Skip to main content
Log in

Desalination of Brackish Water Using Nanofiltration: Performance Comparison of Different Membranes

  • Research Article - Chemical Engineering
  • Published:
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Characterization and performance screening of NF membranes are essential to evaluate their suitability for application in brackish water desalination. In this study, two commercial and two fabricated nanoparticle-modified polyethersulfone membranes were studied and characterized. In addition, their performance in terms of flux and rejection was investigated. Based on these initial studies, the membranes’ suitability for application in brackish water desalination could be ascertained. This information will also be helpful in further improvement of the membranes and in terms of optimizing their performance. The two commercial NF membranes are NF-1 and ASP30 and the two fabricated membranes are polyethersulfone-nanocomposite membranes (PES-5 % Fe3O4, PES-10 % Fe3O4). Pore size diameter, pore size distribution, and roughness were measured using atomic force microscopy. Surface cleanliness of membranes was investigated by field emission scanning electron microscopy. Hydrophobicity and hydrophilicity were also studied using the contact angle. Flux, permeability, and rejection rates were investigated for all membranes. The NF-1 commercial membrane had the highest rejection rate for divalent salt MgSO4, reaching 92 %, while fabricated membrane PES-5 % Fe3O4 had the highest rejection rate for monovalent NaCl salt, reaching 75 %. Commercial NF-1 and ASP30 membranes showed higher flux than fabricated membranes. ASP30 had the highest flux and permeability (176 and 12.77 l/m−2h−1 bar−1, respectively), while PES-5 % Fe3O4 fabricated membrane had the lowest (47.40 and 4.8 l/m−2 h−1 bar−1, respectively).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shomar B., Osenbrück K., Yahya A.: Elevated nitrate levels in the groundwater of the Gaza Strip: Distribution and sources. Sci. Total Environ. 398, 164–174 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. CMWU: Water Desalination Technology in Gaza Strip. Coastal Municipalities Water Utility (2010)

  3. Mogheir, Y.K.Y.: Assessment and Redesign of Groundwater Quality Monitoring Networks Using the Entropy Theory—Gaza Strip Case Study. Department of Civil Engineering University of Coimbra (2003)

  4. CMWU: Second Quarter Report for Disinfection & Biannual Report of Water Quality in Gaza Strip. Coastal Municipalities Water Utility (2009)

  5. World Health Organization (WHO): Guidelines for Drinking Water, 2nd edn, Geneva (1996)

  6. Palestinian Standards Institution (PSI): Water Quality Standards. Ramallah, Palestine (2004)

  7. Al-Agha M.R., Mortaja R.S.: Desalination in the Gaza Strip: drinking water supply and environmental impact. Desalination 173, 157–171 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pontié M., Lhassani A., Diawara C.K., Elana A., Innocent C., Aureau D., Rumeau M., Croue J.P., Buisson H., Hemery P.: Seawater nanofiltration for the elaboration of usable salty waters. Desalination 167, 347–355 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Farooque, A.; Green, T.; Mohammed, N.; Al-Muali, F. Autopsy of NF membranes after 5 years of operation at the Ummlujj SWRO plant. Desalinat. Water Treat. 3, 83–90 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Diawara, C.; Rumeau, M.; Aureau, D.; Hemmery, P.: Seawater nanofiltration (NF): fiction or reality? Desalination 158, 277–280 (2003)

  11. Schaep, J.; Van Der Bruggen, B.; Uytterhoeven, S.; Croux, R.; Vandecasteele, C.; Wilms, D.; Van Houtte, E.; Vanlerberghe, F.: Removal of hardness from groundwater by nanofiltration, Desalination 119, 295–302 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Walha,K.; Amar, R.B.; Firdaous, L.; Quéméneur, F.; Jaouen, P.: Brackish groundwater treatment by nanofiltration, reverse osmosis and electrodialysis in Tunisia: performance and cost comparison. Desalination 207, 95–106 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Haddada R., Ferjani E., Roudesli M.S., Deratani A.: Properties of cellulose acetate nanofiltration membranes. Application to brackish water desalination. Desalination 167, 403–409 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Paugam L., Diawara C.K., Schlumpf J.P., Jaouen P., Quéméneur F.: Transfer of monovalent anions and nitrates especially through nanofiltration membranes in brackish water conditions. Sep. Purif. Technol. 40(3), 237–242 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fan Z., Wang Z., Duan M., Wang J., Wang S.: Preparation and characterization of polyaniline/polysulfone nanocomposite ultrafiltration membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 310, 402–408 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Guo, H.; Wyart, Y.; Perot, J.; Nauleau, F.; Moulin, P.: Application of magnetic nanoparticles for UF membrane integrity monitoring at low-pressure operation. J. Membr. Sci. 350, 172–179 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jadav G.L., Singh P.S.: Synthesis of novel silica-polyamide nanocomposite membrane with enhanced properties. J. Membr. Sci. 328, 257–267 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Boussu K., Vandecasteele C., Vander Bruggen B.: Relation between membrane characteristics and performance in nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 310, 51–65 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lu X., Bian X., Shi L.: Preparation and characterization of NF composite membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 210, 3–11 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. ShiB.L. , Zhang Q.R., Zhang H.F., Liu Z.G., Zhang M.C.: Concentration of benzylpenicillin sodium by polyimide nanofiltration membrane. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 104, 3077–3081 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Boussu, K.; Van der Bruggen, B.; Volodin, A.; Van Haesendonck, C.; Delcour, J.A.; Van der Meeren, P.; Vandecasteele, C.: Characterization of commercial nanofiltration membranes and comparison with self-made polyethersulfone membranes. Desalination 191, 245–253 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chaturvedi, B.K.; Ghosh, A.K.; Ramachandhran, V.; Trivedi, M.K.; Hanra, M.S.; Misra, B.M.: Preparation, characterization and performance of polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranes. Desalination 33, 31–40 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rahimnejad, M.; Ghasemi, M.; Najafpour, G.; Ismail, M.; Mohammad, A.; Ghoreyshi, A.; Hassan, S.H.A.: Synthesis, characterization and application studies of self-made Fe 3 O 4/PES nanocomposite membranes in microbial fuel cell. Electrochem. Acta 85, 700–706 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bowen, W.R.; Hilal, N.: Atomic force microscopy in process engineering—an introduction to AFM for improved processes and products, Elsevier (2009)

  25. Rosa M.J., de Pinho M.N.: Membrane surface characterisation by contact angle measurements using the immersed method. J. Membr. Sci. 131, 167–180 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Roudman A.R., DiGiano F.A.: Surface energy of experimental and commercial nanofiltration membranes: effects of wetting and natural organic matter fouling. J. Membr. Sci. 175, 61–73 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Guan, R.; Zou, H.; Lu, D.; Gong, C.; Liu, Y.: Polyethersulfone sulfonated by chlorosulfonic acid and its membrane characteristics. Eur. Polym. J. 41, 1554–1560 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sivakumar, M.; Mohan, D.R.; Rangarajan, R.: Studies on cellulose acetate-polysulfone ultrafiltration membranes: II. Effect of additive concentration. J. Membr. Sci. 268, 208–219 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Nguyen, C.M.; Bang, S.; Cho, J.; Kim, K.W.: Performance and mechanism of arsenic removal from water by a nanofiltration membrane. Desalination 245, 82–94 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Al-Zoubi, H.; Hilal, N.; Darwish, N.A.; Mohammad, A.W.: Rejection and modelling of sulphate and potassium salts by nanofiltration membranes: neural network and Spiegler-Kedem model. Desalination 206, 42–60 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hilal, N.; Al-Zoubi, H.; Darwish, N.A.; Mohammad, A.W.; Abu Arabi, M.: A comprehensive review of nanofiltration membranes: treatment, pretreatment, modelling, and atomic force microscopy. Desalination 170, 281–308 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hilal, N.; Al-Zoubi, H.; Darwish, N.A.; Mohammad, A.W.: Characterisation of nanofiltration membranes using atomic force microscopy. Desalination 177, 187–199 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Boussu, K.; Van der Bruggen, B.; Volodin, A.; Snauwaert, J.; Van Haesendonck, C.; Vandecasteele, C.: Roughness and hydrophobicity studies of nanofiltration membranes using different modes of AFM. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 286, 632–638 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Palacio L., Calvo J.I., Prádanos P., Hernández A., Väisänen P., Nyström M.: Contact angles and external protein adsorption onto UF membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 152, 189–201 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. W. Mohammad.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abuhabib, A.A., Ghasemi, M., Mohammad, A.W. et al. Desalination of Brackish Water Using Nanofiltration: Performance Comparison of Different Membranes. Arab J Sci Eng 38, 2929–2939 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-013-0616-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-013-0616-z

Keywords

Navigation