Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Natural resource governance: does social media matter?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Mineral Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we study the relationship between communication and “transparency of information” and governance by exploring the link between social media and natural resource governance. Using a cross-country analysis, we document a robust and statistically significant positive relationship between Facebook penetration (a proxy for social media) and natural resource governance. It follows that countries with higher social media levels enjoy natural resource governance of better quality than countries with low levels of social media. The positive effect of social media is robust to controlling for other determinants of institutional quality, additional controls, and outliers, inter alia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. All details reported here are from de www.revenuewatch.org/rgi

  2. Institutional and legal setting: The extent to which laws, regulations, and institutional arrangements facilitate transparency, accountability, and fair competition.

    Reporting practices: The actual disclosure of information by public bodies.

    Safeguards and quality controls: The presence and quality of control and supervision mechanisms that promote integrity and protect against conflicts of interest.

    Enabling environment: State of governance as a whole, based on more than 30 external measures of accountability, government effectiveness, rule of law, corruption, and democracy.

References

  • Acemoglu D, Robinson JA, Johnson S (2001) The colonial origins of comparative development: an empirical investigation. Am Econ Rev 91(5):1369–1401

    Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu D, Hassan TA, Tahoun A (2018) The power of the street: evidence from Egypt’s Arab Spring. Rev Financ Stud 31(1):1–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Adamic, L. A., & Glance, N. (2005). The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election: divided they blog. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Link Discovery, 36–43

  • Alesina AF, Michalopoulos S, Papaioannou E (2016) Ethnic inequality. J Polit Econ 124(2):428–488

    Google Scholar 

  • Alonso JA, Garcimartín C (2013) The determinants of institutional quality. More on the debate. J Int Dev 25(2):206–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen TB, Bentzen J, Dalgaard CJ, Selaya P (2011) Does the Internet reduce corruption? Evidence from U.S. states and across countries. World Bank Econ Rev 25(3):387–417

    Google Scholar 

  • Asongu S, Kodila-Tedika O (2017) Institutions and poverty: a critical comment based on evolving currents and debates. Soc Indic Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1709-y

  • Asongu S, Kodila-Tedika O (2018) Determinants of property rights protection in sub-Saharan Africa. J Knowl Econ 9(4):1291–1308

    Google Scholar 

  • Asongu SA, Nwachukwu JC (2016) The mobile phone in the diffusion of knowledge for institutional quality in sub Saharan Africa. World Dev 86(October):133–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Asongu SA, Odhiambo NM (2019) Governance and social media in African countries: an empirical investigation. Telecommun Policy 43(5):411–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Asongu SA, Nwachukwu JC, Orim S-M, I. (2018) Mobile phones, institutional quality and entrepreneurship in sub-Saharan Africa. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 131:183–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Asongu S, Nwachukwu J, Orim S-M, Pyke C (2019a) Crime and social media. Information Technology & People, Forthcoming

    Google Scholar 

  • Asongu S, Orim ST, Nting RT (2019b). Terrorism and social media: global evidence, Forthcoming. J Global Inf Technol Manag

  • Barberá P, Zeitzoff T (2017) The new public address system: why do world leaders adopt social media? Int Stud Q. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqx047

  • Barberá P, Zeitzoff T (2018) The new public address system: why do world leaders adopt social media. Int Stud Q 62(1):1–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Besley T, Burgess R (2002) The political economy of government responsiveness: theory and evidence from India. Quarterly Journal of Economics CXVII:1415–1451

    Google Scholar 

  • Besley T, Prat A (2006) Handcuffs for the grabbing hand? Media capture and government accountability. Am Econ Rev 96(3):720–736

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen J, Mao H, Zeng X (2011) Twitter mood predicts the stock market. J Comput Sci 2:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Bomsel O (2018) Mineral rents and social orders: when Radetzki meets Douglass North. Miner Econ 31(1):7–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhuri A, Flamm KS, Horrigan J (2005) An analysis of the determinants of Internet access. Telecommun Policy 29(9–10):731–755

    Google Scholar 

  • Chong A, Zanforlin L (2000) Law tradition and institutional quality: some empirical evidence. J Int Dev 12(8):1057–1068

    Google Scholar 

  • Comin D, Easterly W, Gong E (2010) Was the wealth of nations determined in 1000 BC? Am Econ J: Macroecon 65–97

  • Conover MD, Ferrara E, Menczer F, Flammini A (2013) The digital evolution of occupy Wall Street. PLoS One 8(5):e64679

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmarchelier B, Fang ES (2016) Social media and the diffusion of information: a computational experiment on the emergence of food scares. Kyklos 69(4):559–583

    Google Scholar 

  • DiGrazia J, McKelvey K, Bollen J, Rojas F (2013) More tweets, more votes: social media as a quantitative indicator of political behavior. PLoS One 8(11):e79449

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterly W, Levine R (1997) Africa’s growth tragedy: policies and ethnic divisions. Q J Econ 112(4):1203–1250

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisensee T, Stomberg D (2007) New droughts, new floods and U.S. disaster relief. Q J Econ 122:693–728

    Google Scholar 

  • Enikolopov R, Makarin A, Petrova M (2017) Social media and protest participation: evidence from Russia. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2696236

  • Enikolopov R, Petrova M, Sonin K (2018) Social media and corruption. Am Econ J Appl Econ 10(1):150–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson M, Löf O (2019) Mining’s contribution to national economies between 1996 and 2016. Miner Econ 32(2):223–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenske J, Zurimendi I (2017) Oil and ethnic inequality in Nigeria. J Econ Growth 22:397–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferraz C, Finan F (2008) Exposing corrupt politicians: the effect of Brazil’s publicly released audits on electoral outcomes. Q J Econ 123:703–745

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel JA (2012) The natural resource curse: a survey of diagnoses and some prescriptions. HKS Faculty Research Working Paper Series RWP12–014, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University

  • Glaeser E (2008) Researcher incentives and empirical methods. In Rubin (ed) Foundations of positive and normative economics

  • Glaeser EL, La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silane F, Shleifer A (2004) Do institutions cause growth? NBER Working Papers 10568

  • Gylfason T (2018) Political economy, Mr. Churchill, and natural resources. Miner Econ 31(1):23–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Halberstam Y, Knight B (2016) Homophily, group size, and the diffusion of political information in social networks: evidence from Twitter. J Public Econ 143:73–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber PJ (1973) Robust regression: asymptotics, conjectures and Monte Carlo. Ann Stat 1:799–821

  • Hong S, Nadler D (2011) Does the early bird move the polls?: the use of the social media tool ‘twitter’ by us politicians and its impact on public opinion. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times, 182–186

  • Islam R, Montenegro CE (2002) What determines the quality of institutions? Background paper for the World Development Report: building institutions for markets

  • Janetzko D (2014) Predictive modeling in turbulent times – what Twitter reveals about the EUR/USD exchange rate. Netnomics 15(2):69–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Jha CK, Kodila-Tedika O (2020) Does social media promote democracy? Some empirical evidence. J Policy Model 42(2):271–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Jha CK, Sarangi S (2017) Does social media reduce corruption? Inf Econ Policy 39:60–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalonda-Kanyama I (2012) Determinants of institutional quality: reexamining the effect of trade, globalization and GDP in a cross-section of countries. UJ Working Paper

  • Kelejian HH, Murrell P, Shepotylo O (2013) Spatial spillovers in the development of institutions. J Dev Econ 101(C):297–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiiski S, Pohjola M (2002) Cross-country diffusion of the Internet. Inf Econ Policy 14(2):297–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Kodila-Tedika O (2014) Governance and intelligence: empirical analysis from African data. J African Dev 16(1):83–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Kodila-Tedika O (2018) Governance in Africa: convergence or divergence? Econ Bull 38(1):71–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Kodila-Tedika O, Kalonda-Kanyama I (2012) Quality of institutions: does intelligence matter? Economic Research Southern Africa. Working papers 308

  • Kodila-Tedika O, Tcheta-Bampa A (2014) Cold War and institutional quality: some empirical evidence, MPRA Paper 53965. University Library of Munich, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • La Porta R, Lopez-di-Silanes F, Shleifer A, Vishny R (1999) The quality of government. J Law Econ Org 15:222–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Leamer EE (1983) Let’s take the con out of econometrics. Am Econ Rev 73(1):31–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Leamer EE (1985) Sensitivity analyses would help. Am Econ Rev 75(3):308–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Leamer EE (2008) Extreme bounds analysis. In: S. Durlauf and L.Blume (Eds) The new Palgrave dictionary of economics. Second Edition. Palgrave Macmillan

  • Mehlum H, Moene K, Torvik R (2006) Institutions and the resource curse. Econ J 116(508):1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Meisenberg G, Lynn R (2011) Intelligence: a measure of human capital in nations. J Social Polit Econ Stud 36(4):421–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Metaxas PT, Eni M (2012) Social media and the elections. Science 338(6106):472–473

    Google Scholar 

  • Midi H, Talib BA (2008) The performance of robust estimator on linear regression model having both continuous and categorical variables with heteroscedastic errors. Malaysian J Math Sci 2:25–48

  • Mitchell BR (2003a) International historical statistics: Africa, Asia & Oceania, 1750–2001, 4th edn. Palgrave Macmillan, NewYork

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell BR (2003b) International historical statistics: Europe, 1750–2000, 5th edn. PalgraveMacmillan, NewYork

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell BR (2003c) International historical statistics: the Americas 1750–2000, 5th edn. Palgrave Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Narankhuu B (2018) Are natural resources a curse or a blessing for Mongolia? Miner Econ 31(1):171–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Nülle GM, Davis GA (2018) Neither Dutch nor disease?—natural resource booms in theory and empirics. Miner Econ 31(1):35–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Oluwatobi S, Efobi UR, Olurinola OI, Alege P (2015) Innovation in Africa: why institutions matter. South African J Econ 83(3):390–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Papke L, Wooldridge J (1996) Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401(k) plan participation rates. J Appl Econ 11(6):619–632

