Skip to main content
Log in

The (Dis)similarity of a Minority Religion to Its Broader Religious Context: The Case of American Jews

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Review of Religious Research

Abstract

While much research shows the relationship between individual-level variables, such as Jewish background, education, age, and income and an individual’s Jewish identity, very little research has systematically addressed the question of community context, either general or Jewish, as a factor influencing Jewish religious or ethnic identity. This lack of research has been partially a result of the lack of an adequate data set to facilitate such analysis. Using the newly-aggregated Decade 2000 data set, with its 19,800 cases spread across 22 Jewish communities, we find that despite the anecdotal evidence and the logic that suggests that environment impacts behavior, the environmental impact on Jewish identity is clearly weak. Individual characteristics are much stronger than community context in explaining variations in the strength of Jewish identity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In 18 of the 22 communities, for budgetary reasons, the RDD survey was supplemented by calling households with one of over 200 Distinctive Jewish Names (DJN) listed in the most recent computerized local telephone directory (Sheskin 1998). In the Twin Cities (Sheskin 2005b), Russian Jewish first names were also used. Since the RDD sample is more representative than the DJN sample, appropriate weighting factors were applied to the DJN sample to adjust for the demographic bias of using DJNs. With these weighting factors applied, no statistically significant differences are seen between the RDD and DJN samples on any of the key variables, such as age and income.

  2. With the exception of Detroit, Las Vegas, and Washington, telephone numbers were dialed at least four times to determine eligibility for the sample and then to participate in the survey itself. Again, with the exception of Detroit, Las Vegas, and Washington, an interviewing staff that was primarily or entirely Jewish was used to facilitate cooperation and questionnaires were completed using paper and pencil. For Detroit, Las Vegas, and Washington, Social Science Research Solutions (SSRS) (Media, PA), while using mostly non-Jewish interviewers, used Computer Assisted Telephone Interviewing and 8–10 call backs.

  3. A Designated Market Area (DMA) is a Nielsen Corporation term that reflects US market areas by the number of television households within the market borders. There are some 210 DMA’s in the US. Each community study has only one DMA (although some communities are in the same DMA). The ARIS 2001 variables were matched by DMA rather than by county, as some community studies cover multiple counties, which made the matching more difficult.

  4. Data were supplied by the principal investigators, Barry Kosmin and Ariela Keysar, through the Institute for the Study of Secularism in Society and Culture, Trinity College. CT. More details about the survey can be found on their website, http://commons.trincoll.edu/aris/surveys/aris-2001/ or in Kosmin and Keysar (2006, Methodological Appendix).

  5. In each community, a Jewish Institutions Survey was administered to local synagogues, the Jewish Community Center(s), the Jewish day schools(s), and the Jewish Federation collecting data on memberships, enrollments, and the Jewish Federation Annual Campaign.

  6. The Jewish Federation conducts an Annual Campaign similar in purpose and method to that conducted by the United Way for the general community.

  7. The term “Klal Yisrael” refers to solidarity with the broader worldwide community of Jews.

  8. Interestingly, because Jews have a higher percent with secular outlook than other American religious groups (Kosmin and Keysar 2006, p. 43), multi-colinearity prevented the percent “Just Jewish” from being included when the percent nones was included for the broader community. As noted above, the correlation between percent “nones” in the DMA and percent “Just Jewish” was r = .716 (P < .001).

References

  • Abramitzky, Ran, Liran Einav, and Oren Rigbi. 2009. Is Hannukkah responsive to Christmas? The Economic Journal 120: 612–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, Bobby. 1987. Ceremony. In The encyclopedia of religion 3, ed. M. Eliade, 179–183. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alper, Becka A, and Daniel V.A. Olson. Forthcoming 2013. Religious population share and religious identity salience: Is Jewish identity more important to Jews in less Jewish areas? Sociology of Religion.

  • Alper, Becka A., and Daniel V.A. Olson. 2011. Do Jews feel like outsiders in America? The impact of anti-Semitism, friendships, and religious geography. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 50(4): 822–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ament, Jonathan. 2005. American Jewish religious denominations. New York: United Jewish Communities Report Series on the National Jewish Population Survey 2000-01, Report Number 10.

