Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Race/Ethnicity, Religion and Partisan Leanings

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Review of Religious Research

Abstract

Using the 2004–2008 national politics studies, our work suggests that race/ethnicity matters to our understanding of religion and partisan leanings. Among Whites, the association between religious faith and partisan leanings are, in part, explained by contrasting social–political attitudes held by Evangelical and Non-Evangelical Protestants. Similarly, the degree to which White attendees of congregations that encourage political discourse maintain more liberal partisan leanings than other Whites is partly explained by their lower scores on our measures of state power, patriotic symbols, and structural understanding of racial inequality. Even when these views are accounted for, attending worship services, on average, is associated with conservative partisan leanings among Whites. In contrast, worship attendance maintains a fairly negligible relationship with the partisan leanings of Hispanic and African Americans. Similarly, religious faith and attending political congregations maintains a relatively inconsistent relationship with the partisan leanings of racial/ethnic minorities. And, the extent to which these forms of religion are associated with their partisan leanings, their views on state power, patriotism, and race and opportunities play a fairly marginal and inconsistent role in explaining these relationships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Throughout this text, we interchangeably utilize the racial/ethnic identifiers of Black and African American.

  2. This measure maintains alpha scores of 0.8982 for Whites, 0.8039 for Hispanics, and 0.7081 for African Americans.

  3. The Republican Affect Index Variable maintains alpha scores of 0.7617 for Whites, 0.6863 for Hispanics, and 0.6564 for Blacks.

  4. The Democratic Affect Index Variable maintains alpha scores of 0.6918 for Hispanics, 0.6863 for Whites, and 0.632 for African Americans.

  5. Because the Republican and Democratic Affect Measures were only asked of respondents in 2008, we utilize both the new 2008 cross-sectional sample as well as respondents that were originally interviewed in the 2004 cross-section and then again in 2008.

  6. See Steensland et al. (2000) for a more detailed explanation of the denominational groupings in RELTRAD.

  7. This index has a 0.678 alpha score for Whites, a 0.660 alpha score for African Americans, and a 0.649 alpha score for Hispanic Americans.

  8. We attempted to create a single index for these measures. However, we were precluded from doing so given the alpha scores for these measures were well below 0.5 for all three racial/ethnic groups.

  9. Because of the low percentage of African Americans (2.6 %: N = 25) and Non-Hispanic Whites (6.65 %: N = 75) that are foreign born, immigration status serves as control variable for Hispanic Americans only.

  10. Missing values for the partisan leaning variables, save partisan vote choice, worship attendance, age, and income are replaced by the imputation by Chained equations multiple imputation method on STATA 10. The imputed variables do not substantively or significantly change the outcomes of these analyses.

  11. See, StataCorp (2013).

  12. The treatment effect analyses, which are available upon request, between religion and partisanship among African Americans, Hispanics, and the race × worship attendance interactions are consistent with our logit regression findings presented in Tables 3, 4 and 5.

References

  • Anonymous. 2002. Growing list of church leaders, groups oppose war in Iraq. America 188(4): 4.

  • Anonymous. 2003a. Antiwar protests rise; church envoys active. The Christian Century 120(5): 11.

  • Anonymous. 2003b. Jesuit journal suggests oil is true U.S. motive for Iraqi war. America 188(3): 5.

  • Balmer, Randall. 2008. God in the White House: A history: how faith shaped the presidency from John F. Kennedy to George W. Bush. New York, NY: HarperOne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baylor Religion Survey (BRS). 2006. American piety in the 21st century: new insights to the depth and complexity of religion in the US: selected findings from The Baylor Religion Survey.

  • Bellah, Robert N. 1967. Civil religion in America. Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 96(1): 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellah, Robert N. 1975. The broken covenant: American civil religion in time of trial. New York: The Seabury Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boston. 1838. John Winthrop, A Modell of Christian Charity (1630). Collections of the Massachusetts Historical Society: 3rd Series 7: 31–48.

  • Brown, R.Khari. 2009. Denominational differences in support for race-based policies among White, Black, Hispanic, and Asian Americans. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 48(3): 604–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Ronald E., R. Khari Brown, and Aaron Blase. 2013. Religion and military policy attitudes in America. Review of Religious Research 55(4): 573–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Angus, Phillip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald E. Stokes. 1961. The American Voter New York. NY: Wiley.

  • Chaves, Mark, Shawna L. Anderson, and Alison Eagle. 2014. National congregations study. Cumulative data file and codebook. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University, Department of Sociology.

  • Coe, Kevin, and David Domke. 2006. Petitioners or prophets? Presidential discourse, god, and the ascendancy of religious conservatives. Journal of Communication 56: 309–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, Carroll. 2007. Who flies the flag? Not always who you might think: A closer look at patriotism. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.

  • Dudley, Carl S. and David A. Roozen. 2001. FAITH communities TODAY: A report on religion in the United States Today. Hartford, CN: Hartford Institute for Religion Research, Hartford Seminary.

  • Edgell, Penny, and Eric Tranby. 2007. Religious influences on understandings of racial inequality in the United States. Social Problems 54(2): 263–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, Michael O., and Christian Smith. 2001. Divided by faith: Evangelical religion and the problem of race in America. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, John C. 2004. The American religious landscape and political attitudes: A baseline for 2004. Akron, OH: The University of Akron’s Bliss Institute of Applied Politics-Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life.

  • Green, John C. 2008. The fifth national survey of religion and politics: A baseline for the 2008 presidential election. Akron, OH: The University of Akron’s Bliss Institute of Applied Politics.

  • Green, John C., Robert P. Jones, and Daniel Cox. 2009. Faithful, engaged, and divergent: A comparative portrait of conservative and progressive religious activists in the 2008 election and beyond. The University of Akron’s Ray C. Bliss Institute of Applied Politics and Public Religion Research.

  • Groves, Robert M. 2006. Nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias in household surveys. The Public Opinion Quarterly 70(5): 646–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurin, Patricia, Shirley Hatchett, and James S. Jackson. 1989. Hope and independence: Blacks’ response to electoral and party politics. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Charles F. 1997. The Christian Left: Who are they and how are they different from the Christian Right? Review of Religious Research 39(1): 27–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinojosa, Victor J., and Jerry Z. Park. 2004. Religion and the paradox of racial inequality attitudes. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 42: 229–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, James S., Vincent L. Hutchings, Ronald Brown, and Cara Wong. 2004. National politics study, 2004. ICPSR24483-v1. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [Distributor], 23 Mar 2009. doi:10.3886/ICPSR24483.

  • Jelen, Ted G. 2003. Catholic priests and the political order: The political behavior of catholic pastors. Journal for Scientific Study of Religion 42(4): 591–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohut, Andrew, John C. Green, Scott Keeter, and Robert C. Toth. 2000. The diminishing divide: Religion’s changing role in American politics. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohut, Andrew, Carroll Doherty, Michael Dimock, and Scott Keeter. 2012. Trends in American Values: 1987–2012: Partisan Polarization Surges in Bush, Obama Years. Washington, DC: The Pew Research Center.

  • Kluegel, James R., and Eliot R. Smith. 1981. Beliefs about stratification. Annual Review of Sociology 7: 29–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, C.Eric, and Lawrence Mamiya. 1990. The Black church in the African-American experience. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lockerbie, Brad. 2013. Race and religion: Voting behavior and political attitudes. Social Science Quarterly 94(4): 1145–1158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, Mark Hugo. 2010. Latinos and the 2010 elections: Strong support for democrats; weak voter motivation. Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center.

  • López, Ian Haney. 2014. Dog Whistle politics: How coded racial appeals have reinvented racism and wrecked the middle class. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez, Jessica Hamar, Edwin I. Hernández, Rebecca Burwell, Milagros Peña, and David Sikkink. 2012. The politics of the Latino church: Understanding the political views and behaviors of Latino congregations in Chicago. Notre Dame, IN: Center for the Study of Religion and Society, University of Notre Dame.

  • McDaniel, Eric. 2003. Black clergy in the 2000 election. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 42(4): 533–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, Eric L., and Christopher G. Ellison. 2008. God’s party? Race, religion, and partisanship over time. Political Research Quarterly 61(2): 180–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, Brian D., and Stella M. Rouse. 2013. Shades of faith: Religious foundations of political attitudes among African Americans, Latinos, and Whites. American Journal of Political Science 57(1): 218–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morone, James. 2003. A. Hellfire nation: The politics of sin in American history. New Haven, CN: Yale University Press.

  • Newport, Frank. 2009. Religious intensity remains powerful predictor of politics: Relationship is most evident among non-hispanic whites. Washington, DC: Gallup Poll.

  • Pew Hispanic Center and the Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life. 2006. Changing faiths: Latinos and the transformation of American religion.

  • Philpot, Tasha. 2007. Race, republicans, and the return of the party of Lincoln. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Public Religion Research Institute (PRRI)/Religion News Survey (RNS). 2013. Survey|Ahead of independence day: Most proud to be an American, republicans more likely to engage in patriotic activities. Washington, DC: Public Religion Research Institute.

  • Rauschenbusch, Walter. 1917. A theology for the social gospel. New York, NY: Abingdon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • StataCorp. 2013. Stata treatment-effects reference manual: Potential outcomes/counterfactual outcomes: release 13. College Station, TX: Stata Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatz, Robert T., Ervin Staub, and Howard Lavine. 1999. On the varieties of national attachment: Blind versus constructive patriotism. Political Psychology 20(1): 151–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, Jason E., and Michael O. Emerson. 2012. Blacks and Whites in Christian America: How racial discrimination shapes religious convictions. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slessarev-Jamir, Helene. 2011. Prophetic activism: Progressive religious justice movements in contemporary America. New York, NY: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smidt, Corwin, Sue Crawford, Melissa Deckman, Donald Gray, Dan Hofrenning, Laura Olson, Sherrie Steiner, and Beau Weston. 2003. The political attitudes and activities of mainline protestant clergy in the election of 2000: A study of six denominations. The Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 42(4): 515–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steensland, Brian, Jerry Z. Park, Mark D. Regnerus, Lynn D. Robinson, W. Bradford Wilcox, and Robert D. Woodberry. 2000. The measure of American religion: Toward improving the state of the art. Social Forces 79(1): 291–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, Andrew. 2006. The conservative soul: How we lost it, how to get it back. New York, NY: Harper Collins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tate, Katherine. 1995. Structural dependence or group loyalty? In Democracy’s feast: Elections in America, ed. Herbert F. Weisberg, 179–194. London, UK: Chatham House Pubs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Marylee C., and Stephen M. Merino. 2011. Assessing the racial views of white conservative protestants: Who do we compare with whom? Public Opinion Quarterly 75(4): 761–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The National Election Studies (NES). 2004. (http://www.electionstudies.org). The 2004 National Election Study [dataset]. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies [producer and distributor].

  • Williams, Robert L., and Colin C. Quillivan. 2008. The relationship of political evangelicalism to critical thinking and selected sociopolitical values in 2007. Journal of Religion & Society 10: 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wills, Gary. 1990. Under god: Religion and American politics. Norwalk, CN: Easton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, Richard L., and Mark R. Warren. 2002. A different face of faith-based politics: Social capital and community organizing in the public Arena. International Journal of Sociology and Social policy 22(9/10): 6–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA

    R. Khari Brown

  2. Department of Political Science, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA

    Ronald E. Brown

  3. Research Center for Group Dynamics, Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    R. Khari Brown

Authors
  1. R. Khari Brown
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ronald E. Brown
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Khari Brown.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.

Table 6 Statistically significant mediating effects of race, state power, and patriotism variables on the relationship between religion and voting republican among Non-Hispanic Whites: Sobel mediation test
Full size table
Table 7 Statistically significant mediating effects of race, state power, and patriotism variables on the relationship between religion and bush approval among Non-Hispanic Whites: Sobel mediation test
Full size table
Table 8 Statistically significant mediating effects of race, state power, and patriotism variables on the relationship between religion and belief that Republican Party best serve black and Hispanic interests
Full size table
Table 9 Statistically significant mediating effects of race, state power, and patriotism variables on the relationship between religion and belief that Republican Party best serve White interests
Full size table
Table 10 Statistically significant mediating effects of race, state power, and patriotism variables on the relationship between religion and Republican Party affect
Full size table
Table 11 Statistically significant mediating effects of race, state power, and patriotism variables on the relationship between religion and Democratic Party affect
Full size table
Table 12 Statistically significant mediating effects of race, state power, and patriotism variables on the relationship between religion and bush approval among African Americans: Sobel mediation test
Full size table
Table 13 Statistically significant mediating effects of race, state power, and patriotism variables on the relationship between religion and voting republican among Hispanic Americans: Sobel mediation test
Full size table
Table 14 Statistically significant mediating effects of race, state power, and patriotism variables on the relationship between religion and bush approval among Hispanic Americans: Sobel mediation test
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brown, R.K., Brown, R.E. Race/Ethnicity, Religion and Partisan Leanings. Rev Relig Res 57, 469–505 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13644-014-0206-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13644-014-0206-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation