Skip to main content
Log in

Performance of Photogrammetric and Terrestrial Laser Scanning Methods in Volume Computing of Excavtion and Filling Areas

  • Research Article - Earth Sciences
  • Published:
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Volume calculations in filling and cutting areas are required for many engineering applications, particularly those to be used in civil engineering and mining work. Volume calculation, generally, is achieved with classical surveying methods. However, in modern geodetic and photogrammetric methods, volume computations are obtained from the differences between the defined surfaces. Volume calculations must have been carried out as accurately, economically and in a short time period with respect to the expectations. Recently, there are important developments in software and hardware which have had a positive effect on geodetic and photogrammetric methods. Now, many studies related to terrain can be completed more easily, faster and more accurately. The terrain surfaces can be defined by modern geodetic instruments and laser scanners; thus, volumes could be obtained from differences of terrain surfaces. In this study, the ability of digital close-range photogrammetry and terrestrial laser scanning was investigated in terms of volume calculation. For this purpose, both photogrammetric and terrestrial laser scanning methods were used for volume calculation in an excavation and filling area. It was observed that each method could be used in volume computing depending on what was expected from the volume process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chen C.S., Lin H.C.: Estimating pit-excavation volume using cubic spline volume formula. J. Surv. Eng. 117(2), 51 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yanalak M.: Computing pit excavation volume. J. Surv. Eng. 131(1), 15 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Soole, P.; Poropat, G.: Highwall Mapping Using Terrestrial Photogrammetry. In: Beeston J.W. (ed.) Bowen Basin Symposium 2000 Proceedings, Rockhampton, 22–24 October, 343 (2000)

  4. Kraus, K.: Photogrammetry, Fundamentals and Standard Processes, Volume I. Dümmler, Bonn (1993)

  5. Atkinson, K.B.: Close Range Photogrammetry and Machine Vision. Whittles Publishing, Scotland (1996)

  6. Cooper, M.A.R.; Robson, S.: Theory of Close Range Photogrammetry. In: Close Range Photogrammetry and Machine Vision, p. 9 (1996)

  7. Aguilar M.A., Aguilar F.J., Agüera F., Carvajal F.: The evaluation of close-range photogrammetry for the modelling of mouldboard plough surfaces. Biosyst. Eng. 90(4), 397 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Boehler, W.; Vicent, M.B.; Marbs, A.: Investigating Laser Scanner Accuracy. Originally Presented at The XIXth Cıpa Symposium At Antalya, Turkey, 30 Sep–4 Oct, Updated For Web Presentation October 2003 (2003)

  9. Balzani, M.; Pellegrinelli, A.; Perfetti, N.; Uccelli, F.: A terrestrial 3D laser scanner: accuracy tests. In: Proceedings of 18th international symposium on CIPA, 445 (2001)

  10. Johansson, M.: Explorations into the behavior of three different high-resolution ground-based laser scanners in the built environment. In: Proceedings of the CIPA WG6 international workshop on scanning for cultural heritage recording. http://www.isprs.org/commission5/workshop/ (2002)

  11. Kern, F.: Automatisierte Modellierung von Bauwerksgeometrien aus 3D-Laserscannerdaten. Geodätische Schriftenreihe der Technischen Universität Braunschweig, Nr. 19, ISBN 3-926146-14-1 (2003)

  12. Lichti, D.D.; Stewart, M.P.; Tsakiri, M.; Snow, A.J.: Calibration and testing of a terrestrial laser scanner. Int. Arch. of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, XXXIII, Part B5, 485 (2000)

  13. Lichti, D.D.; Gordon, S.J.; Stewart, M.P.; Franke, J.; Tsakiri, M.: Comparison of digital photogrammetry and laser scanning. In: Proceedings of the CIPA WG6 Int. Workshop on scanning for cultural heritage recording. http://www.isprs.org/commission5/workshop/ (2002)

  14. Boehler, W.; Marbs, A.: 3D Scanning instruments. In: Proceedings of the CIPA WG6 Int. Workshop on scanning for cultural heritage recording http://www.isprs.org/commission5/workshop/ (2002)

  15. Kersten, T.P.; Sternberg, H.; Mechelke, K.: Investigations into the accuracy behavior of the terrestrial laser scanning system mensi gs100. In: Optical 3-D Measurement Techniques VII, Gruen/Kahmen (Eds.), Vienna, I, 122 (2005)

  16. Photomodeler 5.0 Software, 2006, Online Manual

  17. Surfer 8.0 Software, Online Handbook, (http://www.goldensoftware.com/demo.shtml) (2006)

  18. URL-1, (http://www.optech.ca) (2007)

  19. URL-2, (http://www.innovmetric.com) (2007)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. M. Yilmaz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yakar, M., Yilmaz, H.M. & Mutluoglu, O. Performance of Photogrammetric and Terrestrial Laser Scanning Methods in Volume Computing of Excavtion and Filling Areas. Arab J Sci Eng 39, 387–394 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-013-0853-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-013-0853-1

Keywords

Navigation