Skip to main content
Log in

Two-phase nutrient recovery from livestock wastewaters combining novel membrane technologies

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The application of new technologies in the agro-industrial sector is needed to close the loop of the nutrient cycle in the food chain. The aim of this work is to study the feasibility of the combination of two nutrient recovery technologies. In a first step, the novel gas-permeable membrane technology recovers N from the wastewater as an ammonium sulfate solution (a bio-based fertilizer). Secondly, the electrodialytic process recovers P, as an electrolyte solution, from which P can then be precipitated as struvite (a slow-release fertilizer). The process was tested in two different livestock wastewaters: swine manure (SM) and anaerobically digested SM (digestate). Recovery efficiencies for N were 53% for SM and 94% for digestate; for P, the efficiencies were 100% and 74% for SM and digestate, respectively. The results showed a great potential of combining these novel membrane technologies in livestock wastewaters, promoting the sustainability of the sector in the realm of the bioeconomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. European Commission (2020) Farm to Fork strategy. For a fair, healthy and environmentally-friendly food system. Available https://ec.europa.eu/food/system/files/2020-05/f2f_action-plan_2020_strategy-info_en.pdf. Accessed 1/5/2020

  2. Buckwell A, Nadeu E (2016) Nutrient recovery and reuse (NRR) in European agriculture. A review of the issues, opportunities, and actions. RISE Foundation, Brussels

  3. Campos J, Crutchik D, Franchi Ó, Pavissich J, Belmonte M, Pedrouso A, Mosquera-Corral A, Val del Río Á (2019) Nitrogen and phosphorus recovery from anaerobically pre-treated agro-food wastes: a review. Front Sustain Food Syst 2:91: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2018.00091

  4. Romero-Güiza M, Mata-Alvarez J, Chimenos-Rivera JM, Astals-Garcia S (2016) Nutrient recovery technologies for anaerobic digestion systems: an overview. Journal ION 29:1. https://doi.org/10.18273/revion.v29n1-2016001

  5. Pandey B, Chen L (2021) Technologies to recover nitrogen from livestock manure - a review. Sci Total Environ 784:147098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147098

  6. Vanotti MB, Szogi AA (2011) Use of gas-permeable membranes for the removal and recovery of ammonia from high strength livestock wastewater. In: Proc Water Environ Fed Recover Manag Conf 1:659–667. https://doi.org/10.2175/193864711802867405

  7. Vanotti MB, Szogi AA (2015) Systems and methods for reducing ammonia emissions from liquid effluents and for recovering the ammonia. U.S. Patent No. 9,005,333 B1. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office

  8. García-González MC, Vanotti MB, (2015) Recovery of ammonia from swine manure using gas-permeable membranes: effect of waste strength and pH. Waste Manage 38: 455–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.01.021

  9. García-González MC, Vanotti MB, Szogi AA (2015) Recovery of ammonia from swine manure using gas-permeable membranes: effect of aeration. J Environ Manage 152:19–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.01.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Vanotti MB, Dube PJ, Szogi AA, García-González MC (2017) Recovery of ammonia and phosphate minerals from swine wastewater using gas-permeable membranes. Water Res 112:137–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.01.045

  11. Riaño B, Molinuevo-Salces B, Vanotti M, García-González M (2019) Application of gas-permeable membranes for semi-continuous ammonia recovery from swine manure. Environments 6(3):32–45. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments6030032

  12. Riaño B, Molinuevo-Salces B, Vanotti MB, García-González MC (2021) Ammonia recovery from digestate using gas-permeable membranes: a pilot-scale study. Environ 8:133. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments8120133

  13. Oliveira V, Horta C, Dias-Ferreira C (2019) Evaluation of a phosphorus fertiliser produced from anaerobically digested organic fraction of municipal solid waste. J Clean Prod 238:117911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117911

  14. Perera MK, Englehardt JD, Dvorak AC (2019) Technologies for recovering nutrients from wastewater: a critical review. Environ Eng Sci 36:5. https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2018.0436

  15. Robles Á, Aguado D, Barat R, Borrás L, Bouzas A, Giménez JB, Martí N, Ribes J, Ruano RV, Serralta J, Ferrer J, Seco A (2020) New frontiers from removal to recycling of nitrogen and phosphorus from wastewater in the circular economy. Bioresour Technol 300:122673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122673

  16. Oliveira V, Kirkelund GM, Horta C, Labrincha J, Dias-Ferreira C (2019). Improving the energy efficiency of an electrodialytic process to extract phosphorus from municipal solid waste digestate through different strategies. Appl Energy 247:182–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.03.175

  17. Oliveira V, Dias‐Ferreira C, Labrincha J, Rocha JL, Kirkelund GM (2020) Testing new strategies to improve the recovery of phosphorus from anaerobically digested organic fraction of municipal solid waste. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 95(2):439–449. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.6037

  18. Oliveira V, Dias-Ferreira C, González-García I, Labrincha J, Horta C, García-González MC (2021) A novel approach for nutrients recovery from municipal waste as biofertilizers by combining electrodialytic and gas permeable membrane technologies. Waste Manage 15:293–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2021.02.055

  19. Guedes P, Mateus EP, Almeida J, Ferreira AR, Couto N, Ribeiro AB (2016) Electrodialytic treatment of sewage sludge: current intensity influence on phosphorus recovery and organic contaminants removal. Chem Eng J 306:1058–1066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.08.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cai Y, Han Z, Lin X, Duan Y, Du J, Ye Z, Zhu J (2020) Study on removal of phosphorus as struvite from synthetic wastewater using a pilot-scale electrodialysis system with magnesium anode. Sci Total Environ 726:138221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138221

  21. Shi L, Hu Y, Xie S, Wu G, Hu Z, Zhan X (2018) Recovery of nutrients and volatile fatty acids from pig manure hydrolysate using two-stage bipolar membrane electrodialysis. Chem Eng J 334:134–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.10.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ye ZL, Ghyselbrecht K, Monballiu A, Pinoy L, Meesschaert B (2019) Fractionating various nutrient ions for resource recovery from swine wastewater using simultaneous anionic and cationic selective-electrodialysis. Water Res 160:424–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.05.085

  23. Jensen PE, Ferreira C, Hansen HK, Rype J-U, Ottosen LM, Villumsen A (2010) Electroremediation of air pollution control residues in a continuous reactor. J Appl Electrochem 40:1173–1181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-010-0090-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rosemarin A, Macura B, Carolus J, Barquet K, Ek F, Järnberg L, Lorick D, Johannesdottir S, Pedersen SM, Koskiaho J, Haddaway NR, Okruszko T (2020) Circular nutrient solutions for agriculture and wastewater – a review of technologies and practices. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 45:78–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2020.09.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Samani Majd AM, Mukhtar S (2013) Ammonia recovery enhancement using a tubular gar-permeable membrane system in laboratory and field-scale studies. Trans ASABE 56:1951–1958

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hansen K, Angelidaki I, Ahring BK (1998) Anaerobic digestion of swine manure: inhibition by ammonia. Water Res 32(1): 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(97)00201-7Get

  27. Oliveira V, Labrincha J, Dias-Ferreira C (2018) Extraction of phosphorus and struvite production from the anaerobically digested organic fraction of municipal solid waste. J Environ Chem Eng 6:2837–2845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2018.04.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. APHA (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21st edn. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  29. Danish Committee (2003) DS 259:2003. Determination of metals in water, sludge and sediments - general guidelines for determination by atomic absorption spectrophotometry in flame

  30. Dube PJ, Vanotti MB, Szogi AA, García-González MC (2016) Enhancing recovery of ammonia from swine manure anaerobic digester effluent using gas-permeable membrane technology. Waste Manage 49:372–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.12.011

  31. Daguerre-Martini S, Vanotti MB, Rodriguez-Pastor M, Rosal A, Moral R (2018) Nitrogen recovery from wastewater using gas-permeable membranes: impact of inorganic carbon content and natural organic matter. Water Res 137:201–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.03.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Oliveira-Filho J, Daguerre-Martini S, Vanotti MB, Saez-Tovar J, Rosal A, Perez-Murcia M, Bustamante MA, Moral R (2018) Recovery of ammonia in raw and co-digested swine manure using gas-permeable membrane technology. Front Sustain Food Syst 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2018.00030

  33. Ottosen LM, Jensen PE, Kirkelund GM (2016) Phosphorous recovery from sewage sludge ash suspended in water in a two-compartment electrodialytic cell. Waste Manage 51:142–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.02.015

  34. Liao PH, Chen A, Lo KV (1995) Removal of nitrogen from swine manure wastewaters by ammonia stripping. Bioresour Tech 54(1):17–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-8524(95)00105-0

  35. Baldi M, Collivignarelli M, Abbà A, Benigna I (2018) The valorization of ammonia in manure digestate by means of alternative stripping reactors. Sustain 10(9):3073. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093073

  36. Milan Z, Sánchez E, Weiland P, Pozas C de L, Borja R, Mayari R, Rovirosa N (1997) Ammonia removal from anaerobically treated piggery manure by ion exchange in columns packed with homoionic zeolite. Chem Eng J 66(1):65–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1385-8947(96)03180-4

  37. Lubensky J, Ellersdorfer M (2020) Pilot scale experiments for ammonium recovery from sludge liquor at a municipal waste water treatment plant. Undefined. J Sustain Dev Energy Water Environ Syst. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2014.07.010

  38. Astals S, Martínez-Martorell M, Huete-Hernández S, Aguilar-Pozo VB, Dosta J, Chimenos JM (2021) Nitrogen recovery from pig slurry by struvite precipitation using a low-cost magnesium oxide. Sci Total Environ 768:144284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144284

  39. Molinuevo-Salces B, Riaño B, Vanotti MB, Hernández-González D, García-González MC (2020) Pilot-scale demonstration of membrane-based nitrogen recovery from swine manure. Membranes 10:270. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes10100270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zarebska A, Romero-Nieto D, Christensen KV, Fjerbæk-Søtoft L, Norddahl B (2015) Ammonium fertilizers production from manure: a critical review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 45:1469–1521. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2014.955630

  41. Dewaele C (2015) NuReSys P & N recovery as struvite. 2nd European Sustainable Phosphorus Conference (ESPC2). Available https://phosphorusplatform.eu/activities/conference/espc2015/47-espc2-highlights/596-presentations-at-the-espc2. Accessed 10/21

  42. Saerens B, Geerts S, Weemaes M (2019) 5th European Conference on Sludge Management (ECSM). Aquafin. Available https://www.nweurope.eu/media/8137/bsaerens.pdf. Accessed 10/21

  43. Bottini A, Rizzo L (2012) Phosphorus recovery from urban wastewater treatment plant sludge liquor by ion exchange. Sep Sci Technol 47(4):613–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/01496395.2011.627904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Liberti L, Petruzzelli D, De Florio L (2001) REM NUT ion exchange plus struvite precipitation process. Environ Technol 22(11):1313–1324. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330409355443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhang Y, Desmidt E, Van Looveren A, Pinoy L, Meesschaert B, Van der Bruggen B (2013) Phosphate separation and recovery from wastewater by novel electrodialysis. Environ Sci Technol 47(11):5888–5895. https://doi.org/10.1021/es4004476

  46. Munasinghe-Arachchige S, Nirmalakhandant N (2020) Nitrogen-fertilizer recovery from the centrate of anaerobically digested sludge. Environ Sci Technol Lett 7(7):450–459. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00355

  47. Monfet E, Aubry G, Ramirez AA (2018) Nutrient removal and recovery from digestate: a review of the technology. Biofuels 9:247−262. https://doi.org/10.1080/17597269.2017.1336348

  48. Beckinghausen A, Odlare M, Thorin E, Schwede S (2020) From removal to recovery: an evaluation of nitrogen recovery techniques from wastewater. Appl Energy 263:114616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114616

  49. Dockhorn T (2009) About the economy of phosphorus recovery. International conference on nutrient recovery from wastewater streams. IWA Publishing, Nutrient recovery from wastewater streams, pp 145–158

    Google Scholar 

  50. Li X, Shen S, Xu Y, Guo T, Dai H, Lu X (2021) Application of membrane separation processes in phosphorus recovery: a review. Sci Total Environ 767:144346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144346

  51. Quinn P (2021) Retail fertilizer prices DTN. Available at https://www.dtnpf.com/agriculture/web/ag/crops/article/2021/09/15/retail-fertilizer-price-climb-slowly. Accessed 10/21

  52. McConville J, Drangert J-O, Tidåker P, Neset T-S, Rauch S, Strid I, Tonderski K (2015) Closing the food loops: guidelines and criteria for improving nutrient management. Sustain: Sci Pract Policy 11:33. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2015.11908144

Download references

Funding

This work has been funded by the National Institute of Research and Agro-Food Technology (INIA) and co-financed with FEDER funds (Projects RTA2015-00060-C04-01 and PID2019-106148RR-C41), and for the EU Program INTERREG V-A Spain – Portugal (POCTEP) 2014–2020 (Project 0745_SYMBIOSIS_II_3_E). Isabel González-García was supported by a grant from the Spanish National Research Agency (Agencia Estatal de Investigación, AEI) training program of research staff under the grant number BES-2017- 082327. Verónica Oliveira has been funded through FCT “Fundação para a Ciência e para a Tecnologia” by POCH – Programa Operacional Capital Humano within ESF – European Social Fund and by Portuguese national funds from MCTES (SFRH/BD/115312/2016). CERNAS is funded by the FCT – Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (UIDB/00681/2020UID). Beatriz Molinuevo-Salces had the financial support of the grant RYC-2020-029030-I/ AEI / 10.13039/501100011033.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Isabel González-García: investigation, resources, formal analysis, writing—original draft. Verónica Oliveira: investigation, resources, formal analysis, conceptualization, writing—review and editing, validation, supervision. Beatriz Molinuevo-Salces: conceptualization, writing—review and editing, validation, supervision. Berta Riaño: conceptualization, writing—review and editing, validation, supervision. María Cruz García-González: conceptualization, supervision, funding acquisition, project administration. Celia Dias-Ferreira: conceptualization, supervision, funding acquisition, project administration.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to María Cruz García-González.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

González-García, I., Oliveira, V., Molinuevo-Salces, B. et al. Two-phase nutrient recovery from livestock wastewaters combining novel membrane technologies. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 12, 4563–4574 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-02546-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-02546-6

Keywords

Navigation