Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Trends in Mortality Decrease and Economic Growth

  • Published:
Demography

Abstract

The vast literature on extrapolative stochastic mortality models focuses mainly on the extrapolation of past mortality trends and summarizes the trends by one or more latent factors. However, the interpretation of these trends is typically not very clear. On the other hand, explanation methods are trying to link mortality dynamics with observable factors. This serves as an intermediate step between the two methods. We perform a comprehensive analysis on the relationship between the latent trend in mortality dynamics and the trend in economic growth represented by gross domestic product (GDP). Subsequently, the Lee-Carter framework is extended through the introduction of GDP as an additional factor next to the latent factor, which provides a better fit and better interpretable forecasts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See the section Economic Growth and Mortality Rates for an overview of related literature.

  2. In this regard, the probability of survival beyond age 99 will be set equal to 0. However, in this article, we focus on life expectancy at early ages so that the survival probability beyond age 99 has little impact.

  3. Hanewald (2011) performed similar unit root tests, with two main procedural differences. First, she used the Brouhns et al. (2002) Poisson variant of the Lee-Carter model, whereas we maintain the original settings. Second, she used real GDP in levels, whereas our analysis is based on real GDP per capita in logarithm. However, the main results are similar.

  4. Based on results from the augmented Dickey-Fuller test, most of ln(m x,t ) are I(1) processes.

  5. We multiply the test statistics by a factor (Tpk) / T, where p denotes the number of lags in the VAR model, and k denotes the number of variables. This is to correct small sample bias, as suggested in Ahn and Reinsel (1990).

  6. Furthermore, cohort life tables are based on the projections over a very long period. Thus, the forecast of cohort life tables is more sensitive to the underlying model and estimation methods.

  7. When used to better fit the in-sample mortality rates at different ages, the Lee-Carter is more volatile than the GDP series, possibly yielding better out-of-sample point forecasts but at the expense of a larger prediction interval.

  8. Compared with the Lee-Carter model, we add constraint (16): namely, . Constraint (16) is needed to identify . This constraint is also required in the Lee-Carter model to identify . If Eq. (16) is not satisfied—that is, =0—then our model reduces to Model (4).

  9. According to Eqs. (13), (14), (15), and (16), we have four constraints. However, constraint (16) is examined only ex post and is not included in the estimation, similar to the Lee-Carter model. Thus, the effective number of constraints is three.

References

  • Acemoglu, D., & Johnson, S. (2007). Disease and development: The effect of life expectancy on economic growth. Journal of Political Economy, 115, 925–985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahn, S. K., & Reinsel, G. C. (1990). Estimation for partially nonstationary nultivariate autoregressive models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 813–823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhargava, A., Jamison, D. T., Lau, L. J., & Murray, C. J. (2001). Modeling the effects of health on economic growth. Journal of Health Economics, 20, 423–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birchenall, J. (2007). Economic development and the escape from high mortality. World Development, 35, 543–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B. E., Canning, D., & Sevilla, J. (2004). The effect of health on economic growth: a production function approach. World Development, 32, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolt, J., & van Zanden, J. L. (2013). The first update of the Maddison Project: Re-estimating growth before 1820 (Maddison-Project Working Paper 4). Retrieved from http://www.ggdc.net/maddison/publications/pdf/wp4.pdf

  • Booth, H., & Tickle, L. (2008). Mortality modelling and forecasting: A review of methods. Annals of Actuarial Science, 3, 3–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, H., Maindonald, J., & Smith, L. (2002). Applying Lee-Carter under conditions of variable mortality decline. Population Studies, 56, 325–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, M. H. (2005). Commentary: Economic growth is the basis of mortality rate decline in the 20th century: Experience of the United States 1901–2000. International Journal of Epidemiology, 34, 1214–1221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brouhns, N., Denuit, M., & Vermunt, J. K. (2002). A Poisson log-bilinear regression approach to the construction of projected lifetables. Insurance Mathematics and Economics, 31, 373–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cairns, A., Black, D., & Dowd, K. (2006). A two-factor model for stochastic mortality with parameter uncertainty: Theory and calibration. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 73, 687–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currie, I. D., Durban, M., & Eilers, P. (2004). Smoothing and forecasting mortality rates. Statistical Modelling, 4, 279–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De la Croix, D., & Licandro, O. (1999). Life expectancy and endogenous growth. Economics Letters, 65, 255–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. F., & Granger, C. W. J. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica, 55, 251–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ettner, S. L. (1996). New evidence on the relationship between income and health. Journal of Health Economics, 15, 67–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanewald, K. (2011). Explaining mortality dynamics: The role of macroeconomic fluctuations and cause of death trends. North American Actuarial Journal, 15, 290–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Human Mortality Database. (n.d.). Berkeley and Rostock, Germany: University of California, Berkeley, and Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research. Retrieved from http://www.mortality.org/ or http://www.humanmortality.de

  • Johansen, S. (1988). Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12, 231–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P., Schmidt, P., & Shin, Y. (1992). Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root? Journal of Econometrics, 54, 159–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. D., & Carter, L. R. (1992). Modeling and forecasting U.S. mortality. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87, 659–671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. D., & Miller, T. (2001). Evaluating the performance of the Lee-Carter method for forecasting mortality. Demography, 38, 537–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nandi, A., Prescott, M., Cerdá, M., Vlahov, D., Tardiff, K., & Galea, S. (2012). Economic conditions and suicide rates in New York City. American Journal of Epidemiology, 175, 527–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, B., & Nielsen, J. (2010, December 8). Identification and forecasting in the Lee-Carter model (Working paper). Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1722538

  • O’Hare, C., & Li, Y. (2012). Explaining young mortality. Insurance Mathematics and Economics, 50, 12–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perron, P. (1988). Trends and random walks in macroeconomic time series: further evidence from a new approach. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12, 297–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitacco, E., Denuit, M., Haberman, S., & Olivieri, A. (2009). Modelling longevity dynamics for pensions and annuity business. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

  • Plat, R. (2009). On stochastic mortality modeling. Insurance Mathematics and Economics, 45, 393–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchett, L., & Summers, L. (1996). Wealthier is healthier. Journal of Human Resources, 31, 841–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swift, R. (2011). The relationship between health and GDP in OECD countries in the very long run. Health Economics, 20, 306–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilmoth, J. (1993). Computational methods for fitting and extrapolating the Lee-Carter model of mortality change (Technical report). Berkeley: Department of Demography, University of California.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

For comments and discussions, we thank two anonymous referees, the Editor, Makov Udi, Qihe Tang, and Jochen Mierau, as well as participants at the 7th Conference in Actuarial Science and Finance in Samos, the 2012 Tilburg University GSS seminar in Tilburg, and the 2012 Netspar Pension Day in Utrecht. We would also like to thank the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) for financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geng Niu.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(PDF 683 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Niu, G., Melenberg, B. Trends in Mortality Decrease and Economic Growth. Demography 51, 1755–1773 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-014-0328-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-014-0328-3

Keywords

Navigation