Skip to main content
Log in

Scour at river bridge piers: real-time vulnerability assessment through the continuous monitoring of a bridge over the river Po, Italy

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bridge failures are not uncommon during floods. Therefore, the assessment of bridge vulnerability is crucial to help a bridge’s administration take the best decisions during emergencies (i.e. closing the bridge). The first step to achieve this is to implement a monitoring system providing needed information to develop scenarios based on administration response time. The proposed system seeks a real-time evaluation of the loads acting on the bridge. Wind and water contributions, debris accumulation upstream of piers and river bed level are evaluated by specific devices. The most difficult measurement is the identification of the riverbed position in close proximity to piers. Scour model predictions are still far from robust and accurate and no standard devices are available to measure it. Unfortunately, the main reason for bridge failure is scour around bridge piers, called local scour. A monitoring system was developed for this purpose and installed on a critical bridge over the river Po in Italy, as a result of the cooperation between the Politecnico di Milano and the Province of Mantova. The aim was to measure the main parameters for a proper evaluation of the bridge’s vulnerability. The paper’s focus is twofold: to show long-term data and all the phases needed to assess bridge safety. The first aspect, not so common in the literature, is useful to understand the temporal evolution of the environment around the bridge. The second one provides a roadmap for risk assessment and management decisions relying on the widely available database. With regard to this second topic, another paper describing the overall strategy has already been published. The main focus here is on potential implementation, with an emphasis on the available data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arneson LA, Zevenbergen LW, Lagasse PF, Clopper PE (2012) Evaluating scour at bridges. Publication No. FHWA-HIF-12-003-HEC18, Hydraulic Engineering Circular No. 18, 5th edn. Federal Highway Administration, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ballio F, Teruzzi A, Radice A (2009) Constriction effects in clear-water scour at abutments. J Hydraul Eng 135(2):140–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ballio F, Ballio G, Franzetti S, Crotti G, Solari G (2018) Actions monitoring as an alternative to structural rehabilitation: case study of a river bridge. Struct Control Health Monit 2018:e2250. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Banks JC, Camp JV, Abkowitz MD (2016) A screening method for bridge scour estimation and flood adaptation planning utilizing HAZUS-MH 2.1 and HEC-18. Nat Hazards 83(3):1731–1741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2390-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Briaud JL (2015) Scour depth at bridges: method including soil properties. I: Maximum scour depth prediction. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 141(2):04014104. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001222 (Article Number: 04014104)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen W, Yu X, Liang F (2017) A review of bridge scour: mechanism, estimation, monitoring and countermeasures. Nat Hazards 87:1881. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-2842-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cheng MY, Wu YW (2013) Multi-agent-based data exchange platform for bridge disaster prevention: a case study in Taiwan. Nat Hazards 69:311–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0708-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cigada A, Ballio F, Inzoli F (2008) Hydraulic Monitoring Unit, application for international patent no. PCT/EP2008/059075

  9. Crotti G, Ballio F, Manzoni S, Inzoli F, Cigada A, Rossi G (2012) Real-time assessment of bridge vulnerability. In: 6th International Conference on Scour and Erosion (ICSE-6), Paris, 27–31 August 2012

  10. Crotti G, Isidori D, Cigada A, Ballio F, Inzoli F, Concettoni E, Cristalli C (2016) A hydraulic monitoring system on a bridge over the River Esino, Italy. J Civ Struct Health Monit 6(3):377–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-016-0179-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. ESDU-82026 (1993) Strong winds in the atmospheric boundary layer, part 1: hourly-mean wind speeds. ESDU International, London

    Google Scholar 

  12. Farooq M, Banthia N and Azhari F (2017) Bridge scour monitoring: challenges and opportunities. In: 39th International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE), Vancouver, 21–23 September 2017

  13. Federal Highway Administration FHWA (2009) Bridge scour and stream instability countermeasures: experience, selection, and design guidance, 3rd edn. Publication No. FHWA-NHI-09-111-HEC23, Hydraulic Engineering Circular No. 23

  14. Franzetti S, Radice A, Rabitti M, Rossi G (2011) Hydraulic design and preliminary performance evaluation of countermeasure against debris accumulation and resulting local pier scour on river Po in Italy. J Hydraul Eng 137(5):615–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hill KO, Meltz G (1997) Fiber Bragg grating technology fundamentals and overview. J Lightwave Technol 15(8):1263–1276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Johnson PA, Sheeder SA (2011) Controlling debris at bridges. In: Andrew S et al (eds) Stream restoration in dynamic fluvial systems: scientific approaches, analyses and tools. Wiley, New York, pp 385–397

    Google Scholar 

  17. Johnson PA, Clopper PE, Zevenbergen LW, Lagasse PF (2015) Quantifying uncertainty and reliability in bridge scour estimations. J Hydraul Eng 141:04015013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lamb R, Aspinall W, Odbert H, Wagener T (2017) Vulnerability of bridges to scour: insights from an international expert elicitation workshop. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 17(8):1393–1409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Manzoni S, Crotti G, Ballio F, Cigada A, Inzoli F, Colombo E (2011) Bless: a fiber optic sedimeter. Flow Meas Instrument. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2011.06.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mazzorana B, Hübl J, Zischg A et al (2011) Modelling woody material transport and deposition in Alpine rivers. Nat Hazards 56:425–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-009-9492-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Melville BW, Coleman SE (2000) Bridge scour. Water Resources Publications, LLC, Highlands Ranch

    Google Scholar 

  22. National Cooperative Highway Research Program NCHRP (2009) Synthesis 396: Monitoring Scour Critical Bridges Project Number: 20-05/Topic 36-02 https://doi.org/10.17226/22979

  23. Provincia di Mantova (2008), Studio della vulnerabilità idraulica ponte di Borgoforte sul fiume Po

  24. Radice A, Lauva O (2017) Live-bed pier scour in a covered flow. J Hydraul Eng 143(10):06017016. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001359

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gianluca Crotti.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Crotti, G., Cigada, A. Scour at river bridge piers: real-time vulnerability assessment through the continuous monitoring of a bridge over the river Po, Italy. J Civil Struct Health Monit 9, 513–528 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-019-00348-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-019-00348-5

Keywords

Navigation