Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prospective elementary teachers’ conceptions of multidigit number: exemplifying a replication framework for mathematics education

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Mathematics Education Research Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Replication studies play a critical role in scientific accumulation of knowledge, yet replication studies in mathematics education are rare. In this study, the authors replicated Thanheiser’s (Educational Studies in Mathematics 75:241–251, 2010) study of prospective elementary teachers’ conceptions of multidigit number and examined the main claim that most elementary pre-service teachers think about digits incorrectly at least some of the time. Results indicated no statistically significant difference in the distribution of conceptions between the original and replication samples and, moreover, no statistically significant differences in the distribution of sub-conceptions among prospective teachers with the most common conception. These results suggest confidence is warranted both in the generality of the main claim and in the utility of the conceptions framework for describing prospective elementary teachers’ conceptions of multidigit number. The report further contributes a framework for replication of mathematics education research adapted from the field of psychology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Borko, H., Eisenhart, M., Brown, C. A., Underhill, R. G., Jones, D., & Agard, P. (1992). Learning to teach hard mathematics: do novice teachers and their instructors give up too easily? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23, 194–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, M. J., IJzerman, H., Dijksterhuis, A., Farach, F. J., Geller, J., Giner-Sorolla, R., et al. (2014). The replication recipe: what makes for a convincing replication? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.10.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, M. D., Cook, B. G., & Therrien, W. J. (2016). Recommendations for replication research in special education: a framework of systematic, conceptual replications. Remedial and Special Education, 37, 244–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/41932516648463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1968). Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychological Bulletin, 70(4), 213–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2008). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • da Ponte, J. P., & Chapman, O. (2015). Prospective mathematics teachers’ learning and knowledge for teaching. In L. D. English & D. Kirshner (Eds.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 275–296).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eastman, P. M. (1975). Replication studies: why so few? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 6(2), 67–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ernest, P. (1998). Social constructivism as a philosophy of mathematics. Albany: SUNY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuson, K. C., Wearne, D., Hiebert, J. C., Murray, H. G., Human, P. G., Olivier, A. I., Carpenter, T. P., & Fennema, E. (1997). Children’s conceptual structures for multidigit numbers and methods of multidigit addition and subtraction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 130–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez, R. (2013). The sociopolitical turn in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 37–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladson-Billings, G., & Tate, W. F. (1995). Toward a critical race theory of education. Teachers College Record, 97, 47–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leinhardt, G. (1989). Math lessons: a contrast of novice and expert competence. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20, 52–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livy, S., & Herbert, S. (2013). Second-year pre-service teachers’ responses to proportional reasoning test items. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 38(11), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2013v38n11.7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luneta, K. (2014). Foundation phase teachers’ (limited) knowledge of geometry. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 4(3), 71–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makel, M. C., & Plucker, J. A. (2014). Facts are more important than novelty: replication in the education sciences. Educational Researcher, 43(6), 304–316. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14545513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClain, K. (2003). Supporting preservice teachers’ understanding of place value and multidigit arithmetic. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5(4), 281–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mejía-Ramos, J. P., & Inglis, M. (2011). Semantic contamination and mathematical proof: can a non-proof prove? The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 30, 10–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2010.11.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nivens, R. A., & Otten, S. (2017). Assessing journal quality in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 48(4), 348–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philipp, R., Schappelle, B., Siegfried, J., Jacobs, V., & Lamb, L. (2008). The effects of professional development on the mathematical content of K-3 teachers. New York: Paper presented at the American Education Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, S. (2009). Shall we really do it again? The powerful concept of replication is neglected in the social sciences. Review of General Psychology, 13(2), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selter, C. (2001). Addition and subtraction of three-digit numbers: German elementary children’s success, methods and strategies. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47(2), 145–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonsohn, U. (2014). Small telescopes: detectability and the evaluating of replication results. Psychological Science. Retrieved at. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2259879.

  • Stanic, G. M., & Kilpatrick, J. (1992). Mathematics curriculum reform in the United States: a historical perspective. International Journal of Educational Research, 17(5), 407–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thanheiser, E. (2018). The effects of preservice elementary school teachers’ accurate self-assessments in the context of whole number. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 49(1), 39–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thanheiser, E. (2010). Investigating further preservice teachers’ conceptions of multidigit whole numbers: refining a framework. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75(3), 241–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thanheiser, E. (2009). Preservice elementary school teachers’ conceptions of multidigit whole numbers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(3), 251–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, C. A. (1990). Solution strategies: subtraction number facts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 21(3), 241–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walshaw, M. (Ed.). (2004). Mathematics education within the postmodern. Greenwich: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erik Jacobson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jacobson, E., Simpson, A. Prospective elementary teachers’ conceptions of multidigit number: exemplifying a replication framework for mathematics education. Math Ed Res J 31, 67–88 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-018-0242-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-018-0242-x

Keywords

Navigation