  • Bauer, John T. 2012. U.S. religious regions revisited. The Professional Geographer 64(4): 521–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson, Peter L., Eugene C. Roehlhepartan, and Stephanie P. Rude. 2003. Spiritual development in childhood and adolescence: Toward a field of inquiry. Applied Developmental Science 7(3): 205–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beyerlein, Kraig, and John R. Hipp. 2006. From pews to participation: The effect of congregation activity and context on bridging civic engagement. Social Problems 53(1): 97–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P.M. 1977. Inequality and heterogeneity. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, Terry C. 1985. Structural constraints on interpersonal relations: A test of Blau’s macrosociological theory. American Journal of Sociology 91(3): 511–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradburn, Norman M., Seymour Sudman, and Brian Wansink. 2004. Asking questions: The definitive guide to questionnaire design—for market research, political polls, and social and health. New York: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Steven M. 2001. Religiosity and ethnicity: Jewish identity trends in the United States. In Who owns Judaism? Public religion and private faith in America and Israel 17, ed. E. Lederhendler, 101–130. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Steven M. 1983. American modernity and Jewish identity. New York: Tavistock Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Steven M., and Arnold Eisen. 2000. The Jew within: Self, family, and community in America. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Harris, and Erika A. Patall. 2009. The relative benefits of meta-analysis using individual participant data or aggregated data. Psychological Methods 14: 165–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curran, Patrick, Andrea M. Hussong, Li Cai, Wenjing Huang, Laurie Chassin, Kenneth J. Sher, and Robert A. Zucker. 2008. Pooling data from multiple longitudinal studies: The role of item response theory in integrative data analysis. Developmental Psychology 44(2): 365–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DellaPergola, Sergio. 2013. World Jewish population. In The American Jewish year book, ed. Arnold Dashefsky, and Ira M. Sheskin, 209–272. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenn, Susan A., and Naomi B. Sokoloff (eds.). 2010. Boundaries of Jewish identity. Baltimore: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, Harriet, and Moshe Hartman. 2001. Dimensions of Jewish identity among American Jews. In Papers in Jewish demography, 1997, ed. Sergio DellaPergola, and J. Even, 239–260. Jerusalem: Avraham Harman Institute of Contemporary Jewry and The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, Harriet, and Debra Kaufman. 2006. Decentering the study of Jewish identity: Opening the dialogue with other religious groups. Sociology of Religion 67(4): 365–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, Harriet, and Ira M. Sheskin. 2011. The influence of community context and individual characteristics on Jewish identity: A 21-community study. Storrs, CT: Mandell Berman Institute, North American Jewish Data Bank, The Association for the Social Scientific Study of Jewry, and The Jewish Federations of North America.at http://www.jewishdatabank.org.

  • Hartman, Harriet, and Ira M. Sheskin. 2012. The relationship of Jewish community contexts and Jewish identity: A 22-community study. Contemporary Jewry 32(3): 237–283.

  • Hoge, Dean R., and David A. Roozen. 1979. Understanding church growth and decline, 1950–1978. Cleveland: Pilgrim Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, Bethamie. 1999. Jewishness in New York: The exception or the rule? In National variations in Jewish identity: Implications for Jewish education, ed. S. Cohen, and G. Horenczyk, 223–243. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joffe, Alex. 2012. The real Jewish geography. Jewish Ideas Daily (Nov. 16). http://www.jewishideasdaily.com/5378/features/the-real-jewish-geography/.

  • Kelley, Jonathan, and Nan Dirk De Graaf. 1997. National context, parental socialization, and religious belief: Results from 15 nations. American Sociological Review 62(4): 639–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keysar, Ariela. 2010. Secular Americans and secular Jewish Americans. Contemporary Jewry 30(1): 29–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosmin, Barry A., et al. 1991. Highlights of the CJF 1990 national Jewish population survey. New York: Council of Jewish Federations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosmin, Barry A., and Ariela Keysar. 2013. American Jewish secularism: Jewish life beyond the synagogues. In The American Jewish year book, ed. Arnold Dashefsky, and Ira M. Sheskin, 3–54. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kosmin, Barry A., and Ariela Keysar. 2006. Religion in a free market. Ithaca, NY: Paramount Marketing Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosmin, Barry A., and Seymour P. Lachman. 1993. One nation under god. New York: Harmony Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler-Berkowitz, Laurence, et al. 2003. Strength, challenge and diversity in the American Jewish population. New York: United Jewish Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massarik, F., and Alvin Chenkin. 1973. United States national Jewish population study. In American Jewish year book, ed. Mark Zborowski, and Elizabeth Herzog, 264–306. Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, S.M. 1996. An interactive model of religiosity inheritance: the importance of family context. American Sociological Review 61(5): 858–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, Bruce A. 1993. Regional differences among American Jews. In Papers in Jewish demography 1989, eds. U. O. Schmelz, S. DellaPergola, 104–112. Jerusalem: Avraham Harman Institute of Contemporary Jewry and The Hebrew University of Jerusalem. http://www.bjpa.org/Publications/details.cfm?PublicationID=2752.

  • Putnam, Robert D. 2000. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Robert D., and David E. Campbell. 2010. American grace: How religion divides and unites us. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinowitz, Jonathan, Israel Kim, and Bernard Lazerwitz. 1992. Metropolitan size and participation in religio-ethnic communities. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 31(3): 339–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabinowitz, Jonathan, Bernard Lazerwitz, and Israel Kim. 1995. Changes in the influence of Jewish community size on primary group, religious, and Jewish communal involvement—1971 and 1990. Sociology of Religion 56(4): 417–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rebhun, Uzi. 2011. The wandering Jew. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebhun, Uzi. 2004. Jewish identities in America: Structural analyses of attitudes and behaviors. Review of Religious Research 46(10): 43–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rebhun, Uzi. 1995. Geographic mobility and religioethnic identification: Three Jewish communities in the U.S. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 34(4): 485–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regnerus, Mark, Christian Smith, and Brad Smith. 2004. Social context in the development of adolescent religiosity. Applied Developmental Science 8(1): 27–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roehlhepartan, Eugene C., Peter L. Benson, and Peter C. Scales. 2011. Spiritual identity: Contextual perspectives. In The handbook of identity theory and research, ed. S.J. Schwartz, K. Luyckx, and V.L. Vignoles, 545–562. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Roof, Wade Clark. 2001. Spiritual marketplace: baby boomer and the remaking of American religion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharot, Stephen. 2011. Comparative perspectives on Judaisms and Jewish identities. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheskin, Ira M. 2012. Comparisons of Jewish communities: A compendium of tables and bar charts. Storrs, CT: Mandell Berman Institute, North American Jewish Data Bank and the Jewish Federations of North America. http://www.jewishdatabank.org.

  • Sheskin, Ira M. 2005a. Comparisons between local Jewish community studies and the 2000–01 National Jewish Population Survey. Contemporary Jewry 25: 158–192. http://www.bjpa.org.

  • Sheskin, Ira M. 2005b. The Jewish community study of the twin cities. Minneapolis/St. Paul: The Minneapolis Jewish Federation and the United Jewish Fund and Council of Greater St. Paul. http://www.jewishdatabank.org.

  • Sheskin, Ira M. 2001. How Jewish communities differ: Variations in the findings of local Jewish demographic studies. New York: City University of New York, North American Jewish Data Bank. http://www.jewishdatabank.org.

  • Sheskin, Ira M. 1998. A methodology for examining the changing size and spatial distribution of a Jewish population: A Miami case study. Shofar, Special issue: Studies in Jewish geography 17(1): 97–116. http://www.bjpa.org.

  • Sheskin, Ira M., and Arnold Dashefsky. 2013. Jewish population in the United States, 2012. In The American Jewish year book, ed. Arnold Dashefsky, and Ira M. Sheskin, 143–212. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Silk, Mark, and Andrew Walsh. 2008. One nation divisible: How regional religious differences shape American politics. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Christian. 2003. The secular revolution. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Christian, David Sikkink, and Jason Bailey. 1998. Devotion in Dixie and beyond: A test of the Shibley thesis on the effects of regional origin and migration on individual religiosity. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 37(3): 494–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Tom W. 2005. Jewish distinctiveness in America: A statistical portrait. New York: The American Jewish Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stump, Roger W. 2008. The geography of religion, faith, place, and space. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stump, Roger W. 1986. Regional variations in the determinants of religious participation. Review of Religious Research 27(3): 208–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Tubergen, Frank. 2007. Religious affiliation and participation among immigrants in a secular society: A study of immigrants in the Netherlands. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 33(5): 747–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weissbach, Lee Shai. 2005. Jewish life in small-town America: A history. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are most grateful for the support of the North American Jewish Data Bank for Harriet Hartman’s 2010 Berman Summer Research Fellowship and to the Religious Research Association for her 2010–2011 Jacquet Research Award. Naturally, responsibility for the content presented herein is the sole responsibility of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ira M. Sheskin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hartman, H., Sheskin, I.M. The (Dis)similarity of a Minority Religion to Its Broader Religious Context: The Case of American Jews. Rev Relig Res 55, 459–490 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13644-013-0112-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13644-013-0112-7

Keywords

Navigation