Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Early Aggressive Enteral Feeding in Neonates Weighing 750–1250 Grams: A Randomized Controlled Trial

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Indian Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

In preterm neonates, enteral feeding is advanced slowly, considering the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis. Prolonged intravenous alimentation in these neonates, however, may increase the risk of sepsis-related morbidity and mortality, particularly in low resource settings.

Objectives

Objective of this was study to evaluate impact of aggressive enteral feeding on mortality and morbidities among preterm neonates.

Design

Randomized controlled trial.

Participants

Neonates with birthweight 750–1250 g.

Interventions

131 preterm neonates with birth weight 750–1250 g, admitted to neonatal intensive care unit between April 2012 and June 2014, were randomized to aggressive feeding or conservative feeding regimen.

Outcomes

The primary outcome of the study was all-cause mortality during hospital stay. The secondary outcomes included proportion of sepsis (blood culture proven), necrotizing enterocolitis, feed intolerance, survival without major morbidity at discharge, time to reach full enteral feed (180 mL/kg/d), duration of hospitalization, and average daily weight gain (g/kg).

Results

All-cause mortality was 33.3% in aggressive regimen and 43.1% in conservative regimen, [RR (95%) CI 0.77 (0.49, 1.20)]. Neonates with aggressive feeding regimen reached full enteral feed earlier; median (IQR) 7 (6, 8) days compared to conservative regimen, 10 (9, 14) days; P <0.001. There was no difference in culture positive sepsis rate, survival without major morbidities, feed intolerance, necrotizing enterocolitis, duration of hospitalization and average daily weight gain.

Conclusions

In neonates with birth weight 750–1250 g, early aggressive feeding regimen is feasible but not associated with significant reduction in all-cause mortality, culture positive sepsis or survival without major morbidities during hospital stay. Neonates with aggressive regimen have fewer days on IV fluids and reach full feed earlier.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson DM, Kliegman RM. The relationship of neonatal alimentation practices to the occurrence of endemic necrotizing enterocolitis. Am J Perinatol. 1991;8:62–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brown EG, Sweet AY. Preventing necrotizing enterocolitis in neonates. JAMA. 1978;240:2452–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. McKeown RE, Marsh TD, Amarnath U, Garrison CZ, Addy CL, Thompson SJ, et al. Role of delayed feeding and of feeding increments in necrotizing enterocolitis. J Pediatr. 1992;121:764–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Berseth CL. Neonatal small intestinal motility: motor responses to feeding in term and preterm infants. J Pediatr. 1990;117:777–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Burrin DG, Stoll B. Key nutrients and growth factors for the neonatal gastrointestinal tract. Clin Perinatol. 2002;29:65–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hartel C, Haase B, Browning-Carmo K, Gebauer C, Kattner E, Kribs A, et al. Does the enteral feeding advancement affect short-term outcomes in very low birth weight infants? J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2009;48:464–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Morris BH, Miller-Loncar CL, Landry SH, Smith KE, Swank PR, Denson SE. Feeding, medical factors, and developmental outcome in premature infants. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1999;38:451–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Basu S, Rathore P, Bhatia BD. Predictors of mortality in very low birth weight neonates in India. Singapore Med J. 2008;49:556–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Narayan S, Aggarwal R, Upadhyay A, Deorari AK, Singh M, Paul VK. Survival and morbidity in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants. Indian Pediatr. 2003;40:130–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mukhopadhyay K, Louis D, Mahajan R, Kumar P. Predictors of mortality and major morbidities in extremely low birth weight neonates. Indian Pediatr. 2013;50: 1119–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kliegman RM, Walsh MC. Neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis: pathogenesis, classification, and spectrum of illness. Curr Probl Pediatr. 1987;17:213–88.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jobe AH, Bancalari E. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;163:1723–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Papile LA, Burstein J, Burstein R, Koffler H. Incidence and evolution of subependymal and intraventricular hemorrhage: a study of infants with birth weights less than 1,500 gm. J Pediatr. 1978;92:529–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. de Vries LS, Eken P, Dubowitz LM. The spectrum of leukomalacia using cranial ultrasound. Behav Brain Res. 1992;49:1–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rayyis SF, Ambalavanan N, Wright L, Carlo WA. Randomized trial of “slow” versus “fast” feed advancements on the incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants. J Pediatr. 1999;134:293–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Caple J, Armentrout D, Huseby V, Halbardier B, Garcia J, Sparks JW, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of slow versus rapid feeding volume advancement in preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2004;114:1597–600.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Salhotra A, Ramji S. Slow versus fast enteral feed advancement in very low birth weight infants: a randomized control trial. Indian Pediatr. 2004;41:435–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Krishnamurthy S, Gupta P, Debnath S, Gomber S. Slow versus rapid enteral feeding advancement in preterm newborn infants 1000–1499 g: a randomized controlled trial. Acta Paediatr. 2010;99:42–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Karagol BS, Zenciroglu A, Okumus N, Polin RA. Randomized controlled trial of slow versus rapid enteral feeding advancements on the clinical outcomes of preterm infants with 750–1250g. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2013;37:223–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Jain S, Mukhopadhyay K, Jain V, Kumar P. Slow versus rapid enteral feed in preterm neonates with antenatal absent end diastolic flow. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29:2828–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Morgan J, Young L, McGuire W. Delayed introduction of progressive enteral feeds to prevent necrotising enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;12:CD001970.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Morgan J, Young L, McGuire W. Slow advancement of enteral feed volumes to prevent necrotising enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;12:CD001241.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sanghvi KP, Joshi P, Nabi F, Kabra N. Feasibility of exclusive enteral feeds from birth in VLBW infants >1200 g–An RCT. Acta Paediatr. 2013;102:e299–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manoj Modi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Modi, M., Ramji, S., Jain, A. et al. Early Aggressive Enteral Feeding in Neonates Weighing 750–1250 Grams: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Indian Pediatr 56, 294–298 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-019-1517-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-019-1517-3

Keywords

Clinical Trial Registration

Navigation