Skip to main content
Log in

Performance and cost analysis of dye wastewater treatment by Fenton, electro-Fenton, and biosorption: Box-Behnken experimental design and response surface methodology

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, efficiency and cost of the Fenton, electro-Fenton, and biosorption processes for treatment of ariazol brown GR and indigo carmine dye mixture were compared. The Box-Behnken experimental design and response surface methodology (RSM) were used to optimize the process variables such as pH, [Fe2+], [H2O2], voltage, biosorbent dose, and time. Finally, the costs of 1 m3 wastewater treatment were calculated in optimal conditions. The operating costs for classical Fenton, electro-Fenton, and biosorption processes were 0.92, 0.48, and 0.13 US$ per 1 m3 wastewater, respectively. The efficiency of the Fenton and electro-Fenton processes for dye removal was similar, but the cost of the electro-Fenton method was half of the Fenton. Furthermore, the electro-Fenton was nine times faster than the Fenton. Efficiency of electro-Fenton was better than the biosorption process even if it is repeated four times with fresh biosorbent (total cost is the same as electro-Fenton). As a general conclusion, the electro-Fenton process is an appropriate choice based on speed and cost in wastewater treatment with respect to Fenton and biosorption processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Forgacs E, Cserhati T, Oros G (2004) Removal of synthetic dyes from wastewaters: a review. Environ Int 30:953–971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Elgarahy AM, Elwakeel KZ, Mohammad SH, Elshoubaky GA (2021) A critical review of biosorption of dyes, heavy metals and metalloids from wastewater as an efficient and green process. Cleaner Eng Technol 4:100209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tabaraki R, Heidarizadi E (2018) Simultaneous biosorption of arsenic (III) and arsenic (V): application of multiple response optimizations. Ecotox Environ Safe 166:35–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tabaraki R, Nateghi A (2014) Multimetal biosorption modeling of Zn2+, Cu2+and Ni2+ by Sargassum ilicifolium. Ecol Eng 71:197–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tabaraki R, Sadeghinejad N (2018) Comparison of magnetic Fe3O4/chitosan and arginine-modified magnetic Fe3O4/chitosan nanoparticles in simultaneous multidye removal: Experimental design and multicomponent analysis. Int J Biol Macromol 120:2313–2323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tan KB, Vakili M, Amini Horri B, Poh PE, Abdullah AZ, Salamatinia B (2015) Adsorption of dyes by nanomaterials: recent developments and adsorption mechanisms. Sep Purif Technol 150:229–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bhatia D, Sharma NR, Singh J, Kanwar RS (2017) Biological methods for textile dye removal from wastewater: A review. Crit Rev Env Sci Tec 47:1836–1876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ribeiro JP, Nunes MI (2021) Recent trends and developments in Fenton processes for industrial wastewater treatment – a critical review. Env Res 197:110957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jain B, Singh AK, Kim H, Lichtfouse E, Sharma VK (2018) Treatment of organic pollutants by homogeneous and heterogeneous Fenton reaction processes. Env chem lett 16:947–967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kuo WG (1992) Decolorizing dye wastewater with Fenton’s reagent. Water Res 26:881–886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Casado J (2019) Towards industrial implementation of electro-Fenton and derived technologies for wastewater treatment: a review. J Env Chem Eng 7:102823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Brillas E, Martinez-Huitle CA (2015) Decontamination of wastewaters containing synthetic organic dyes by electrochemical methods. An updated review. Appl Catal B Environ 166–167:603–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Malakootian M, Moridi A (2017) Efficiency of electro-Fenton process in removing acid red 18 dye from aqueous solutions. Process Saf Environ 111:138–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fomina M, Gadd GM (2014) Biosorption: current perspectives on concept, definition and application. Bioresource Technol 160:3–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yaseen DA, Scholz M (2019) Textile dye wastewater characteristics and constituents of synthetic effluents: a critical review. Int J Environ Sci Te 16:1193–1226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Baird RB, Eaton AD, Rice EW (eds) (2017) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 23rd edn. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation Washington, DC

  17. Zhou M, Yu Q, Lei L, Barton G (2007) electro-Fenton method for the removal of methyl red in an efficient electrochemical system. Sep Purif Technol 57:380–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nawaz S, Siddique M, Khan R, Riaz N, Waheed U, Shahzadi I, Ali A (2022) Ultrasound-assisted hydrogen peroxide and iron sulfate mediated Fenton process as an efficient advanced oxidation process for the removal of congo red dye. Pol J Environ Stud 31:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gonçalves AC, Braccini AL, Schwantes D, Campagnolo MA, Da Paz SA, Manfrin J, Conradi E, Zimmermann J (2020) Adsorbents developed from residual biomass of canola grains for the removal of lead from water. Desalin Water Treat 197:261–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tabaraki R, Heidarizadi E (2017) Simultaneous multidye biosorption by chemically modified Sargassum glaucescens: Doehlert optimization and kinetic, equilibrium, and thermodynamic study in ternary system. Sep Sci Technol 52:583–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rodrigues CS, Madeira LM, Boaventura RA (2014) Synthetic textile dyeing wastewater treatment by integration of advanced oxidation and biological processes–pserformance analysis with costs reduction. J Environ Chem Eng 2:1027–1039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jaafarzadeh N, Takdastan A, Jorfi S, Ghanbari F, Ahmadi M, Barzegar G (2018) The performance study on ultrasonic/Fe3O4/H2O2 for degradation of azo dye and real textile wastewater treatment. J Mol Liq 256:462–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Reza Tabaraki: supervision, project administration, resources, writing – review and editing. Saeed Zadkhast carried out the experiment and wrote the original draft. Amene Najafi carried out the experiment and wrote the original draft. Vahideh Rezaei Moghaddam: carried out the experiment.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reza Tabaraki.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 15 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tabaraki, R., Zadkhast, S., Najafi, A. et al. Performance and cost analysis of dye wastewater treatment by Fenton, electro-Fenton, and biosorption: Box-Behnken experimental design and response surface methodology. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 13, 13527–13537 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-02809-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-02809-2

Keywords

Navigation