Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

MMP2 expression is a prognostic marker for primary melanoma patients

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Cellular Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP2) is a collagenase, which aids tumor growth and invasion by digesting the extracellular matrix surrounding the tumor tissue. Our study examined MMP2 expression in various stages of melanoma progression and tested the prognostic significance of MMP2 expression. We also analyzed the correlation between p-Akt status and MMP2 expression in melanoma patients.

Methods

Tissue microarray (TMA) and immunohistochemistry were employed to study the expression of MMP2. A total of 482 melanoma (330 primary and 152 metastatic) tumor biopsies and 149 nevi biopsies (49 normal and 100 dysplastic nevi) were used for the analysis. MMP2 expression was correlated with melanoma progression. Kaplan-Meier survival curve and multivariate Cox regression analysis were applied to verify the prognostic significance of MMP2 expression. The correlation between MMP2 and p-Akt expression was analyzed in 92 cases which were common in the present and the previous study on p-Akt expression.

Results

Strong MMP2 expression is significantly increased in primary (25 %) and metastatic melanoma (43 %) compared to normal (5 %) and dysplastic nevi (10 %). Patients with strong MMP2 had significantly poorer survival compared to those with negative-to-moderate MMP2 expression. MMP2 expression could predict the patient survival independent of tumor thickness and ulceration. Furthermore, in our cohort study MMP2 expression was associated with p-Akt status and patient survival.

Conclusions

Strong MMP2 staining is associated with worse survival of melanoma patients and is an independent molecular prognostic factor for primary melanoma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. T.L. Diepgen, V. Mahler, The epidemiology of skin cancer. Br. J. Dermatol. 146(Suppl 61), 1–6 (2002)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. A.C. Geller, S.M. Swetter, K. Brooks, M.F. Demierre, A.L. Yaroch, Screening, early detection, and trends for melanoma: current status (2000–2006) and future directions. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 57(4), 555–572 (2007). quiz 573–556

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. A.J. Miller, M.C. Mihm Jr., Melanoma. New Engl. J. Med. 355(1), 51–65 (2006)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. H. Tsao, A.J. Sober, Melanoma treatment update. Dermatol. Clin. 23(2), 323–333 (2005)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. M.B. Lens, T.G. Eisen, Systemic chemotherapy in the treatment of malignant melanoma. Expert. Opin. Pharmacother. 4(12), 2205–2211 (2003)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. C.M. Balch, S.J. Soong, J.E. Gershenwald, J.F. Thompson, D.S. Reintgen, N. Cascinelli et al., Prognostic factors analysis of 17,600 melanoma patients: validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer melanoma staging system. J. Clin. Oncol. 19(16), 3622–3634 (2001)

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. A.N. Houghton, D. Polsky, Focus on melanoma. Canc. Cell. 2(4), 275–278 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. R.M. Turner, K.J. Bell, R.L. Morton, A. Hayen, A.B. Francken, K. Howard et al., Optimizing the frequency of follow-up visits for patients treated for localized primary cutaneous melanoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 29(35), 4641–4646 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. K.Y. Bilimoria, M.V. Raval, D.J. Bentrem, J.D. Wayne, C.M. Balch, C.Y. Ko, National assessment of melanoma care using formally developed quality indicators. J. Clin. Oncol. 27(32), 5445–5451 (2009)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. A.C. Geller, S.M. Swetter, S. Oliveria, S. Dusza, A.C. Halpern, Reducing mortality in individuals at high risk for advanced melanoma through education and screening. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 65(5), S87–94 (2011)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. C.M. Balch, J.E. Gershenwald, S.J. Soong, J.F. Thompson, M.B. Atkins, D.R. Byrd et al., Final version of 2009 AJCC melanoma staging and classification. J. Clin. Oncol. 27(36), 6199–6206 (2009)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. J.F. Thompson, S.J. Soong, C.M. Balch, J.E. Gershenwald, S. Ding, D.G. Coit et al., Prognostic significance of mitotic rate in localized primary cutaneous melanoma: an analysis of patients in the multi-institutional American Joint Committee on Cancer melanoma staging database. J. Clin. Oncol. 29(16), 2199–2205 (2011)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Bjorklund, E. Koivunen, Gelatinase-mediated migration and invasion of cancer cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1755(1), 37–69 (2005)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. E.I. Deryugina, J.P. Quigley, Matrix metalloproteinases and tumor metastasis. Canc. Metastasis Rev. 25(1), 9–34 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. C.E. Brinckerhoff, J.L. Rutter, U. Benbow, Interstitial collagenases as markers of tumor progression. Clin. Canc. Res. 6(12), 4823–4830 (2000)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. U.B. Hofmann, J.R. Westphal, G.N. Van Muijen, D.J. Ruiter, Matrix metalloproteinases in human melanoma. J. Invest. Dermatol. 115(3), 337–344 (2000)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. U.B. Hofmann, J.R. Westphal, A.J. Zendman, J.C. Becker, D.J. Ruiter, G.N. van Muijen, Expression and activation of matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) and its co-localization with membrane-type 1 matrix metalloproteinase (MT1-MMP) correlate with melanoma progression. J. Pathol. 191(3), 245–256 (2000)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. T. Turpeenniemi-Hujanen, Gelatinases (MMP-2 and −9) and their natural inhibitors as prognostic indicators in solid cancers. Biochimie. 87(3–4), 287–297 (2005)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. A.H. Vaisanen, M. Kallioinen, T. Turpeenniemi-Hujanen, Comparison of the prognostic value of matrix metalloproteinases 2 and 9 in cutaneous melanoma. Hum. Pathol. 39(3), 377–385 (2008)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. S. Shukla, G.T. Maclennan, D.J. Hartman, P. Fu, M.I. Resnick, S. Gupta, Activation of PI3K-Akt signaling pathway promotes prostate cancer cell invasion. Int. J. Canc. 121(7), 1424–1432 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. V. Vasko, M. Saji, E. Hardy, M. Kruhlak, A. Larin, V. Savchenko et al., Akt activation and localisation correlate with tumour invasion and oncogene expression in thyroid cancer. J. Med. Genet. 41(3), 161–170 (2004)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. D.L. Dai, M. Martinka, G. Li, Prognostic significance of activated Akt expression in melanoma: a clinicopathologic study of 292 cases. J. Clin. Oncol. 23(7), 1473–1482 (2005)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. K.M. Sze, K.L. Wong, G.K. Chu, J.M. Lee, T.O. Yau, I. Oi-Lin Ng, Loss of phosphatase and tensin homolog enhances cell invasion and migration through AKT/Sp-1 transcription factor/matrix metalloproteinase 2 activation in hepatocellular carcinoma and has clinicopathologic significance. Hepatology 53(5), 1558–1569 (2011)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. H. Lin, R.P. Wong, M. Martinka, G. Li, Loss of SNF5 expression correlates with poor patient survival in melanoma. Clin. Canc. Res. 15(20), 6404–6411 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. W. Remmele, H.E. Stegner, Recommendation for uniform definition of an immunoreactive score (IRS) for immunohistochemical estrogen receptor detection (ER-ICA) in breast cancer tissue. Pathologe. 8(3), 138–140 (1987)

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. A. Vaisanen, P. Kuvaja, M. Kallioinen, T. Turpeenniemi-Hujanen, A prognostic index in skin melanoma through the combination of matrix metalloproteinase-2, Ki67, and p53. Hum. Pathol. 42(8), 1103–1111 (2011)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. F. Su, W.D. Bradley, Q. Wang, H. Yang, L. Xu, B. Higgins et al., Resistance to selective BRAF inhibition can be mediated by modest upstream pathway activation. Cancer Res. 72(4), 969–978 (2012)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. J.A. Sparano, P. Bernardo, P. Stephenson, W.J. Gradishar, J.N. Ingle, S. Zucker et al., Randomized phase III trial of marimastat versus placebo in patients with metastatic breast cancer who have responding or stable disease after first-line chemotherapy: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trial E2196. J. Clin. Oncol. 22(23), 4683–4690 (2004)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. R.L. Camp, V. Neumeister, D.L. Rimm, A decade of tissue microarrays: progress in the discovery and validation of cancer biomarkers. J. Clin. Oncol. 26(34), 5630–5637 (2008)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project is funded by grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP-93810, MOP-110974 and CCI-117958) and Canadian Dermatology Foundation to G.L.

Conflict of interest

The authors state no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gang Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rotte, A., Martinka, M. & Li, G. MMP2 expression is a prognostic marker for primary melanoma patients. Cell Oncol. 35, 207–216 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13402-012-0080-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13402-012-0080-x

Keywords

Navigation