Skip to main content
Log in

Modification of an Industrial Ethane Recovery Plant Using Mixed Integer Optimization and Shuffled Frog Leaping Algorithm

  • Research Article - Special Issue - Mechanical Engineering
  • Published:
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A currently in operation ethane recovery plant was simulated and compared with the real one. The objective of this process is to separate C1–C2 and \({{\rm C}_{3}^{+}}\) at the minimum utility cost. Then, optimal operating parameters were determined, in which the objective function is based on the plant profit. Shuffled frog leaping algorithm was applied for the optimization of this plant. The algorithm parameters were adjusted for improving the performance of the algorithm through optimization of the problem. The results show that at the optimum point the profit increased by 2.4% and utility costs decreased by 5%. In the next part, the potential of the plant for modification of the process configuration was considered. The analysis showed that it is possible to improve the process and refrigeration cycle configurations to the more efficient one. In the optimum point the profit increased by 8% towards the base case and operating cost decreased by 12.8%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A-1:

Air cooler

C-1:

Demethaniser

C-2:

Deethaniser

D-1:

Feed flash KO drum

D-2:

Deethaniser reflux drum

D-3:

Refrigeration cycle separator

D-4:

Refrigeration cycle separator

D-5:

Refrigeration cycle separator

D-6:

Refrigeration cycle separator

D-7:

Refrigeration cycle separator

E-1:

Heat exchanger

E-2:

Demethaniser exchanger

E-3:

Deethaniser reboiler

E-4:

Heat exchanger

E-5:

Heat exchanger

E-6:

Demethaniser reboiler

E-7:

Deethaniser condenser

K-1:

Compressor

K-2:

Refrigeration cycle compressor

LNG-1:

Multi-stream heat exchanger

LNG-2:

Multi-stream heat exchanger as a condenser for the deethanizer

LNG-3:

Multi-stream heat exchanger as a reboiler for the demethanizer

V-1:

Expansion valve

V-2:

Expansion valve

V-3:

Expansion valve

V-4:

Expansion valve

X-1:

Feed gas expander

C 1 :

Methane

C 2 :

Ethane

\({{\rm C}\,_{3}^+}\) :

Propane plus

NGL:

Natural gas liquids

HHV:

Higher heating value

SL:

Saturated line

CL:

Condensed line

AS:

Added stream to the configuration

ES:

External stream (belonging to other plant)

PRSV:

Peng–Robinson–Stryjek–Vera

RS:

Refrigeration cycle stream

S:

Process stream

References

  1. Hudson, H.M.; Wilkinson, J.D.; Lynch, J.T.; Pitman R.N., Pierce M.C.: Reducing treating requirements for cryogenic NLG recovery plants. In: 80th Annual Convention of the Gas Processors Association, San Antonio, Texas, March 12, 2001

  2. Cuellar, K.T.; Cuellar, J.D.; Hudson, H.M.; Pierce, M.C.: Co-Producing LNG from cryogenic NGL recovery plants. In: 81th Annual Convention of the Gas Processors Association, Dallas, Texas, March 12, 2002

  3. Lynch, J.T.; Wilkinson, J.D.; Hudson, H.M.; Pitman, R.N.: Process retrofits maximize the value of existing NGL and LPG recovery plants. In: 82nd Annual Convention of the Gas Processors Association, San Antonio, Texas (2003)

  4. Singh D., Sing S.: Improve natural gas liquids recovery. Hydrocarbon Process. 1, 53–55 (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Mak, J.: Configurations and Methods for Improved NGL Recovery. Patent WO03/040633 A1 (2001)

  6. Mak, J.: Configuration and Process for NGL Recovery Using a Subcooled Absorption Reflux Process. Patent WO 03/095913 A1 (2003)

  7. Mak, J.: Low Pressure NGL Plant Configurations. Patent US 2005/0255012 A1 (2005)

  8. Finn A.J., Tomlinson T.R., Johnson J.L.: Design equipment changes make possible high C3 recovery. Oil Gas J. 3, 37–46 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Diaz S., Serrani A., Bandoni A., Brignole E.A.: A study on the capital and operating alternatives in an ethane extraction plant. Comput. Chem. Eng. 20, S1499–S1504 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Diaz M.S., Serrani A., Bandoni J.A., Brignole E.A.: Automatic design and optimization of natural gas plants. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 36, 2715–2724 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee G.C., Smith R., Zhu X.X.: Optimal synthesis of mixed-refrigerant systems for low-temperature processes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 41, 5016–5028 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jang W.H., Hahn J., Hall K.R.: Genetic/quadratic search algorithm for plant economic optimizations using a process simulator. Comput. Chem. Eng. 30, 285–294 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Panjeshahi M.H., Tahouni N.: Pressure drop optimisation in debottlenecking of heat exchanger networks. Energy 33, 942–951 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tirandazi B., Mehrpooya M., Vatani A., Moosavian S.M.A.: Exergy analysis of C2+ recovery plants refrigeration cycles. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 89(6), 676–689 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mehrpooya M., Jarrahian A., Pishvaie M.R.: Simulation and exergy-method analysis of an industrial refrigeration cycle used in NGL recovery units. Int. J. Energy. Res. 30, 1336–1351 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mehrpooya M., Gharagheizi F., Vatani A.: Thermoeconomic analysis of a large industrial propane refrigeration cycle used in NGL recovery plant. Int. J. Energy. Res. 33, 960–977 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mehrpooya M., Gharagheizi F., Vatani A.: An optimization of capital and operating alternatives in a NGL recovery unit. Chem. Eng. Technol. 29, 1469–1480 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chebbi R., Mazroui Al K.A., Jabbar Abdel N.M.: Optimum ethane recovery in conventional turboexpander process. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 88, 779–787 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mehrpooya M., Vatani A., Mousavian S.M.A.: Optimum design of integrated liquid recovery plants by variable population size genetic algorithm. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 9999, 1–11 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lee, R.J.; Jame, Y.Z.; Juh, J.Y.; Elliot, G.: Internal Refrigeration for Enhanced NGL Recovery. US Patent 2006/0150672 A1

  21. Shah N.M., Hoadley A.F., Rangaiah G.P.: Inherent safety analysis of a propane precooled gas-phase liquified natural gas process. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 48, 4917–4927 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Angira R., Babu B.V.: Optimization of process synthesis and design problems: A modified differential evolution approach. Chem. Eng. Sci. 61, 4707–4721 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Corne D., Dorigo M., Glover F.: New Ideas in Optimization. McGraw-Hill, Berkshire (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Liong S.Y., Atiquzzaman M.D.: Optimal design of water distribution network using shuffled complex evolution. J. Ind. Eng. Singap. 44, 93–101 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rahimi-Vahed A., Mirzaei A.H.: A hybrid multi-objective shuffled frog-leaping algorithm for a mixed-model assembly line sequencing problem. Comput. Ind. Eng. 53, 642–651 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Eusuff M.M., Lansey K.E.: Optimizing of water distribution network design using the shuffled frog leaping algorithm. J. Water. Resour. Plan. Manag. 129, 210–225 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jones W.E., Vais A.M., Wilson J.A.: Getting the maximum benefit from a side-reboiler. Chem. Eng. Commun. 171, 195–209 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Liu Z.Y., Jobson M.: Retrofit design for increasing the processing capacity of distillation columns 1. A hydraulic performance indicator. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 82, 3–9 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Liu Z.Y., Jobson M.: Retrofit design for increasing the processing capacity of distillation columns 2. Proposing and evaluating design options. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2, 10–17 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sharma R., Jindal A., Mandawala D., Jana S.K.: Design/retrofit targets of pump-around refluxes for better energy integration of a crude distillation column. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 38, 2411–2417 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Agrawal R., Fidkowski Z.T.: Ternary distillation schemes with partial reboiler or partial condenser. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 37, 3455–3462 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Agrawal R., Fidkowski Z.T.: On the use of intermediate reboilers in the rectifying section and condensers in the stripping section of a distillation column. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 35, 2801–2807 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Peters M.S., Timmerhaus K.D.: Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, Berkshire (1991)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehdi Mehrpooya.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vatani, A., Mehrpooya, M. & Pakravesh, H. Modification of an Industrial Ethane Recovery Plant Using Mixed Integer Optimization and Shuffled Frog Leaping Algorithm. Arab J Sci Eng 38, 439–455 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-012-0433-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-012-0433-9

Keywords

Navigation