Skip to main content
Log in

Disposable bipolar irrigated sealer (Aquamantys®) for liver resection: use with caution

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Updates in Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The disposable bipolar irrigated sealer has been demonstrated to reduce perioperative bleeding, but its role in preventing postoperative cut-surface complications has not been evaluated to date. A prospective observational study was performed between January and September 2013 to evaluate a disposable bipolar irrigated sealed (Aquamantys®) on a continuous series of 51 first liver resections without biliary reconstruction. Primary end-point was the occurrence of cut-surface complications during the postoperative period. Secondary endpoints were postoperative complications and the 1-year overall survival rate. The results were compared to a propensity score matched group of 153 liver resections performed with conventional monopolar cautery. A cut-surface complication occurred in 13/51 (25.5 %) resected patients. Bleeding, bile leakage and subphrenic abscess occurred in 7.8, 11.8 and 11.8 % patients, respectively. Compared to the matched group, the resected group had a higher rate of cut-surface complications (25.5 vs. 14.7 %, p < 0.01) and a higher rate of Clavien–Dindo type ≥3 postoperative complications (29.5 vs. 17.2 %, p < 0.01). In the multivariate analysis, preoperative chemotherapy (p = 0.03, 95 % CI 1.09–5.9, OR 2.53), blood transfusion (p = 0.02, 95 % CI 1.78–6.55, OR 2.78) and Aquamantys® use (p = 0.02, 95 % CI 1.21–6.7, OR 2.85) were independent of cut-surface complications within the first 90 postoperative days. The overall 1-year survival rates were not different between the two groups (p = 0.078). Aquamantys® use is associated with an increased rate of postoperative complications compared to classical monopolar cautery, and we recommend that it should be used with caution in this type of surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fong ZV, Tanabe KK (2014) The clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States, Europe, and Asia : a comprehensive and evidence-based comparison and review. Cancer 120:2824–2838

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gurusamy KS, Pamesha V, Sharma D, Davidson BR (2009) Techniques for liver parenchymal transection in liver resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 29:CD006880

    Google Scholar 

  3. Egger ME, Squires MH, Kooby DA, Maithel SK, Cho CS, Weber SM et al (2015) Risk stratification for readmission after major hepatectomy: development of a readmission risk score. J Am Coll Surg 220:640–648

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Okumura K, Sugimachi K, Kinjo N, Shoji F, Ikebe M, Makino I et al (2013) Risk factors of bile leakage after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology 60:1717–1719

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lim C, Dokmak S, Farges O, Aussilhou B, Sauvanet A, Belghiti J (2014) Reoperation for post-hepatectomy hemorrhage: increased risk of mortality. Langenbecks Arch Surg 399:735–740

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Marulanda GA, Ulrich SD, Seyler TM, Delanois RE, Mont MA (2008) Reductions in blood loss with a bipolar sealer in total hip arthroplasty. Expert Rev Med Devices 5:125–131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kaibori M, Matsui K, Ishizaki M, Sakaguchi T, Matsushima H, Matsui Y et al (2013) A prospective randomized controlled trial of hemostasis with a bipolar sealer during hepatic transection for liver resection. Surgery 154:1046–1052

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Currò G, Barbera A, Cogliandolo A, Dattola A, De Marco ML, De Leo E et al (2014) The Aquamantys® system as alternative for parenchymal division and hemostasis in liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a preliminary study. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 18(2 suppl):2–5

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Viganò L, Capussotti L, De Rosa G, De Saussure WO, Mentha G, Rubbia-Brandt L et al (2013) Liver resection for colorectal metastases after chemotherapy: impact of chemotherapy-related liver injuries, pathological tumor response, and micrometastases on long-term survival. Ann Surg 258:731–740

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Couinaud C (1999) Liver anatomy: portal (and suprahepatic) or biliary segmentation. Dig Surg 16:459–467

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Vauthey JN, Chaoui A, Do KA, Bilimoria MM, Fenstermacher MJ, Charnsangavej C et al (2000) Standardized measurement of the future liver remnant prior to extended liver resection: methodology and clinical associations. Surgery 127:512–519

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rahbari NN, Garden OJ, Padbury R, Maddern G, Koch M, Hugh TJ et al (2011) Post-hepatectomy haemorrhage: a definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS). HPB (Oxford) 13:528–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Solomkin JS, Mazuski JE, Bradley JS, Rodvold KA, Goldstein EJ, Baron EJ et al (2010) Diagnosis and management of complicated intra-abdominal infection in adults and children: guidelines by the Surgical Infection Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 11:79–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Koch M, Garden OJ, Padbury R, Rahbari NN, Adam R, Capussotti L et al (2011) Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Surgery 149:680–688

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mayo SC, Shore AD, Nathan H, Edil BH, Hirose K, Anders RA et al (2011) Refining the definition of perioperative mortality following hepatectomy using death within 90 days as the standard criterion. HPB (Oxford) 13:473–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dindo DDN, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Guillaud A, Pery C, Campillo B, Lourdais A, Sulpice L, Boudjema K (2013) Incidence and predictive factors of clinically relevant bile leakage in the modern era of liver resections. HPB (Oxford) 15:224–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Huntington JT, Schmidt CR (2014) Minimizing blood loss during hepatectomy: a literature review. J Surg Oncol 109:81–88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Capussotti L, Ferrero A, Viganò L, Sgotto E, Muratore A, Polastri R (2006) Bile leakage and liver resection: where is the risk? Arch Surg 141:690–694

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sulpice L, Rayar M, Campillo B, Pery C, Guillaud A, Meunier B et al (2014) Advanced age remains an achilles heel for liver resections. World J Surg 38:918–926

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chang CM, Yin WY, Su YC, Wei CK, Lee CH, Juang SY et al (2014) Preoperative Risk Score predicting 90-day mortality after liver resection in a population-based study. Medicine (Baltimore) 93:e59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wong JS, Wong GL, Chan AW, Wong VW, Cheung YS, Chong CN et al (2013) Liver stiffness measurement by transiet elastography as a predictor on post-hepatectomy outcomes. Ann Surg 257:922–928

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wolf PS, Park JO, Bao F, Allen PJ, DeMatteo RP, Fong Y et al (2013) Preoperative chemotherapy and the risk of hepatotoxicity and morbidity after liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: a single institution experience. J Am Coll Surg 216:41–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kimura N, Toyoki Y, Ishido K, Kudo D, Yakoshi Y, Tsutsumi S et al (2015) Perioperative blood transfusion as a poor prognostic factor after aggressive surgical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 19:866–879

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Hallet J, Tsang M, Cheng ES, Habashi R, Kulyk I, Hanna SS, et al (2015) The Impact of Perioperative Red Blood Cell Transfusions on Long-Term Outcomes after Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 10 [Epub ahead of print]

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Patrizi.

Ethics declarations

Funding

The study received no external support.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in the study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Patrizi, A., Jezequel, C., Sulpice, L. et al. Disposable bipolar irrigated sealer (Aquamantys®) for liver resection: use with caution. Updates Surg 68, 171–177 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-016-0367-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-016-0367-y

Keywords

Navigation