Abstract
Background
In preterm neonates, enteral feeding is advanced slowly, considering the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis. Prolonged intravenous alimentation in these neonates, however, may increase the risk of sepsis-related morbidity and mortality, particularly in low resource settings.
Objectives
Objective of this was study to evaluate impact of aggressive enteral feeding on mortality and morbidities among preterm neonates.
Design
Randomized controlled trial.
Participants
Neonates with birthweight 750–1250 g.
Interventions
131 preterm neonates with birth weight 750–1250 g, admitted to neonatal intensive care unit between April 2012 and June 2014, were randomized to aggressive feeding or conservative feeding regimen.
Outcomes
The primary outcome of the study was all-cause mortality during hospital stay. The secondary outcomes included proportion of sepsis (blood culture proven), necrotizing enterocolitis, feed intolerance, survival without major morbidity at discharge, time to reach full enteral feed (180 mL/kg/d), duration of hospitalization, and average daily weight gain (g/kg).
Results
All-cause mortality was 33.3% in aggressive regimen and 43.1% in conservative regimen, [RR (95%) CI 0.77 (0.49, 1.20)]. Neonates with aggressive feeding regimen reached full enteral feed earlier; median (IQR) 7 (6, 8) days compared to conservative regimen, 10 (9, 14) days; P <0.001. There was no difference in culture positive sepsis rate, survival without major morbidities, feed intolerance, necrotizing enterocolitis, duration of hospitalization and average daily weight gain.
Conclusions
In neonates with birth weight 750–1250 g, early aggressive feeding regimen is feasible but not associated with significant reduction in all-cause mortality, culture positive sepsis or survival without major morbidities during hospital stay. Neonates with aggressive regimen have fewer days on IV fluids and reach full feed earlier.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson DM, Kliegman RM. The relationship of neonatal alimentation practices to the occurrence of endemic necrotizing enterocolitis. Am J Perinatol. 1991;8:62–7.
Brown EG, Sweet AY. Preventing necrotizing enterocolitis in neonates. JAMA. 1978;240:2452–4.
McKeown RE, Marsh TD, Amarnath U, Garrison CZ, Addy CL, Thompson SJ, et al. Role of delayed feeding and of feeding increments in necrotizing enterocolitis. J Pediatr. 1992;121:764–70.
Berseth CL. Neonatal small intestinal motility: motor responses to feeding in term and preterm infants. J Pediatr. 1990;117:777–82.
Burrin DG, Stoll B. Key nutrients and growth factors for the neonatal gastrointestinal tract. Clin Perinatol. 2002;29:65–96.
Hartel C, Haase B, Browning-Carmo K, Gebauer C, Kattner E, Kribs A, et al. Does the enteral feeding advancement affect short-term outcomes in very low birth weight infants? J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2009;48:464–70.
Morris BH, Miller-Loncar CL, Landry SH, Smith KE, Swank PR, Denson SE. Feeding, medical factors, and developmental outcome in premature infants. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1999;38:451–7.
Basu S, Rathore P, Bhatia BD. Predictors of mortality in very low birth weight neonates in India. Singapore Med J. 2008;49:556–60.
Narayan S, Aggarwal R, Upadhyay A, Deorari AK, Singh M, Paul VK. Survival and morbidity in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants. Indian Pediatr. 2003;40:130–5.
Mukhopadhyay K, Louis D, Mahajan R, Kumar P. Predictors of mortality and major morbidities in extremely low birth weight neonates. Indian Pediatr. 2013;50: 1119–23.
Kliegman RM, Walsh MC. Neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis: pathogenesis, classification, and spectrum of illness. Curr Probl Pediatr. 1987;17:213–88.
Jobe AH, Bancalari E. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;163:1723–9.
Papile LA, Burstein J, Burstein R, Koffler H. Incidence and evolution of subependymal and intraventricular hemorrhage: a study of infants with birth weights less than 1,500 gm. J Pediatr. 1978;92:529–34.
de Vries LS, Eken P, Dubowitz LM. The spectrum of leukomalacia using cranial ultrasound. Behav Brain Res. 1992;49:1–6.
Rayyis SF, Ambalavanan N, Wright L, Carlo WA. Randomized trial of “slow” versus “fast” feed advancements on the incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants. J Pediatr. 1999;134:293–7.
Caple J, Armentrout D, Huseby V, Halbardier B, Garcia J, Sparks JW, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of slow versus rapid feeding volume advancement in preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2004;114:1597–600.
Salhotra A, Ramji S. Slow versus fast enteral feed advancement in very low birth weight infants: a randomized control trial. Indian Pediatr. 2004;41:435–41.
Krishnamurthy S, Gupta P, Debnath S, Gomber S. Slow versus rapid enteral feeding advancement in preterm newborn infants 1000–1499 g: a randomized controlled trial. Acta Paediatr. 2010;99:42–6.
Karagol BS, Zenciroglu A, Okumus N, Polin RA. Randomized controlled trial of slow versus rapid enteral feeding advancements on the clinical outcomes of preterm infants with 750–1250g. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2013;37:223–8.
Jain S, Mukhopadhyay K, Jain V, Kumar P. Slow versus rapid enteral feed in preterm neonates with antenatal absent end diastolic flow. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29:2828–33.
Morgan J, Young L, McGuire W. Delayed introduction of progressive enteral feeds to prevent necrotising enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;12:CD001970.
Morgan J, Young L, McGuire W. Slow advancement of enteral feed volumes to prevent necrotising enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;12:CD001241.
Sanghvi KP, Joshi P, Nabi F, Kabra N. Feasibility of exclusive enteral feeds from birth in VLBW infants >1200 g–An RCT. Acta Paediatr. 2013;102:e299–304.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Modi, M., Ramji, S., Jain, A. et al. Early Aggressive Enteral Feeding in Neonates Weighing 750–1250 Grams: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Indian Pediatr 56, 294–298 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-019-1517-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-019-1517-3