Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The different mathematics performances in PISA 2012 and a curricula comparison: enriching the comparison by an analysis of the role of problem solving in intended learning processes

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Mathematics Education Research Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The results of international comparative studies like PISA and TIMSS attract researchers to conduct studies comparing math contents of curricula directly to each other. Unlike those studies, we compared math contents of Indonesian and Singaporean curricula based on math contents tested in PISA 2012 items. We also enrich the comparison with the examination of the role of problem solving in the intended learning processes of the two curricula. The results of the comparison of math contents show that there are differences in the breadth of the math contents of the two curricula. The results also indicate that the Singaporean curriculum covers math contents tested in the PISA 2012 items which are missing in the Indonesian curriculum. However, it is still difficult to identify possible reasons for the distinct performances between Indonesia and Singapore in the PISA 2012 study from the comparison. Enriching the comparison with the examination of the role of problem solving in the intended learning processes of the two curricula gives us additional insight into a possible reason. The results show that the intended learning process of the Singaporean curriculum highlights problem solving much more than does that of the Indonesian curriculum. These results are suggestive of the need for further research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J. (2009). Mathematics curriculum development and the role of problem solving. Paper presented at the 2009 ACSA National Biennial Conference Curriculum, Canberra, ACT, http://www.acsa.edu.au/pages/images/Judy%20Anderson%20-%20Mathematics%20Curriculum%20Development.pdf. Retrieved on November 16, 2015.

  • Arslan, Ç., & Altun, M. (2007). Learning to solve non-routine mathematical problems. Elementary Education Online, 6(1), 50–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority [ACARA]. (2017). Literature review: Contemporary approaches to comparative education research, http://curriculumuat.azurewebsites.net/media/3576/literature-review.pdf. Retrieved on February 28, 2018.

  • Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan (BSNP). (2006). Standar isi untuk satuan pendidikan dasar dan menengah: Standar kompetensi dan kompetensi dasar SMP/MTs [content standards of primary and secondary school: Competency standards and basic competencies of junior high school]. Jakarta: BSNP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branca, N. A. (1980). Problem solving as a goal, process, and basic skill. In S. Krulik & R. E. Reys (Eds.), Problem solving in school mathematics (pp. 3–8). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

  • BSNP. (2007). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 41 tahun 2007 tentang standar proses untuk satuan pendidikan dasar dan menengah [the decree of the minister of National Education of Indonesia no. 41 year 2007 about the process standard for elementary and secondary school]. Jakarta: BSNP.

  • Chapman, O. (2017). Mathematics teachers ‘ways of supporting students’ learning of problem solving. In M. Stein (Ed.), A life’s time for mathematics education and problem solving (pp. 45–69). Munster: WTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed method approaches. In Thousand oaks. California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education. (2012). Review of the National Curriculum in England: What can we learn from the English, mathematics and science curricula of high-performing jurisdictions?. Research Report DFE-RR178, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/184064/DFE-RR178.pdf. Retrieved on February 23, 2018.

  • Dindyal, J. (2006). The Singaporean mathematics curriculum: Connections to TIMSS. In P. Grootenboer, R. Zevenbergen, & M. Chinappan (Eds.), Identities, Cultures, and Learning Spaces: Proceedings of the 29th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 179–186), http://www.merga.net.au/documents/RP182006.pdf. Retrieved on November 23, 2015.

  • Eisenmann, P., Novotnà, J., Přibyl, J., & Břehovský, J. (2015). The development of a culture of problem solving with secondary students through strategies. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 27(4), 536–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fielding-Wells, J. (2015). Identifying core elements of argument-based inquiry in primary mathematics learning. In M. Marshman, V. Geiger, & A. Bennison (Eds.), Mathematics education in the margins (proceedings of the 38th annual conference of the mathematics education research Group of Australasia) (pp. 229–236). Sunshine Coast: MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, V., Stillman, G., Brown, J., Galbriath, P., & Niss, M. (2017). Using mathematics to solve real word problems: The role of enablers. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 30(1), 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert, J., Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Fuson, K., Human, P., Murray, H., Olivier, A., & Wearne, D. (1996). Problem solving as a basis for reform in curriculum and instruction: The case of mathematics. Educational Researcher, 25(4), 12–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim, Z. B., & Othman, K. I. (2010). Comparative study of secondary mathematics curriculum between Malaysia and Singapore. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8(1), 351–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jane, G., Wilson, B., & Zbar, V. (2011). Curriculum mapping project phase 4a: Comparing international curricula against the Australian curriculum, final report. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority, https://acaraweb.blob.core.windows.net/resources/International_Mapping_Project_Phase_4a_v1_file_2.pdf. Retrieved on August 8, 2017.

  • Kaur, B. (2014). Mathematics education in Singapore – An insider’s perspective. IndoMS-JME, 5(1), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayan Indonesia. (2013). Lampiran Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Indonesia no. 65 tahun 2013: Standar proses untuk satuan pendidikan dasar dan menengah [The attachment of the decree of the Minister of Education and Culture of Indonesia no. 65 year 2013: The process standard for elementary and secondary school]. Available from http://jdih.kemdikbud.go.id/new/public/produkhukum. Accessed on November 16, 2015.

  • Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayan Indonesia. (2014). Lampiran Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Indonesia no. 58 tahun 2014: Kurikulum 2013 Sekolah Menengah Pertama/Madrasah Tsanawiyah [The attachment of the decree of the Minister of Education and Culture of Indonesia no. 58 year 2014: 2013 Curriculum for junior high school]. Available from http://jdih.kemdikbud.go.id/new/public/produkhukum. Accessed on December 18, 2015.

  • Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional Indonesia. (2006). Lampiran Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Indonesia nomor 22 tahun 2006: Standar isi untuk satuan pendidikan dasar dan menengah [The attachment of the decree of the Minister of National Education of Indonesia no. 22 year 2006: The content standards of primary and secondary school]. Available from http://jdih.kemdikbud.go.id/new/public/produkhukum. Accessed on December 22, 2015.

  • Kiselova, R. & Kangro, A. (2009). Mathematics curriculum in Latvia and PISA assessment(symposium869). Paper presented at the ECER 2009 conference, http://www.eera-ecer.de/ecer-programmes/conference/2/contribution/3253/. Accessed on June 20, 2017.

  • Kultusministerkonferenz (KMK). (2003). Beschlüsse der Kultusministerkonferenz: Bildungsstandards im Fach Mathematik für den Mittleren Schulabschluss (Resolutions by the Standing Conference of Ministers of Education and Cultural Affairs: Educational standards in mathematics for the intermediate school leaving certificate), http://www.kmk.org/fileadmin/veroeffentlichungen_beschluesse/2003/2003_12_04-Bildungsstandards-Mathe-Mittleren-SA.pdf. Retrieved on February 27, 2018.

  • Makar, K. (2012). The pedagogy of mathematical inquiry. In R. Gillies (Ed.), Pedagogy: New developments in the learning sciences (pp. 371–397). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Gonzalez, E. J., & Chrostowski, S. J. (2004). TIMSS 2003 international mathematics report: Findings from IEA’s trends in international mathematics and science study at the fourth and eighth grades. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS and PIRLS International Study Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., Olson, J. F., Preuschoff, C., Erberber, E., Arora, A., & Galia, J. (2008). TIMSS 2007 international mathematical report: Findings from IEA’s trends in international mathematics and science study at the fourth and eighth grades. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS and PIRLS International Study Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics (NCSM). (1977). Position paper on basic mathematics skills. Washington D.C: National Institute of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and Standards of School Mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. In Thousand oaks. California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2004). Learning for tomorrow’s world: First results from PISA 2003, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264006416-en.

  • OECD. (2007). PISA 2006: Science competencies for tomorrow’s world (volume 1: Analysis), https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264040014-en.

  • OECD. (2010). PISA 2009 results: What students know and can do – Student performance in reading, mathematics and science (volume I), https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264091450-en.

  • OECD (2013a). PISA 2012 assessment and analytical framework: Mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264190511-en.

  • OECD. (2013b). PISA 2012 released mathematics items, http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/pisa2012-2006-rel-items-maths-ENG.pdf. Retrieved on November 16, 2015.

  • OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 results : What students know and can do - student performance in mathematics, reading and science, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264201118-en.

  • OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 Results (Volume I): Excellence and Equity in Education, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-en

  • OECD. (n.d.). Data base-PISA 2012: Downloadable data [Data sets: Compendium for the cognitive item responses]. Available from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/pisa2012database-downloadabledata.htm

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2003). Literacy skills for the world of tomorrow: Further results from PISA 2000, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264102873-en

  • Pehkonen, E. (2017). Teaching mathematics via problem solving. In M. Stein (Ed.), A life’s time for mathematics education and problem solving (pp. 45–69). Munster: WTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, A. C. (2002). Measuring the content of instruction: uses in research and practice. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rott, B. (2012). Problem solving processes of fifth graders: An analysis of problem solving types. In B. Ubuz (Ed.), Proceedings of the 35th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of mathematics education, Vol. 4 (pp. 65–72). Turkey: Ankara.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruddock, G. & Sainsbury, M. with Clausen-May, T., Vappula, H., Mason, K., Patterson, E. W., Pyle, K., Kispal, A., Siddiqui, R., Mc Naughton, S., & Rees, F. (2008). Comparison of the core primary curriculum in England to those of other high performing countries. National Foundation for Educational Research, http://www.uquebec.ca/observgo/fichiers/48461_GSE-2.pdf. Retrieved on August 8, 2017.

  • School Mathematics Study Group (SMSG). (1972). Minimum goals for mathematics education. Newsletter No. 38, section 2. Stanford, Calif: SMSG.

  • Schroeder, T. L., & Lester, F. K. (1989). Understanding mathematics via problem solving. In P. Trafton (Ed.), New directions for elementary school mathematics (pp. 31–42). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, K. (2011). The PISA view of mathematical literacy in Indonesia. IndoMS Journal on Mathematics Education, 2(2), 95–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, P. (2011). Teaching mathematics: Using research-informed strategies. In Camberwell. Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Ministry of Education of Singapore (MOE). (2006). Secondary mathematics syllabuses. Singapore: Curriculum Planning and Development Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, M. (2010). Comparing the Similarities and Differences of PISA 2003 and TIMSS. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 32, OECD Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1787/5km4psnm13nx-en

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research is supported by Directorate General of Resources for Research, Technology and Higher Education of Indonesia (Project number 101.20/E4.4/2015).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Mulawarman University, Kampus Gn. Kelua, Samarinda, 75119, Indonesia

    Safrudiannur

  2. Institute of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Sciences, University of Cologne, Gronewaldstr. 2, D-50931, Cologne, Germany

    Safrudiannur & Benjamin Rott

Authors
  1. Safrudiannur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Benjamin Rott
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Safrudiannur.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Safrudiannur, Rott, B. The different mathematics performances in PISA 2012 and a curricula comparison: enriching the comparison by an analysis of the role of problem solving in intended learning processes. Math Ed Res J 31, 175–195 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-018-0248-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-018-0248-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation