Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Structural health monitoring techniques implemented on IASC–ASCE benchmark problem: a review

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Various structural health monitoring techniques have been developed over the years. Due to the lack of a common platform to test the efficiency of these methods, the damage analysis models have been tested on different structures selected according to the choice of researches. Therefore, perfect comparison among the models was not possible. In light of this event, a benchmark structure was developed providing a common ground to analyse the effectiveness of the damage detection strategies. This structural damage analysis consists of different damage patterns, major damages and minor damages. The damage detection algorithms were tested for the detection of these different damage patterns and the effectiveness against noise contamination. Also the amount of data required for the algorithms to effectively detect damage was also recorded, which indicated the efficiency of the method applied. The paper deals with the application of different damage detection techniques on the ASCE benchmark Phase-I and Phase-II structure and studies their efficiency against the other structures. A brief comparison has been made among different damage detection models such as Bayesian model, neural network, autoregressive models, and model update. These methods have been successfully implemented on the benchmark structure and their efficiencies have been measured in terms of noise contamination, the amount of data required to measure the damage and the detection of damage (major and minor). Out of all the techniques discussed, model update technique, wavelet approach, autoregressive technique, convolution neural network and synchrosqueezed wavelet transform have proved to a robust damage analysing tool.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rytter T (1993) Vibration based inspection of civil engineering structure. Department of building technology and structure engineering. Aalborg University, Denmark

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zhu F, Wu Y (2014) A rapid structural damage detection method using integrated ANFIS and interval modeling technique. Appl Soft Comput 25:473–484

    Google Scholar 

  3. Reddy RRK, Ganguli R (2003) Structural damage detection in a helicopter rotor blade using radial basis function neural networks. Smart Mater Struct 12:232–241

    Google Scholar 

  4. Das S, Saha P, Parto SK (2016) Vibration based damage detction techniques used for health monitoring of structrues: a review. J Civil Struct Health Monit 6(3):477–507

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shi A, Yu XH (2012) Structural damage detection using artificial neural networks and wavelet transform. 2012 IEEE international conference on computational intelligence for measurement system and applications. IEEE, Piscataway

    Google Scholar 

  6. Katebi L, Tehranizadeh M, Mohammadgholibeyki N (2018) A generalized flexibility matrix-based model updating method for damage detection of plane truss and frame structures. J Civil Struct Health Monit 8(2):301–314

    Google Scholar 

  7. Neves AC, Gonza´lez I, Leander J, Karoumi R (2017) Structural health monitoring of bridges: a model-free ANN-based approach to damage detection. J Civil Struct Health Monit 7(5):689–702

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mahato S, Teja MV, Chakraborty A (2017) Combined wavelet–Hilbert transform-based modal identification of road bridge using vehicular excitation. J Civil Struct Health Monit 7(1):29–44

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kodikara KATL, Chan THT, Nguyen T, Thambiratnam DP (2016) Model updating of real structures with ambient vibration data. J Civil Struct Health Monit 6(3):329–341

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ghrib F, Li L (2017) An adaptive filtering-based solution for the Bayesian modal identification formulation. J Civil Struct Health Monit 7:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  11. Johnson EA, Lam HF, Ktafygiotis LS, Beck JL (2004) Phase I IASC–ASCE structural health monitoring benchmark problem using simulated data. J Eng Mech 130(1):3–15

    Google Scholar 

  12. IASC–ASCE SHM Task Group (1999)

  13. Bernal D, Dyke SJ, Lam HF, Beck JL (2002) Phase II of the ASCE benchmark study on SHM. In: Proceedings of 15th engineering mechanics conference. ASCE, Reston

  14. Caicedo JM, Dyke SJ, Johnson EA (2004) Natural excitation technique and eigensystem realization algorithm for Phase I of the IASC–ASCE benchmark problem: simulated data. J Eng Mech 130(1):49–60

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bergland GD (ed) (2000) Random data: analysis and measurement procedures, 4th edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. James GH, Carne TG, Lauffer JP (1993) The natural excitation technique for modal parameter extraction from operating wind turbines. Sandia National Laboratories, Sandia

    Google Scholar 

  17. James GH, Carne TG, Mayes RL (1996) Modal parameter extraction from large operating structures using ambient excitation. In: 14th international modal analysis conference, Dearborn, Michigan, pp 77–83

  18. Farrar CR, James GH (1997) System identification from ambient vibration measurements on a bridge. J Sound Vib 205(1):1–18

    Google Scholar 

  19. Farrar CR, Jauregui DA (1998) Comparative study of damage identification algorithms applied to a bridge II: numerical study. Smart Mater Struct 7:721–731

    Google Scholar 

  20. Juang JN, Pappa RS (1985) An eigensystem realization algorithm for modal parameter identification and model reduction. J Guid Control Dyn 8:620–627

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Luş H, Betti R, Yu J, De Angelis M (2004) Investigation of a system identification methodology in the context of the ASCE benchmark problem. J Eng Mech 130(1):71–84

    Google Scholar 

  22. Luş H, Betti R, Longman RW (1999) Identification of linear structural systems using earthquake-induced vibration data. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 28(11):1449–1467

    Google Scholar 

  23. Juang J-N, Phan M, Horta LG, Longman RW (1993) Identification of Observer/Kalman filter Markov parameters: theory and experiments. J Guid Control Dyn 16(2):320–329

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Luş H (2001) Control theory based system identification. Columbia University, New York

    Google Scholar 

  25. Luş H, Betti R, Longman RW (2000) Obtaining refined first order predictive models of linear structural systems. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 31:1413–1440

    Google Scholar 

  26. De Angelis M, Luş H, Betti R, Longman RW (2002) Extracting physical parameters of mechanical models from identified state space representations. ASME J Appl Mech 69(9):617–625

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Perez-Ramirez CA, Amezquita-Sanchez JP, Adeli H, Valtierra-Rodriguez M, Camarena-Martinez D, Romero-Troncoso RJ (2016) New methodology for modal parameters identification of smart civil structures using ambient vibrations and synchrosqueezed wavelet transform. Eng Appl Artif Intell 48:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  28. Stubbs N, Kim JT, Tapole K (1992) An efficient and robust algorithm for damage localization in offshore platforms. In: ASCE 10th structures congress. Reston, VA. https://doi.org/10.2307/3716590

  29. Zimmerman DC, Kauk M (1994) Structural damage detection using a minimum rank update theory. J Sound Vib 116(2):221–231

    Google Scholar 

  30. Pandey AK, Biswas M (1991) Damage detection in structures using changes in flexibility`. J Sound Vib 169(1):3–17

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang Z, Aktan HM (1995) The damage indices for constructed facilities. In: Proceedings of SPIE - The international society for optical engineering, vol 2460. pp 1520–1529

  32. Farrar CR, Jauregui DA (1998) Comparative study of damage identification algorithms applied to a bridge: 1. experiment. Smart Mater Struct 7:704–719

    Google Scholar 

  33. Barroso LR, Rodriques R (2004) Damage detection utilizing the damage index method to a benchmark structure. J Eng Mech 130(2):142–151

    Google Scholar 

  34. Brinker R, Zhang L, Andersen P (2000) Modal identification from ambient responses using frequency domain decomposition. In: 18th international modal analysis conference, San Antonio, Texas, USA, pp 625–630

  35. Bernal D, Gunes B (2004) Flexibility based approach for damage characterization: benchmark application. J Eng Mech 130(1):61–70

    Google Scholar 

  36. Van Overschee P, Moor BLR (eds) (1996) Subspace identification for linear systems: theory, implementation, applications. Springer: Kluwer Academic, Boston

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Bernal D (2002) Load vectors for damage localization. J Eng Mech 128(1):7–14

    Google Scholar 

  38. Dempster AP, Laird NM, Rubin DB (1977) Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Methodological) 39(1):1–38

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. McLachlan GJ, Krishnam T (2008) The EM algorithm and extensions, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  40. Cara FJ, Carpio J, Jaun J, Alarcon E (2012) An approach to operational modal analysis using the expectation maximization algorithm. Mech Syst Signal Process 31:109–129

    Google Scholar 

  41. Hou Z, Noori M (1999) Application of wavelet analysis for structural health monitoring. 2nd international workshop on structural health monitoring. Stanford University, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  42. Hou Z, Noori M, Amand RS (2000) Wavelet-based approach for structural damage detection. J Eng Mech 126(7):677–683

    Google Scholar 

  43. Hera A, Hou Z (2004) Application of wavelet approach for ASCE structural health monitoring benchmark studies. J Eng Mech 130(1):96–104

    Google Scholar 

  44. Huang NE, Shen Z, Long SR, Wu MC, Shih HH, Zheng Q, Yen NC, Ting CC, Liu HH (1971) The empirical mode decomposition and hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and nonstationary time series analysis. R Soc Lond Ser A 1998(454):903–995

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Huang NE, Shen Z, Long SR (1999) A new view of nonlinear water waves: the Hilbert spectrum. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 31:417–457

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  46. Corbin M, Hera A, Hou Z (2000) Locating damages using wavelet approach. In: 14th engineering mechanics conference (EM2000), Austin, Tex

  47. Chui CK (1992) Introduction to wavelets. Academic Press, San Diego

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  48. Daubechies I (1992) Ten lectures on wavelets. In: CBS-NSF regional conference in applied mathematics

  49. Sone A, Yamamoto S, Masuda A, Nakaoka A (1996) Health monitoring system of building by using wavelet analysis. In: Eleventh world conference on earthquake engineering. ISBN: 0060426223

  50. Yang JN, Lei Y, Lin S, Huang N (2004) Hilbert–Huang based approach for structural damage detection. J Eng Mech 130(1):85–95

    Google Scholar 

  51. Yang JN, Lei Y, Huang NE (2001) Damage identification of civil engineering structures using Hilbert–Huang transform. In: 3rd international workshop on structural health monitoring, Stanford, CA

  52. Yang JN, Lin S, Pan S (2002) Damage detection of a health monitoring benchmark building using Hilbert–Huang spectral analysis. Adv Build Technol 2:1017–1024

    Google Scholar 

  53. Lin S, Yang JN, Zhou L (2005) Damage identification of a benchmark building for structural health monitoring. Smart Mater Struct 14:S162–S169

    Google Scholar 

  54. Ibrahim SR (1977) Random decretment technique for modal identification of structures. J Spacecr Rockets (AIAA) 14(11):696–700

    Google Scholar 

  55. Huan SL, Mcinnis BC, Denman ED (1983) Analysis of the random decrement method. Int J Syst Sci 14(4):417–423

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  56. Chase JG, Begoc V, Barroso LR (2005) Efficient structural health monitoring for a benchmark structure using adaptive RLS filters. Comput Struct 83:639–647

    Google Scholar 

  57. Haykin S (1991) Adaptive filter theory, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  58. Ifeachor EC, Jervis BW (2002) Digital signal processing, a practical approach. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  59. Sohn H, Farrar CR (2001) Damage diagnosis using time series analysis of vibration signals. Smart Mater Struct 10(3):446–451

    Google Scholar 

  60. da Silva S, Junior MD, Junior VL (2007) Damage detection in a benchmark structure using AR-ARX models and statistical pattern recognition. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng XXIX(2):174–184

    Google Scholar 

  61. Bezdek J, Pal SK (1992) Fuzzy models for pattern recognition. IEEE Press, Piscataway

    Google Scholar 

  62. Doebling SW, Farrar CR, Prime MB, Shevitz DW (1996) Damage identification and health monitoring of structural and mechanical systems from changes in their vibration characteristics: a literature review. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos (NM 87545)

    Google Scholar 

  63. Nair KK, Kiremidjian AS, Law KH (2006) Time series-based damage detection and localization algorithm with application to the ASCE benchmark structure. J Sound Vib 291:349–368

    Google Scholar 

  64. Worden K, Manson G, Fieller NRJ (2000) Damage detection using outlier analysis. J Sound Vib 229(3):647–667

    Google Scholar 

  65. Fugate ML, Sohn H, Farrar CR (2000) Unsupervised learning methods for vibration-based damage detection. In: 18th international modal analysis conference, San Antonio, Texas, USA

  66. Carden EP, Brownjohn JMW (2008) ARMA modelled time-series classification for structural health monitoring of civil infrastructure. Mech Syst Signal Process 22:295–314

    Google Scholar 

  67. Maia NMM, Silva JMM (1998) Theoretical and experimental modal analysis. Research Studies Press, Hertfordshire

    Google Scholar 

  68. Lynch JP (2004) Linear classification of system poles for structural damage detection using piezoelectric active sensors. In: Proceedings of SPIE - The international society for optical engineering, vol 5391, pp 9–20

  69. Ljung L (ed) (1999) System identification: theory for the User. 2. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  70. Carden EP, Brownjohn JMW (2007) ARMA modelled time series classification for structural health monitoring. In: 2007 IMAC-XXV: Conference and exposition on structural dynamics

  71. Nair KK, Kiremidjian AS (2007) Time series based structural damage detection algorithm using gaussian mixtures modeling. J Dyn Syst Meas Control 129:285–293

    Google Scholar 

  72. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Freidman J (2001) Elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference and prediction. Springer Verlag, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  73. Mardia KV, Kent JT, Bibby JM (2003) Multivariate analysis. Academic, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  74. Bernal D, Beck J (2004) Special section: Phase I of the IASC-ASCE structural health monitoring benchmark. J Eng Mech 130(1):1–2

    Google Scholar 

  75. Yang JN, Lin S, Huang H, Zhou L (2006) An adaptive extended Kalman filter for structural damage identification. Struct Control Health Monit 13:849–867

    Google Scholar 

  76. Yang JN, Huang H, Lin S (2006) Sequential non-linear least-square estimation for damage identification of structures. Int J Non-Linear Mech 41:124–140

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  77. Jazwinshi AH (1970) Stochastic processes and filtering theory. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  78. Hoshiya M, Saito E (1984) Structural identification by extended Kalman filter. J Eng Mech 110:1757–1771

    Google Scholar 

  79. Sato T, Takei K (1998) Development of a Kalman filter with fading memory. In: Structural safety and reliability, ICOSSAR, vol 1998. pp 387–394

  80. Maruyama O, Hoshiya M (2001) System identification of an experimental model by extended Kalman filter. In: Structural safety and reliability, ICOSSAR 2001

  81. Wang D, Haldar A (1997) System identification with limited observations and without input. J Eng Mech 123:504–511

    Google Scholar 

  82. Al-Hussein A, Haldar A (2015) Structural health assessment at a local level using minimum information. Eng Struct 88:100–110

    Google Scholar 

  83. Yang JN, Pan S, Huang H (2007) An adaptive extended Kalman filter for structural damage identifications II: unknown inputs. Struct Control Health Monit 14:497–521

    Google Scholar 

  84. Lei Y, Jiang Y, Xu Z (2012) Structural damage detection with limited input and output measurement signals. Mech Syst Signal Process 28:229–243

    Google Scholar 

  85. Pan S, Xiao D, Xing S, Law SS, Du P, Li Y (2016) A general extended Kalman filter for simultaneous estimation of system and unknown inputs. Eng Struct 109:85–98

    Google Scholar 

  86. Yang JN, Huang H (2007) Sequential non-linear least-square estimation for damage identification of structures with unknown inputs and unknown outputs. Non-Linear Mech 42:789–801

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  87. Huang H (2006) System identification and damage detection of structures, Irvine, CA

  88. Bendat JS, Piersol AG (1993) Engineering applications of correlation and spectral analysis, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  89. Brownjohn JMW (2003) Ambient vibration studies for system identification of tall buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 32:71–95

    Google Scholar 

  90. Andersen P, Brincker R, Kirkegaard PH (1996) Theory of covariance equivalent ARMAV models of civil engineering structures. In: Proceedings of XIV international modal analysis conference. Dearborn, MI

  91. Lam HF, Katafygiotis LS, Mickleborough NC (2004) Application of a statistical model updating approach on Phase I of the IASC–ASCE structural health monitoring benchmark study. J Eng Mech 130(1):34–48

    Google Scholar 

  92. Friswelli MI, Mottershead JE (1995) Finite element model updating in structural dynamics, 2nd edn. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  93. Ching J, Muto M, Beck JL (2006) Structural model updating and health monitoring with incomplete modal data using Gibbs. Comput-Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng 21:242–257

    Google Scholar 

  94. Yuen KV, Au SK, Beck JL (2004) Two-stage structural health monitoring approach for Phase I benchmark studies. J Eng Mech 130(1):16–33

    Google Scholar 

  95. Beck JL (1978) Determining models of structures from earthquake records. California Institute of Technology, Earthquake Engineering Research Laboratory, Pasadena

    Google Scholar 

  96. Beck JL (1996) System identification methods applied to measured seismic response. In: 11th world conference on earthquake engineering. Elsevier, New York

  97. Werner SD, Beck JL, Levine MB (1987) Seismic response evaluation of Meloland road overpass using 1979 Imperial Valley earthquake records. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 15:249–274

    Google Scholar 

  98. Beck JL, Au S-K, Vanik MW (2001) Monitoring structural health using a probabilistic measure. Comput-Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng 16:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  99. Vanik MW, Beck JL, Au SK (2000) Bayesian probabilistic approach to structural health monitoring. J Eng Mech 126(7):738–745

    Google Scholar 

  100. Beck JL, Katafygiotis LS (1998) Updating models and their uncertainties. I: Bayesian statistical framework. J Eng Mech 124(4):455–461

    Google Scholar 

  101. Ching J, Beck JL (2004) Bayesian analysis of the phase II IASC–ASCE structural health monitoring experimental benchmark data. J Eng Mech 130(10):1233–1244

    Google Scholar 

  102. Beck JL, May BS, Polidori DC (1994) Determination of modal parameters from ambient vibration data for structural health monitoring. In: 1st world conference on structural control. Pasadena, California. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles

  103. Grande E, Imbimbo M (2012) A data-driven approach for damage detection: an application to the ASCE steel benchmark structure. J Civil Struct Health Monit 2:73–85

    Google Scholar 

  104. Ahmed AE, Mahmoud RH, Marzouk H (2010) Damage detection in offshore structures using neural networks. Mar Struct 23(1):131–145

    Google Scholar 

  105. Jiang SF, Zhang CM, Zhang S (2011) Two-stage structural damage detection using fuzzy neural networks and data fusion techniques. Expert Syst Appl 38(1):511–519

    Google Scholar 

  106. Bischop MB (1996) Neural networks for pattern recognition. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  107. Lam HF, Yuen KV, Beck JL (2006) Structural health monitoring via measured ritz vectors utilizing artificial neural networks. Comput-Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng 21(4):232–241

    Google Scholar 

  108. Yuen KV, Lam HF (2006) On the complexity of artificial neural networks for smart structures monitoring. Eng Struct 28(7):977–984

    Google Scholar 

  109. Vakil-Baghmisheh MT, Peimani M, Sadeghi MH, Ettefagh MM (2008) Crack detection in beam-like structures using genetic algorithms. Appl Soft Comput 8:1150–1160

    Google Scholar 

  110. Pawar PM (2005) Matrix crack detection in thin-walled composite beam usinggenetic fuzzy system. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 16:395–409

    Google Scholar 

  111. Beena P, Ganguli R (2011) Structural damage detection using fuzzy cognitive mapsand Hebbian learning. Appl Soft Comput 11:1014–1020

    Google Scholar 

  112. Zhu F, Deng Z, Zhang J (2013) An integrated approach for structural damage identification using wavelet neuro-fuzzy model. Expert Syst Appl 40:7415–7427

