Abstract
Concentrically braced frames are stiff, strong systems frequently used to resist wind and seismic loading; in regions of high seismicity in the US special concentrically braced frames (SCBFs) are used. CBF configurations vary, but in low rise or other structures with modest levels of demands single-story, X-configured braced frames (X-braced) are commonly used. The brace sections used also vary but hollow structural sections (HSS) are the most common in the U.S. Although important, in part because low-rise structures sustain large demands, few research programs have focused on the single-story X-brace configuration. A large research program was undertaken to understand and improve the response of SCBFs with selected testing on single-story X braced SCBFs. The test matrix consisted of two, full-scale planar X-braced frame experiments and one nearly-full-scale three-dimensional X-braced frame. The tests were designed using a new design and detailing philosophy, called the Balanced Design Method. In this paper, application of this design method to the frame is investigated, with a focus on the center-splice connection. The results show that the ultimate inelastic deformation capacity of the system is less dependent on the specific design detail at this splice. Additionally, the bi-directional load testing indicated that the out-of-plane demands did not impact the system performance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AISC (2005a). Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings. AISC/ANSI Standard 341-05, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, IL.
AISC (2005b). Steel construction manual, 13th Ed., American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, IL.
ASCE (2005). Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. Standard ASCE/SEI 07-05, American Society of Civil Engineers, Virginia, USA.
ATC (1992). Guidelines for Cylic Seimic Testing of Components of Steel Structures. ATC-24, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA.
Goel, S. and ElTayem, A. A. (1986). “Cyclic load behavior of angle X-bracing.” Journal of Structural Engineering, 112(11), pp. 2528–2539.
Hsiao, P. C., Lehman, D. E., and Roeder, C. W. (2012a). “Improved analytical model for special concentrically braced frames.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 73, pp. 80–94.
Hsiao, P. C., Lehman, D. E., and Roeder, C. W. (2012b). “A model to simulation of special concentrically braced frames beyond brace fracture.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, published online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2202.
Kotulka, B. (2007). Analysis for a design guide on gusset plates used in special concentrically braced frames. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Lumpkin, E. J. (2009). Enhanced seismic performance of multi-story special concentrically brace frames using a balanced design procedure. MS Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Lehman, D. E, Roeder, C. W., Herman, D., Johnson, S., and Kotulka, B. (2008). “Improved seismic performance of gusset plate connections.” J. Struct. Eng., 134(6), pp. 890–901.
Palmer, K. D., Roeder, C. W., Lehman, D. L., Shield, C. K., and Okazaki, T. (2012). International hybrid simulation tomorrow’s braced frame systems: summary of two-story. Three-dimensional frame tests at the University of Minnesota Multi-Axial Subassemblage Testing Facility, Uploaded 11/3/2011, from https://nees.org/warehouse/experiment/2548/project/605
Roeder, C. W., Lehman, D. E., Clark, K., Powell, J., Yoo, J. H., Tsai, K. C., Lin, C. H., and Wei, C. Y. (2011a). “Influence of gusset plate connections and braces on the seismic performance of X-braced frames.” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 40, pp. 355–374.
Roeder, C. W., Lumpkin, E. J., and Lehman, D. E. (2011b). “A balanced design procedure for special concentrically braced frame connections.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 67, pp. 1760–1772.
Shepard, R. (1972). “Multiphase cross bracing in earthquake resistant Structures.” Earthquake and Structural Dynamics, 1(4), pp. 311–324.
Sherman, J. C. (2009). Bidirectional loading behavior of buckling-restrained braced frames. MS Thesis, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Tremblay, R., Archambault, M. H., and Filiatrault, A., (2003). “Seismic response of concentrically braced steel frames made with rectangular hollow brace members.” Journal of Structural Engineering, 129(12), pp. 1626–1636.
Uriz, P. (2005). Towards earthquake resistant design of concentrically braced steel structures. PhD Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Yoo, J. (2006). Analytical investigation on the seismic performance of special concentrically braced frames. Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Note.-Discussion open until February 1, 2013. This manuscript for this paper was submitted for review and possible publication on May 10, 2012; approved on September 6, 2012.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Palmer, K.D., Roeder, C.W., Lehman, D.E. et al. Concentric X-braced frames with HSS bracing. Int J Steel Struct 12, 443–459 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-012-3012-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-012-3012-8