Skip to main content
Log in

Crossing Boundaries: Nativity, Ethnicity, and Mate Selection

  • Published:
Demography

Abstract

The influx of immigrants has increased diversity among ethnic minorities and indicates that they may take multiple integration paths in American society. Previous research on ethnic integration has often focused on panethnic differences, and few have explored ethnic diversity within a racial or panethnic context. Using 2000 U.S. census data for Puerto Rican–, Mexican-, Chinese-, and Filipino-origin individuals, we examine differences in marriage and cohabitation with whites, with other minorities, within a panethnic group, and within an ethnic group by nativity status. Ethnic endogamy is strong and, to a lesser extent, so is panethnic endogamy. Yet, marital or cohabiting unions with whites remain an important path of integration but differ significantly by ethnicity, nativity, age at arrival, and educational attainment. Meanwhile, ethnic differences in marriage and cohabitation with other racial or ethnic minorities are strong. Our analysis supports that unions with whites remain a major path of integration, but other paths of integration also become viable options for all ethnic groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Puerto Ricans, nonetheless, face similar conditions confronting immigrants. For example, Puerto Ricans speak Spanish in Puerto Rico and typically remain a distinct group on the mainland.

  2. The smaller the L2 and BIC, the better the model fit. The BIC statistic adjusts the L2 for sample size. BIC = L2 – (df) log(N).

  3. As shown in Table 2, gender differences are evident for Chinese and Filipinos but are beyond the scope of this article.

  4. BC in the denominator of Eq. (4) is constrained to be exp(λ21) in quasi-symmetry models.

References

  • Agbayani-Siewert, P., & Bevilla, L. (1995). Filipino Americans. In P. G. Min (Ed.), Asian Americans: Contemporary trends and issues (pp. 134–168). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agresti, A. (2002). Categorical data analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alba, R. D., Logan, J. R., Stults, B. J., & Zhang, W. (1999). Immigrant groups in the suburbs: A reexamination of suburbanization and spatial assimilation. American Sociological Review, 64, 446–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alba, R. D., & Nee, V. (2003). Remaking the American mainstream: Assimilation and contemporary immigration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bean, F. D., & Stevens, G. (2003). America’s newcomers and the dynamics of diversity. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell, D. L., & Lichter, D. T. (2000). Mate selection among married and cohabiting couples. Journal of Family Issues, 21, 275–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. L., Van Hook, J., & Glick, J. E. (2008). Generational differences in cohabitation and marriage in the U.S. Population Research and Policy Review, 27, 531–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bumpass, L. L., & Lu, H.-H. (2000). Trends in cohabitation and implications for children's family contexts. Population Studies, 54, 29–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bumpass, L. L., Sweet, J. A., & Cherlin, A. (1991). The role of cohabitation in declining rates of marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 913–927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarkberg, M., Stolzenberg, R. M., & Waite, L. J. (1995). Attitudes, values, and entrance into cohabitational versus marital unions. Social Forces, 74, 609–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espiritu, Y. L. (1992). Asian American panethnicity: Bridging institutions and identities. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espiritu, Y. L. (1996). Colonial oppression, labour importation, and group formation: Filipinos in the United States. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 19, 29–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espiritu, Y. L. (2003). Home bound: Filipino American lives across cultures, communities, and countries. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farley, R. (1996). The new American reality: Who we are, how we got here, where we are going. New York: Russell Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu, V. K. (2001). Racial intermarriage pairings. Demography, 38, 147–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbertson, G. A., Fitzpatrick, J. P., & Yang, L. (1996). Hispanic intermarriage in New York City: New evidence from 1991. International Migration Review, 30, 445–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, J. E., & Van Hook, J. (1998). The Mexican-origin population of the United States in the twentieth century. In Migration between Mexico and the United States: Binational study (Vol. 2, pp. 571–585). Mexico City and Washington, DC: Mexican Ministry of Foreign Affairs and U.S. Commission on Immigration Reform.

  • Gordon, M. M. (1964). Assimilation in American life. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gullickson, A. (2006). Education and black-white interracial marriage. Demography, 43, 673–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez, D. G. (1995). Walls and mirrors: Mexican Americans, Mexican immigrants and the politics of ethnicity. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. A., & Furstenberg, F. F., Jr. (1986). Changing places: Conjugal careers and women’s marital mobility. Social Forces, 64, 714–732.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, N. A., & Symens Smith, A. (2001). The two or more races population: 2000 (Census 2000 Brief C2KBR/01-6). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalmijn, M. (1998). Intermarriage and homogamy: Causes, patterns, trends. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 395–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labov, T. G., & Jacobs, J. A. (1998). Preserving multiple ancestry: Intermarriage and mixed births in Hawaii. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 29, 481–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landale, N. S., & Fennelly, K. (1992). Informal unions among mainland Puerto Ricans: Cohabitation or an alternative to legal marriage? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 269–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landale, N. S., & Oropesa, R. S. (2002). White, black, or Puerto Rican? Racial self-identification among mainland and island Puerto Ricans. Social Forces, 81, 231–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., & Bean, F. D. (2010). The diversity paradox: Immigration and the color line in twenty-first century America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, K. B. (1993). Intermarriage and ethnicity: Punjabi Mexican Americans, Mexican Japanese, and Filipino Americans. Explorations in Ethnic Studies, 16, 147–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang, Z., & Ito, N. (1999). Intermarriage of Asian Americans in New York City Region: Contemporary patterns and future prospects. International Migration Review, 33, 876–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichter, D. T., & Qian, Z. (2004). Marriage and family in a multiracial society. In R. Farley & J. Haaga (Eds.), The American people. New York and Washington, DC: Russell Sage Foundation and Population Reference Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. S. (1995). The new immigration and ethnicity in the United States. Population and Development Review, 21, 631–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Min, P. G., & Kim, C. (2009). Patterns of intermarriages and cross-generational in-marriages among native-born Asian Americans. International Migration Review, 43, 447–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okamoto, D. G. (2007). Marrying out: A boundary approach to understanding the marital integration of Asian Americans. Social Science Research, 36, 1391–1414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omi, M., & Winant, H. (1994). Racial formation in the United States: From the 1960s to the 1990s. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oropesa, R. S., & Landale, N. S. (2009). Why do immigrant youth who never enroll in US schools matter? School enrollment among Mexicans and non-Hispanic whites. Sociology of Education, 82, 240–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padilla, F. M. (1985). Latino ethnic consciousness: The case of Mexican Americans and Puerto Ricans in Chicago. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez, A. D., & Hirschman, C. (2009). The changing racial and ethnic composition of the U.S. population: Emerging American identities. Population and Development Review, 35, 1–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A., & Zhou, M. (1993). The new second generation: Segmented assimilation and its variants. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 530, 74–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian, Z. (1997). Breaking the racial barriers: Variations in interracial marriage between 1980 and 1990. Demography, 34, 478–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian, Z., Blair, S. L., & Ruf, S. (2001). Asian American interracial and interethnic marriages: Differences by education and nativity. International Migration Review, 35, 557–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian, Z., & Cobas, J. A. (2004). Latinos’ mate selection: Variations by national origin, race, and nativity. Social Science Research, 33, 225–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian, Z., & Lichter, D. T. (2007). Social boundaries and marital assimilation: Interpreting trends in racial and ethnic intermarriage. American Sociological Review, 72, 68–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, C. E. (2000). Changing race: Latinos, the census, and the history of ethnicity in the United States. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, M. J. (2001). The salience of pan-national Hispanic and Asian identities in U.S. marriage markets. Demography, 38, 161–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, M. J. (2002). Measures of assimilation in the marriage market: Mexican Americans 1970–1990. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 152–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, M. J. (2008). Racial, educational, and religious endogamy in the United States: A comparative historical perspective. Social Forces, 87, 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, C. R., & Mare, R. D. (2005). Trends in educational assortative marriage from 1940 to 2003. Demography, 42, 621–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. P., & Edmonston, B. (1997). The new Americans: Economic, demographic, and fiscal effects of immigration. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smock, P. J. (2000). Cohabitation in the United States: An appraisal of research themes, findings, and implications. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, G., & Schoen, R. (1988). Linguistic intermarriage in the United States. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 267–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tafoya, S. M., Johnson, H., & Hill, L. (2004). Who chooses to choose two? Multiracial identification and Census 2000 (report). In R. Farley & J. Haaga (Eds.), The American people. New York and Washington, DC: Russell sage foundation and population reference bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, M. (2009). Contemporary Chinese America: Immigration, ethnicity, and community transformation. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a grant (1 R01 HD43035-01) from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. We thank Dan Lichter, Grace Kao, and several anonymous reviewers for helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhenchao Qian.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Qian, Z., Glick, J.E. & Batson, C.D. Crossing Boundaries: Nativity, Ethnicity, and Mate Selection. Demography 49, 651–675 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-012-0090-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-012-0090-3

Keywords

Navigation