Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sediment Rating Curve Parameters Relationship with Watershed Characteristics in the Semiarid River Watersheds

  • Research Article - Earth Sciences
  • Published:
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to effective management of water resources, an accurate estimate of the water transporting load is necessary. But no individual method has been shown to consistently provide accurate load estimates among different water sampling sites. We evaluated the accuracy of several load estimation methods by simulation of the relationship between river discharge and sediment yield, across a broad range of sampling and environmental conditions. Sediment rating curves (SRCs) are generally used to estimate the suspended sediment load of the rivers and drainage watersheds. Since the regression equations of the SRCs are obtained by logarithmic retransformation and have a little independent variable in this equation, they can be used to estimate the true sediment load of the rivers. One of the modification methods to compensate this bias is developing various correction factors. For optimization of SRCs and to evaluate the bias correction factors in Kale Shour and Kashaf Rud watersheds, seven hydrometric stations of this region were selected with the easy-to-find variables in the upstream watershed of stations. Investigation of the accuracy index (ratio of estimated sediment yield to observed sediment yield) and the precision index (the estimated coefficient of variation) of different bias correction factors of Food and Agriculture Organization coefficient (FAO) and three regression models, the quasi-maximum likelihood estimator (QMLE), smearing estimator, and the 7-parameter minimum-variance unbiased estimator (MVUE) with the least significant difference test showed that FAO coefficient increases the estimated error in all of the stations. Applications of MVUE in linear and mean load SRCs have not statistically meaningful effects. The QMLE and the smearing factors increased the estimated error in mean load SRCs, but that does not have any effect on linear SRCs estimation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhang, Y.; Ohata, T.; Yang, D.; Davaa, G.: Bias correction of daily precipitation measurements for Mongolia. Hydrol. Process. 18(16), 2991–3005 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gholami, V.; Jolandan, M.A.; Torkaman, J.: Evaluation of climate change in northern Iran during the last four centuries by using dendroclimatology. Nat. Hazards 85, 1835–1850 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jain, S.: Development of integrated SRCs using ANNs. J. Hydraul. Eng. 127(1), 30–37 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2001)127:1(30)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Goodison, B.E.: Compatibility of Canadian snowfall and snow cover data. Water Resour. Res. 17, 893–900 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Groisman, P.Y.; Easterling, D.R.: Variability and trends of total precipitation and snowfall over the United States and Canada. J. Clim. 7(1), 184–205 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Crawford, C.G.: Estimation of suspended and SRCs and mean suspended sediment loads. J. Hydrol. 129, 331–398 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(91)90057-O

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee, C.J.; Hirsch, R.M.; Schwarz, G.E.; Holtschlag, D.J.; Preston, S.D.; Crawford, C.G.; Vecchia, A.V.: An evaluation of methods for estimating decadal stream loads. J. Hydrol. 542, 185–203 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.08.059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cohn, T.A.; Caulder, D.L.; Gilroy, E.J.; Zynjuk, L.D.; Summers, R.M.: The validity of a simple statistical model for estimating fluvial constituent loads: an empirical study involving nutrient loads entering Chesapeake Bay. Water Resour. Res. 28(9), 2353–2363 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cox, N.J.; Warburton, J.; Armstrong, A.; Holliday, V.J.: Fitting concentration and load rating curves with generalized linear models. Earth Surf. Processes Landf. 33(1), 25–39 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ferguson, R.I.: River loads underestimated by rating curves. Water Resour. Res. 22, 74–76 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1029/WR022i001p00074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hu, B.Q.; Wang, H.J.; Yang, Z.S.; Sun, X.X.: Temporal and spatial variations of SRCs in the Changjiang (Yangtze River) watershed and their implications. Quat. Int. 230(1–2), 34–43 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2009.08.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tananaev, N.I.: Fitting sediment rating curves using regression analysis: a case study of Russian Arctic Rivers. In: Proceedings of a Symposium, New Orleans, IAHS Publications 367, Louisiana, USA, 11–14 Dec 2014 (2015)

  13. Asselman, N.E.M.: Fitting and interpretation of SRCs. J. Hydrol. 234(3–4), 228–248 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00253-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. De Girolamo, A.M.; Pappagallo, G.; Lo Porto, A.: Temporal variability of suspended sediment transport and rating curves in a Mediterranean river basin: The Celone (SE Italy). Catena 128, 135–143 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2014.09.020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Martine, R.; Rango, F.: Merits of statistical criteria for performance of hydrological models. Water Resour. Bull. 25(2), 42–432 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1989.tb03079.x

    Google Scholar 

  16. Khaleghi, M.R.; Varvani, J.; Kamyar, M.; Gholami, V.; Ghaderi, M.: An evaluation of bias correction factors in SRCs: a case study of hydrometric stations in Kalshor and Kashafroud Watershed, Khorasan Razavi Province, Iran. Int. Bull. Water Resour. Dev. 3(2), 1–10 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schleppi, P.; Waldner, P.A.; Stahli, M.: Errors of flux integration methods for solutes in grab samples of runoff water, as compared to flow-proportional sampling. J. Hydrol. 2, 1–16 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.06.034

    Google Scholar 

  18. Boning, W.C.: Recommendations for use of retransformation methods in Regression, models used to estimate sediment loads. http://water.Usgs.Gov (2001)

  19. Goodison, B.E.: Compatibility of Canadian snowfall and snow cover data. Water Resour. Res. 17, 893–900 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Duan, N.: Smearing estimate, a nonparametric retransformation method. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 78(383), 605–610 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1983.10478017

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Thomas, R.B.: Estimating total suspended sediment yield with probability sampling. Water Resour. Res. 21, 1381–1388 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1029/WR021i009p01381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Keener, R.W.: Statistical Theory: Notes for a Course in Theoretical Statistics, pp. 47–48, 57–58. Springer, Berlin (2006)

  23. Wang, P.; Linker, L.C.; Storrick, J.: Chesapeake Bay Watershed Model application & calculation of nutrient & sediment loadings, Appendix G: observed data used for calibration, a regression model, and a confirmation scenario of Phase IV Watershed Model. EPA/CBPO document (1998)

  24. Wang, P.; Linker, L.: An alternative regression method for constituent loads from steams. Water Qual. Ecosyst. Model. 4, 935–942 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Meade, R.H.; Yuzyk, T.R.; Day, T.J.: Movement and storage of sediment in rivers of the United States and Canada. In: Surface Water Hydrology, vol. 3. Geological Society of America, Boulder, CO, pp. 255–280 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3071-1_8

  26. Fan, X.; Shi, C.; Zhou, Y.; Shao, W.: SRCs in the Ningxia-Inner Mongolia reaches of the upper Yellow River and their implications. Quat. Int. 282, 152–162 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2012.04.044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Walling, D.E.; Webb, B.W.: The reliability of suspended sediment load data. In: Erosion and Sediment Transport Measurement, IAHS Publication 133. IAHS Press, Wallingford, pp. 177–194 (1981)

  28. De Vries, A.; Klavers, H.C.: Riverine fluxes of pollutants: monitoring strategy first, calculation methods second. Eur. J. Water Pollut. Control 4, 12–17 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2007.05.001

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ferguson, R.I.: Accuracy and precision of methods for estimating river loads. Earth Surf. Processes Landf. 12, 95–104 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3290120111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Jansson, M.B.: Estimating a SRCs of the Reventon River at Palomo using logged mean loads within discharge classes. J. Hydrol. 183(4), 227–241 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(95)02988-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Jones, K.R.; Berney, O.; Carr D.P.; Barrett E.C.: Arid zone hydrology for agricultural development. In: FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 37, Flood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 271 pp (1981)

  32. Jansson, M.B.: Comparison of SRCs developed on load and on concentration. Nord. Hydrol. 28(3), 189–200 (1997). https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.1997.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Iadanza, C.; Napolitano, F.: Sediment transports time series in the Tiber River. Phys. Chem. Earth Parts A B C 31(18), 1212–1227 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2006.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Holtschlag, D.J.: Optimal estimation of suspended-sediment concentrations in streams. Hydrol. Process. 15, 1133–1156 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hudson, P.F.: Event sequence and sediment exhaustion in the lower Panuco Watershed, Mexico. Catena 52(1), 57–76 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0341-8162(02)00145-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lecce, S.A.; Pease, P.P.; Gares, P.A.; Wang, J.Y.: Seasonal controls on sediment delivery in a small coastal plain watershed, North Carolina, USA. Geomorphology 73(3–4), 246–260 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2005.05.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Marttila, H.; Kleve, B.: Dynamics of erosion and suspended sediment transport from drained peat-land forestry. J. Hydrol. 388(3–4), 414–425 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.05.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Morehead, M.D.; Syvitski, J.P.M.; Hutton, E.W.H.; Peckham, S.D.: Modeling the temporal variability in the flux of sediment from un-gauged river watersheds. Glob. Planet. Change 39(1–2), 95–110 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8181(03)00019-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Yang, G.F.; Chen, Z.Y.; Yu, F.; Wang, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, Z.: Sediment rating parameters and their implications: Yangtze River, China. Geomorphol. 85(3–4), 166–175 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.03.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wang, H.J.; Yang, Z.S.; Wang, Y.; Saito, Y.; Liu, J.P.: Reconstruction of sediment flux from the Changjiang (Yangtze River) to the sea since the 1860s. J. Hydrol. 349(3–4), 318–332 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.11.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Taormina, R.; Chau, K.W.; Sivakumar, B.: Neural network river forecasting through base flow separation and binary-coded swarm optimization. J. Hydrol. 529, 1788–1797 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.08.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Wu, C.L.; Chau, K.W.; Fan, C.: Prediction of rainfall time series using modular artificial neural networks coupled with data preprocessing techniques. J. Hydrol. 389(1–2), 146–167 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Chau, K.W.; Wu, C.L.: A hybrid model coupled with singular spectrum analysis for daily rainfall prediction. J Hydro Inform. 12(4), 458–473 (2010). https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2010.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Chen, X.Y.; Chau, K.W.; Busari, A.O.: Comparative study of population-based optimization algorithms for downstream river flow forecasting by a hybrid neural network model. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 46, 258-26 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2015.09.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Gholami, V.; Chau, K.W.; Fadaee, F.; Torkaman, J.; Ghaffari, A.: Modeling of groundwater level fluctuations using dendrochronology in alluvial aquifers. J. Hydrol. 529, 1060–1069 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.09.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Arabkhedri, M.; Varvani, J.; Hakimkhani, Sh: The validity of extrapolation methods in estimation of annual mean suspended sediment yield (17 hydrometric stations). J. Agric. Sci. Nat. Resour. 13, 123–131 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Arabkhedri, M.; Noor-Akma, I.; Mohamad-Roslan, M.K.: Effect of adaptive cluster sampling design on accuracy of SRC estimation. J. Hydrol. Eng. 15(2), 142–151 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Najfinejad, A.; Mardian, M.; Varvani, J.; Sheikh, V.B.: Performance evaluation of correction factors in optimization of sediment rating curve (case study: Kamal Saleh Dam Watershed, Markazi Province, Iran. J. Agric. Sci. Nat. Resour. 18(2), 105–122 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Phillips, J.M.; Webb, B.W.; Walling, D.E.; Leeks, G.J.L.: Estimating the suspended sediment loads of rivers in the LOIS study area using infrequent samples. Hydrol. Processes 13, 1035–1050 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199905)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank TAMAB (Water Resources Research Organization of Iran) for providing the data for discharge and sediment and for helping us with the data preprocessing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Range and Watershed Management, Torbat-e-Jam Branch, Islamic Azad University, Torbat-e-Jam, Iran

    M. R. Khaleghi

  2. Department of Range and Watershed Management, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran

    J. Varvani

Authors
  1. M. R. Khaleghi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. Varvani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. R. Khaleghi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khaleghi, M.R., Varvani, J. Sediment Rating Curve Parameters Relationship with Watershed Characteristics in the Semiarid River Watersheds. Arab J Sci Eng 43, 3725–3737 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-018-3092-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-018-3092-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation