Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Algae production for energy and foddering

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

This study not only presents the results of our own experiments in alga production, but also shows the expected economic results of the various uses of algae (animal feed, direct burning, pelleting, bio-diesel production), the technical characteristics of a new pelleting method based on literature, and also our own recommended alga production technology. In our opinion, the most promising alternative could be the production of alga species with high levels of oil content, which are suitable for utilization as by-products for animal feed and in the production of bio-diesel, as well as for use in waste water management and as a flue gas additive. Based on the data from our laboratory experiments, of the four species we analyzed, Chlorella vulgaris should be considered the most promising species for use in large-scale experiments. Taking expenses into account, our results demonstrate that the use of algae for burning technology purposes results in a significant loss under the current economic conditions; however, the utilization of algae for feeding and bio-diesel purposes—in spite of their innovative nature—is nearing the level needed for competitiveness. By using the alga production technology recommended by us and described in the present study in detail, with an investment of 545 to 727 thousand EUR/ha, this technology should be able to achieve approximately 0–29 thousand EUR/ha net income, depending on size. More favorable values emerge in the case of the 1-ha (larger) size, thanks to the significant savings on fixed costs (depreciation and personnel costs).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wilkie AC, Mulbry WW (2002) Recovery of dairy manure nutrients by benthic freshwater algae. Bioresour Technol 84(1):81–91. doi:10.1016/S0960-8524(02)00003-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kim J, Lingaraju BP, Rheaume R, Lee JY, Siddiqui KF (2010) Removal of ammonia from wastewater effluent by Chlorella vulgaris. Tshinghua Science and Technology 15(4):391–396. doi:10.1016/S1007-0214(10)70078-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lim SL, Chu WL, Phang SM (2010) Use of Chlorella vulgaris for bioremediation of textile wastewater. Bioresour Technol 101(19):7314–7322. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.04.092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. González LE, Cañizares RO, Baena S (1997) Efficiency of ammonia and phosphorus removal from a Columbian agroindustrial wastewater by the microalgae Chlorella vulgaris and Scenedesmus dimorphus. Bioresour Technol 60(3):259–262. doi:10.1016/S0960-8524(97)00029-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mulbry W, Kondrad S, Pizarro C, Kebede-Westhead E (2008) Treatment of dairy manure effluent using freshwater algae: algal productivity and recovery of manure nutrients using pilot-scale algal turf scrubbers. Biorescour Technol 99(17):8137–8142. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2008.03.073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Narsi S (2011) Oilgae comprehensive report. A detailed guide for algae biofuels. www.oilgae.com/ref/report/report.html. Accessed 8 June 2011

  7. Sambamurty AVSS (2005) A textbook of algae. I K International, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bergman P C A, Kiel J H A (2005) Torrefaction for biomass upgrading, ECN report, ECN-RX-05-180 doi:www.ieabcc.nl/meetings/task32_Berlin_ws_system_perspectives/03_Kiel.pdf. Accessed 8 June 2011

  9. Prins MJ, Ptasinski KJ, Janssen J (2006) More efficient biomass gasification via torrefaction. Energy ECOS 2004—17th International Conference on Efficiency, Costs, Optimization, Simulation, and Environmental Impact of Energy on Process Systems 31 (15): 3458–3470 doi:10.1016/j.energy.2006.03.008

  10. Peng JH, Bi HT, Sokhansanj S, Lim JC, Melin S (2010) An economical and market analysis of Canadian wood pellets. Int J Green Energ 7(2):128–142. doi:10.1080/15435071003673518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ghezelbash F, Farboodnia T, Heidari R, Agh N (2008) Biochemical effects of different salinities and luminance on green microalgae Tetraselmis chuii. Research Journal of Biological Sciences 3(2):217–221. doi:10.3923/rjbsci.2008.217.221

    Google Scholar 

  12. Seyfabadi J, Ramezanpour Z, Khoeyi ZA (2010) Protein, fatty acid and pigment content of Chlorella vulgaris under different light regimes. J Appl Phycol. doi:10.1007/s10811-010-9569-8

  13. Nábrádi A (2002) Fertilization management. In Bai (ed) Use of biomass. Szaktudás, Budapest, pp. 30–37

  14. Nábrádi A (2007) The economic value of grassland products. APSTRACT 1(1):19–28. doi:ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/43572/2/a2.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  15. Molnár Zs, Pájtli P, Keresztessyné MK (2009) Cereals and industrial plants. Agriculture market report. https://www.aki.gov.hu/download/gabona_07_17_pdf/483. Accessed 8 June 2011

  16. Barka E, Bartha T, Halmai O, Szabó T, Vigassy Cs (2010) Annual Report. Hungarian Energy Office. http://www.eh.gov.hu/gcpdocs/201012/tajekoztato_2009_web.pdf. Accessed 8 June 2011

  17. Stündl L, Bársony P, Herpergel Z, Fehér M (2010) in Bai A (Ed) Complex economic analysis of our algae experiments including a case study. Final study of the project titled “Development of algae production in animal sludge for energy and feeding. Economic modelling” (ATEBIOEN, 2009–2010). Baross Gábor Research Program. Debrecen, pp. 1–73

  18. Kiel J H A, Verhoeff F, Gerhauser H, Meuleman B (2008) BO2-technology for biomass upgrading into solid fuel-pilot-scale testing and market implementation. Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands (ECN). http://www.ecn.nl/docs/library/report/2008/m08036.pdfBO2

  19. Németh A (2009) Economic and technological review of biomass conversion technologies and economic feasibility analysis of torrefied pellet production in Hungary. MSc thesis, Wageningen University

  20. Narsi S (2010) The algae energy industry. Opportunities and prospects. Oilgae Digest. www.oilgae.com/ref/report/digest/digest.html#k_t_aways. Accessed 8 June 2011

  21. Sevrin-Reyssac J (1998) Biotreatment of swine manure by production of aquatic valuable biomasses. Agr Ecosyst Environ 68(3):177–186. doi:10.1016/S0167-8809(97)00070-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Applied Economics and Rural Development (UD-FAERD), Centre for Agricultural and Applied Economic Sciences, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary

    Attila Bai, Péter Jobbágy & Emília Durkó

Authors
  1. Attila Bai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Péter Jobbágy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Emília Durkó
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Attila Bai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bai, A., Jobbágy, P. & Durkó, E. Algae production for energy and foddering. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 1, 163–171 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-011-0015-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-011-0015-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation