Abstract
The three middle level mathematics teachers in this set of case studies were engaged in a longitudinal professional development program that sought to impact teaching practices through increasing participants’ mathematical knowledge for teaching. This study investigates how teachers use the contexts in which their teaching practices are situated. Data collected include multiple classroom observations, videotapes, and interviews. The roles of contextual elements in the three teachers’ teaching practices vary greatly, influenced by teachers’ knowledge and beliefs. The realities of contexts were less important than how teachers chose to use those contexts. These cases specifically illuminate the complexities in teachers’ uses of school structure, professional development, curriculum, testing policies, principal expectations, community expectations, and extra-curricular activities. For the three teachers in this study, the roles of contextual elements in their teaching practices varied greatly; such roles are influenced by teachers’ knowledge and beliefs. While much of this analysis is specific to mathematics, some teaching practices transcend mathematics and thus be interesting to a wide audience.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For a research study of a Cohort 2 teacher in her second year, see Rolle (2008).
All names are pseudonyms.
Looping in this context means the teacher teaches the same students across multiple years. In Mrs. Zatechka’s school, teachers typically looped with students in a subject (e.g., mathematics) across 3 years. By changing from teaching 4th–6th grades to 7th–9th grades, Mrs. Zatechka was thus in a 6-year loop with her mathematics students.
During the 2006–2007 school year, when Ms. Lamb implemented an action research project in her classroom as part of the requirements of the M2, she was met with vocal parent protests over the changes she tried to make to homework.
Abbreviations
- Math in the Middle:
-
M2
References
Augustine, N. R., et al. (2010). Rising above the gathering storm, revisited: Rapidly approaching category 5. Washington: National Academies Press.
Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2003). Toward a practice-based theory of mathematical knowledge for teaching. In B. Davis & E. Simmt (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2002 annual meeting of the Canadian mathematics education study group (pp. 3–14). Edmonton, AB: CMESG/GCEDM.
Ball, D. L., Lubienski, S. T., & Mewborn, D. (2001). Research on teaching mathematics: The unsolved problem of teachers’ mathematical knowledge. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: what makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.
Boaler, J., & Humphreys, C. (2005). Connecting mathematical ideas: Middle school video cases to support teaching and learning. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
Chaiklin, S., & Lave, J. (Eds.). (1993). Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (2009). Inquiry as stance. New York: Teachers College Press.
Cohen, D. K. (1990). A revolution in one classroom: The case of Mrs. Oublier. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(3), 311–329.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.
DuFour, R. (2001). In the right context. Journal of Staff Development, 22(1), 14–17.
Flores, M. A., & Day, D. (2006). Contexts which shape and reshape new teachers’ identities: a multi-perspective study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 219–232.
Friel, S., Rachlin, S., & Doyle, D. (2001). Navigating through algebra in grades 6–8. Reston: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Fullan, M. G. (1993). Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform. London: Falmer Press.
Fullan, M. G. (2001). The new meaning of educational change (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967/2007). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research (4th ed.). New Brunswick: Adline Transaction.
Goldsmith, L. T., & Schifter, D. (1997). Understanding teachers in transition: Characteristics of a model for the development of mathematics teaching. In E. Fennema & B. S. Nelson (Eds.), Mathematics teachers in transition (pp. 19–54). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hadjioannou, X. (2007). Bringing the background to the foreground: what do classroom environments that support authentic discussions look like? American Educational Research Journal, 44(2), 370–399.
Hargreaves, A. (2005). Educational change takes ages: life, career and generational factors in teachers’ emotional responses to educational change. Teaching & Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 21(8), 967–983.
Heaton, R. M., Lewis, W. J., Homp, M. R., Dunbar, S. R., & Smith, W. M. (2012a). Challenging and rigorous yet accessible and relevant mathematics courses for middle level teachers. MAA Notes Series, forthcoming.
Heaton, R. M., Lewis, W. J., & Smith, W. M. (2012b). The Math in the Middle Institute: Strengthening middle level teachers’ mathematical and pedagogical capacities. MAA Notes Series, forthcoming.
Hill, H. C., Schilling, S. G., & Ball, D. L. (2004). Developing measures of teachers’ mathematics knowledge for teaching. The Elementary School Journal, 105(1), 11–30.
Janvier, C. (1987). Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Jones, D. (1997). A conceptual framework for studying the relevance of context to mathematics teachers’ change. In E. Fennema & B. S. Nelson (Eds.), Mathematics teachers in transition (pp. 131–154). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lampert, M., & Blunk, M. L. (1998). Talking mathematics in school: Studies of learning and teaching. Cambridge: University Press.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108, 1017–1054.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: Author.
Nelson, B. S., Warfield, J., & Wood, T. (2001). Introduction. In T. Wood, B. S. Nelson, & J. Warfield (Eds.), Beyond classical pedagogy: Teaching elementary school mathematics (pp. 1–26). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 509–523.
Peterson, P. L. (1990). Doing more in the same amount of time: Cathy Swift. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(3), 261–280.
Polly, D. (2011). Teachers’ learning while constructing technology-based instructional resources. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42, 950–961.
Ried, D., & Zack, V. (2010a). Observing the process of mathematics teacher change—part 1. Journal of Math Teacher Education. doi:10.1007/s10857-010-9158-4.
Ried, D., & Zack, V. (2010b). Observing the process of mathematics teacher change—part 2. Journal of Math Teacher Education. doi:10.1007/s10857-010-9165-5.
Rolle, Y. A. (2008). Habits of practice: a qualitative case study of a middle-school mathematics teacher. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, [location blinded for review]
Schifter, D. (1996). What’s happening in math class? Envisioning new practices through teacher narratives, Vol. 1. New York: Teachers College Press.
Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching. Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–28.
Silver, E. A., & Herbst, P. G. (2007). Putting philosophy to work: Coping with multiple theoretical perspectives. In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 39–67). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Simon, M. A. (1997). Developing new models of mathematics teaching: An imperative for research on mathematics teacher development. In E. Fennema & B. S. Nelson (Eds.), Mathematics teachers in transition (pp. 55–86). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Simon, M. A., & Tzur, R. (2004). Explicating the role of mathematical tasks in conceptual learning: an elaboration of the hypothetical learning trajectory. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 91–104.
Smith, W. M. (2008). Exploring how three middle level mathematics teachers use their experiences in an ambitious professional development program. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Lincoln, NE, USA.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap. New York: Free Press.
Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (2004). Improving mathematics teaching. Educational Leadership, 61(5), 12–17.
Swidler, S. A. (2004). Naturally small: Teaching and learning in the last one-teacher schools. Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
Thompson, A. G. (1984). The relationship of teachers’ conceptions of mathematics and mathematics teaching to instructional practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15, 105–127.
Tubbs, N. (2000). From reflective practitioner to comprehensive teacher. Educational Action Research, 8(1), 167–178.
Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareia Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2012). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The author acknowledges the support of the National Science Foundation (EHR-0412502) in doing, studying and writing about the professional development project described in this article. All ideas expressed in this paper are the author’s and do not reflect the views of the funding agency. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, April 2009.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smith, W.M. Exploring relationships among teacher change and uses of contexts. Math Ed Res J 24, 301–321 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-012-0053-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-012-0053-4