Skip to main content
Log in

Estimation and suppression of side lobes in medical ultrasound imaging systems

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomedical Engineering Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper estimates the side lobe levels from the received echo data, and proposes and compares three types of filters that can be used to suppress them in an ultrasound image. Ultrasound echo signals from the off-axis scatterers can be modeled as a sinusoidal wave whose spatial frequency in the lateral direction of a transducer array varies as a function of the incident angle. The received channel data waveform due to side lobes have a spatial frequency of an integer plus a half. Doubling the length of the channel data by appending zeros and taking the discrete Fourier transform of the elongated data makes the spatial frequency of the channel data due to side lobes become an integer. Thus, it is possible to estimate the complex amplitude of the side lobes. Adding together all the channel data of the estimated side lobes, we can obtain the side lobe levels present in ultrasound field characteristics. We define the summed value as a quality factor that is used as a parameter of side lobe suppression filters. Computer simulations as well as experiments on wires in a water tank and a cyst phantom show that the proposed filters are very effective in reducing side lobe levels and that the amount of computation is smaller than that of the minimum variance beamforming method while showing comparable performance. A method of estimating and suppressing side lobes in an ultrasound image is presented, and the performance of the proposed filters is found to be viable against the conventional B-mode imaging and minimum variance beamforming methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kim JH, Song TK, Park SB. Pipelined sampled delay focusing in ultrasound imaging. Ultrason Imaging. 1987;9(2):75–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Macovski A. Medical imaging systems. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall; 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Goodman JW. Introduction to Fourier optics. Greenwood Village: Roberts and Company Publishers; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Keitman-Curdes O, Brendel B, Marg C, Ermert H. Optimization of apodizations based on the sidelobe pressure energy in simulated ultrasound fields. Conf Proc IEEE Ultrason Symp. 2002; 2:1677–80.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bae MH, Jeong MK. A study of synthetic-aperture imaging with virtual source elements in B-mode ultrasound imaging systems. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferrelectr. 2000;47(6):1510–9.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Vignon F, Burcher MR. Capon beamforming in medical ultrasound imaging with focused beams. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferrelectr. 2008;55(3):619–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Synnevåg JF, Austeng A, Holm S. Benefits of minimum variance beamforming in medical ultrasound imaging. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferrelectr. 2009;56(9):1868–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Asl BM, Mahloojifar A. Minimum variance beamforming combined with adaptive coherence weighting applied to ultrasound medical imaging. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferrelectr. 2009;56(9):1923–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Asl BM, Mahloojifar A. Contrast enhancement and robustness improvement of adaptive ultrasound imaging using forward-backward minimum variance beamforming. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferrelectr. 2011;58(4):858–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nilsen CIC, Holm S. Wiener beamforming and the coherence factor in ultrasound imaging. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferrelectr. 2010;57(6):1329–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim K, Park S, Kim J, Park SB, Bae M. A fast minimum variance beamforming method using principal component analysis. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferrelectr. 2014;61(6):930–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hollman KW, Rigby KW, O’Donnell M. Coherence factor of speckle from a multi-row probe. Conf Proc IEEE Ultrason Symp. 1999;2:1257–60.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Li PC, Li ML. Adaptive imaging using the generalized coherence factor. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferrelectr. 2003;50(2):128–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lediju MA, Trahey GE, Byram BC, Dahl JJ. Short-lag spatial coherence of backscattered echoes: imaging characteristics. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferrelectr. 2011;58(7):1377–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Camacho J, Parrilla M, Fritsch C. Phase coherence imaging. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferrelectr. 2009;56(5):958–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fritsch C, Camacho J, Parrilla M. New ultrasound imaging techniques with phase coherence processing. Ultrasonics. 2010;50(2):122–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li ML, Li PC. Improved Fourier transform-based parallel receive beam formation. Ultrason Imaging. 2003;25(2):73–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dahl JJ, Trahey GE. Off-axis scatterer filters for improved aberration measurement. Conf Proc IEEE Ultrason Symp. 2003; 2:1094–7.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jeong MK. A Fourier transform-based sidelobe reduction method in ultrasound imaging. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferrelectr. 2000;47(3):759–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Byram B, Die K, Dumont D. An improved acoustic clutter model and direct in vivo assessment of off-axis and multipath clutter energy in the liver. Conf Proc IEEE Ultrason Symp. 2014;531–4.

  21. Byram B, Jakovljevic M. Ultrasonic multipath and beamforming clutter rejection: a chirp model approach. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferrelectr. 2014;61(3):428–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jeong MK, Kwon SJ. Estimation of side lobes in ultrasound imaging systems. Biomed Eng Lett. 2015;5(3):229–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jeong MK, Kwon SJ. A novel side lobe estimation method in medical ultrasound imaging systems. Conf Proc IEEE Ultrason Symp. 2015;1–4.

  24. Ziomek LJ. Fundamentals of acoustic field theory and space-time signal processing. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Oppenheim AV, Schafer RW. Discrete-time signal processing. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education; 2009.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Jensen JA, Nikolov SI. Fast simulation of ultrasound images. Conf Proc IEEE Ultrason Symp. 2000;2:2721–4.

    Google Scholar 

  27. http://www.alpinion.co.kr. Accessed 4 June 2016.

  28. http://www.sunnuclear.com/snc_site/solutions/diagnostic/subcat/ultrasoundqa. Accessed 4 June 2016.

  29. Chen J, Yiu BYS, So HKH, Yu ACH. Real-time GPU-based adaptive beamformer for high quality ultrasound imaging. Conf Proc IEEE Ultrason Symp. 2011;474–7.

  30. Bae MH, Park SB, Kwon SJ. Fast minimum variance beamforming based on Legendre polynomials. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferrelectr. 2009;63(9):1422–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Daejin University Research Grants in 2016.

Conflict of interest

Kwon SJ declares that he has no conflict of interest in relation to the work in this article. Jeong MK declares that he has no conflict of interest in relation to the work in this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mok Kun Jeong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kwon, S.J., Jeong, M.K. Estimation and suppression of side lobes in medical ultrasound imaging systems. Biomed. Eng. Lett. 7, 31–43 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13534-016-0002-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13534-016-0002-3

Keywords

Navigation