FormalPara Key Summary Points

Why carry out this study?

Atopic dermatitis (AD) can have a profound negative impact on the quality of life (QoL) of patients.

We analyzed the long-term changes in symptoms, QoL, and patient assessment of treatment effect in adults with moderate-to-severe AD treated for 2 years with dupilumab.

What was learned from the study?

In adults with moderate-to-severe AD, dupilumab treatment over 2 years resulted in sustained improvements in patient-reported symptoms and QoL and a favorable patient perception of treatment effect.

Digital Features

This article is published with digital features, including video abstract, to facilitate understanding of the article. To view digital features for this article go to https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.16720783.

Introduction

Atopic dermatitis (AD), a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by intense itch and recurring eczematous lesions, can have a profound negative impact on the quality of life (QoL) of patients [1,2,3].

Dupilumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that blocks the shared receptor subunit for IL-4 and IL-13, thus inhibiting signaling of these key and central inflammatory cytokines in AD pathophysiology. Dupilumab is approved for patients with type 2 inflammatory diseases, including AD, asthma, and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps [4, 5]. In phase 3 trials in adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD and in children with severe AD, dupilumab was shown to significantly improve clinical signs, symptoms, and QoL with an acceptable safety profile [6,7,8,9,10]. In an ongoing, open-label extension (OLE) study in adults with moderate-to-severe AD (LIBERTY AD OLE; NCT01949311), dupilumab has also demonstrated sustained efficacy with an acceptable safety profile for up to 3 years [11].

In this study we report the long-term changes in symptoms and QoL as well as patient assessment of treatment effect in adults with moderate-to-severe AD treated for 2 years with dupilumab in an OLE study (LIBERTY AD OLE). A short author video summarizing the key findings of this study can be found in the online version of the manuscript.

Methods

Study Design

LIBERTY AD OLE (NCT01949311) is an ongoing phase 3, multicenter, OLE clinical trial in adults with moderate-to-severe AD who previously participated in phase 1–3 clinical trials of dupilumab. The study design has been previously reported [11].

Briefly, patients with moderate-to-severe AD were eligible for inclusion if they had adequately completed the required assessments of the parent phase 1–3 dupilumab studies. Patients treated with dupilumab in the parent studies (prior dupilumab treated) as well as patients who received placebo in the parent studies (dupilumab treatment-naïve) were included. Patients were excluded if they had experienced dupilumab-related adverse events (AEs) or serious AEs (SAEs) leading to discontinuation from the parent studies. Treatment consisted initially (October 2013) of subcutaneous dupilumab 200 mg weekly (qw), which was revised following a protocol amendment (December 2013) to 300 mg qw. Concomitant topical corticosteroids (TCS) were allowed without restriction.

The study was conducted in 28 countries in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, the International Council for Harmonisation Good Clinical Practice guideline, and applicable regulatory requirements. The local institutional review board or ethics committee at each study center oversaw trial conduct and documentation. All patients provided written informed consent before participating in the trial.

Patient-Reported Outcomes

AD symptoms and their effect on QoL can be evaluated using multiple validated patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures, including both disease-specific and general health status PROs. Among these, Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) can be used to evaluate the frequency of seven AD signs and symptoms during the past week, including skin manifestations, itch, and sleep disturbance [12]. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) established for POEM is a reduction of 3.4 points [13]. The burden of skin disease in adult patients can be assessed using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) [14, 15]. The MCID established for DLQI in inflammatory skin diseases is a 4-point reduction [16]. The Patient Global Assessment of Treatment Effect (PGATE) instrument measures patient-reported global assessment of treatment effect by asking patients: “How would you rate the way your eczema responded to the study medication?” PGATE rating was based on a 5-point scale ranging from “Poor” to “Excellent.” Additionally, the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire, a generic health-related QoL instrument, measures overall health-related QoL of patients in five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression). Each dimension has three levels of severity: no problem (1), some problems (2), and severe problems (3). The EQ-5D-3L consists of two components: a health state profile and a visual analog scale (VAS), with which a patient captures their current QoL state on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health) to 100 (best imaginable health) [17].

The primary objective of this OLE study was to assess the long-term safety of dupilumab. Additional outcomes, particularly PROs, were assessed through week 100 only as a result of a 2016 protocol amendment in which these assessments were removed to reduce the burden to investigators and patients.

For the purpose of this study, two baselines were defined: parent study baseline (PSBL) and OLE baseline (the point of entry into the current OLE study). POEM, DLQI, and EQ-5D-3L assessments were performed at both parent study and OLE baselines and at weeks 48 and 100. PGATE was collected at weeks 48 and 100.

Endpoints reported here include proportions of patients who achieved a change in POEM ≥ 4 points from baseline of parent study at weeks 48 and 100 and proportion of patients who maintained a ≥ 4-point change in POEM at week 100, among those who had achieved the change at week 48, and distribution of patients in categorical severities of POEM (0–2: clear/almost clear; 3–7: mild; 8–16: moderate; 17–24: severe; 25–28: very severe) [12] at parent study and OLE baselines and at week 100.

Endpoints also included proportions of patients who achieved a change in DLQI ≥ 4 points from baseline of parent study at weeks 48 and 100 and proportion of patients who maintained a ≥ 4-point change in DLQI at week 100, among those who had achieved the change at week 48, and distribution of patients in categorical severities of DLQI (0–1: no effect at all on patient’s life; 2–5: small effect; 6–10: moderate effect; 11–20 very large effect; 21–30 extremely large effect) [18] at parent study and OLE baselines and at week 100. Proportions of patients reporting “None” (i.e., no effect of AD on that domain) for the five individual domains of EQ-5D-3L at week 100 and PGATE with dupilumab at weeks 48 and 100 were also evaluated.

Analysis

All analyses were carried out in the safety analysis set (SAF), which included all patients in LIBERTY AD OLE who received at least one dose of dupilumab and completed the week 100 visit. Endpoints were analyzed descriptively using all observed data. There was no imputation for missing data.

For continuous variables, descriptive statistics include the number of patients reflected in the calculation (n), mean, and standard deviation (SD). For categorical or ordinal data, frequencies and percentages of observed values are given for each category. No formal statistical hypotheses were tested.

Results

Patients

A total of 2677 patients were included in LIBERTY AD OLE and received study treatment. At the time of the interim database lock, 82.4% of patients (2207/2677) had completed up to week 52, 1028 (38.4%) up to week 100, and 347 (13.0%) up to week 148 [11]. Of the 1325 (49.5%) patients who withdrew from the study, most (807 [30.1%]) did so because of per-protocol study termination by the sponsor upon regulatory approval/commercial availability of the drug and 57 (4.3%) because of lack of efficacy [11]. The patient disposition, baseline demographics, and disease characteristics for this patient population in LIBERTY AD OLE have been previously reported, along with efficacy, and overall safety outcomes up to 3 years [11].

At the parent study and OLE baselines, patients had a mean age of approximately 39 years (Table 1). Mean DLQI and POEM scores were higher at the PSBL compared with the OLE baseline, and mean EQ-5D VAS score was higher at the OLE baseline, reflecting improvement in dupilumab-treated patients in the parent study (Table 1).

Table 1 Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics

POEM

At weeks 48 and 100, 94.1% and 95.6% of patients had achieved a ≥ 4-point reduction in POEM from the PSBL, respectively, and 91.5% of patients achieved this change at both weeks 48 and 100 (Table 2). Almost all (97.2%) of the patients who achieved a ≥ 4-point change in POEM at week 48 maintained the change at week 100.

Table 2 Study outcomes: POEM, DLQI, and EQ-5D-3L

At week 100, 35.1% of patients had a POEM score of ≤ 2 (AD clear/almost clear) compared with 0.1% at PSBL (Fig. 1a).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Distribution of patients in categorical severities for a POEM and b DLQI at parent and OLE study baselines and at week 100. Analyses include patients with parent study baseline, OLE study baseline, and week 100 assessments. DLQI Dermatology Life Quality Index, OLE open-label extension, POEM Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure

QoL Assessments

By weeks 48 and 100, 93.3% and 93.4% of patients had achieved a ≥ 4-point reduction in DLQI from the PSBL, respectively, and 90.3% achieved this change at both weeks 48 and 100 (Table 2). Almost all (96.8%) of the patients who achieved a ≥ 4-point change in DLQI at week 48 maintained the change at week 100. At week 100, half of patients (49.9%) had a DLQI score of 0 or 1 (no effect at all on patient’s life) compared with 1.5% at PSBL (Fig. 1b).

At week 100, for each of the five individual domains of the EQ-5D-3L (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression), most patients (range 74.5–97.3%) reported “None” (i.e., no effect of AD on that domain) (Table 2).

PGATE

At weeks 48 and 100, almost all patients (91.7 and 93.8%, respectively) reported dupilumab treatment effect was “good,” very good,” or “excellent” according to the PGATE scale (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Proportion of patients reporting the individual PGATE responses at weeks 48 and 100. Week 48 and week 100 analyses include patients with assessments at week 48 and week 100, respectively. PGATE Patient Global Assessment of Treatment Effect

Discussion

In this long-term OLE study in adults with moderate-to-severe AD, almost all patients treated with dupilumab for 100 weeks achieved clinically relevant benefits from the reduction of symptoms and improvement in QoL, with the majority achieving mild disease or clear skin. Over 90% of patients rated the effect of treatment as “good,” “very good,” or “excellent.”

A prior analysis of this OLE study found that dupilumab treatment for up to 3 years resulted in sustained improvements in AD signs and symptoms, with both safety and efficacy results supporting dupilumab as continuous long-term therapy for adults with moderate-to-severe AD [11]. As reported by Beck et al. [11], 58.1% of patients achieved an Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) at week 100 of the OLE study, and 77.2% achieved a reduction in IGA of ≥ 2 from PSBL. Additional improvements in AD signs are reflected in reduction of Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), including a mean percent change from PBSL to week 100 of −91.5%. Furthermore, 98.5% of patients achieved a ≥ 50% reduction in EASI from baseline by week 100, 91.3% achieved a ≥ 75% reduction, and 72.8% a ≥ 90% reduction. Itch, a key patient-reported symptom impacting QoL, decreased from PSBL to week 100 as measured by mean percent change in weekly pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (−65.7%), and 79.1% of patients achieved a ≥ 3-point reduction in weekly pruritus Numerical Rating Scale from baseline [11]. These improvements in itch, as well as in other AD signs and symptoms reported previously [11], correspond with the improvements observed in PROs reported here. Correlations and associations between improvements in clinical and PROs in adults with AD treated with dupilumab have been reported elsewhere [19, 20].

Patient perception of relief from overall AD disease burden is reflected by multidimensional PROs. In this analysis, most patients receiving dupilumab showed substantial improvements in the PROs POEM, DLQI, and EQ-5D-3L and favorably assessed the effect of dupilumab treatment.

Of note, adults received dupilumab 300 mg qw in the OLE study, while the currently approved dose regimen for adults is 300 mg every 2 weeks. Safety and efficacy were generally consistent with controlled studies [6,7,8]. The weekly dupilumab dosage regimen was selected for this OLE study to increase the likelihood of identifying any safety signals and to generate safety data to support both weekly and every other week regimens. The safety results confirmed an acceptable safety profile with no increase over time in rates of treatment-related AEs or SAEs (per 100 patient years) [11].

The strengths of this study include the large patient population in an international setting and long-term study duration. Limitations include the open-label study design and lack of a control arm. Additionally, fewer patients were available at later time points because of the timing of the analysis and the required withdrawal of patients upon regulatory approval of dupilumab in the individual countries in which the patients were enrolled [11].

Conclusions

In adults with moderate-to-severe AD, dupilumab treatment over 2 years resulted in sustained improvements in patient-reported symptoms and QoL and a favorable patient perception of treatment effect.