Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluating biomas-derived biochar on seed germination and early seedling growth of maize and black gram

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Seed treatment with biomass-derived biochar has potential to overcome the moisture, nutrients, and hormonal constraint on native germination and early growth. An experiment was conducted to study the effect of different levels of biochars obtained from four divergent biomass on seed germination and seedling growth of maize and black gram. All the biochars were prepared at 500 °C and characterized for their physicochemical properties. We determined the effect of biochar type and application rate. The biochar under study enhanced the seed germination and seedling growth significantly at a reasonable application rate than higher rate which might be due to secretion of chemical substances by the respective biochar. But the pine needle biochar (PNB) did not perform satisfactorily, and it may be due to lignin-rich feedstock. Both the maize stalk biochar (MSB) and Lantana camara biochar (LCB) showed slightly inhibitory effect at higher application rate due to presence of some heavy metals. However, the black gram biochar (BGB) performed well and constantly increased seed germination as well as seedling growth, and thus has a greater potential to increase its application rate under field condition. The shoot/root ration decreased with increase in biochar application rate. Our results offer new facts for the requirement of creating environmental risk management of biochar before its field soil application.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kanwal S, Ilyas N, Shabir S, Saeed M, Gul R, Zahoor M, Batool N, Mazhar R (2018) Application of biochar in mitigation of negative effects of salinity stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J Plant Nutr 41(4):526–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Das SK, Ghosh GK, Avasthe RK (2020) Valorizing biomass to engineered biochar and its impact on soil, plant, water, and microbial dynamics: a review. Biomass Convers Bior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00836-5

  3. Das SK, Ghosh GK (2020) Soil health management through low cost biochar technology. In: Singh J, Singh C (eds) Biochar applications in agriculture and environment management. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  4. Biederman LA, Harpole WS (2013) Biochar and its effects on plant productivity and nutrient cycling: a meta-analysis. GCB Bioenergy 5:202–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Das SK, Avasthe RK (2018) Development of innovative low cost biochar production technology. J Krishi Vigyan 7(1):223–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bray RH, Kurtz LT (1945) Determination of total organic and available forms of phosphorus in soils. Soil Sci 59:39–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Carvalho MTM, Madari BE, Bastiaans L, van Oort PAJ, Leal WGO, Heinemann AB, Meinke H (2016) Properties of a clay soil from 1.5 to 3.5 years after biochar application and the impact on rice yield. Geoderma 276:7–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Crane-Droesch A, Abiven S, Jeffery S, Torn MS (2013) Heterogeneous global crop yield response to biochar: a meta-regression analysis. Environ Res Lett 8(4):044–049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Das SK, Ghosh GK (2017) Soil hydro-physical environment as influenced by different biochar amendments. Int J Bio-Resour Stress Manag 8(5):668–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kamara A, Kamara A, Mansaray M, Sawyerr PE (2014) Effects of biochar derived from maize stover and rice straw on the germination of their seeds. Am J Agric 2:246–249

    Google Scholar 

  11. Das SK, Avasthe RK, Yadav A (2017) Secondary and micronutrients: deficiency symptoms and management in organic farming. Innov Farm 2(4):209–211

    Google Scholar 

  12. AOAC (1999) Official methods of analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 16th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ghani A, Dexter M, Perrott KW (2003) Hot-water extractable carbon in soils: a sensitive measurement for determining impacts of fertilization, grazing and cultivation. Soil Biol Biochem 35:1231–1243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gomez KA, Gomaz AA (1984) Statistical procedures for agricultural research. John Wiley & Sons, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hanway JJ, Heidel H (1952) Soil analyses methods as used in Iowa state college soil testing laboratory. Iowa Agric 57:1–31

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jaiswal AK, Elad Y, Graber ER, Frenkel O (2014) Rhizoctonia solani suppression and plant growth promotion in cucumber as affected by biochar pyrolysis temperature, feedstock and concentration. Soil Biol Biochem 69:110–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Taylorson RB (1979) Response of weed seeds to ethylene and related hydrocarbons. Weed Sci 27:7–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. ASTM (1990) D1762-84, standard method for chemical analysis of wood charcoal. ASTM International, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chidumayo EN (1994) Effects of wood carbonisation on soil and initial development of seedlings in miombo woodland, Zambia. Forest Ecol Manag 70:353–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Keller ML, Masiello CA, Dugan B, Rudgers JA, Capareda SC (2010) Phytotoxicity and plant productivity analysis of tar-enriched biochars. In: American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting abstract 1:0481

  21. Li Y, Yang Y, Shen F, Yang G, Zhang Y, Deng S, Zhang J, Zeng Y, Hu Y (2017) Mitigating biochar phytotoxicity via lanthanum (La) participation in pyrolysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:10267–10278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Veihmeyer FJ, Hendrickson AH (1948) The permanent wilting percentage as a reference for the measurement of soil moisture. Transactions, Am Geophys Union 29. https://doi.org/10.1029/TR029i006p00887

  23. Anyanwu IN, Alo MN, Onyekwere AM, Crosse JD, Nworie O, Chamba EB (2018) Influence of biochar aged in acidic soil on ecosystem engineers and two tropical agricultural plants. Ecotoxicol Environ Safe 153:116–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lindsay WL, Norvell WA (1978) Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese and copper. Soil Sci Soc Am J 42:421–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Novak JM, Busscher WJ, Laird DL, Ahmedna M, Watts DW, Niandou MAS (2009) Impact of biochar amendment on fertility of a southeastern coastal plain soil. Soil Sci 174:105–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Morrison DA, Morris EC (2000) Pseudoreplication in experimental designs for the manipulation of seed germination treatments. Austral Ecol 25:292–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Das SK (2017) Rice cultivation under changing climate with mitigation practices: a mini review. Univ J Agri Res 5(6):333–337

    Google Scholar 

  28. Thomas S, Gale N (2015) Biochar and forest restoration: a review and meta-analysis of tree growth responses. New For 46:931–946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. OECD (1984) Terrestrial plant test: seedling emergence and seedling growth test. OECD guidelines for testing of chemicals 208. OECD, Paris

  30. Singh NS, Mukherjee I, Das SK, Varghese E (2018) Leaching of clothianidin in two different Indian soils: effect of organic amendment. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 100(4):553–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Pluchon N, Gundale MJ, Nilsson MC, Kardol P, Wardle DA (2014) Stimulation of boreal tree seedling growth by wood-derived charcoal: effects of charcoal properties, seedling species and soil fertility. Funct Ecol 28:766–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Robertson SJ, Rutherford PM, Lo’pez-Gutie’rrez JC, Massicotte HB (2012) Biochar enhances seedling growth and alters root symbioses and properties of sub-boreal forest soils. Can J Soil Sci 92:329–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Das SK (2019) Soil carbon sequestration strategies under organic production system: a policy decision. Agrica 8(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.5958/2394-448X.2019.00001.4

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Saletnik B, Bajcar M, Zaguła G, Czernicka M, Puchalski C (2016) Influence of biochar and biomass ash applied as soil amendment on germination rate of Virginia mallow seeds (Sida hermaphrodita R.). Econtechmod Int Q J 5:71–76

    Google Scholar 

  35. Newman EI (1966) A method of estimating the total length of root in a sample. J Appl Ecol 3:139–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Das SK, Avasthe RK (2018) Soil organic nutrients management through integrated approach: a policy for environment & ecology. Environ Anal Ecol Stud 4(1):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  37. Solaiman Z, Murphy D, Abbott L (2012) Biochars influence seed germination and early growth of seedlings. Plant Soil 353:273–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Makoto K, Hirobe M, DeLuca TH, Bryanin SV, Procopchuk VF, Koike T (2011) Effects of fire-derived charcoal on soil properties and seedling regeneration in a recently burned Larix gmelinii/Pinus sylvestris forest. J Soils Sediments 11(8):1317–1322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Das SK, Das SK (2020) Influence of phosphorus and organic matter on microbial transformation of arsenic. Environ Technol Innov 100930:100930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2020.100930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Das SK, Avasthe RK (2015) Carbon farming and credit for mitigating greenhouse gases. Curr Sci 109(7):1223

    Google Scholar 

  41. Liao S, Pan B, Li H, Zhang D, Xing B (2014) Detecting free radicals in biochars and determining their ability to inhibit the germination and growth of corn, wheat and rice seedlings. Environ Sci Technol 48:8581–8587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Mate CJ, Mukherjee I, Das SK (2014) Mobility of spiromesifen in packed soil columns under laboratory conditions. Environ Monit Assess 186(11):7195–7202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Subbiah BV, Asija GL (1956) A rapid procedure for the determination of available nitrogen in soil. Curr Sci 25:259–260

    Google Scholar 

  44. Das SK, Avasthe RK (2020) Packages of organic nutrient management as soil policy for upgrading cropping system to restore soil productivity. Intech Open. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.91928

  45. Spokas KA, Novak JM, Stewart CE, Cantrell KB, Uchimiya M, DuSaire MG, Ro KS (2011) Qualitative analysis of volatile organic compounds on biochar. Chemosphere 85:869–882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Das SK, Avasthe RK, Matber S (2016) Carbon-negative biochar from weed biomass for agricultural research in India. Curr Sci 110(11):2045–2046

    Google Scholar 

  47. Macdonald LM, Farrell M, Van Zwieten L, Krull ES (2014) Plant growth responses to biochar addition: an Australian soils perspective. Biol Fert Soils 50:1035–1045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Wang GJ, Xu ZW (2013) The effects of biochar on germination and growth of wheat in different saline-alkali soil. Asian Agr Res 5:116–119

    Google Scholar 

  49. Mukherjee I, Das SK, Kumar A, Shukla L (2020) Sludge amendment affect the persistence, carbon mineralization and enzyme activity of atrazine and bifenthrin. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-020-02917-7

  50. Singh M, Gupta B, Das SK (2018) Soil organic carbon density under different agroforestry systems along an elevation gradient in north-western Himalaya. Range Manag Agrofor 39(1):8–13

    Google Scholar 

  51. Thies JE, Rillig MC (2009) Characteristics of biochars: biological properties. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management. Earthscan, London, pp 85–105

    Google Scholar 

  52. Wear JI (1965) Boron. In: Black CA et al (eds) Methods of soils analysis. Part 2. Agronomy. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 1059–1063

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The first author (Shaon Kumar Das) received financial support, and had access to the research work facility during the entire period of study, from the Director of ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Umiam, Meghalaya, India, and Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Palli Siksha Bhavana, Visva Bharati, Shantiniketan, West Bengal, India.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Sikkim Centre, Gangtok, Sikkim, 737102, India

    Shaon Kumar Das & Ravikant Avasthe

  2. Palli Siksha Bhavana, Visva Bharati, Sriniketan, Birbhum, West Bengal, 731236, India

    Shaon Kumar Das & Goutam Kumar Ghosh

Authors
  1. Shaon Kumar Das
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Goutam Kumar Ghosh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ravikant Avasthe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shaon Kumar Das.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Das, S.K., Ghosh, G.K. & Avasthe, R. Evaluating biomas-derived biochar on seed germination and early seedling growth of maize and black gram. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 12, 5663–5676 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00887-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00887-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation