Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Biogas potential for electricity generation in the Emirate of Abu Dhabi

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In 2009, the Government of Abu Dhabi made a commitment to generate 7 % of its total power output from renewable sources of energy by 2020. Biomethane is considered a viable option in accomplishing this goal. The objective of this work is to estimate the biogas to electricity potential from nine different biomasses found in the Emirate of Abu Dhabi, i.e., sheep dung, goat dung, cattle dung, camel dung, print paper, newspaper, carton paper, food waste, and animal waste blood. These biomasses are considered waste, and they were selected for their organic content and relative abundance in the Emirate. The objective was accomplished through experimental work measuring the biomethane potential of the nine biomasses and the estimation of their availability in the Emirate. Food waste had the highest biomethane potential yield of 517.36 mL-CH4/g-VSadded at standard conditions of temperature and pressure (STP), while newspaper had the lowest yield of 76.6 mL-CH4/g-VSadded STP, despite its high cellulose content. Varying levels of inhibition were also observed across the biomasses. An estimation of the total biomethane potential showed that the nine biomasses are able to provide 6 % of domestic electricity use in Abu Dhabi Emirate and 1.9 % of renewable energy commitment, with food waste contributing the highest fraction (51 %) and paper waste having the highest specific electricity potential (0.94 kWh/t).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Statistics Center, Abu Dhabi (SCAD) (2013) Energy and Environment Statistics 2012

  2. Mundi. Electricity consumption per capita [Online]. Available: http://www.indexmundi.com/. Accessed 5 November 2014

  3. UAE government news agency WAM (2009) Abu Dhabi Commits to 7% Renewable Energy Target by 2020. Available: http://www.wam.org.ae/

  4. Abu Dhabi Annual Weather Averages. Holiday Weather [Online]. Available: http://www.holiday-weather.com/abu_dhabi/averages/. Accessed 8 November 2014

  5. Abu Dhabi Urban Planning Council (2014) Plan Abu Dhabi 2030: Urban structure framework plan

  6. UAEinteract. The Country & The Environment - Solar Energy [Online]. Available: http://www.uaeinteract.com/news/default3.asp?ID=231. Accessed 14 March 2015

  7. Ministry of Foreign Affairs (2012) Directorate of Energy and Climate Change. UAE Energy Outlook, Abu Dhabi

  8. Grant I (2010) Establishing the nuclear safety infrastructure in the United Arab Emirates. Federal Authority for Nuclear Regulation (FANR), Abu Dhabi

  9. Shamma H (2013) Direct-use geothermal energy: an overlooked energy efficiency resource. RG Thermal Energy Solutions, Dubai

  10. Murphy JD, McKeogh E (2004) Technical, economic and environmental analysis of energy production from municipal solid waste. Renew Energy 29:1043–1057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Venkata BK (2014) WBA Global Bioenergy Statistics 2014. World Bioenergy Association (WBA), Stockholm

  12. Angelidaki I, Alves M, Bolzonella D, Borzacconi L, Campos JL, Guwy AJ, Kalyuzhnyi S, Jenicek P, Van Lier JB (2009) Defining the biomethane potential (BMP) of solid organic wastes and energy crops: a proposed protocol for batch assays. Water Sci Technol 59(5):927–934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Esposito G, Frunzo L, Liotta F, Panico A, Pirozzi F (2012) Bio-methane potential tests to measure the biogas production from the digestion and co-digestion of complex organic substrates. Open Environ Eng J 5:1–8

  14. Lesteur M, Bellon-Maurel V, Gonzalez C, Latrille E, Roger J, Junqua G, Steyer JP (2010) Alternative methods for determining anaerobic biodegradability: a review. Process Biochem 45(4):431–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. APHA (1995) Standard methods. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  16. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) (2008) (NREL/TP-510-42622), NREL LAP: determination of ash in biomass. NREL, Colorado

  17. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) (2009) ASTM E 1690–01: standard test method for the determination of ethanol extractives in biomass. NREL, Colorado

  18. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) (2011) NREL LAP (NREL/TP-510-42618): determination of structural carbohydrates and lignin in biomass. NREL, Colorado

  19. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) (2009) NREL LAP (NREL/TP-510-42621): determination of total solids in biomass and total dissolved solids in liquid process samples. NREL, Colorado

  20. Bastidas-Oyanedela JR, Mohd-Zakib Z, Pratt S, Steyer JP, Batstone DJ (2010) Development of membrane inlet mass spectrometry for examination of fermentation processes. Talanta 83:482–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Statistics Center, Abu Dhabi (SCAD) (2012) Waste Statistics in the Emirate of Abu Dhabi 2012

  22. Statistics Center, Abu Dhabi (SCAD) (2013) Livestock Statistics 2012. Statistic Center, Abu Dhabi (SCAD)

  23. Bio&Ag Engineering and NC State University. Animal and poultry manure production and characterization [Online]. Available: http://www.bae.ncsu.edu/topic/animal-waste-mgmt/program/land-ap/barker/a&pmp&c/content.htm. Accessed 5 September 2014

  24. Euken R (2009) Managing manure from beef feedlots for crop production. In: Cattle Feeder’s Conference: a new era of management, Iowa

  25. Harner J, Brouk M (2007) An Overview of dairy manure nutrients. Ohio Dairy Vets, Ohio

  26. Erb K (2002) Manure 101: nutrient management and the dairy industry. University of Wisconsin, Green Bay

  27. Rosillo-Calle F (2007) The biomass assessment handbook: bioenergy for a sustainable environment. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  28. Statistic Centre - Abu Dhabi (2012) Waste Statistics 2010. Centre of Waste Management - Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi

  29. MAF Biosecurity New Zealand (2009) Blood Harvesting Guidelines. National Animal Ethics Advisory Committee (NAEAC), Wellington

  30. Angelidaki I, Ellegaard L, Sorensen AH, Schmidt JE (2002) Environmental biotechnology 12133. Environment & Resources DTU, Lyngby

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mahler JF (1992) National Toxicity Program (NTP) technical report on toxicity studies of black newsprint inks. United States Department of Health and Human Services

  32. Budiyono IN, Widiasa S, Johari and Sunarso (2010) The influence of total solid contents on biogas yield from cattle manure using rumen fluid inoculum. Energy Res J 1(1):6–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Rota Guido. Products, Biogas Plants [Online]. Available: http://www.rotaguido.it/eng/prodotti/recupero-biogas.html. Accessed 31 March 2014

  34. Worldweather.org. World Weather Information Service - Abu Dhabi [Online]. Available: http://www.worldweather.org/117/c00222.htm. Accessed 27 August 2014

  35. Glass A (2008) UAE temperature hits 51.4 degrees. Arabian Business [Online]. Available: http://www.arabianbusiness.com/uae-temperature-hits-51-4-degrees-47457.html

  36. Edwards DR, Larson BT, Lim TT (2000) Runoff nutrient and fecal coliform content from cattle manure application to fescue plots. J Am Water Resour Assoc 36:4

    Google Scholar 

  37. Esse PC, Buerkert A, Hiernaux P, Assa A (2001) Decomposition of and nutrient release from ruminant manure on acid sandy soils in the Sahelian zone of Niger, West Africa. Agr Ecosyst Environ 83(1–2):55–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Amon T, Amon B, Kryvoruchko V, Zollitsch W, Mayer K, Gruber L (2007) Biogas production from maize and dairy cattle manure—Influence of biomass composition on the methane yield. Agr Ecosyst Environ 118(1–4):173–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Moller HB, Sommer SG, Ahring BK (2004) Methane productivity of manure, straw and solid fractions of manure

  40. Cecchi F, Traverso P, Pavan P, Bolzonella D, Innocenti L (2003) Chapter 6 characteristics of the OFMSW and behaviour of the anaerobic digestion process. In: Biomethanisation of the organic fraction of municipal solid wastes. IWA Publishing, London, pp 141–154

    Google Scholar 

  41. Zhang Y, Banks CJ, Heaven S (2012) Anaerobic digestion of two biodegradable municipal waste streams. J Environ Manage 104:166–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Allen E, Browne JD, Murphy JD (2013) Evaluation of the biomethane yield from anaerobic codigestion of nitrogenous substrates. Environ Technol 34(13–14):2059–2068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Browne JD, Murphy JD (2013) Assessment of the resource associated with biomethane from food waste. Appl Energy 104:170–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Davidsson A, Gruvberger C, Christensen TH, Hansen TL, Jansen J (2007) Methane yield in source-sorted organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Waste Manag 27(3):406–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Environmental Agency - Abu Dhabi (EAD) (2013) Towards integrated waste management in Abu Dhabi

  46. Banks C (2009) Optimising anaerobic digestion. University of Southampton, England

  47. Clarke Energy (2013) CHP efficiency for biogas [Online]. Available: http://www.clarke-energy.com/2013/chp-cogen-efficiency-biogas/. Accessed 14 April 2014

  48. US Energy Information Administration (EIA) (2014) How much electricity is lost in transmission and distribution in the United States? [Online]. Available: http://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.cfm?id=105&t=3. Accessed 5 September 2014

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Masdar Institute of Science & Technology, Al Wathba ISTP2 Wastewater Treatment Plant (Vebes O & M Co.), Al Mina Automated Slaughter House, Al Shahama Slaughter House, Sumo Japanese Restaurant, and the Abu Dhabi Government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute Center for Energy (iENERGY), Masdar Institute of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, UAE

    Akinleye Sowunmi, Richard Michael Mamone, Juan-Rodrigo Bastidas-Oyanedel & Jens Ejbye Schmidt

  2. Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

    Richard Michael Mamone

Authors
  1. Akinleye Sowunmi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Richard Michael Mamone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Juan-Rodrigo Bastidas-Oyanedel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jens Ejbye Schmidt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jens Ejbye Schmidt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sowunmi, A., Mamone, R.M., Bastidas-Oyanedel, JR. et al. Biogas potential for electricity generation in the Emirate of Abu Dhabi. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 6, 39–47 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-015-0182-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-015-0182-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation