Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Differential ability of pyrolysed biomass derived from diverse feedstocks in alleviating salinity stress

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Effectiveness of application of pyrolysed biomass (biochar) derived from different feedstocks in mitigating adverse response in the saline environments needs further insight. Therefore, ability of three different biochars [maize stover biochar (MB), poultry manure biochar (PB), rice straw biochar (RB)] in ameliorating saline soils varying in electrical conductivity (EC2, EC8, EC16 dS m−1) was investigated by conducting an incubation experiment for 8 weeks. Increasing salinity reduced (28–45%) soil microbial activity in the unamended soils. However, greater C mineralization and microbial biomass C (MBC) were noticed in soils amended with PB followed by RB or MB. Likewise, the percentage of net C mineralized was greater in the PB-amended (15–23%) compared to RB (11–19%)- or MB (9–17%)-amended soils at given salinity levels. Furthermore, greater available N and P in soils amended with PB than RB or MB could be related to its lower C to N ratio and better ash content. Instead, significantly higher soil organic C (SOC) concentration observed in the saline soils amended with RB (41–67%) than PB (17–44%) was most likely due to its higher C content and greater stability. Additionally, RB with its greater reserve of potassium can serve as a good source of available K in the saline soils. The study showed the potential of biochar derived from different feedstocks in ameliorating saline soils. Greater ability of poultry manure biochar in improving resilience of soil microbial biomass to survive under salinity was a noticeable evidence of feedstock’s type in influencing biochar behavior in stressed environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bhattacharya R, Ghosh BN, Mishra PK, Mandal B, Rao CS, Sarkar D, Das K, Anil KS, Lalitha M, Hati KM, Franzluebbers AJ (2015) Soil degradation in India: challenges and potential solutions. Sustainability 7:3528–3570

    Google Scholar 

  2. Griggs D, Stafford-Smith M, Gaffney O, Rockström J, Öhman MC, Shyamsundar P, Steffen W, Glaser G, Kanie N, Noble I (2013) Policy: sustainable development goals for people and planet. Nature 495:305–307

    Google Scholar 

  3. Qadir M, Oster JD, Schubert S, Nobel AD, Sahrawat KL (2007) Phytoremediation of sodic and saline sodic soils. Adv Agron 96:197–247

    Google Scholar 

  4. Choudhary OP, Mavi MS (2019) Management of sodic waters in agriculture. In: Dagar JC, Yadav RK, Sharma PC (eds) Research developments in saline agriculture. Springer Nature, Singapore Ltd, pp 785–813

    Google Scholar 

  5. Munns R (2005) Genes and salt tolerance: bringing them together. New Phytol 167:645–663

    Google Scholar 

  6. Singh R, Mavi MS, Choudhary OP (2019) Saline soils can be ameliorated by adding biochar generated from rice-residue waste. Clean – Soil Air Water 47:1700656

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rengasamy P (2006) World salinization with emphasis on Australia. J Experiment Bot 57:1017–1023

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wichern J, Wichern F, Joergensen RG (2006) Impact of salinity on soil microbial communities and the decomposition of maize in acidic soils. Geoderma 137:100–108

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mavi MS, Marshner P (2017) Impact of salinity on respiration and organic matter dynamics in soils is more closely related to osmotic potential than to electrical conductivity. Pedosphere 27:947–956

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chahal SS, Choudhary OP, Mavi MS (2018) Microbial activity is constrained by the quality of carbon and nitrogen under long-term saline water irrigation. Comm Soil Sci Plant Anal 49:1266–1280

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bhullar RS, Mavi MS, Choudhary OP (2019) Adverse impact of sodicity on soil functions can be alleviated through addition of rice straw biochar. Comm Soil Sci Plant Anal 50:2369–2383

    Google Scholar 

  12. Leogrande R, Vitti C (2018) Use of organic amendments to reclaim saline and sodic soils: a review. Arid Land Res Manage 33:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tisdall JM, Oades JM (1982) Organic matter and water-stable aggregates in soils. Euro J Soil Sci 33:141–163

    Google Scholar 

  14. Diacono M, Montemurro F (2015) Effectiveness of organic wastes as fertilizers and amendments in salt-affected soils. Agriculture 5:221–230

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chahal SS, Choudhary OP, Mavi MS (2017) Organic amendments decomposability influences microbial activity in saline soils. Arch Agron Soil Sci 67:1875–1888

  16. Chaganti VN, Crohn DM (2015) Evaluating the relative contribution of physiochemical and biological factors in ameliorating a saline–sodic soil amended with composts and biochar and leached with reclaimed water. Geoderma 259:45–55

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bharath G, Krishnamoorthy R, Banat F, Hai A, Arangadi AF, Ponpandian N (2019) Enhanced electrochemical performances of peanut shell derived activated carbon and its Fe3O4 nanocomposites for capacitive deionization of Cr(VI) ions. Sci Total Environ 691:713–726

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tomczyk A, Sokołowska Z, Boguta P (2020) Biochar physicochemical properties: pyrolysis temperature and feedstock kind effects. Rev Environm Sci Biotechnol 19:191–215

    Google Scholar 

  19. Al-Wabel MI, Al-Omran A, El-Naggar AH, Nadeem M, Usman AR (2013) Pyrolysis temperature induced changes in characteristics and chemical composition of biochar produced from conocarpus wastes. Bioresour Technol 131:374–379

    Google Scholar 

  20. Saifullah DS, Naeemc A, Rengeld Z, Naidue R (2018) Biochar application for the remediation of salt affected soils: challenges and opportunities. Sci Total Environ 625:320–335

    Google Scholar 

  21. Akhtar SS, Andersen MN, Naveed M, Zahir D, Liu F (2015) Interactive effect of biochar and plant growth-promoting bacterial endophytes on ameliorating salinity stress in maize. Function Plant Biol 42:770–781

    Google Scholar 

  22. Major J, Rondon M, Molina D, Susan JR, Lehmann J (2010) Maize yield and nutrition during 4 years after biochar application to a colombian savanna oxisol. Plant Soil 333:117–128

    Google Scholar 

  23. Krishnamoorthy R, Bharath G, Banat F, Sagadevan V, Purushothaman M, Show PL (2019) Date pits activated carbon for divalent lead ions removal. J Biosci Bioeng 28:88–97

    Google Scholar 

  24. Olmo M, Villar R, Salazar P, Alburquerque JA (2016) Changes in soil nutrient availability explain biochar’s impact on wheat root development. Plant Soil 399:333–343

    Google Scholar 

  25. Luo Y, Jiao YJ, Zhao XR, Li GT, Zhao LX, Meng HB (2014) Improvement to maize growth caused by biochars derived from six feedstocks prepared at three different temperatures. J Integrat Agric 13:533–540

    Google Scholar 

  26. Yue Y, Guo WN, Lin QM, Li GT, Zhao XR (2016) Improving salt leaching in a simulated saline soil column by three biochars derived from rice straw (Oryza sativa L.), sunflower straw (Helianthus annuus), and cow manure. J Soil Water Conser 71:467–475

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ouyang L, Yu L, Zhang R (2014) Effects of amendment of different biochars on soil carbon mineralisation and sequestration. Soil Res 52:46–54

    Google Scholar 

  28. Novak J, Cantrell K, Watts D (2013) Compositional and thermal evaluation of lignocellulosic and poultry litter chars via high and low temperature pyrolysis. Bio Energy Res 6:114–130

    Google Scholar 

  29. Singh G, Mavi MS (2018) Impact of addition of different rates of rice-residue biochar on C and N dynamics in texturally diverse soils. Arch Agron Soil Sci 64:1419–1431

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bharath G, Hai A, Krishnamoorthy R, Banat F, Jayaraman R, Taher H, Oyanedel JRB, Ashraf MT, Schmidt JE (2020) Systematic production and characterization of pyrolysis-oil from date tree wastes for bio-fuel applications. Biomass Bioenergy 135:105523

    Google Scholar 

  31. Demirbas A (2004) Effects of temperature and particle size on biochar yield from pyrolysis of agricultural residues. J Anal Appl Pyrol 72:243–248

    Google Scholar 

  32. Alef K (1995) Soil respiration. In: Alef K and Nannipieri P (Ed.) Methods in applied soil microbiology and biochemistry. (pp 214–19). Academic Press, San Diego, California, United States

  33. Anderson J M, Ingram JSI (1993) Tropical soil biology and fertility: a handbook of methods. (pp 45–46). CAB International, Wallingford, UK

  34. Vance ED, Brookes PC, Jenkinson DS (1987) An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biol Biochem 19:703–707

    Google Scholar 

  35. Page A L, Miller RH, Keeney DR (1982) Methods of soil analysis. Part 2 - Chemical and microbiological properties, Agronomy Society of America. 2nd Edition. Madison, WI

  36. Gao JF, Zhang Q, Su K, Wang JH (2010) Competitive biosorption of yellow 2G and reactive brilliant red K-2G onto inactive aerobic granules: simultaneous determination of two dyes by first-order derivative spectrophotometry and isotherm studies. Bioresour Technol 101:5793–5801

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kim S, Won SW, Cho CW, Yun YS (2015) Valorization of Escherichia coli waste biomass as biosorbent for removing reactive dyes from aqueous solutions. Desalin Water Treat 57:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  38. Sarmah AK, Srinivasan P, Smernik RJ, Manley-Harris M, Antal MJ, Downie A, Zwieten LV (2010) Retention capacity of biochar-amended New Zealand dairy farm soil for an estrogenic steroid hormone and its primary metabolite. Soil Res 48:648–658

