Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Establishing national neonatal perinatal database and birth defects registry network — Need of the hour!

  • Perspective
  • Published:
Indian Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Early detection and prevention of birth defects is necessary to further reduce neonatal morbidity and mortality. A birth defect registry or surveillance system is necessary to assess the exact magnitude, profile and modifiable risk factors for birth defects. We review the existing efforts and suggest possible options for addressing this important issue. Connecting birth defects registry with the pre-existing programs such as National Neonatal Perinatal Database could be one of the option.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Christianson A, Howson CP, Modell CB. March of Dimes Global Report on Birth Defects: The Hidden Toll of Dying and Disabled Children. The March of Dimes. 2006. Available from: http://www.marchofdimes.com/materials/global-report-on-birth-defects-the-hidden-tollof-dying-and-disabled-children-executive-summary.pdf. Accesssed January 5,2014.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Agarwal SS, Singh U, Singh PS, Singh SS, Das V, Sharma A, et al. Prevalence and spectrum of congenital malformations in a prospective study at a teaching hospital. Indian J Med Res. 1991;94:413–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Taksande A, Vilhekar K, Chaturvedi P, Jain M. Congenital malformations at birth in Central India: A rural medical college hospital based data. Indian J Hum Genet. 2010;16:159–63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Bhat BV, Babu L. Congenital malformations at birth — a prospective study from south India. Indian J Pediatr. 1998;65:873–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chaturvedi P, Banerjee KS. An epidemiological study of congenital malformations in newborn. Indian J Pediatr. 1993;60:645–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Stoll C, Alembik Y, Roth MP, Dott B. Parental consanguinity as a cause for increased incidence of births defects in a study of 238,942 consecutive births. Ann Genet. 1999;42:133–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bhide P, Sagoo GS, Moorthie S, Burton H, Kar A. Systematic review of birth prevalence of neural tube defects in India. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2013;97:437–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Capacity Building for Birth Defect Surveillance in South East Asia. Report of the Regional Workshop on Birth Defects Surveillance. April 2012. Available from: http://www.searo.who.int/entity/child_adolescent/documents/sea_cah_10/en/. Accesssed Febuary 8,2014.

  9. Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Updated guidelines for evaluating public health surveillance systems: Recommen-dations from the guidelines working group. MMWR. 2001;50:1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Report of National Neonatal Perinatal Database (NNPD) 2002-2003. Available from: http://www.newbornwhocc. org/nnpo.html. Accesssed January 20, 2014.

  11. Sankar VH, Phadke SR. Clinical utility of fetal autopsy and comparison with prenatal ultrasound findings. J Perinatol. 2006;26:224–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neerja Gupta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gupta, N., Kabra, M. & Kapoor, S. Establishing national neonatal perinatal database and birth defects registry network — Need of the hour!. Indian Pediatr 51, 693–696 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-014-0483-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-014-0483-z

Keywords

Navigation