Skip to main content
Log in

Damage detection in existing reinforced concrete building using forced vibration test based on mode shape data

  • Application based
  • Published:
Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Damage detection of a full-scale nine-story reinforced concrete building is investigated using forced vibration test (FVT). The building was the former Civil and Architecture Department of Tohoku University located in Sendai Japan. Earthquake resistance elements of this building were severely damaged in 1978 Miyagi-Ken Oki earthquake and the building was retrofitted on 2001. FVT was performed on the structure before and after retrofitting with same sensor arrangement. Using data acquired from sensors, system identification was performed using rational fraction polynomial and the damage assessment (detection and location) was done by modal assurance criterion and its derivatives. The results indicate that detected damages and their location using this method corresponds with the actual damages occurred in the structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

References

  1. Catbas FN, Kijewski-Correa T, Aktan AE (2011) Structural identification (St-Id) of constructed facilities: approaches, methods and technologies for effective practice of St-Id. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Structural Engineering Institute (SEI)

  2. Aktan AE et al (1997) Structural identification for condition assessment: experimental arts. J Struct Eng 123(12):1674–1684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Holschemacher K, Kaseberg S (2013) Smart FRP systems with embedded FBG for structural monitoring and retrofitting. Proceedings of the thirteenth East Asia-Pacific conference on structural engineering and construction (EASEC-13)

  4. Kaseberg S, Schaller MB, Holschemacher K (2012) CFRP Systems with embedded FBG for structural monitoring and retrofitting. Proceeding of sixth European workshop on structural health monitoring.

  5. Chang, Fu-Kuo (eds) (2011) Condition based maintenance and intelligent structures: proceedings of the 8th international workshop on structural health monitoring., Structural health monitoringDEStech Publications, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  6. Haruhiko K et al (2009) Vibration tests on nuclear power station stacks equipped with structural control oil dampers. No. VTT-SYMP–256

  7. Doebling Scott W et al (1996) Damage identification and health monitoring of structural and mechanical systems from changes in their vibration characteristics: a literature review

  8. Chopra, Anil K (2015) Dynamics of structures: international edition. Pearson Higher Ed

  9. Doebling SW et al (1996) Damage identification and health monitoring of structural and mechanical systems from changes in their vibration characteristics: a literature review

  10. Niousha A, Motosaka M (2007) System identification and damage assessment of an existing building before and after retrofit. J Struct Eng 53B:297–304

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shiga T et al (1981) Observation of strong earthquake motions and nonlinear response analysis of the building of architectural and civil engineering department of Tohoku University. Trans Arhit Inst J 301:119–130

    Google Scholar 

  12. Motosaka M et al (2002) Evaluation of seismic damage and reinforcement effects of an existing building based on the forced vibration tests before and after repair work. Fifth European conference on structural dynamic

  13. Motosaka M, Sato T, Yamamoto Y (2004) The amplitude dependent dynamic characteristics of an existing building before and after seismic retrofit. 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, CD-ROM. No. 1023

  14. Wang Y et al (2016) On the seismic response of the Faculty of Architecture and Engineering Building at Tohoku University. Earthquake Spec 32(1):523–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Richardson Mark H, Formenti DL (1982) Parameter estimation from frequency response measurements using rational fraction polynomials. Proceedings of the international modal analysis conference

  16. Pastor M, Binda M, Harčarik T (2012) Modal assurance criterion. Proceedings Eng 48:543–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Allemang RJ (2003) The modal assurance criterion-twenty years of use and abuse. Sound Vib 37(8):14–23

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sinou JJ (2009) A review of damage detection and health monitoring of mechanical systems from changes in the measurement of linear and non-linear vibrations. Mech Vib 12:643–702

    Google Scholar 

  19. Niousha A (2011) Damage detection of actual buildings using dynamically measured flexibility. In: Sixth international conference of seismology and earthquake engineering, Tehran, Iran, 16–18 May 2011

  20. Schwarz B, Richardson M (2003) Scaling mode shapes obtained from operating data. Sound Vib 37(11):18–23

    Google Scholar 

  21. Motosaka M (2012) Lessons of the 2011 great east Japan earthquake focused on characteristics of ground motions and building damage. Proceedings of the International symposium on engineering lessons learned from the 2011 great East Japan earthquake.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors of this paper would like to show their gratitude to Prof. Masato Motosaka, Tohoku University for providing the data and sharing his pearls of wisdom during the course of this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arman Tatar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tatar, A., Niousha, A. & Rofooei, F.R. Damage detection in existing reinforced concrete building using forced vibration test based on mode shape data. J Civil Struct Health Monit 7, 123–135 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-017-0209-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-017-0209-8

Keywords

Navigation