Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The emergence of very large container vessel (VLCV) in maritime trade: implications on the Malaysian seaport operations

  • Article
  • Published:
WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Revolution in containerization has caused an impressive advancement in container shipping and significant developments have been witnessed in this industry, including infrastructure expansions, modern system design, technological advancement, emergence of multimodalism, and introduction of co-modality, as well as improvement in the mechanism of interoperability. Owing to a significant dynamism in maritime logistics, it is projected that the amplification of vessel capacity will continue and achieve up to 24,000 TEUs in coming years and even larger in order to cope with the demand of economies of scale (EOS). The increasing trend of throughput at container terminals to which the very large container vessels (VLCVs) have contributed has challenged seaport decision makers to carry out immense infrastructure improvements and make massive investments in current seaport terminals. Predicated on the previous issues, a question has been raised about the benefits and equality between seaports and liner shipping operators due to the emergence of VLCVs. As a result, this paper has identified, analyzed, and evaluated the impact of VLCVs on Malaysian seaport operations and infrastructures from the sustainability management perspectives. In order to achieve the research objectives, two mathematical methods are employed: the analytical hierarchical process and evidential reasoning. Three major seaports in Malaysia are selected, the Port of Tanjung Pelepas, Northport, and Westport, as case studies in this paper. The result obtained from this paper will assist seaport operators to develop their substantial strategies for adapting to the emergence of VLCVs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anuar MAH, Salleh NHM, Jeevan J (2020) Developing dive site risk assessment model (DSRAM) to enhance tourism safety and sustainability in Perhentian Island. J Sustain Sci Manag 15(1):125–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Ascutia R (2015) Malaysia needs to retrofit ports for arrival of mega ships. Port Call Asia, July 22, 2015. Retrieved from https://www.portcalls.com/malaysia-needs-to-retrofit-ports-for-arrival-of-mega-ships/

  • Banomyong R (2005) The impact of port and trade security initiatives on maritime supply-chain management. Marit Policy Manag 32(1):3–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bin LC, Salleh NHM, Bin LK (2020) The evaluation model for coral reef restoration from management perspective for ensuring marine tourism sustainability. J Sustain Sci Manag 15(1):93–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark X, Dollar D, Micco A (2004) Port efficiency, maritime transport costs and bilateral trade. Working Paper 10353. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cullinane K, Wang TF, Song DW, Ji P (2006) The technical efficiency of container ports: comparing data envelopment analysis and stochastic frontier analysis. Transp Res A Policy Pract 40(4):354–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helmy S, Shrabi A (2016) Mega container ships, pros, cons and its implication recession. J Shipp Ocean Eng 6(2016):284–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Hung SW, Lu WM, Wang TP (2010) Benchmarking the operating efficiency of Asia container ports. Eur J Oper Res 203(3):706–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Global Shippers Forum (2016) The implication of mega-ships and alliances for competition and total supply chain efficiency: an economic perspective. Retrieved from https://globalshippersforum.com

  • Imai A, Nishimura E, Papadimitriou S, Liu M (2006) The economic viability of container mega-ships. Transp Res E Logist Transp Rev 42(1):21–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imai A, Shintani K, Papadimitriou S (2009) Multi-port vs. hub-and-spoke port calls by containerships. Transp Res E Logist Transp Rev 45(1):740–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Transport Forum (2015) The impact of mega-ships. International Transport Forum, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Ismail NA, Salleh NHM, Jeevan J (2019) Emergence of mega vessels and their influence on future Malaysian seaport expansion requirements, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu. J Undergrad Res 1(1):58–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyer G (2019) Mega-ships in the Indian Ocean: evaluating the impact and exploring littoral cooperation. ORF Occasional Paper No. 204, July 2019, Observer Research Foundation

  • Jeevan J, Roso V (2019) Exploring seaport - dry ports dyadic integration to meet the increase in container vessels size. J Shipp Trade 4(8):1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang C, Wan Y, Zhang A (2017) Internalization of port congestion: strategic effect behind shipping line delays and implications for terminal charges and investment. Marit Policy Manag 44(1):112–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King M (2017) Asia-Europe trade set for 24,000 TEU ships from 2019. Lloyd’s Loading List. Retrieved from https://www.lloydsloadinglist.com. Accessed 2 June 2019

  • Kontovas C, Psaraftis HN (2011) Reduction of emissions along the maritime intermodal container chain: operational models and policies. Marit Policy Manag 38(4):451–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee PT-W, Yang Z (eds) (2018) Multi-criteria decision making in maritime studies and logistics: applications and cases. Springer International Publishing

  • Lee CB, Salleh NHM, Loke KB (2020) The evaluation model for coral reef restoration from management perspective for ensuring marine tourism sustainability. J Sustain Sci Manag 15(1):93–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Marle GV (2014) Congestion in Hamburg highlights the impact of mega-ships and bad weather. The Load Star. Retrieved from https://theloadstar.co.uk/congestion-hamburg-highlights-dangers-mega-vessels/. Accessed 5 June 2019

  • Meng Q, Weng J, Suyi L (2017) Impact analysis of mega vessels on container terminal operations. Transp Res Procedia 25(2017):187–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merk O (2015) The impact of mega-ships. SRM Maritime Economy, Naples

    Google Scholar 

  • Mongelluzzo B (2016) Impacts of mega-ships on US ports spread unevenly. Retrieved from https://www.joc.com/port-news/port-productivity/impacts-mega-ships-us-ports-spread-unevenly_20161024.html. Accessed 5 June 2019

  • Moon DSH, Woo JK (2014) The impact of port operations on efficient ship operation from both economic and environmental perspectives. Marit Policy Manag 41(5):444–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munim ZH, Schramm HJ (2020) Forecasting container freight rates for major trade routes: a comparison of artificial neural networks and conventional models. Marit Econ Logist:1–18

  • Munim ZH, Sornn-Friese H, Dushenko M (2020) Identifying the appropriate governance model for green port management: applying analytic network process and best-worst methods to ports in the Indian Ocean Rim. J Clean Prod 268(2020):122156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Notteboom TE (2004) Container shipping and ports: an overview. Rev Netw Econ 3(2):86–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Notteboom TE, Winkelmans W (2001) Structural changes in logistics: how will port authorities face the challenge. Marit Policy Manag 28(1):71–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Notteboom TE, Parola F, Satta G, Pallis AA (2017) The relationship between port choice and terminal involvement of alliance members in container shipping. J Transp Geogr 64:158–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Othman MR, Jeevan J, Rizal S (2016) The Malaysian intermodal terminal system: the implication on the Malaysian maritime cluster. Int J e-Navig Marit Econ 4:46–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Prokopowicz AK, Berg J (2016) An evaluation of current trends in container shipping industry, very large container ships (VLCSs), and port capacities to accommodate TTIP increased trade. Transp Res Procedia 14:2910–2919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigue J-P (2015) The disadvantages of scale in maritime shipping. Port Economics. Retrieved from http://www.porteconomics.eu/2015/06/11/1065/. Accessed 22 June 2019

  • Rodrigue J-P (2017) The Geography of Transport Systems, 4th edn. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigue J-P, Notteboom T (2009) The terminalization of supply chains: reassessing the role of terminals in port/hinterland logistical relationships. Marit Policy Manag 36(2):165–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1977) A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J Math Psychol 15(3):234–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (2008) Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int J Serv Sci 1(1):83–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Salleh, NHM, Abdul Halim MA (2018) Enhancing environmental sustainability over fisheries industry through proactive risk evaluation: a case of Tok Bali fishing port. J Sustain Sci Manag 13 (Special Issue No. 4): The Role of Transparency and Management Integrity in Organisational Sustainability 51–63

  • Salleh NHM, Riahi R, Yang Z, Wang J (2014) Risk assessment of liner shipping from a business environment perspective. In Vulnerability, Uncertainty, and Risk: Quantification, Mitigation, and Management - Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Vulnerability and Risk Analysis and Management, ICVRAM 2014 and the 6th International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis, ISUMA 2014 (pp. 2320–2329). American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)

  • Salleh NHM, Hanafiah RM, Ngah AH, Jeevan J, Abdullah L (2019) A framework proposal for evaluating the organizational reliability and capability of a liner shipping operator in a fuzzy context. Int J Eng Adv Technol 8(6S3):327–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song DW, Panayides PM eds (2012) Logistics performance of supply chain-oriented ports In Song DW, Panayides P M (eds), Maritime Logistics: A Complete Guide to Effective Shipping and Port Management, 271-302. London: Kogan Page

  • Song DW, Yeo KT (2004) A competitive analysis of Chinese container ports using the analytic hierarchy process. Marit Econ Logist 6(1):34–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sys C, Blauwens G, Omey E, Voorde E, Witlox F (2008) In search of the link between ship size and operations. Transp Plan Technol 31(4):435–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tran NK, Haasis HD (2015) An empirical study of fleet expansion and growth of ship size in container liner shipping. Int J Prod Econ 159:241–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widjaja L (2012) Mega container ships: implications to Port of Singapore. Master’s thesis, City University, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilmsmeier G, Hoffmann J, Sanchez RJ (2006) The impact of port characteristics on international maritime transport costs. Res Transp Econ 16:117–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson ID, Roach PA (2000) Container stowage planning: a methodology for generating computerized solutions. J Oper Res Soc 51(2000):1248–1255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Shipping Council (2015) Some observations on port congestions, vessel size and vessel sharing agreements. World Shipping Council, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu L, Yang JB (2001) Introduction to multi-criteria decision making and the evidential reasoning approach. Manchester School of Management, Manchester

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu D, Yang J (2005) Intelligent Decision System Based on the Evidential Reasoning Approach and its Applications. Journal of Telecommunications and Information Technology. 3:73–80

  • Yang JB (2001) Rule and Utility Based Evidential Reasoning Approach for Multiple Attribute Decision Making Analysis under Uncertainties. European Journal of Operational Research. 131:31–61

  • Yang JB, Xu DL (2002) On the evidential reasoning algorithm for multiple attribute decision analysis under uncertainty. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern A Syst Hum 32(3):289–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Maritime Studies, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030, Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysia

    Nurul Haqimin Mohd Salleh, Norliyana Zulkifli & Jagan Jeevan

Authors
  1. Nurul Haqimin Mohd Salleh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Norliyana Zulkifli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jagan Jeevan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nurul Haqimin Mohd Salleh.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Salleh, N.H.M., Zulkifli, N. & Jeevan, J. The emergence of very large container vessel (VLCV) in maritime trade: implications on the Malaysian seaport operations. WMU J Marit Affairs 20, 41–61 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-020-00225-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-020-00225-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation