Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of genetic markers and glioblastoma stem-like cells in activation of dendritic cells

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Human Cell Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive intraparenchymal primary brain tumor in adults. The principal reasons for the poor outcomes of GBM are the high rates of recurrence and resistance to chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to determine the role of tailored cellular therapy for GBM with a poor prognosis and compare the activity of dendritic cells (DCs) that have encountered GBM cells. Detecting the correlations between methylation and expression of MGMT and PTEN genes and GBM cancer stem cells (CSCs) markers after co-cultures with a mononuclear cell cocktail are also aims for this study. Allogenic umbilical cord blood (UCB)-derived DCs were labeled with the CD11a and CD123 for immature DCs, and CD80 and CD11c for mature DCs. CD34, CD45, and CD56 cells were isolated from allogenic UCB for using in DCs maturation. GBM CSCs were detected with CD133/1 and CD111 antibodies after co-culture studies. DC activation was carried out via GBM cells including CD133 and CD111 cells and a mononuclear cells cocktail including CD34, CD45, and CD56 natural killer cells. Real-time PCR was performed to detect the expression and promoter methylation status of PTEN and MGMT genes. The expression of CSCs markers was found in all GBM cases, and a statistically significant correlation was found among them after co-culture studies. The most pronounced affinity of DCs to GBM cells was observed at dilutions between 1/4 and 1/256 in co-cultures. There was a statistically significant correlation between cellularity and granularity ratios for CD123 and CD11c. PTEN and MGMT gene expression and methylation values were evaluated with respect to CSCs expression and no statistical significance was found. Activation of DCs might associate with CSCs and the mononuclear cells cocktail including CD34, CD45, and CD56 cells which were obtained from allogenic UCB.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rock K, et al. A clinical review of treatment outcomes in glioblastoma multiforme—the validation in a non-trial population of the results of a randomised Phase III clinical trial: has a more radical approach improved survival? Br J Radiol. 1017;85:e729–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Stupp R, et al. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(10):987–96.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Stupp R, et al. Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10(5):459–66.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Han SJ, et al. Biologic principles of immunotherapy for malignant gliomas. Neurosurg Clin North Am. 2010;21(1):1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Choucair AK, et al. Development of multiple lesions during radiation therapy and chemotherapy in patients with gliomas. J Neurosurg. 1986;65(5):654–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Green SB, et al. Comparisons of carmustine, procarbazine, and high-dose methylprednisolone as additions to surgery and radiotherapy for the treatment of malignant glioma. Cancer Treat Rep. 1983;67(2):121–32.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Deutsch M, et al. Results of a randomized trial comparing BCNU plus radiotherapy, streptozotocin plus radiotherapy, BCNU plus hyperfractionated radiotherapy, and BCNU following misonidazole plus radiotherapy in the postoperative treatment of malignant glioma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1989;16(6):1389–96.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kanwal R, Gupta S. Epigenetic modifications in cancer. Clin Genet. 2012;81(4):303–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ohgaki H, Kleihues P. Genetic pathways to primary and secondary glioblastoma. Am J Pathol. 2007;170(5):1445–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ohgaki H, et al. Genetic pathways to glioblastoma: a population-based study. Cancer Res. 2004;64(19):6892–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tohma Y, et al. PTEN (MMAC1) mutations are frequent in primary glioblastomas (de novo) but not in secondary glioblastomas. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1998;57(7):684–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sano T, et al. Differential expression of MMAC/PTEN in glioblastoma multiforme: relationship to localization and prognosis. Cancer Res. 1999;59(8):1820–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lin H, et al. Allelic deletion analyses of MMAC/PTEN and DMBT1 loci in gliomas: relationship to prognostic significance. Clin Cancer Res. 1998;4(10):2447–54.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wen PY, Kesari S. Malignant gliomas in adults. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(5):492–507.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hegi ME, et al. MGMT gene silencing and benefit from temozolomide in glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(10):997–1003.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rolle CE, Sengupta S, Lesniak MS. Challenges in clinical design of immunotherapy trials for malignant glioma. Neurosurg Clin North Am. 2010;21(1):201–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Xu X, Stockhammer F, Schmitt M. Cellular-based immunotherapies for patients with glioblastoma multiforme. Clin Dev Immunol. 2012;2012:764213.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Banchereau J, et al. Immunobiology of dendritic cells. Annu Rev Immunol. 2000;18:767–811.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Steinman RM, Banchereau J. Taking dendritic cells into medicine. Nature. 2007;449(7161):419–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen R, et al. A hierarchy of self-renewing tumor-initiating cell types in glioblastoma. Cancer Cell. 2010;17(4):362–75.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Joo KM, et al. Clinical and biological implications of CD133-positive and CD133-negative cells in glioblastomas. Lab Invest. 2008;88(8):808–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Pellegatta S, et al. Neurospheres enriched in cancer stem-like cells are highly effective in eliciting a dendritic cell-mediated immune response against malignant gliomas. Cancer Res. 2006;66(21):10247–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Paola B, et al. CD133 is essential for glioblastoma stem cell maintenance. Stem Cells. 2013;31:857–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu G, et al. Analysis of gene expression and chemoresistance of CD133+ cancer stem cells in glioblastoma. Mol Cancer. 2006;5:67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pallini R, et al. Cancer stem cell analysis and clinical outcome in patients with glioblastoma multiforme. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14(24):8205–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Qiang L, et al. Isolation and characterization of cancer stem like cells in human glioblastoma cell lines. Cancer Lett. 2009;279(1):13–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Salmaggi A, et al. Glioblastoma-derived tumorospheres identify a population of tumor stem-like cells with angiogenic potential and enhanced multidrug resistance phenotype. Glia. 2006;54(8):850–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Beier D, et al. CD133(+) and CD133(−) glioblastoma-derived cancer stem cells show differential growth characteristics and molecular profiles. Cancer Res. 2007;67(9):4010–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kang MK, Kang SK. Tumorigenesis of chemotherapeutic drug-resistant cancer stem-like cells in brain glioma. Stem Cells Dev. 2007;16(5):837–47.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Friedman GK, et al. Engineered herpes simplex viruses efficiently infect and kill CD133+ human glioma xenograft cells that express CD111. J Neurooncol. 2009;95(2):199–209.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Harada Y, et al. Cytokine-based log-scale expansion of functional murine dendritic cells. PLoS ONE. 2009;4(8):e6674.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Harada Y, et al. Cytokine-based high log-scale expansion of functional human dendritic cells from cord-blood CD34-positive cells. Sci Rep. 2011;1:174.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wehner R, et al. The bidirectional crosstalk between human dendritic cells and natural killer cells. J Innate Immun. 2011;3(3):258–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Martin-Fontecha A, et al. Induced recruitment of NK cells to lymph nodes provides IFN-gamma for T(H)1 priming. Nat Immunol. 2004;5(12):1260–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Morandi B, et al. NK cells of human secondary lymphoid tissues enhance T cell polarization via IFN-gamma secretion. Eur J Immunol. 2006;36(9):2394–400.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Mocikat R, et al. Natural killer cells activated by MHC class I(low) targets prime dendritic cells to induce protective CD8 T cell responses. Immunity. 2003;19(4):561–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Altin JG, Sloan EK. The role of CD45 and CD45-associated molecules in T cell activation. Immunol Cell Biol. 1997;75(5):430–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Piccioli D, et al. Contact-dependent stimulation and inhibition of dendritic cells by natural killer cells. J Exp Med. 2002;195(3):335–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by ONKIM Stem Cell Technologies. We acknowledge Pınar Hüner and Cem Kulen from ONKIM Stem Cell Technologies for their contributions in the study.

Conflict of interest

We confirm that this manuscript has not been published elsewhere and is not under consideration by another journal. We do not have any conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cigir Biray Avci.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yurtsever, A., Haydaroglu, A., Biray Avci, C. et al. Assessment of genetic markers and glioblastoma stem-like cells in activation of dendritic cells. Human Cell 26, 105–113 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13577-013-0065-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13577-013-0065-8

Keywords

Navigation