Abstract
The role of barrier modifications and the relevant nuclear structure effects in the fusion of the \( {}_8{}^{16}O+{}_{62}{}^{144,148,150,152,154}Sm \) and \( {}_3{}^{6,7}Li+{}_{62}{}^{152}Sm \) systems is analyzed within the context of the energy-dependent Woods-Saxon potential model (EDWSP model) and the coupled channel model. For the \( {}_8{}^{16}O+{}_{62}{}^{144,148,150,152,154}Sm \) reactions, where the colliding pairs are stable against breakup, the collective excitations and/or static deformations are sufficient to account for the observed fusion enhancement. In contrast, the model calculations overpredict the complete fusion data at above - barrier energies for the \( {}_3{}^{6,7}Li+{}_{62}{}^{152}Sm \) systems, where the importance of projectile breakup effects has been pointed out. Due to the low threshold of the alpha-breakup channel, the weakly bound projectiles \( \left({}_3{}^{6,7}Li\right) \) break up into charged fragments before reaching the fusion barrier and consequently the complete fusion cross section is suppressed by 28% (25%) in the \( {}_3{}^6Li+{}_{62}{}^{152}Sm\;\left({}_3{}^7Li+{}_{62}{}^{152}Sm\right) \) reaction with respect to predictions of coupled channel calculations. However, the EDWSP model based calculations can minimize the suppression factor by as much as of 13% (8%) in the \( {}_3{}^6Li+{}_{62}{}^{152}Sm\;\left({}_3{}^7Li+{}_{62}{}^{152}Sm\right) \) reaction with reference to the predictions made by the coupled channel calculations. Therefore, the complete fusion data of the \( {}_3{}^6Li+{}_{62}{}^{152}Sm\;\left({}_3{}^7Li+{}_{62}{}^{152}Sm\right) \) reaction at above - barrier energies is reduced by 15% (17%) with respect to the expectations of the EDWSP model. The extracted suppression factors for the studied reactions are due to the modifications of the barrier profile as a consequence of the energy - dependence in nucleus-nucleus potential, and thus greater barrier modifications occur for more weakly bound system, which in turn, confirms the breakup of projectile in the incoming channel.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A.O. Caldeira, A.J. Leggett, Phys. Rev. Lett. 46, 211 (1981)
J.D. Bierman et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1587 (1996)
M.S. Gautam, Indian J. Phys. 90, 335 (2016)
P.R.S. Gomes et al., Phys. Rev. C 49, 245 (1994)
E.F. Aguilera et al., Phys. Rev. C 52, 3103 (1995)
J.R. Leigh et al., Phys. Rev. C 52, 3151 (1995)
M.S. Gautam, Nucl. Phys. A 933, 272 (2015)
A.A. Sonzogni et al., Phys. Rev. C 57, 722 (1998)
N.V.S.V. Prasad et al., Nucl. Phys. A 603, 176 (1996)
H.Q. Zhang et al., Phys. Rev. C 82, 054609 (2010)
M.S. Gautam, Phys. Scr. 90, 055301 (2015)
C.H. Dasso et al., Nucl. Phys. A 405, 381 (1983)
J.X. Wei et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 3368 (1991)
C.R. Morton et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 4074 (1994)
M.S. Gautam, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 30, 1550013 (2015)
L.F. Canto et al., Phys. Rep. 424, 1 (2006)
K. Hagino, N. Takigawa, Prog. Theor. Phys. 128, 1061 (2012)
A.M. Stefanini et al., Phys. Rev. C 62, 014601 (2000)
V. Tripathi et al., Phys. Rev. C 65, 014614 (2001)
M.S. Gautam et al., Phys. Rev. C 92, 054605 (2015)
A.M. Stefanini et al., Phys. Rev. C 73, 034606 (2006)
R.G. Stokstad et al., Phys. Rev. C 23, 281 (1981)
R.G. Stokstad et al., Phys. Rev. C 21, 2427 (1980)
H. Esbensen, Nucl. Phys. A 352, 147 (1981)
W. Reisdorf et al., Nucl. Phys. A 438, 212 (1985)
W. Reisdorf et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1811 (1982)
N. Rowley et al., Phys. Lett. B 254, 25 (1991)
K. Hagino, N. Rowley, A.T. Kruppa, Comput. Phys. Commun. 123, 143 (1999) K Hagino (private communication)
M.S. Sukhvinder, R. Kharab, Nucl. Phys. A 897, 179 (2013)
M.S. Gautam, Phys. Rev. C 90, 024620 (2014)
P.K. Rath et al., Phys. Rev. C 79, 051601 (2009)
P.K. Rath et al., Nucl. Phys. A 874, 14 (2012)
P.K. Rath et al., Phys. Rev. C 88, 044617 (2013)
Z.H. Liu et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 26, 73 (2005)
M.S. Hussein et al., Phys. Rev. C 46, 377 (1992)
M.S. Hussein et al., Phys. Rev. C 51, 846 (1995)
M.S. Gautam, Can. J. Phys. 93, 1343 (2015)
C.H. Dasso et al., Phys. Rev. C 50, R12 (1994)
C.H. Dasso et al., Phys. Lett. B 276, 1 (1992)
K.E. Zyromski et al., Phys. Rev. C 55, R562 (1997)
P.A. DeYong et al., Phys. Rev. C 58, 3442 (1998)
J.J. Kolata et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 4580 (1998)
M. Trotta et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2342 (2000)
M. Dasgupta et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1395 (1999)
C. Signorini et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 5, 7 (1999)
M. Dasgupta et al., Phys. Rev. C 66, 041602(R) (2002)
V. Tripathi et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 172701 (2002)
H. Kumawat et al., Phys. Rev. C 86, 024607 (2012)
D.L. Hill, J.A. Wheeler, Phys. Rev. 89, 1102 (1953)
C.Y. Wong, Phys. Rev. Lett. 31, 766 (1973)
M.S. Sukhvinder, R. Kharab, Nucl. Phys. A 897, 198 (2013)
J.O. Newton et al., Phys. Rev. C 70, 024605 (2004)
A. Mukherjee et al., Phys. Rev. C 75, 044608 (2007)
L.C. Chamon et al., Phys. Rev. C 66, 014610 (2002)
K. Washiyama, D. Lacroix, Phys. Rev. C 74, 024610 (2008)
A.S. Umar, C. Simenel, V.E. Oberacker, Phys. Rev. C 89, 034611 (2011)
A.S. Umar, V.E. Oberacker, Eur. Phys. J. A 39, 243 (2009)
E.F. Aguilera, J.J. Kolata, Phys. Rev. C 85, 014603 (2012)
K. Hagino et al., J. Phys. G 23, 1413 (1997)
V.I. Zagrebaev, V.V. Samarin, Phys. At. Nucl. 67, 1488 (2004)
R.A. Gatenby et al., Phys. Rev. C 41, R414 (1990)
R.A. Gatenby et al., Phys. Rev. C 56, 633 (1993)
N. Takigawa et al., J. Phys. G 23, 1367 (1997)
K. Hagino et al., Phys. Rev. C 57, 1349 (1997)
D.E. DiGregorio et al., Phys. Rev. C 39, 516 (1989)
I.J. Thompson, Com. Phys. Report 7, 167 (1988)
A. Diaz-Torres, I.J. Thompson, Phys. Rev. C 65, 024606 (2002)
P.R.S. Gomes et al., Journal of Physics G (Conferences Series) 420, 012121 (2013)
C. Signorini et al., Phys. Rev. C 67, 044607 (2003)
D.R. Otomar et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 46, 285 (2010)
D.R. Otomar et al., Phys. Rev. C 87, 014615 (2013)
D.H. Luong et al., Phys. Lett. B 695, 105 (2011)
M. Dasgupta et al., Nucl. Phys. A 834, 147c (2010)
R. Rafiei et al., Phys. Rev. C 81, 024601 (2010)
N.A. Elmahdy et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 51, 62 (2015)
E.F. Aguilera et al., Phys. Rev. C 41, 910 (1990)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gautam, M.S., Vinod, K. & Kumar, H. Role of Barrier Modification and Nuclear Structure Effects in Sub-Barrier Fusion Dynamics of Various Heavy Ion Fusion Reactions. Braz J Phys 47, 461–472 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13538-017-0510-3
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13538-017-0510-3