Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental Analysis of the Behavior of Composite Column-Reinforced Concrete Beam Joints

  • Research Article-Civil Engineering
  • Published:
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study assesses the seismic performance of steel-reinforced concrete (SRC) composite columns connected to reinforced concrete (RC) beam joints, and their ability to dissipate seismic energy through inelastic deformations. In this article, experimental aspects regarding the seismic performance of high-ductility and low-ductility steel–concrete composite frame were investigated. The principle design parameter in this study was ductility, which is considered a conceptual framework in Efficiency-Based Seismic Engineering. Thus, attention was focused on assuring various ductility ranges of joints obtained through a detailed study of the Turkish Earthquake Code (TEC 18) [Ministry of Public Works and Housing.: Türkiye Bina Deprem Yönetmeliği (Turkey’s Earthquake Code for Buildings). Official Gazette (2018) (in Turkish).]. After identifying deficiencies and the energy dissipation capacity in the newly proposed joints, two half-scaled frames with specific ductility-related designs were constructed, instrumented, tested, and analyzed. The specimens were tested under displacement-controlled lateral cyclic loading that incorporated constant axial loading to create cyclic tension and compression facets across the joint areas. The test results proved that the SRC column-RC beam frames employing an extra column reinforcement ratio exhibit slightly better seismic performance. Due to the presence of structural steel, the shear failure of the joint was effectively prevented, even after the formation of the plastic hinge on the interface of the beam. During the testing, the column rebars, to some extent, made a minor contribution to the joint strength of the specimen compared to the structural steel that absorbed almost all of the load applied to the frame.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ministry of Public Works and Housing.: Türkiye Bina Deprem Yönetmeliği (Turkey's Earthquake Code for Buildings). Official Gazette (2018) (in Turkish).

  2. Xu, C.; Peng, S.; Wang, C.; Ma, Z.: Influence of the degree of damage and confinement materials on the seismic behavior of RC beam-SRC column composite joints. Compos. Struct. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Durrani, A.J.; Wight, J.K.: Behavior of interior beam-to-column connections under earthquake-type loading. ACI J. Proce. 82(3), 343–349 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gentry, T.R.; Wight, J.K.: Wide beam-column connections under earthquake-type loading. Earthquake Spectra 10(4), 675–703 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lowes, L.N.; Altoontash, A.: Modeling reinforced-concrete beam-column joints subjected to cyclic loading. J Struct. Eng. 129(12), 1686–1697 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Climent, A.B.; Cahís, X.; Zahran, R.: Exterior wide beam–column connections in existing RC frames subjected to lateral earthquake loads. Eng. Struct. 31(7), 1414–1424 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.02.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shafaei, J.; Zareian, M.S.; Hosseini, A.; Marefat, M.S.: Effects of joint flexibility on lateral response of reinforced concrete frames. Eng. Struct. 81, 412–431 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.09.046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. do Carmo, R.N.F.; Costa, H.; Gomes, G.; Valença, J.: Experimental evaluation of lightweight aggregate concrete beam–column joints with different strengths and reinforcement ratios. Struct. Concr. 18, 950–961 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201600166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Skyscraper Center: 2019 tall building year in review. http://www.skyscrapercenter.com/year-in-review/2019 (2019). Accessed 10 Aug. 2020

  10. Ji, X.; Kang, H.; Chen, X.; Qian, J.: Seismic behavior and strength capacity of steel tube-reinforced concrete composite columns. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dynam. 43(4), 487–505 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu, J.; Li, X.; Zang, X.; Chen, Y.F.; Wang, X.: Hysteretic behavior and modified design of square TSRC columns with shear studs. Thin-Walled Struct. 129, 265–277 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2018.04.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhou, X.; Liu, J.: Seismic behavior and strength of tubed steel reinforced concrete (SRC) short columns. J. Constr. Steel Res. 66(7), 885–896 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Abdullah, J.A.; Sumei, Z.; Jiepeng, L.: Shear strength and behavior of tubed reinforced and steel reinforced concrete (TRC and TSRC) short columns. Thin-Walled Struct. 48(3), 191–199 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2009.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Şermet, F.; Ercan, E.; Hökelikli, E.; Arısoy, B.: Cyclic Behavior of Composite Column-Reinforced Concrete Beam Joints. Sigma: J. Eng. Nat. Sci. 38(3), 1427–1445 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lai, B.L.; Liew, J.Y.R.; Le Hong, A.: Behavior of high strength concrete encased steel composite stub columns with C130 concrete and S690 steel. Eng. Struct. 200, 109743 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lai, B.L.; Liew, J.Y.R.; Xiong, M.X.: Experimental study on high strength concrete encased steel composite short columns. Constr. Build. Mater. 228, 116640 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lai, B.L.; Liew, J.Y.R.; Wang, T.: Buckling behaviour of high strength concrete encased steel composite columns. J. Constr. Steel Res. 154, 27–42 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lai, B.L.; Liew, J.Y.R.; Le Hoang, A.; Xiong, M.: A unified approach to evaluate axial force moment interaction curves of concrete encased steel composite columns. Eng. Struct. 201, 109841 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lai, B.L.; Liew, J.Y.R.: Axial-moment interaction of high strength concrete encased steel composite columns: design recommendation. J. Constr. Steel Res. 170, 106136 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ma, D.Y.; Han, L.H.; Zhao, X.L.: Seismic performance of the concrete-encased CFST column to RC beam joint: Experiment. J. Constr. Steel Res. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.11.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhou, K.; Han, L.-H.: Experimental performance of concrete-encased CFST columns subjected to full-range fire including heating and cooling. Eng. Struct. 165, 331–348 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.03.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhou, K.; Han, L.-H.: Modelling the behaviour of concrete-encased concrete-filled steel tube (CFST) columns subjected to full-range fire. Eng. Struct. 183, 265–280 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.12.100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhou, K.; Han, L.H.: Experimental and numerical study of temperature developments of composite joints between concrete-encased concrete-filled steel tube columns and reinforced concrete beams. Fire Saf. J. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2020.103187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Li G.H., Xie L., Zhao D.F.: Test and parametric analysis of postfire seismic performance of SRC column–RC beam joints. Proceedings of the International Conference on Civil, Architecture and Environmental Engineering, 135–138 (2016).