    Google Scholar 

  113. Shim MB, Suh MW (2003) Crack identification of a planar frame structure based on a synthetic artificial intelligence technique. Int J Numer Methods Eng 57:57–82

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  114. Lew JS, Horta IG (2007) Uncertainty quantification using interval modeling withperformance sensitivity. J Sound Vib 308:330–336

    Google Scholar 

  115. Arsava KS, Kim Y, El-Korchi T, Park HS (2013) Nonlinear system identification ofsmart structures under high impact loads. Smart Mater Struct 22:55008

    Google Scholar 

  116. Mitchell R, Kim Y, El-Korchi T (2012) System identification of smart structures usinga wavelet neuro-fuzzy model. Smart Mater Struct 21:115009

    Google Scholar 

  117. Red-Horse JR, Paez TI (2008) Sandia National Laboratories Validation Workshop: structural dynamics application. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197:2578–2584

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  118. Lew JS, Loh CH (2012) Real-time aircraft structural damage identification with flight condition variations. In: SPIE 8347, nondestructive characterization for composite materials, aerospace engineering, civil infrastructure and homeland security 2012, San Diego, California

  119. Saeed RA, Galybin AN, Popov V (2013) 3D fluid-structure modelling and vibrationanalysis for fault diagnosis of Francis turbine using multiple ANN and multiple ANFIS. Mech Syst Signal Process 34:259–276

    Google Scholar 

  120. Hosseinzadeh AZ, Amiri GG, Koo KY (2016) Optimization-based method for structural damage localization and quantification by means of static displacements computed by flexibility matrix. Eng Optim 48(4):543–561

    Google Scholar 

  121. Rajabioun R (2011) Cuckoo optimization algorithm. Appl Soft Comput 11(8):5508–5518

    Google Scholar 

  122. Holland J (1975) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  123. Dyke SJ, Bernal D, Beck JL, Ventura C (2001) An experimental benchmark problem in structural health monitoring. In: Third international workshop on structural health monitoring, Stanford, CA, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 488–497. ISBN: 1566768810

  124. Mikami S, Beskhyroun S, Miyamori Y, Oshima T (2007) Application of a vibration-based damage detection algorithm on a benchmark structure. In: The 3rd international conference on structural health monitoring and intelligent infrastructure, pp U205–U212

  125. Sohn H, Law KH (1997) A Bayesian probabilistic approach for structure damage detection. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 26(12):1259–1281

    Google Scholar 

  126. Sohn H, Law KH (2000) Bayesian probabilistic damage detection of a reinforced-concrete bridge column. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 29(8):1131–1152

    Google Scholar 

  127. Beck JL, Yuen KV (2004) Model selection using response measurements: Bayesian probabilistic approach. J Eng Mech 130(2):192–203

    Google Scholar 

  128. Jiang X, Mahadevan S (2008) Bayesian probabilistic inference for nonparametric damage detection of structures. J Eng Mech 134:820–831

    Google Scholar 

  129. Adeli H, Jiang X (2006) Dynamic fuzzy wavelet neural network model for structural system identification. J Struct Eng 132(1):102–111

    Google Scholar 

  130. Taha MMR (2010) A neural-wavelet technique for damage identification in the ASCE benchmark structure using Phase II experimental data. Adv Civil Eng 2010:675927

    Google Scholar 

  131. Jiang X, Mahadevan S, Yuan Y (2017) Fuzzy stochastic neural network model for structural system identification. Mech Syst Signal Process 82:394–411

    Google Scholar 

  132. Huang Y, Beck JL, Li H (2017) Hierarchical sparse Bayesian learning for structural damage detection: theory, computation and application. Struct Saf 64:37–53

    Google Scholar 

  133. Tipping ME (2001) Sparse Bayesian learning and the relevance vector machine. J Mach Learn Res 1:211–244

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  134. Ji S, Xue Y, Carin L (2008) Bayesian compressive sensing. IEEE Trans Signal Process 56(6):2346–2356

