Skip to main content
Log in

Waist-to-height ratio as an indicator of high blood pressure in urban Indian school children

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Indian Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To examine the utility of waist-to-height ratio to identify risk of high blood pressure when compared to body mass index and waist circumference in South Indian urban school children.

Design

Secondary data analysis from a cross-sectional study.

Setting

Urban schools around Bangalore, India.

Participants

1913 children (58.1% males) aged 6-16 years with no prior history of chronic illness (PEACH study).

Methods

Height, weight, waist circumference and of blood pressure were measured. Children with blood pressure ≥90th percentile of age-, sex-, and height-adjusted standards were labelled as having high blood pressure.

Results

13.9% had a high waist-to-height ratio, 15.1% were overweight/obese and 21.7% had high waist circumference. High obesity indicators were associated with an increased risk of high blood pressure. The adjusted risk ratios (95% CI) of high systolic blood pressure with waist-to-height ratio, body mass index and waist circumference were 2.48 (1.76, 3.47), 2.59 (1.66, 4.04) and 2.38 (1.74, 3.26), respectively. Similar results were seen with high diastolic blood pressure.

Conclusion

Obesity indicators, especially waist-to-height ratio due to its ease of measurement, can be useful initial screening tools for risk of high blood pressure in urban Indian school children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Luma GB, Spiotta RT. Hypertension in children and adolescents. Am Fam Physician. 2006;73:1558–68.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sorof J, Daniels S. Obesity hypertension in children: a problem of epidemic proportions. Hypertension. 2002;40:441–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Raj M, Sundaram R, Paul M, Kumar K. Blood pressure distribution in Indian children. Indian Pediatr. 2010;47:477–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Genovesi S, Antolini L, Gallieni M, Aiello A, Mandal SK, Doneda A, et al. High prevalence of hypertension in normal and underweight Indian children. J Hypertens. 2011;29:217–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Prasad DS, Kabir Z, Dash AK, Das BC. Abdominal obesity, an independent cardiovascular risk factor in Indian subcontinent: A clinico epidemiological evidence summary. J Cardiovasc Dis Res. 2011;2:199–205.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. López-Jaramillo P, Velandia-Carrillo C, Alvarez-Camacho J, Cohen DD, Sánchez-Solano T, Castillo-López G. Inflammation and hypertension: Are there regional differences? Int J Hypertens. 2013;2013:492094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yajnik CS, Fall CH, Coyaji KJ, Hirve SS, Rao S, Barker DJ, et al. Neonatal anthropometry: the thin-fat Indian baby. The Pune Maternal Nutrition Study. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2003;27:173–180.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen X, Wang Y. Tracking of blood pressure from childhood to adulthood: a systematic review and metaanalysis regression. Circulation. 2008;117:3171–80.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pickering TG, Hall JE, Appel LJ, Falkner BE, Graves J, Hill MN, et al. Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals, Part 1: Blood pressure measurement in humans: A statement for professionals from the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research. Circulation. 2005;111:697–716.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim JY, Oh S, Chang MR, Cho YG, Park KH, Paek YJ, et al. Comparability and utility of body composition measurement vs. anthropometric measurement for assessing obesity related health risks in Korean men. Int J Clin Pract. 2013;67:73–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. McCarthy HD, Ashwell M. A study of central fatness using waist-to-height ratios in UK children and adolescents over two decades supports the simple message-’keep your waist circumference to less than half your height’. Int J Obes (Lond). 2006;30:988–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Savva SC, Tornaritis M, Savva ME, Kourides Y, Panagi A, Silikiotou N, et al. Waist circumference and waist-toheight ratio are better predictors of cardiovascular disease risk factors in children than body mass index. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000;24:1453–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Freedman DS, Kahn HS, Mei Z, Grummer-Strawn LM, Dietz WH, Srinivasan SR, et al. Relation of body mass index and waist-to-height ratio to cardiovascular disease risk factors in children and adolescents: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;86:33–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hu YH, Reilly KH, Liang YJ, Xi B, Liu JT, Xu DJ, et al. Increase in body mass index, waist circumference and waist-to-height ratios associated with high blood pressure in children and adolescents in China. J Int Med Res. 2011;39:23–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kuriyan R, Thomas T, Lokesh DP, Sheth NR, Mahendra A, Joy R, et al. Waist circumference and waist for height percentiles in urban South Indian children aged 3-16 years. Indian Pediatr. 2011;48:765–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kuba VM, Leone C, Damiani D. Is waist-to-height ratio a useful indicator of cardio-metabolic risk in 6-10-year-old children? BMC Pediatr. 2013;13:91.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Brambilla P, Bedogni G, Heo M, Pietrobelli A. Waist circumference-to-height ratio predicts adiposity better than body mass index in children and adolescents. Int J Obes (Lond). 2013;37:943–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gordon CC, Chumlea WC, Roche AF. Stature, recumbent length, and weight. In: Lohman TG, Roche AF, Martorell R, eds. Anthropometric Standardization reference Manual. Human Kinetics Books, Champaign, Illinois, 1988: p. 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  19. World Health Organization. Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry: a report of a WHO expert committee. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1995;854:1–452.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, Irwin ML, Swartz AM, Strath SJ, et al. Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32:498–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. A SAS program for the CDC growth charts. 2011. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_11/sr11_246.pdf. Accessed February 9, 201.

    Google Scholar 

  22. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. The Fourth Report on the Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents. National Institutes of Health. NIH Publication No.05-5267 Revised May 2005. Available from: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/prof/heart/hbp/hbp_ped.pdf. Accessed February 9, 2015.

  23. Cole TJ, Lobstein T. Extended international (IOTF) body mass index cut-offs for thinness, overweight and obesity. Pediatr Obes. 2012;7:284–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. A method for comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology. 1983;148:839–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Kuriyan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mishra, P.E., Shastri, L., Thomas, T. et al. Waist-to-height ratio as an indicator of high blood pressure in urban Indian school children. Indian Pediatr 52, 773–778 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-015-0715-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-015-0715-x

Keywords

Navigation