    Google Scholar 

  39. Smidt E, Meissl K (2007) The applicability of Fourier transforms infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. Waste Manag 27:268–276

    Google Scholar 

  40. Das P, Mukherjee S, Sen R (2009) Biosurfactant of marine origin exhibiting heavy metal remediation properties. Bioresour Technol 100:4887–4890

    Google Scholar 

  41. Tatzber M, Stemmer M, Spiegel H, Katzlberger C, Zehetner F, Haberhauer G (2009) Decomposition of carbon-14-labeled organic amendments and humic acids in a long-term field experiment. Soil Sci Soc Am J 73:744–750

    Google Scholar 

  42. Dai Z, Zhang X, Tang C, Muhammad N, Wu J, Brookes PC, Xu J (2017) Potential role of biochars in decreasing soil acidification - a critical review. Sci Total Environ 581–582:601–611

    Google Scholar 

  43. Streubel JD, Collins HP, Garcia-Perez M, Tarara J, Granatstein D, Kruger CE (2011) Influence of contrasting biochar types on five soils at increasing rates of application. Soil Sci Soc Am J 75:1402–1413

    Google Scholar 

  44. Mandal S, Donner E, Vasileiadis S, Skinner W, Smith E, Lombi E (2018) The effect of biochar feedstock, pyrolysis temperature, and application rate on the reduction of ammonia volatilisation from biochar-amended soil. Sci Total Environ 627:942–950

    Google Scholar 

  45. Karer J, Wimmer B, Zehetner F, Kloss S, Soja G (2013) Biochar application to temperate soils: effects on nutrient uptake and crop yield under field conditions. Agric Food Sci 22:390–403

    Google Scholar 

  46. Lentz RD, Ippolito JA (2012) Biochar and manure affect calcareous soil and corn silage nutrient concentrations and uptake. J Environ Qual 41:1033–1043

    Google Scholar 

  47. Van Zwieten L, Kimber S, Morris S, Chan KY, Downie A, Rust J, Joseph S, Cowie A (2010) Effects of biochar from slow pyrolysis of papermill waste on agronomic performance and soil fertility. Plant Soil 327:235–246

    Google Scholar 

  48. Thomas SC, Frye S, Gale N, Garmon M, Launchbury R, Machado N, Melamed S, Murray J, Petroff A, Winsborough C (2013) Biochar mitigates negative effects of salt additions on two herbaceous plant species. J Environ Manag 129:62–68

    Google Scholar 

  49. Hai A, Bharath G, Krishnamoorthy R, Naushad MHT, Banat F (2019) Date seeds biomass-derived activated carbon for efficient removal of NaCl from saline solution. Proc Safety Environ Protect 129:103–111

    Google Scholar 

  50. Iqbal MT, Joergensen RG, Knoblauch C, Lucassen R, Singh Y, Watson C, Wichern F (2016) Rice straw addition does not substantially alter microbial properties under hypersaline soil conditions. Biol Fertil Soils 52:867–877

    Google Scholar 

  51. Ameloot N, Neve SD, Jegajeevagan K, Yildiz G, Buchan D, FunkuinYN PW, Bouckaert L, Sleutel S (2013) Short-term CO2 and N2O emissions and microbial properties of biochar amended sandy loam soils. Soil Biol Biochem 57:401–410

    Google Scholar 

  52. Bhaduri D, Saha A, Desai D, Meena HN (2016) Restoration of carbon and microbial activity in salt-induced soil by application of peanut shell biochar during short-term incubation study. Chemosphere 148:86–98

    Google Scholar 

  53. Junna S, Bingchen W, Gang X, Hongbo S (2014) Effects of wheat straw biochar on carbon mineralization and guidance for large-scale soil quality improvement in the coastal wetland. Ecol Engineer 62:43–47

    Google Scholar 

  54. Zhao R, Coles N, Wu J (2015) Soil carbon mineralization following biochar addition associated with external nitrogen. Chile J Agric Res 75:465–471

    Google Scholar 

  55. Lanza G, Rebensburg P, Kern J, Lentzsch P, Wirth S (2016) Impact of chars and readily available carbon on soil microbial respiration and microbial community composition in a dynamic incubation experiment. Soil Till Res: Current and future challenges in biochar research 164:18–24

    Google Scholar 

  56. Weyers SL, Spokas KA (2014) Crop residue decomposition in Minnesota biochar-amended plots. Solid Earth 5:499–507

    Google Scholar 

  57. Lin Y, Munroe P, Joseph SD, Henderson R (2012a) Migration of dissolved organic carbon in biochars and biochar–mineral complexes. Brazil Agric Res 47:677–686

    Google Scholar 

  58. Purakayastha TJ, Bera T, Bhaduri D, Sarkar B, Mandal S, Wade P, Kumari S, Biswas S, Menon M, Pathak H, Tsang DCW (2019) A review on biochar modulated soil condition improvements and nutrient dynamics concerning crop yields: pathways to climate change mitigation and global food security. Chemosphere 227:345–365

    Google Scholar 

  59. Purakayastha TJ, Kumari S, Pathak H (2015) Characterisation, stability, and microbial effects of four biochars produced from crop residues. Geoderma 239-240:293–303

    Google Scholar 

  60. Fageria NK, Gheyi HR, Moreira A (2011) Nutrient bioavailability in salt affected soils. J Plant Nutr 34:945–962

    Google Scholar 

  61. Kanwal S, Ilyas N, Shabir S, Saeed M, Gul R, Zahoor M, Batool N, Mazhar R (2018) Application of biochar in mitigation of negative effects of salinity stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J Plant Nutr 41:526–538

    Google Scholar 

  62. Ghosh S, Wilson BR, Mandal B, Ghoshal SK, Growns I (2010) Changes in soil organic carbon pool in three long-term fertility experiments with different cropping systems and inorganic and organic soil amendments in the eastern cereal belt of India. Soil Res 48:413–420

    Google Scholar 

  63. Carlson J, Saxena J, Basta N (2015) Application of organic amendments to restore degraded soil: effects on soil microbial properties. Environ Monit Asses 187:109

    Google Scholar 

  64. Moradi S, Rasouli-Sadaghiani MH, Sepehr E, Khodaverdiloo H, Barin M (2019) Soil nutrients status affected by simple and enriched biochar application under salinity conditions. Environ Monit and Assess 191:257

    Google Scholar 

  65. Laird DA, Fleming P, Davis DD, Horton R, Wang B, Karlen DL (2010) Impact of biochar amendments on the quality of a typical Midwestern agricultural soil. Geoderma 158:443–449

    Google Scholar 

  66. Chan KY, Van Zwieten L, Meszaros I, Downie A, Joseph S (2008) Using poultry litter biochars as soil amendments. Soil Res 46:437–444

    Google Scholar 

  67. Dempster DN, Gleeson DB, Solaiman ZM, Jones DL, Murphy DV (2012) Decreased soil microbial biomass and nitrogen mineralisation with Eucalyptus biochar addition to a coarse textured soil. Plant Soil 354:311–324

    Google Scholar 

  68. Shah A, Darr MJ, Dalluge D, Medic D, Webster K, Brown RC (2012) Physicochemical properties of bio-oil and biochar produced by fast pyrolysis of stored single-pass corn Stover and cobs. Bioresour Technol 125:348–352

    Google Scholar 

  69. Kolb SE, Fermanich KJ, Dornbush ME (2009) Effect of charcoal quantity on microbial biomass and activity in temperate soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 73:1173–1181

    Google Scholar 

  70. Arienzo M, Christen EW, Quayle W, Kumar (2009) A review of the fate of potassium in the soil–plant system after land application of wastewaters. J Hazard Mat 164:415–422

    Google Scholar 

  71. Lashari MS, Ye Y, Ji H, Li L, Grace WK, Lu H, Zheng J, Pan G (2015) Biochar-manure compost in conjunction with pyroligneous solution alleviated maize salt stress and improved growth in a salt affected soil from Central China: a two-year field experiment. J Sci Food Agri 95:1321–1327

    Google Scholar 

  72. Nigussie A, Kissi E, Misganaw M, Ambaw G (2012) Effect of biochar application on soil properties and nutrient uptake of lettuces (Lactuca sativa) grown in chromium polluted soils. Am-Eur J Agric Environ Sci 12:369–376

    Google Scholar 

  73. Uzoma KC, Inoue M, Andry H, Fujimaki H, Zahoor A, Nishihara E (2011) Effect of cow manure biochar on maize productivity under sandy soil condition. Soil Use Manag 27:205–212

    Google Scholar 

  74. Chakraborty K, Bhaduri D, Meena HN, Kalariya KS (2016) External potassium (K) application improves salinity tolerance by promoting Na-exclusion, K-accumulation and osmotic adjustment in contrasting peanut cultivars. Plant Physiol Biochem 103:143–153

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Soil Science, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, 141004, India

    Manpreet Singh Mavi, Rajanbeer Singh Bhullar & Om Parkash Choudhary

Authors
  1. Manpreet Singh Mavi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rajanbeer Singh Bhullar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Om Parkash Choudhary
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manpreet Singh Mavi.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mavi, M.S., Bhullar, R.S. & Choudhary, O.P. Differential ability of pyrolysed biomass derived from diverse feedstocks in alleviating salinity stress. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 12, 5229–5240 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-01087-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-01087-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation