Abstract
Background and Objective
The effect of cancer cachexia on the pharmacokinetics of vancomycin remains unclear. We investigated whether the pharmacokinetics of vancomycin and the risk of kidney injury are altered with the development of cancer cachexia.
Methods
A retrospective analysis was conducted using therapeutic drug monitoring data obtained from 86 cancer patients who received vancomycin intravenously for infection. The patients were classified into four groups according to the stage of cachexia defined by international consensus—non-cachexia (n = 26), pre-cachexia (n = 10), cachexia (n = 21) and refractory cachexia (n = 29). Vancomycin pharmacokinetics were analyzed by a traditional one-compartment model and Bayesian method using plasma concentrations measured in these patients. Renal function and pharmacokinetic parameters were compared between the non-cachexia patients (n = 26) and total cancer cachexia patients (n = 60).
Result
No significant difference in estimated glomerular filtration rate was observed between the non-cachexia and the total cancer cachexia patients. In contrast, systemic clearance of vancomycin was significantly lower in the total cancer cachexia patients compared with the non-cachexia patients when analyzed by the traditional one-compartment model [median (range)—49.7 (9.8‒98.7) vs 70.2 (12.5‒211.8) mL/min, p < 0.01] and by the Bayesian method [45.6 (12.5–84.7) vs 63.3 (12.2–102.5) mL/min, p < 0.05]. None of the non-cachexia patients developed kidney injury, whereas 15% (9 of 60 patients) of the total cancer cachexia patients developed kidney injuries (p = 0.052).
Conclusions
The present study revealed that cancer patients with cachexia may have reduced vancomycin clearance compared with those without cachexia. Cancer cachexia may be a risk factor of vancomycin-associated kidney injury, independent of renal function.
References
Mirhosseini M, Oneschuk D, Hunter B, Hanson J, Quan H, Amigo P. The role of antibiotics in the management of infection-related symptoms in advanced cancer patients. J Palliat Care. 2006;22:69–74.
Fearon K, Strasser F, Anker SD, Bosaeus I, Bruera E, Fainsinger RL, Jatoi A, Loprinzi C, MacDonald N, Mantovani G, Davis M, Muscaritoli M, Ottery F, Radbruch L, Ravasco P, Walsh D, Wilcock A, Kaasa S, Baracos VE. Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: an international consensus. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:489–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70218-7.
Bachmann J, Heiligensetzer M, Krakowski-Roosen H, Büchler MW, Friess H, Martignoni ME. Cachexia worsens prognosis in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12:1193–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-008-0505-z.
Bruera E. ABC of palliative care. Anorexia, cachexia, and nutrition. BMJ. 1997;315:1219–22.
Kirst HA, Thompson DG, Nicas TI. Historical yearly usage of vancomycin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998;42:1303–4.
Moellering RC Jr. Vancomycin: a 50-year reassessment. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42(Suppl 1):S3–4.
Levine DP. Vancomycin: a history. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42(Suppl 1):S5–12.
Rybak M, Lomaestro B, Rotschafer JC, Moellering R Jr, Craig W, Billeter M, Dalovisio JR, Levine DP. Therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin in adult patients: a consensus review of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2009;66:82–98. https://doi.org/10.2146/ajhp080434.
Buelga DS, de Mar Fernandez de Gatta M, Herrera EV, Dominguez-Gil A, García MJ. Population pharmacokinetic analysis of vancomycin in patients with hematological malignancies. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49:4934–41.
Al-Kofide H, Zaghloul I, Al-Naim L. Pharmacokinetics of vancomycin in adult cancer patients. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2010;16:245–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078155209355847.
Omote S, Yano Y, Hashida T, Masuda S, Yano I, Katsura T, Inui K. A retrospective analysis of vancomycin pharmacokinetics in Japanese cancer and non-cancer patients based on routine trough monitoring data. Biol Pharm Bull. 2009;32:99–104.
Mizuno T, Mizokami F, Fukami K, Ito K, Shibasaki M, Nagamatsu T, Furuta K. The influence of severe hypoalbuminemia on the half-life of vancomycin in elderly patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus hospital-acquired pneumonia. Clin Interv Aging. 2013;8:1323–8. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S52259.
Hidayat LK, Hsu DI, Quist R, Shriner KA, Wong-Beringer A. High-dose vancomycin therapy for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: efficacy and toxicity. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:2138–44.
Lodise TP, Patel N, Lomaestro BM, Rodvold KA, Drusano GL. Relationship between initial vancomycin concentration-time profile and nephrotoxicity among hospitalized patients. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49:507–14. https://doi.org/10.1086/600884.
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, May 28, 2009. Available from: https://evs.nci.nih.gov/ftp1/CTCAE/CTCAE_4.03_2010-06-14_QuickReference_5x7.pdf. Accessed 16 Dec 2017.
Sawchuk RJ, Zaske DE. Pharmacokinetics of dosing regimens which utilize multiple intravenous infusions: gentamicin in burn patients. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1976;4:183–95.
Yamamoto M, Kuzuya T, Baba H, Yamada K, Nabeshima T. Population pharmacokinetic analysis of vancomycin in patients with gram-positive infections and the influence of infectious disease type. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2009;34:473–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2710.2008.01016.x.
Nakayama H, Suzuki M, Usuki K, Kato T. Amikacin pharmacokinetics in terminal stage of hematological malignancy. Ther Drug Monit. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1097/ftd.0000000000000621.
Masman AD, Tibboel D, Baar FP, van Dijk M, Mathot RA, van Gelder T. Prevalence and implications of abnormal laboratory results in patients in the terminal phase of life. J Palliat Med. 2016;19:822–9. https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2015.0548.
Cvan Trobec K, Kerec Kos M, Trontelj J, Grabnar I, Tschirner A, Palus S, Anker SD, Springer J, Lainscak M. Influence of cancer cachexia on drug liver metabolism and renal elimination in rats. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2015;6:45–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12012.
Franken LG, Masman AD, de Winter BC, Koch BC, Baar FP, Tibboel D, van Gelder T, Mathot RA. Pharmacokinetics of morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide and morphine-6-glucuronide in terminally ill adult patients. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2016;55:697–709. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-015-0345-4.
Kullar R, Davis SL, Levine DP, Rybak MJ. Impact of vancomycin exposure on outcomes in patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: support for consensus guidelines suggested targets. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52:975–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cir124.
Rybak MJ. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of vancomycin. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42(Suppl 1):S35–9.
Marsot A, Boulamery A, Bruguerolle B, Simon N. Vancomycin: a review of population pharmacokinetic analyses. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2012;51:1–13. https://doi.org/10.2165/11596390-000000000-00000.
Lanke S, Yu T, Rower JE, Balch AH, Korgenski EK, Sherwin CM. AUC-guided vancomycin dosing in adolescent patients with suspected sepsis. J Clin Pharmacol. 2017;57:77–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.782.
Zhou Y, Gao F, Chen C, Ma L, Yang T, Liu X, Liu Y, Wang X, Zhao X, Que C, Li S, Lv J, Cui Y, Yang L. Development of a population pharmacokinetic model of vancomycin and its application in Chinese geriatric patients with pulmonary infections. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2019;44:361–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13318-018-0534-2.
Pryka RD, Rodvold KA, Garrison M, Rotschafer JC. Individualizing vancomycin dosage regimens: one- versus two-compartment Bayesian models. Ther Drug Monit. 1989;11:450–4.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Ethics approval
The protocol of the present study was approved by Ethics Committee of NTT Medical Center Tokyo prior to the study (the approval number: 17‒227).
Informed consent
The IRB waived the requirement of written informed consent from patients, because the present study had a retrospective design and the data used were obtained from routine medical care including TDM. Nevertheless, the study was conducted with full consideration of protecting patients’ personal information according to the guidelines on privacy policy.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nakayama, H., Suzuki, M., Kato, T. et al. Vancomycin Pharmacokinetics in Patients with Advanced Cancer Near End of Life. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 44, 837–843 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13318-019-00564-w
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13318-019-00564-w