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrova M, Sen A, Yildirim P (2016). Social media and political donations: new technology and incumbency advantage in the United States. Available at SSRN: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2836323

  • Potrafke N (2012) Intelligence and corruption. Econ Lett 114(1):109–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Prat A, Strömberg D (2013) The political economy of mass media. Advances in economics and econometrics. Cambridge University Press

  • Qin B, Strömberg D, Wu Y (2016) The political economy of social media in China. Unpublished

  • Qin B, Strömberg D, Wu Y (2017) Why does China allow freer social media? Protests versus surveillance and propaganda. J Econ Perspect 31(1):117–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Raftery A (1995) Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociol Methodol 25:111–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinikka R, Svensson J (2004) The power of information: evidence from a newspaper campaign to reduce capture. Policy Research Working Paper No. 3239, World Bank

  • Rindermann H, Kodila-Tedika O, Christainsen G (2015) Cognitive capital, good governance, and the wealth of nations. Intelligence 51:98–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs JD, Warner AM (2001) The curse of natural resources. Eur Econ Rev 45(4):827–838

    Google Scholar 

  • Sala-i-Martin X (1997) I just ran two million regressions. Am Econ Rev 87(2):178–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Sala-i-Martin X, Doppelhofer G, Miller R (2004) Determinants of long-term growth: a Bayesian averaging of classical estimates Approach. Am Econ Rev 94(4):813–835

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons J, Nelson L, Simonsohn U (2011) False-positive psychology: undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychol Sci 22(11):1359–1366

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder JM Jr, Strömberg D (2010) Press coverage and political accountability. J Polit Econ 118(2):355–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprenger TO, Sandner PG, Tumasjan A, Welpe IM (2014) News or noise? Using Twitter to identify and understand company-specific news flow. J Bus Financ Acc 41(7–8):791–830

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens P (2003) Resource impact: curse or blessing? A literature survey. J Energy Lit XI.1:3–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Strömberg D (1999) The political economy of public spending. Ph.D. Dissertation, Princeton University

  • Strömberg D (2004) Radio's impact on public spending. Q J Econ 119(1):189–221

  • Strömberg D (2016) Media coverage and political accountability: theory and evidence. In Simon P. Anderson, Joel Waldfogel, and David Strömberg (eds) 595–622. Handbook of media economics. Amsterdam: North-Holland

  • Tcheta-Bampa A, Kodila-Tedika O (2018a) Conditions institutionnelles de la malédiction des ressources naturelles en Afrique sur les performances économiques, MPRA Paper 86511. University Library of Munich, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Tcheta-Bampa A, Kodila-Tedika O (2018b) Dynamisation de la malédiction des ressources naturelles en Afrique sur les performances économiques: institution et guerre froide, MPRA Paper 86510. University Library of Munich, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Tebaldi E, Mohan R (2010) Institutions and poverty. Oxf Dev Stud 46(6):1047–1066

  • Treme J, Van Der Ploeg Z (2014) The Twitter effect: social media usage as a contributor to movie success. Econ Bull 34(2):793–809

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Ploeg F (2011) Natural resources: curse or blessing? J Econ Lit 49(2):366–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Ploeg F, Poelhekke S (2016) The impact of natural resources survey of recent quantitative evidence. J Dev Stud 53(2):205–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams LV, Reade J (2016) Prediction markets, social media and information efficiency. Kyklos 69(3):518–556

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge J (2010) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data, 2nd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge J (2012) Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach, 5nd edn. CENGAGE Learning Custom Publishing

  • Young C (2009) Model uncertainty in sociological research: an application to religion and economic growth. Am Soc Rev 74:380–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Young C, Kroeger K (2017) Model Uncertainty and robustness: a computational framework for multi-model analysis. Social Methods Res 46(1):3–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Young C, Kroeger K, Muñoz J (2013) An estimator for model robustness

  • Zeitzoff T (2011) Using social media to measure conflict dynamics: an application to the 2008–2009 Gaza conflict. J Confl Resolut 55(6):938–969

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeitzoff T (2017) How social media is changing conflict. J Confl Resolut 61(9):1970–1991

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeitzoff T (2018) Does social media influence conflict? Evidence from the 2012 Gaza conflict. J Confl Resolut 62(1):29–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeitzoff T, Kelly J, Lotan G (2015) Using social media to measure foreign policy dynamics: an empirical analysis of the Iranian–Israeli confrontation (2012–13). J Peace Res 52(3):368–383

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo

    Oasis Kodila-Tedika

Authors
  1. Oasis Kodila-Tedika
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oasis Kodila-Tedika.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kodila-Tedika, O. Natural resource governance: does social media matter?. Miner Econ 34, 127–140 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13563-020-00234-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13563-020-00234-3

Keywords

JEL classification

Search

Navigation