  25. Liao, F.-Y.; Han, L.-H.; Tao, Z.: Behaviour of composite joints with concrete encased CFST columns under cyclic loading: Experiments. Eng. Struct. 59, 745–764 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.11.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Han, L.H.; An, Y.F.: Performance of concrete-encased CFST stub columns under axial compression. J. Constr. Steel Res. 93, 62–76 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. An, Y.F.; Han, L.H.; Roeder, C.: Flexural performance of concrete-encased concrete-filled steel tubes. Mag. Concr. Res. 66(5), 249–267 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. An, Y.F.; Han, L.H.: Behavior of concrete-encased CFST columns under combined compression and bending. J. Constr. Steel Res. 101, 314–330 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kim, C.S.; Park, H.G.; Chung, K.S.; Choi, I.R.: Eccentric axial load testing for concrete encased steel columns using 800 MPa steel and 100 MPa concrete. J. Struct. Eng. 138(8), 1019–1031 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Moon, J.H.; Lim, J.H.; Oh, K.H.; Kim, S.H.; Lee, K.M.: Cyclic load testing for weak axis joints connected with SRC column and RC beams. J. Korea Concr. Inst. (2009). https://doi.org/10.4334/JKCI.2009.21.1.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chen, C.; Li, J.; Weng, C.: Experimental behaviour and strength of concrete-encased composite beam-columns with T-shaped steel section under cyclic loading. J. Constr. Steel Res. 61(7), 863–881 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2005.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. TSE-TS-500.: Betonarme Yapıların Tasarım ve Yapım Kuralları (Requirements for Design and Construction of Reinforced Concrete Structures). Turkish Standards Institution, Ankara (2000) (in Turkish).

  33. ANSI/AISC 360–16.: Specification for Structural Steel Buildings. AISC Committee on Specifications: Chicago, USA (2016)

  34. TSE-TS-708.: Steel for the Reinforcement of Concrete. Turkish Standards Institution, Ankara, (2010) (in Turkish)

  35. Liang, Q.Q.: Analysis and Design of Steel and Composite Structures. CRC Press, New York, USA, Taylor & Francis Group (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  36. ACI 318–14.: Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete. Reported by ACI Committee 318 (2014)

  37. ACI 374.2R-13.: Guide for Testing Reinforced Concrete Structural Elements Under Slowly Applied Simulated Seismic Loads. Reported by ACI Committee 374 (2013)

  38. FEMA P440A.: Effects of Strength and Stiffness Degradation on Seismic Response. Reported by FEMA (2009)

  39. Yang, H.; Zhao, W.; Zhu, Z.; Fu, J.: Seismic behavior comparison of reinforced concrete interior beam-column joints based on different loading methods. Eng. Struct. 166, 31–45 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.03.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Alavi-Dehkordi, S.; Mostofinejad, D.; Alaee, P.: Effects of high-strength reinforcing bars and concrete on seismic behavior of RC beam-column joints. Eng. Struct. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.01.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Rizkalla, S.; El-Hacha, R.; El-Agroudy, H.: Bond characteristics of high-strength steel reinforcement. ACI Struct. J. 103(6), 771–782 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Moehle, J.P.: Displacement-based design of RC structures subjected to earthquakes. Earthq. Spectra. 8(3), 403–428 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Rodriguez, M.E.; Aristizabal, J.C.: Evaluation of a seismic damage parameter. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 28(5), 463–477 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the assistance of Dogan Tok, Engin Alp and Mohammed Othman during the testing phase of this study.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gokhan Tunc.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tunc, G., Dakhil, A. & Mertol, H.C. Experimental Analysis of the Behavior of Composite Column-Reinforced Concrete Beam Joints. Arab J Sci Eng 46, 10785–10801 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-021-05545-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-021-05545-3

Keywords

Navigation