Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of sampling methods to quantify abundance of hardwoods and snags within conifer-dominated riparian zones

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Annals of Forest Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

• Aims

Six sampling alternatives were examined for their ability to quantify selected attributes of snags and hardwoods in conifer-dominated riparian areas of managed headwater forests in western Oregon.

• Methods

Each alternative was simulated 500 times at eight headwater forest locations based on a 0.52-ha square stem map. The alternatives were evaluated based on how well they estimated the number of hardwoods and snags per hectare and their basal area per hectare using root mean square error and percent bias.

• Results

In general, 3.6-m wide systematic strips oriented perpendicular to the stream outperformed the other alternatives. However, the variance of all six sampling alternatives was quite high and further research is needed to determine an optimal sampling method for quantifying hardwood and snag attributes in forests dominated by live conifers.

• Conclusion

When sampling snag and hardwood as a minor component of the overall forest composition within a riparian area, we suggest using 3.6-m strips perpendicular to the stream.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams PW (2007) Policy and management for headwater streams in the Pacific Northwest: synthesis and reflection. For Sci 53:104–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson PD, Larson DJ, Chan SS (2007) Riparian buffer and density management influences on microclimate of young headwater forests of western Oregon. For Sci 53:254–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Bate LJ, Garton EO, Wisdom MJ (1999) estimating snag and large tree densities and distributions on a landscape for wildlife management. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. Gen Rept PNW-GTR-425. pp 76

  • Cissel J, Anderson PD, Berryman S, Chan S, Puettman K, Thompson C (2006) BLM Density Management and Riparian Buffer Study: Establishment Report and Study Plan. U.S. Dept. Interior, U.S. Geological Survey. p 161

  • Ducey MJ, Jordan GJ, Gove JH, Valentine HT (2002) A practical modification of horizontal line sampling for snag and cavity tree inventory. Can J For Res 32:1217–1224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis TM, Betts MG (2011) Bird abundance and diversity across a hardwood gradient within early seral plantation forest. For Ecol Manage 261:1372–1381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eskelson BNI, Temesgen H, Barrett T (2009) Estimating cavity tree and snag abundance using negative binomial regression models and nearest neighbor imputation methods. Can J For Res 39:1749–1765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganey JL (1999) Snag density and composition of snag populations on two National Forests in northern Arizona. For Ecol Manage 117:169–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganey JL, Vojta SC (2010) Coarse woody debris assay in northern Arizona mixed-conifer and ponderosa pine forests. US Forest Service Research paper RMRS-RP-80WWW. Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, p 19

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagar JC (2007) Wildlife species associated with non-coniferous vegetation in Pacific Northwest conifer forests: a review. For Ecol Manage 246:108–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmon MH, Franklin JF, Swanson FJ, Sollins P, Gregory SV, Lattin JD, Anderson NH, Cline SP, Aumen NG, Sedell JR, Lienkaemper GW, Cromack K Jr, Cummins KW (1986) Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosystems. Adv Ecol Res 15:133–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holden ZA, Morgan P, Rollins MG, Wright RG (2006) Ponderosa pine snag densities following multiple fires in the Gila Wilderness, New Mexico. For Ecol Manage 221:140–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenning RS, Ducey MJ, Brissette JC, Gove JH (2005) Field efficiency and bias of snag inventory methods. Can J For Res 35:2900–2910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marquardt T, Temesgen H, Anderson PD (2010) Examination of the accuracy and suitability of selected sampling methods to quantify selected stand attributes within riparian zones. For Ecol Manage 260:313–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohmann JL, McComb WC, Zumrawi A (1994) Snag abundance for primary cavity-nesting birds on nonfederal forestlands in Oregon and Washington. Wildl Soc Bull 22:607–620

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson DH, Weaver G (2007) Vertebrate assemblages associated with headwater hydrology in western Oregon managed forests. For Sci 52:343–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Parish R, Antos JA, Ott PK, Di Lucca CM (2010) Snag longevity of Douglas-fir, western hemlock, and western red cedar from permanent sample plots in coastal British Columbia. For Ecol Manage 259:633–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rametsteiner E, Simula M (2003) Forest certification—an instrument to promote sustainable forest management? J Env Manage 67:87–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson JS, Danehy RJ (2007) A synthesis of the ecology of headwater streams and their riparian zones in temperate forests. For Sci 53:131–147

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc (1990) SAS/STAT User’s Guide, Version 6, Fourth Edition. Height to diameter ratio 2. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, p 848

    Google Scholar 

  • Temesgen H (2003) Evaluation of sampling alternatives to quantify tree leaf area. Can J For Res 33:82–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Temesgen H, Goerndt ME, Johnson GP, Adams DM, Monserud RA (2007) Forest measurement and biometrics in forest management: status and future needs of the Pacific Northwest USA. J For 105:233–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Temesgen H, Barrett T, Latta G (2008) Estimating cavity tree abundance using nearest neighbor imputation methods for western Oregon and Washington forests. Silva Fennica 42:337–354

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We thank Timothy Drake and Andrew Neil for their support during the data collection phase of the project, and Dr. Jeremy Groom for his insights and comments on an earlier draft. We greatly appreciate the Bureau of Land Management and the DMS site coordinators for their support and encouragement.

Funding

We greatly acknowledge the cooperation and financial support provided by the Pacific North West Research Station (agreement number: 04-JV-11261953-414).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hailemariam Temesgen.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Barry Alan Gardiner

Contribution of co-authors

Theresa Marquardt collected data and wrote most part of the manuscript.

Dr. Hailemariam Temesgen wrote part of the manuscript, contributed to the design and analysis of the simulations, and handled reviews.

Dr. Paul D. Anderson wrote part of the manuscript and contributed to the Discussion section.

Dr. Bianca Eskelson conducted part of the simulation, prepared the figures, and critically reviewed the manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marquardt, T., Temesgen, H., Anderson, P.D. et al. Evaluation of sampling methods to quantify abundance of hardwoods and snags within conifer-dominated riparian zones. Annals of Forest Science 69, 821–828 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-012-0204-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-012-0204-5

Keywords

Navigation