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  135. Huang H, Beck JL (2015) Hierarchical sparse Bayesian learning for structural health monitoring with incomplete modal data. Int J Uncertain Quantif 5(2):139–169

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  136. Dyke SJ, Bernal D, Beck JL, Ventura C (2003) Experimental phase II of the structural health monitoring benchmark problem. In: 16th engineering mechanics conference. ASCE, Reston

  137. Yang X, Mi Y (2012) Damage identification of benchmark structure using ANN. Appl Mech Mater 152–154:796–801

    Google Scholar 

  138. Li ZX, Tang XM (2008) Damage identification for beams using ANN based on statistical property of structural responses. Comput Struct 86(1–2):64–71

    Google Scholar 

  139. Katafygiotis LS, Beck JL (1998) Updating models and their uncertainties. Part II: model identifiability. J Eng Mech 124(4):463–467

    Google Scholar 

  140. Beck JL, Au SK (2002) Bayesian updating of structural models and reliability using Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation. J Eng Mech 128:380–391

    Google Scholar 

  141. Sun Z, Chang CC (2003) Structural degradation monitoring using covariance-driven wavelet packet signature. Struct Health Monit 2(4):309–325

    Google Scholar 

  142. Zabrodsky H, Peleg S, Avnir D (1992) Continuous symmetry measures. J Am Chem Soc 114:7843–7851

    Google Scholar 

  143. Chen JG, Büyüköztürk O (2017) A symmetry measure for damage detection with mode shapes. J Sound Vib 408:123–137

    Google Scholar 

  144. Chen B, Zang C (2011) A hybrid immune model for unsupervised structural damage pattern recognition. Expert Syst Appl 38:1650–1658

    Google Scholar 

  145. Lynch JP (2005) Damage characterization of the IASC–ASCE structural health monitoring benchmark structure by transfer function pole migration. In: 2005 ASCE structures congress, New York

  146. Wu JR, Li QS (2006) Structural parameter identification and damage detection for a steel structure using a two-stage finite element model updating method. J Constr Steel Res 62:231–239

    Google Scholar 

  147. Cox RT (1961) The algebra of probable inference. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  148. Shumway RH, Stoffer DS (1982) An approach to time series smoothing and forecasting using the EM algorithm. J Time Ser Anal 4:253–263

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  149. Papadimitriou C, Beck JL, Katafygiotis LS (1997) Asymptotic expansions for reliabilities and moments of uncertain dynamic systems. J Eng Mech 123(12):1219–1229

    Google Scholar 

  150. de Lautour OR, Omenzetter P (2010) Damage classification and estimation in experimental structures using time series analysis and pattern recognition. Mech Syst Signal Process 24:1556–1569

    Google Scholar 

  151. Altunok E, Taha MMR, Epp DS, Mayes RL, Baca TJ (2006) Damage pattern recognition for structural health monitoring using fuzzy similarity prescription. Comput-Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng 21(8):549–560

    Google Scholar 

  152. Taha MMR, Noureldin A, Osman A, El-Sheimy N (2004) Introduction to the use of wavelet multiresolution analysis for intelligent structural health monitoring. Can J Civ Eng 31(5):719–731

    Google Scholar 

  153. Abdeljaber O, Avci O, Kiranyaz MS, Boashah B, Sodano H, Inman DJ (2017) 1-D CNNs for structural damage detection: verification on a structural health monitoring benchmark data. Neurocomputing 275:1308–1317

    Google Scholar 

  154. Abdeljaber O, Avci O, Kiranyaz S, Gabbouj M, Inman DJ (2017) Real-time vibration-based structural damage detection using one-dimensional convolutional neural networks. J Sound Vib 388:154–170

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Civil Engineering, KIIT University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India

    Swagato Das & Purnachandra Saha

Authors
  1. Swagato Das
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Purnachandra Saha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Swagato Das.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Das, S., Saha, P. Structural health monitoring techniques implemented on IASC–ASCE benchmark problem: a review. J Civil Struct Health Monit 8, 689–718 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-018-0292-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-018-0292-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation