Skip to main content
Log in

Detection of soil-abutment interaction by monitoring bridge response using vehicle excitation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper aims to explore fundamental characteristics of bridge vibration spectra to potentially evaluate soil-abutment interactions and changes in abutment earth pressures. To this aim, the bridge response to the excitation of an approaching vehicle on road is utilized to evaluate the transmissibility of the road-soil-abutment-bridge (r-s-a-b) path. By comparing the FFT spectrums of bridge acceleration responses before and upon a vehicle traversing over an abutment, we found that the response spectrum consists of specific frequency of vehicle excitation, even though the bridge response before vehicle traversed over the abutment has a much smaller magnitude. This suggests that the bridge response before the vehicle traversed over the abutment is sensitive enough to be used to characterize the dynamic features of r-s-a-b transmissibility. Hilbert–Huang Transform method is used to extract the non-stationary information of the moving vehicle excitation from the bridge responses to characterize the r-s-a-b transmissibility. It is found that specific signature associated with the specific frequency of vehicle excitation can be extracted from the Hilbert spectrum of empirical modal decomposition signals, and this signature could be readily quantified as a monitoring index which exhibits time-varying property.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hsieh KH, Halling MW, Barr PJ (2006) Overview of vibrational structural health monitoring with representative case studies. ASCE J Bridge Eng 11(12):707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Modares M, Waksmanski N (2013) Overview of structural health monitoring for steel bridges. ASCE Pract Period Struct Des Constr 18(3):187–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Whelana MJ, Gangonea MV, Janoyan KD, Jha R (2009) Real-time wireless vibration monitoring for operational modal analysis of an integral abutment highway bridge. Eng Struct 31:2224–2235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pugasap K, Kim W, Laman JA (2009) Long-term response prediction of integral abutment bridges. ASCE J Bridge Eng 3/4:129

  5. Thomson TA Jr, Lutenegger AJ (1998) Passive earth pressure tests on an integral bridge abutment. In: Proceedings 4th international conference on case histories in geotechnical engineering, St. Louis, Missouri, March 9–12

  6. Khodair YA (2009) Lateral earth pressure behind an integral abutment. Struct Infrastruct Eng 5(2):123–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bloodworth A, Xu M, Banks J, Clayton C (2012) Predicting the earth pressure on integral bridge abutments. J Bridge Eng 17(2):371–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wilson P, Elgamal A (2008) Full scale bridge abutment passive earth pressure tests and calibrated models. 14th world conference on earthquake engineering, October 12–17, 2008, Beijing, China

  9. Huntley SA, Valsangkar AJ (2013) Field monitoring of earth pressures on integral bridge abutments. Can Geotech J. doi:10.1139/cgj-2012-0440

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim WS, Laman JA (2010) Numerical analysis method for long-term behavior of integral abutment bridges. Eng Struct 32:2247–2257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shamsabadi A, Nordal S (2006) Modeling passive earth pressures on bridge abutments for nonlinear Seismic Soil-Structure interaction using Plaxis Bulletin, Issue 20

  12. Whelan MJ, Gangone MV, Janoyan KD, Jha R (2009) Real-time wireless vibration monitoring for operational modal analysis of an integral abutment highway bridge. Eng Struct 31:2224–2235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lekidis V, Tsakiri M, Makra K, Karakostas C, Klimis N, Sous I (2005) Evaluation of dynamic response and local soil effects of the Evripos cable-stayed bridge using multi-sensor monitoring systems. Eng Geol 79:43–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Abu-Hejleh N, Zornberg JG, Wang T, Watcharamonthein J (2002) Monitored displacements of unique geosynthetic-reinforced soil bridge abutments. Geosynth Int 9:171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Huang NE, Shen Z, Long SR, Wu MC, Shih HH, Zheng Q, Yuen NC, Tung CC, Liu HH (1998) The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis. Proc R Soc London 454A:903–995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Huang NE, Shen Z, Long SR (1999) A new view of non-linear water waves: the Hilbert spectrum. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 31:417–457

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Dicleli M, Erhan S (2010) Effect of soil-bridge interaction on the magnitude of internal forces in integral abutment bridge components due to live load effects. Eng Struct 32:129–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the support from the Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Leroy Hulsey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huffman, J.T., Xiao, F., Chen, G. et al. Detection of soil-abutment interaction by monitoring bridge response using vehicle excitation. J Civil Struct Health Monit 5, 389–395 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-015-0114-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-015-0114-y

Keywords

Navigation