Skip to main content
Log in

Demystifying LMS and BCPE methods of centile estimation for growth and other health parameters

  • Essentials of Biostatistics
  • Published:
Indian Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Lambda-Mu-Sigma and Box-Cox Power Exponential are popular methods for constructing centile curves but are difficult to understand for medical professionals. As a result, the methods are used by experts only. Non-experts use software as a blackbox that can lead to wrong curves. This article explains these methods in a simple non-mathematical language so that medical professionals can use them correctly and confidently.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cole TJ, Green PJ. Smoothing reference centile curves: the LMS method and penalized likelihood. Stat Med. 1992;11:1305–1319.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rigby RA, Stasinopoulos DM. Smooth centile curves for skew and kurtotic data modelled using the Box-Cox power exponential distribution. Stat Med. 2004;23:3053–3076.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group. WHO Child Growth Standards based on length/height, weight and age. Acta Paediatr Suppl. 2006;450:76–85.

    Google Scholar 

  4. de Onis M, Onyango AW, Borghi E, Siyam A, Nishida C, Siekmann J. Development of a WHO growth reference for school-aged children and adolescents. Bull World Health Organ. 2007;85:660–667.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang SY, Liu LJ, Han YS, Liu G, Ma ZG, Shen XZ, et al. [Reference values of differences between TW3-C RUS and TW3-C Carpal bone ages of children from five cities of China]. Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2008;46:851–855.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wallace JM, Bhattacharya S, Horgan GW. Gestational age, gender and parity specific centile charts for placental weight for singleton deliveries in Aberdeen, UK. Placenta. 2013;34:269–274.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Voges I, Jerosch-Herold M, Hedderich J, Pardun E, Hart C, Gabbert DD, et al. Normal values of aortic dimensions, distensibility, and pulse wave velocity in children and young adults: a cross-sectional study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2012;14:77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. WHO Child Growth Standards: Methods and Development: Head circumference-for-age, Arm circumference-for-age, Triceps skinfold-for-age and Subscapular skinfold-for-age. World Health Organization, 2007 Available from: http://www.who.int/childgrowth/standards/second_set/technical_report_2/en/. Accessed November 11, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Indrayan A. Medical Biostatistics, Third Edition. CRC Press, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Borghi E, de Onis M, Garza C, Van den Broeck J, Frongillo EA, Grummer-Strawn L, et al. WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group. Construction of the World Health Organization child growth standards: selection of methods for attained growth curves. Stat Med. 2006;25:247–265.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nepal: Demographic and Health Survey 2011. Population Division, Ministry of Health and Population, Government of Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal, March 2012. Available from: http://www.measuredhs.com/publications/publication-FR257-DHS-Final-Reports.cfm. Accessed November 11, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cole TJ. The LMS method for constructing normalized growth standards. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1990;44:45–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Stasinopoulos DM, Rigby RA. Generalized additive models for location, scale and shape (GAMLSS) in R. J Statistical Software. 2007:23:1–46.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Royston P, Wright EM. Goodness-of-fit statistics for agespecific reference intervals. Stat Med. 2000;19:2943–2962.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pan H, Cole TJ. A comparison of goodness of fit tests for age-related reference ranges. Stat Med. 2004;23:1749–1765.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. van Buuren S, Fredriks M. Worm plot: a simple diagnostic device for modelling growth reference curves. Stat Med. 2001;20:1259–1277.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abhaya Indrayan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Indrayan, A. Demystifying LMS and BCPE methods of centile estimation for growth and other health parameters. Indian Pediatr 51, 37–43 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-014-0310-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-014-0310-6

Keywords

Navigation