Journal of Social Psychology 33: 287–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S. M. 2006. A tale of two Jewries: The “Inconvenient Truth” for American Jews. Steinhardt Foundation for Jewish Life. http://www.bjpa.org/Publications/details.cfm?PublicationID=2908.

  • Cohen, S. M., J. B. Ukeles, and R. Miller. 2012. Jewish community study of New York: 2011 comprehensive report. NY: UJA-Federation of New York. http://www.bjpa.org/Publications/details.cfm?PublicationID=14186.

  • Collette, J., and O. Lizardo. 2009. A power control theory of gender and religiosity. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 48(2): 213–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornwall, Marie. 2009. Reifying sex difference isn't the answer: Gendering processes, risk, and religiosity. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 48(2): 252–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denton, M. L., L. D. Pearce, and C. Smith. (2008). Religion and spirituality on the path through adolescence, research report number 8. National Study of Youth and Religion, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

  • de Vaus, D., and I. McAllister. 1987. Gender differences in religion: A test of the structural location theory. American Sociological Review 52: 472–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, Sylvia Barack. 2007. The way into the varieties of Jewishness. Vermont: Jewish Lights.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, J. 1994. Moral stages and the development of faith. In Fundamental research in moral development, ed. B. Puka, 344–374. Xi, NY: Garland Publishing Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freese, Jeremy. 2004. Risk preferences and gender differences in religiousness: Evidence from the World Values Survey. Review of Religious Research 46(1): 88–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaunt, Ruth. 2012. “Blessed is He who has not made me a woman”: Ambivalent sexism and Jewish religiosity. Sex Roles 67: 477–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glenn, Susan A., and Naomi B. Sokoloff (eds.). 2010. Boundaries of Jewish identity. Baltimore: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick, Peter, and Susan T. Fiske. 1999. The ambivalence toward men inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent beliefs about men. Psychology of Women Quarterly 23: 519–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, Peter, and Susan T. Fiske. 2001. Ambivalent sexism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 33: 115–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gold, Steven J. 2003. Israeli and Russian Jews: Gendered perspectives on settlement and return migration. In Gender and US immigration: Contemporary trends, ed. Pierrette Hondagneu-Sotelo, 127–147. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greeley, Andrew, and Michael Hout. 1999. Americans’ increasing belief in life after death: Religious competition and acculturation. American Sociological Review 64(6): 813–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, Harriet. 2016. The Jewish family. In The American Jewish year book 2016. Springer (forthcoming).

  • Hartman, Harriet, and Moshe Hartman. 2009. Gender and American Jews: Patterns in work, education & family in contemporary life. NH: Brandeis University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, Harriet, and Debra Kaufman. 2006. Decentering the study of Jewish identity: Opening the dialogue with other religious groups. Sociology of Religion 67(4): 365–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, Harriet, and Ira Sheskin. 2012. The relationship of Jewish community contexts and Jewish identity: A 22-community study. Contemporary Jewry 32(3): 237–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Janine, Josie St, Sherira Fernandes Peter, Todd Herrenkohl, J. Rick Kosterman, and David Hawkins. 2011. Ethnic and gender variation in religious involvement: Patterns of expression in young adulthood. Review of Religious Research 53: 207–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, Debra. 1991. Rachel’s daughters: Newly Orthodox Jewish women. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klaff, Vivian. 2006. Defining American Jewry from religious and ethnic perspectives: The transitions to greater heterogeneity. Sociology of Religion 67(4): 415–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knopp, Abby. 2014. Why Jews of Russian-speaking backgrounds matter to our communal future. Journal of Jewish Communal Service 89(1): 105–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosmin, B., and A. Keysar. 2013. American Jewish secularism: Jewish life beyond the synagogue. In American Jewish year book 2012, ed. A. Dashefsky, and I. Sheskin. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, Mairi. 1995. Sexual identity and religious socialization. British Journal of Sociology 46(3): 529–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGinity, K. 2014. Marrying out: Jewish men, intermarriage and fatherhood (the modern Jewish experience). Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A., and R. Stark. 2002. Gender and religiousness: Can socialization explanations be saved? American Journal of Sociology 107(6): 1399–1423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pew Research Center. 2015. America’s changing religious landscape. http://www.pewforum.org/files/2015/05/RLS-05-08-full-report.pdf.

  • Phillips, Benjamin, and Sylvia B. Fishman. 2006. Ethnic capital and intermarriage: A case study of American Jews. Sociology of Religion 67(4): 487–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rebhun, Uzi. 2004. Jewish identities in America: Structural analyses of attitudes and behaviors. Review of Religious Research 46(10): 43–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, Louise, and Jeffrey Kroll. 2007. Risky business: Assessing risk preference explanations for gender differences in religiosity. American Sociological Review 72(2): 205–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnabel, Landon. 2015. How religious are American women and men? Gender differences and similarities. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 54(3): 616–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharot, Stephen. 2011. Comparative perspectives on Judaisms and Jewish identities. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheskin, Ira M. 2013. Comparisons of Jewish communities: A compendium of tables and bar charts. Storrs, CT: Berman Jewish Data Bank and the Jewish Federations of North America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Tom. 2009. Religious switching among American Jews. New York: American Jewish Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullins, D.Paul. 2006. Gender and religion: Deconstructing universality, constructing complexity. American Journal of Sociology 112(3): 838–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter, Tony. 1990. Why are most churchgoers women? A literature review. Vox Evangelica 20: 73–90.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harriet Hartman.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 6 Factor analysis loadings on Jewish identity factors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hartman, H. Gender Differences in American Jewish Identity: Testing the Power Control Theory Explanation. Rev Relig Res 58, 407–431 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13644-016-0248-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13644-016-0248-3

Keywords

Navigation