Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparative short term efficacy and tolerability of methylphenidate and atomoxetine in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Indian Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To compare the short term efficacy and tolerability of methylphenidate and atomoxetine in children with Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

Design

Open label randomized parallel group clinical trial.

Setting

Child Guidance Clinic of a tertiary care hospital of Northern India from October 2010 to June 2012.

Participants

69 patients (age 6–14 y) with a diagnosis of ADHD receiving methylphenidate or atomoxetine.

Intervention

Methylphenidate (0.2–1 mg/kg/d) or atomoxetine (0.5–1.2 mg/kg/d) for eight weeks.

Main outcome measures

Treatment response (>25% change in baseline Vanderbilt ADHD Diagnostic Parent Rating Scale (VADPRS); Vanderbilt ADHD Diagnostic Teacher Rating Scale (VADTRS); Clinical Global Impression Severity Scale (CGI-S) at eight weeks and adverse effects.

Results

Treatment response was observed in 90.7% patients from methylphenidate group and 86.2% patients of atomoxetine group at an average dose of 0.45 mg/kg/d and 0.61 mg/kg/d, respectively. The patients showed comparable improvement on VADPRS (P=0.500), VADTRS (P=0.264) and CGI-S (P=0.997). Weight loss was significantly higher in methylphenidate group (−0.57±0.78 kg; P=0.001), and heart rate increase was observed at higher rate in atomoxetine group (7± 9 bpm; P=0.021).

Conclusion

Methylphenidate and atomoxetine are efficacious in Indian children with ADHD at lesser doses than previously used. Their efficacy and tolerability are comparable.

Trial Registration No.

CTRI/2011/08/001981

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Faraone SV, Sergeant J, Gillberg C, Biederman J. The worldwide prevalence of ADHD: is it an American condition? World Psychiatry. 2003;2:104–13.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kidd PM. Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children: rationale for its integrative management. Altern Med Rev. 2000;5:402–28.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mannuzza S, Klein RG, Bessler A, Malloy P, LaPadula M. Adult psychiatric status of hyperactive boys grown up. Am J Psychiatry. 1998;155:493–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pliszka S, AACAP Work Group on Quality Issues. Practice parameter for the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2007;46:894–921.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Subcommittee on Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder; Steering Committee on Quality Improvement and Management, Wolraich M, Brown L, Brown RT, DuPaul G, et al. ADHD: Clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2011;128:1007–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Greydanus DE, Nazeer A, Patel DR. Psychopharmacology of ADHD in pediatrics: current advances and issues. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2009;5:171–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kratochvil CJ, Heiligenstein JH, Dittmann R, Spencer TJ, Biederman J, Wernicke J, et al. Atomoxetine and methylphenidate treatment in children with ADHD: a prospective, randomized, open-label trial. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2002;41:776–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kemner JE, Starr HL, Ciccone PE, Hooper-Wood CG, Crockett RS. Outcomes of OROS methylphenidate compared with atomoxetine in children with ADHD: a multicenter, randomized prospective study. Adv Ther. 2005;22:498–512.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sangal RB, Owens J, Allen AJ, Sutton V, Schuh K, Kelsey D. Effects of atomoxetine and methylphenidate on sleep in children with ADHD. Sleep. 2006;29:1573–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Prasad S, Harpin V, Poole L, Zeitlin H, Jamdar S, Puvanendran K, et al. A multi-center, randomized, openlabel study of atomoxetine compared with standard current therapy in UK children and adolescents with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Curr Med Res Opin. 2007;23:379–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang Y, Zheng Y, Du Y, Song DH, Shin YJ, Cho SC, et al. Atomoxetine versus methylphenidate in pediatric outpatients with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a randomized, double-blind comparison trial. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2007;41:222–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Newcorn JH, Kratochvil CJ, Allen AJ, Casat CD, Ruff DD, Moore RJ, et al. Atomoxetine and osmotically released methylphenidate for the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: acute comparison and differential response. Am J Psychiatry. 2008;165:721–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yildiz O, Sismanlar SG, Memik NC, Karakaya I, Agaoglu B. Atomoxetine and methylphenidate treatment in children with ADHD: the efficacy, tolerability and effects on executive functions. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2011;42:257–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder, 4th ed. Text Revision. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Busner J, Targum SD. The clinical global impressions scale: A pplying a research tool in clinical practice. Psychiatry (Edgmont). 2007;4:28–37.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. William JR. The Declaration of Helsinki and public health. Bull World Health Organ. 2008;86:650–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Indian Council Medical Research. Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research on Human Participants. New Delhi: Director-General, Indian Council Medical Research; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gautam S, Batra L, Gaur N, Meena PS. Clinical practice guidelines for the assessment and treatment of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. In: Gautam S, Avasthi A, editors. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Clinical Practice Guidelines for Psychiatrists in India. Jaipur: Indian Psychiatric Society; 2008. p. 23–42.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wolraich ML, Lambert W, Doffing MA, Bickman L, Simmons T, Worley K. Psychometric properties of the Vanderbilt ADHD diagnostic parent rating scale in a referred population. J Pediatr Psychol. 2003;28:559–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wolraich ML, Feurer ID, Hannah JN, Baumgaertel A, Pinnock TY. Obtaining systematic teacher reports of disruptive behavior disorders utilizing DSM-IV. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1998;26:141–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hanwella R, Senanayake M, de Silva V. Comparative efficacy and acceptability of methylphenidate and atomoxetine in treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry. 2011;11:176.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sitholey P, Agarwal V, Chamoli S. A preliminary study of factors affecting adherence to medication in clinic children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Indian J Psychiatry. 2011;53:41–4.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jasmin Garg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Garg, J., Arun, P. & Chavan, B.S. Comparative short term efficacy and tolerability of methylphenidate and atomoxetine in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Indian Pediatr 51, 550–554 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-014-0445-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-014-0445-5

Keywords

Navigation