Skip to main content
Log in

Constructing entity specific projected mortality table: adjustment to a reference

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
European Actuarial Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article presents an operational framework for constructing and validating projected mortality table specific to an insurer. We describe several methods of increasing complexity and the process of validation allowing an insurer to adjust a baseline mortality to get closer to a best estimate assessment of its mortality and longevity risk. They provide to the insurer some latitude of choice while preserving simplicity of implementation for the basic methodology. The methodologies articulate around an iterative procedure allowing to choose parsimoniously the most satisfying one. The process of validation is assessed on three levels. This concerns the proximity between the observations and the model, the regularity of the fit as well as the plausibility and consistency of the mortality trends. Finally, the procedure is illustrated from experience data originating from a French Insurance portfolio.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cairns AJG, Blake D, Dowd K (2006) Pricing death: frameworks for the valuation and securization of mortality risk. ASTIN Bull 36:79–120

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Debón A, Montes F, Sala R (2006) A comparison of nonparametric methods in the graduation of mortality: application to data from the Valencia region (Spain). Int stat Rev 74(2):215–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Delwarde A, Denuit M (2005) Construction de tables de mortalité périodiques et prospectives. Assurance Audit Actuariat. Economica

  4. Delwarde A, Kachkhdze D, Olie L, Denuit M (2004) Modèles linéaires et additifs géneralisés, maximum de vraisemblance local et méthodes relationelles en assurance sur la vie. Bulletin Français d’Actuariat 6(12):77–102

    Google Scholar 

  5. Denuit M, Goderniaux AC (2005) Closing and projecting life tables using log-linear models. Bull Swiss Assoc Bull Swiss Assoc Actuar 1:29–48

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Felipe A, Guillén M, Pérez-Marín A (2002) Recent mortality trends in the Spanish population. Br Actuar J 8(4):757–786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Forfar D, McCutcheon J, Wilkie A (1988) On graduation by mathematical formula. J Insti Actuar 115(1):1–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hunt A, Blake D (2013) A general procedure for constructing mortality models. Discuss Paper Pension Inst 1301:1–51

    Google Scholar 

  9. Liddell FDK (1984) Simple exact analysis of the standardised mortality ratio. J Epidemiol Commun Health 38:85–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Planchet F, Thérond P (2011) Modélisation statistique des phénomènes de durée—Applications actuarielles. Assurance Audit Actuariat, Economica Paris

    Google Scholar 

  11. R Development Core Team (2014). R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org

  12. Tomas J (2011) A local likelihood approach to univariate graduation of mortality. Bulletin Français d’Actuariat 11(22):105–153

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tomas, J. (2013). Quantifying biometric life insurance risks with non-parametric methods. Ph.D. thesis, Amsterdam School of Economics Research Institute

  14. Tomas J, Planchet F (2013a) Multidimensional smoothing by adaptive local kernel-weighted log-likelihood with application to long-term care insurance. Insur: Math Econ 52(3):573–589

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Tomas J, Planchet F (2013b) Construction et validation des références de mortalité de place. Technical report II1291-11 v1.3, Institut des Actuaires

  16. Tomas J, Planchet F (2013c) Critères de validation: aspects méthodologiques. Technical report II1291-14 v1.1, Institut des Actuaires

  17. Tomas J, Planchet F (2013d) Méthodes de positionnement: aspects méthodologiques. Technical report II1291-12v1.4, Institut des Actuaires

  18. Tomas J, Planchet F (2014) Prospective mortality table and portfolio experience. In: Charpentier A (ed) Computational actuarial science, with R, The R Series, chapter 9. Chapman and Hall (to appear)

Download references

Acknowledgments

This article has benefitted substantially from the constructive comments of the working group mortalité of Institut des Actuaires. This research was supported by grants from BNP Paribas Cardif Chair Management de la modélisation and Institut des Actuaires. In addition, we are also grateful to a referee for a careful reading of the manuscript and comments which led to an improved version of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julien Tomas.

Additional information

The views expressed in this document are the authors own and do not necessarily reflect those endorsed by BNP Paribas Cardif and Institut des Actuaires.

Appendix A: The data

Appendix A: The data

Table 12 presents the observed characteristics of the male and female population.

Table 12 Observed characteristics of the male and female population of the portfolio

Figures 13 and 14 display the observed statistics of the male and female population respectively.

Fig. 13
figure 13

Observed satistics, male population

Fig. 14
figure 14

Observed satistics, female population. a D x,t , b E x,t , c logq x (t)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tomas, J., Planchet, F. & ISFA, Laboratoire SAF. Constructing entity specific projected mortality table: adjustment to a reference. Eur. Actuar. J. 4, 247–279 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13385-014-0095-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13385-014-0095-y

Keywords

Navigation