Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Preparation and characterization of hydrothermally processed carbonaceous hydrochar from pulp and paper sludge waste

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The results of this study demonstrated the successful conversion of paper sludge waste (PS) to carbonaceous hydrochar by applying hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) under controlled conditions. The experimental conditions were designed by Box–Behnken design (BBD) within a temperature range of 200–220 °C, time of 2–6 h, and liquid–solid ratios (L/S) of 12–20. The response values, including final yield (Y), energy densification (ED), and energy recovery (ER), were considered for evaluating the combustion characteristics of the hydrochar. The obtained results illustrated that the hydrochar produced at higher temperatures and for a longer time showed excellent fuel characteristics with steadily increased C content and high heating value (HHV). A suitable condition for hydrochar production was 220 °C, 6 h, and an L/S ratio of 16. This suggested condition provided the hydrochar with an HHV of 25 MJ kg−1 and atomic H/C and O/C ratios of 1.31 and 0.35, respectively. At the same time, this HTC condition can also provide numerous porous structures in the morphology of hydrochar, as well as high fixed carbon content and energy densification (ED). Regarding the kinetic study, the first-order combustion reactions of PS and hydrochar were fitted. The results presented that the activation energy of hydrochar was higher than that of PS, indicating the higher stability of solid fuel, meaning that PS can be transformed into a high-quality solid fuel that can replace lignite coal. Accordingly, this research could hopefully result in sustainable and broader applications in the fields of energy, agriculture, and waste treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

References

  1. Fukase E, Martin W (2020) Economic growth, convergence, and world food demand and supply. World Dev 132:104954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.104954

  2. Valone TF (2021) Linear global temperature correlation to carbon dioxide level, sea level, and innovative solutions to a projected 6 °C warming by 2100. J Environ Prot Sci 9:84–135. https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2021.93007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kan R, Kaosol T, Tekasakul P (2016) Characterization and elemental composition of lignite and rubber wood sawdust pellets. Eng Appl Sci Res 43:259–262. https://ph01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/easr/article/view/70205

  4. Srisawasdi W, Tsusaka TW, Winijkul E, Sasaki N (2021) Valuation of local demand for improved air quality: the case of the Mae Moh Coal mine site in Thailand. Atmosphere 12:1132. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12091132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu Y, Zhu Z, Zhang R, Zhao X (2022) Life cycle assessment and life cycle cost analysis of Jatropha biodiesel production in China. Biomass Conv Bioref. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-03614-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Abbass K, Qasim MZ, Song H et al (2022) A review of the global climate change impacts, adaptation, and sustainable mitigation measures. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:42539–42559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19718-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yana S, Nizar M, Irhamni, Mulyati D (2022) Biomass waste as a renewable energy in developing bio-based economies in Indonesia: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 160:112268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112268

  8. Shah AV, Srivastava VK, Mohanty SS, Varjani S (2021) Municipal solid waste as a sustainable resource for energy production: state-of-the-art review. J Environ Chem Eng 9:105717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.105717

  9. Gałko G, Mazur I, Rejdak M, et al (2023) Evaluation of alternative refuse-derived fuel use as a valuable resource in various valorised applications. Energy 263:125920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.125920

  10. Chen YC, Lin HC, Chen LY (2022) Solid fuel recovered from food waste dechlorination: proof of concept and cost analysis. J Clean Prod 360:132240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132240

  11. Kharissova OV, Kharisov BI, Oliva González CM, et al (2019) Greener synthesis of chemical compounds and materials. R Soc Open Sci 6:191378. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191378

  12. Suwannaruang T, Pratyanuwat A, Sinthujariwat P et al (2022) Dynamically driven perovskite La-Fe-modified SrTiO3 nanocubes and their improved photoresponsive activity under visible light: influence of alkaline environment. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23977-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Munir MT, Mansouri SS, Udugama IA et al (2018) Resource recovery from organic solid waste using hydrothermal processing: opportunities and challenges. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 96:64–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.07.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Frías M, Rodríguez O, Sánchez de Rojas MI (2015) Paper sludge, an environmentally sound alternative source of MK-based cementitious materials: a review. Constr Build Mater 74:37–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.10.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Masoumi S, Borugadda VB, Nanda S, Dalai AK (2021) Hydrochar: a review on its production technologies and applications. Catalysts 11:939. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11080939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Xiao LP, Shi ZJ, Xu F, Sun RC (2012) Hydrothermal carbonization of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 118:619–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.05.060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kanchanatip E, Prasertsung N, Thasnas N et al (2022) Valorization of cannabis waste via hydrothermal carbonization: solid fuel production and characterization. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24123-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hoekman SK, Broch A, Robbins C (2011) Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) of lignocellulosic biomass. Energ Fuel 25:1802–1810. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef101745n

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wu Q, Yu S, Hao N et al (2017) Characterization of products from hydrothermal carbonization of pine. Bioresour Technol 244:78–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Reza MT, Wirth B, Lüder U, Werner M (2014) Behavior of selected hydrolyzed and dehydrated products during hydrothermal carbonization of biomass. Bioresour Technol 169:352–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.07.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Saha N, Saba A, Saha P et al (2019) Hydrothermal carbonization of various paper mill sludges: an observation of solid fuel properties. Energies 12:858. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12050858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Monte MC, Fuente E, Blanco A, Negro C (2009) Waste management from pulp and paper production in the European Union. Waste Manag Res 29:293–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2008.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zule J, Černec F, Likon M (2007) Chemical properties and biodegradability of waste paper mill sludges to be used for landfill covering. Waste Manag Res 25:538–546. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X07079188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Singla A, Iwasa H, Inubushi K (2014) Effect of biogas digested slurry based-biochar and digested liquid on N2O, CO2 flux and crop yield for three continuous cropping cycles of komatsuna (Brassica rapa var. perviridis). Biol Fertil Soils 50:1201–1209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-014-0950-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lin Y, Ma X, Peng X et al (2015) Effect of hydrothermal carbonization temperature on combustion behavior of hydrochar fuel from paper sludge. Appl Therm Eng 91:574–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.08.064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Heidari M, Dutta A, Acharya B, Mahmud S (2019) A review of the current knowledge and challenges of hydrothermal carbonization for biomass conversion. J Energy Inst 92:1779–1799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2018.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sermyagina E, Saari J, Kaikko J, Vakkilainen E (2015) Hydrothermal carbonization of coniferous biomass: effect of process parameters on mass and energy yields. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 113:551–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2015.03.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lu L, Namioka T, Yoshikawa K (2011) Effects of hydrothermal treatment on characteristics and combustion behaviors of municipal solid wastes. Appl Energy 88:3659–3664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.04.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang C, Wang F, Yang Q, Liang R (2009) Thermogravimetric studies of the behavior of wheat straw with added coal during combustion. Biomass Bioenergy 33:50–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2008.04.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Henrich E, Bürkle S, Meza-Renken ZI, Rumpel S (1999) Combustion and gasification kinetics of pyrolysis chars from waste and biomass. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 49:221–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-2370(98)00119-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ma Q, Han L, Huang G (2018) Effect of water-washing of wheat straw and hydrothermal temperature on its hydrochar evolution and combustion properties. Bioresour Technol 269:96–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.08.082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang J, Lin Q, Zhao X (2014) The hydrochar characters of municipal sewage sludge under different hydrothermal temperatures and durations. J Integr Agric 13:471–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60702-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Peng C, Zhai Y, Zhu Y et al (2016) Production of char from sewage sludge employing hydrothermal carbonization: char properties, combustion behavior and thermal characteristics. Fuel 176:110–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.02.068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Oktaviananda C, Rahmawati RF, Prasetya A, et al (2017) Effect of temperature and biomass-water ratio to yield and product characteristics of hydrothermal treatment of biomass. AIP Conf Proc 1823:020029. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4978102

  35. Wang T, Zhai Y, Zhu Y et al (2018) A review of the hydrothermal carbonization of biomass waste for hydrochar formation: process conditions, fundamentals, and physicochemical properties. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 90:223–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Vaux DL, Fidler F, Cumming G (2012) Replicates and repeats—what is the difference and is it significant? EMBO Rep 13:291–296. https://doi.org/10.1038/embor.2012.36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Mendoza Martinez CL, Alves Rocha EP, Oliveira Carneiro AC et al (2019) Characterization of residual biomasses from the coffee production chain and assessment the potential for energy purposes. Biomass Bioenergy 120:68–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wu S, Zhang S, Wang C et al (2018) High-strength charcoal briquette preparation from hydrothermal pretreated biomass wastes. Fuel Process Technol 171:293–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2017.11.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Liu Z, Quek A, Kent Hoekman S, Balasubramanian R (2013) Production of solid biochar fuel from waste biomass by hydrothermal carbonization. Fuel 103:943–949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.07.069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Chen C, Liang W, Fan F, Wang C (2021) The effect of temperature on the properties of hydrochars obtained by hydrothermal carbonization of waste Camellia oleifera shells. ACS Omega 6:16546–16552. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c01787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Suwannaruang T, Rivera KKP, Neramittagapong A, Wantala K (2015) Effects of hydrothermal temperature and time on uncalcined TiO2 synthesis for reactive red 120 photocatalytic degradation. Surf Coat Technol 271:192–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.12.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Suwannaruang T, Wantala K (2016) Single-step uncalcined N-TiO2 synthesis, characterizations and its applications on alachlor photocatalytic degradations. Appl Surf Sci 380:257–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.01.117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Ependi DR, Saleh AR, Sudarmanta B (2019) The experimental study of the effect of air preheating in MSW pellet multi-stage downdraft gasifier. IPTEK J Technol Sci 30:36–40. https://doi.org/10.12962/j20882033.v30i2.5005

  44. Axelsson L, Franzén M, Ostwald M et al (2012) Jatropha cultivation in southern India: assessing farmers’ experiences. Biofuel Bioprod Biorefin 6:246–256. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Petrović J, Simić M, Mihajlović M, et al (2021) Upgrading fuel potentials of waste biomass via hydrothermal carbonization. Hemijska Industrija 75:381–381. https://www.ache-pub.org.rs/index.php/HemInd/article/view/796. Accessed 23 Dec 2022

  46. He C, Chen CL, Giannis A et al (2014) Hydrothermal gasification of sewage sludge and model compounds for renewable hydrogen production: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 39:1127–1142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Chen WT, Qian W, Zhang Y et al (2017) Effect of ash on hydrothermal liquefaction of high-ash content algal biomass. Algal Res 25:297–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2017.05.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Fan F, Zheng Y, Huang Y et al (2017) Preparation and characterization of biochars from waste Camellia oleifera shells by different thermochemical processes. Energ Fuel 31:8146–8151. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b00269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Gao P, Zhou Y, Meng F et al (2016) Preparation and characterization of hydrochar from waste eucalyptus bark by hydrothermal carbonization. Energy 97:238–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.12.123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Cantrell KB, Hunt PG, Uchimiya M et al (2012) Impact of pyrolysis temperature and manure source on physicochemical characteristics of biochar. Bioresour Technol 107:419–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.11.084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Xiao K, Liu H, Li Y et al (2018) Correlations between hydrochar properties and chemical constitution of orange peel waste during hydrothermal carbonization. Bioresour Technol 265:432–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.06.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Duwiejuah AB, Cobbina SJ, Bakobie N (2017) Review of eco-friendly biochar used in the removal of trace metals on aqueous phases. Int J Environ Bioremediat Biodegrad 5:27–40. https://doi.org/10.12691/ijebb-5-2-1

  53. Zhang X, Li Y, Wang M et al (2020) Effects of hydrothermal carbonization conditions on the combustion and kinetics of wheat straw hydrochar pellets and efficiency improvement analyses. Energ Fuel 34:587–598. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b03754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Liu Z, Quek A, Balasubramanian R (2014) Preparation and characterization of fuel pellets from woody biomass, agro-residues and their corresponding hydrochars. Appl Energy 113:1315–1322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.08.087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Zhu Y, Si Y, Wang X et al (2018) Characterization of hydrochar pellets from hydrothermal carbonization of agricultural residues. Energ Fuels 32:11538–11546. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b02484

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Environmental Hazardous Substance Management (EHSM) and Faculty of Engineering, Khon Kaen University, Thailand, for a partial scholarship. This research project is also supported by the Research and Graduate Studies, Khon Kaen University. Furthermore, the support was partially provided by the French Ministry of Europe and Foreign Affairs (MEAE), the French Ministry of Higher Education, Research and Innovation (MESRI), and the MHESI. Finally, the authors would like to thank Phoenix Pulp & Paper PCL., Khon Kaen, and Wallop Promprakone for the raw paper sludge used in this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Piyanut Phuthongkhao: conceptualization, methodology, data curation, software, formal analysis, writing — original draft, and visualization. Kitanchalee Phasin: conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, and data curation. Purita Boonma: conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, and data curation. Rattabal Khunphonoi: data curation, writing — review and editing, and validation. Ekkachai Kanchanatip: writing — review and editing, and validation. Totsaporn Suwannaruang: writing — original draft, writing — review and editing, and validation. Harikaranahalli Puttaiah Shivaraju: writing — review and editing and validation. Kitirote Wantala: conceptualization, methodology, data curation, software, formal analysis, writing — original draft, visualization, supervision, writing — review and editing, and validation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kitirote Wantala.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent to publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Phuthongkhao, P., Phasin, K., Boonma, P. et al. Preparation and characterization of hydrothermally processed carbonaceous hydrochar from pulp and paper sludge waste. Biomass Conv. Bioref. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-023-03761-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-023-03761-5

Keywords

Navigation