Skip to main content
Log in

Societal transformation in response to global environmental change: A review of emerging concepts

  • Review
  • Published:
Ambio Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study of societal transformation in response to environmental change has become established, yet little consensus exists regarding the conceptual basis of transformation. This paper aims to provide structure to the dialog on transformation, and to reflect on the challenges of social research in this area. Concepts of transformation are identified through a literature review, and examined using four analytical criteria. It is found that the term ‘transformation’ is frequently used merely as a metaphor. When transformation is not used as a metaphor, eight concepts are most frequently employed. They differ with respect to (i) system conceptualization, (ii) notions of social consciousness (deliberate/emergent), and (iii) outcome (prescriptive/descriptive). Problem-based research tends to adopt concepts of deliberate transformation with prescriptive outcome, while concepts of emergent transformation with no prescriptive outcome tend to inform descriptive-analytical research. Dialog around the complementarities of different concepts and their empirical testing are priorities for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agrawal, A., M.C. Lemos, B. Orlove, and J. Ribot. 2012. Cool heads for a hot world—Social sciences under a changing sky. Global Environmental Change 22: 329–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angelstam, P., K. Andersson, M. Annerstedt, R. Axelsson, M. Elbakidze, P. Garrido, P. Grahn, K.I. Jönsson, S. Pedersen, P. Schlyter, E. Skärbäck, M. Smith, and I. Stjernquist. 2013. Solving problems in social–ecological systems: Definition, practice and barriers of transdisciplinary research. AMBIO 42: 254–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aylett, A. 2013. Networked urban climate governance: Neighborhood-scale residential solar energy systems and the example of Solarize Portland. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 31: 858–875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkin, D. 2011. Communities constructing their own alternatives in the face of crisis. Mountain Research and Development 32: 12–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beddoe, R., R. Costanza, J. Farley, E. Garza, J. Kent, I. Kubiszewski, L. Martinez, T. McCowen, et al. 2009. Overcoming systemic roadblocks to sustainability: The evolutionary redesign of worldviews, institutions, and technologies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106: 2483–2489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkhout, F. 2013. Speed, scope and depth: What counts as a socio-transformation? Paper presented at the International Conference Transformation in a Changing Climate, 19–21 June, 2013, University of Oslo, Norway

  • Bina, O. 2013. The green economy and sustainable development: An uneasy balance? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 31: 1023–1047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, A., and S. Fankhauser. 2011. The green growth narrative: Paradigm shift or just spin? Global Environmental Change 21: 1157–1159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, N., N. Grist, and K. Brown. 2009. Development futures in the context of climate change: Challenging the present and learning from the past. Development Policy Review 27: 741–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K., and E. Westaway. 2011. Agency, capacity, and resilience to environmental change: Lessons from human development, well-Being, and disasters. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 36: 321–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G., P. Kraftl, J. Pickerill, and C. Upton. 2012. Holding the future together: Towards a theorisation of the spaces and times of transition. Environment and Planning A 44: 1607–1623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown K., S. O’Neill, and C. Fabricius. 2013 Social science understanding of transformation. In: International Social Science Council/United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (ISSC/UNESCO). 2013. The World Social Science Report 2013: Changing Global Environments. OECD Publishing/UNESCO Publishing.

  • Butzer, K.W. 2012. Collapse, environment, and society. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109: 3632–3639.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Haan, J., and J. Rotmans. 2011. Patterns in transitions: Understanding complex chains of change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 78: 90–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeFries, R.S., E.C. Ellis, F. Stuart Chapin, P.A. Matson, B.L. Turner, A. Agrawal, P.J. Crutzen, C. Field, et al. 2012. Planetary opportunities: A social contract for global change science to contribute to a sustainable future. BioScience 62: 603–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ernstson, Henrik. 2011. Transformative collective action: A network approach to transformative change in ecosystem-based management. In Social networks and natural resource management: Uncovering the social fabric of environmental governance, ed. Ö. Bodin, and C. Prell, 255–287. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Escobar, A. 1995. Encountering development. The making and unmaking of the Third World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J.P. 2011. Resilience, ecology and adaptation in the experimental city. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 36: 223–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fals-Borda, O. 1955. Peasant society in the Colombian Andes: A sociological study of Saucío. Gainesville: University of Florida Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feola, G. 2013. What (science for) adaptation to climate change in Colombian agriculture? A commentary on “A way forward on adaptation to climate change in Colombian agriculture: perspectives towards 2050” by J. Ramirez-Villegas, M. Salazar, A. Jarvis, and C. E. Navarro-Valcines. Climatic Change 119: 565–574

  • Feola, G., L.A. Agudelo, and B.C. Bamón. 2014. Colombian agriculture under multiple exposures: a review and research agenda. Climate and Development. doi:10.1080/17565529.2014.934776.

  • Ferguson, B.C., R.R. Brown, and A. Deletic. 2013. Diagnosing transformative change in urban water systems: Theories and frameworks. Global Environmental Change 23: 264–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer-Kowalski, M., and H. Haberl. 2007. Socioecological transitions and global change: Trajectories of social metabolism and land use. Cheltenham: Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer-Kowalski, M., and J. Rotmans. 2009. Conceptualizing, observing, and influencing social–ecological transitions. Ecology and Society 14: 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C., S. Carpenter, B. Walker, M. Scheffer, T. Chapin, and J. Rockström. 2010. Resilience thinking: Integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecology and Society 15: 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F., and J. Schot. 2007. Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy 36: 399–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • German Advisory Council on Global Change (WBGU). 2011. World in transition. A social contract for sustainability. Berlin: WBGU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. 1984. The constitution of society. Polity: Cambridge.

  • Gomez-Echeverri, L. 2013. The changing geopolitics of climate change finance. Climate Policy 13: 632–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, R., M. Mitchell, G. Walkerden, V. Brown, and B. Walker. 2010. Building a framework for transformative action in the Wakool Shire Transformation for resilient landscapes and communities project. Institute for Land, Water and Society, Report 61, Charles Sturt University.

  • Grin, J. J. Rotmans and J. Schot. 2010. Transitions to sustainable development. New directions in the study of long term transformative change. New York/London: Routledge.

  • Gudeman, S. 2012. Vital energy. The current of relations. Social Analysis 56: 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haberl, H., M. Fischer-Kowalski, F. Krausmann, J. Martinez-Alier, and V. Winiwarter. 2011. A socio-metabolic transition towards sustainability? Challenges for another great transformation. Sustainable Development 19: 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y., F. Li, X. Bai, and S. Cui. 2012. Comparing vulnerability of coastal communities to land use change: Analytical framework and a case study in China. Environmental Science & Policy 23: 133–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Social Science Council (ISSC). 2012. Transformative cornerstones of social science research for global change. Paris: ISSC.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC, 2012: Summary for policymakers. In Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation, eds. Field, C.B., V. Barros, T.F. Stocker, D. Qin, D.J. Dokken, K.L. Ebi, M.D. Mastrandrea, K.J. Mach, et al. A special report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK, and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–21.

  • International Social Science Council/United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (ISSC/UNESCO). 2013. The world social science report 2013: Changing global environments. OECD Publishing/UNESCO Publishing.

  • Interngovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2014. Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Geneva: IPCC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, T. 2009. Prosperity without growth: Economics of a finite planet. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapoor, R. 2007. Transforming self and society: Plural paths to human emancipation. Futures 39: 475–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kates, R.W., W.R. Travis, and T.J. Wilbanks. 2012. Transformational adaptation when incremental adaptations to climate change are insufficient. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109: 7156–7161.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kristjanson, P., H. Neufeldt, A. Gassner, J. Mango, F.B. Kyazze, S. Desta, G. Sayula, B. Thiede, W. Förch, and P.K. Thornton. 2012. Are food insecure smallholder households making changes in their farming practices? Evidence from East Africa. Food Security 4: 381–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, D., A. Wiek, M. Bergmann, M. Stauffacher, P. Martens, P. Moll, M. Swilling, and C. Thomas. 2012. Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: Practice, principles, and challenges. Sustainability Science 7: 25–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leggewie, C., and D. Messner. 2012. The low-carbon transformation—A social science perspective. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy 4: 041404.

  • Lele, S.M. 1991. Sustainable development: A critical review. World Development 19: 607–621.

  • Luhmann, N. 1995. Social systems. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, N.A., S.E. Park, W.N. Adger, K. Brown, and S.M. Howden. 2012. Transformational capacity and the influence of place and identity. Environmental Research Letters 7: 034022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mustelin J., and J. Handmer. 2013. Triggering transformation: Managing resilience or invoking real change? In: Proceedings of Transformation in a Changing Climate, 19–21 June 2013, Oslo: University of Oslo.

  • Nelson, D.R. 2009. Conclusions: Transforming the world. In Adapting to climate change. Thresholds, values, governance, ed. W.N. Adger, I. Lorenzoni, and K.L. O’Brien, 514 pp. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Nelson, D.R., W.N. Adger, and K. Brown. 2007. Adaptation to environmental change: Contributions of a resilience framework. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 32: 395–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell, B. 2012. Simple models, powerful ideas: Towards effective integrative practice. Global Environmental Change 22: 776–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, K. 2011. Responding to environmental change: A new age for human geography? Progress in Human Geography 35: 542–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, K. 2012. Global environmental change II: From adaptation to deliberate transformation. Progress in Human Geography 36: 667–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, K., and J. Barnett. 2013. Global environmental change and human security. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 38: 373–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, K., and L. Sygna. 2013. Responding to climate change: The three spheres of transformation In: Proceedings of Transformation in a Changing Climate, 19-21 June 2013, Oslo: University of Oslo.

  • Olsson, P., L.H. Gunderson, S.R. Carpenter, P. Ryan, L. Lebel, C. Folke, and C.S. Holling. 2006. Shooting the rapids: Navigating transitions to adaptive governance of social–ecological systems. Ecology and Society 11: 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, S.E., N.A. Marshall, E. Jakku, A.M. Dowd, S.M. Howden, E. Mendham, and A. Fleming. 2012. Informing adaptation responses to climate change through theories of transformation. Global Environmental Change 22: 115–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, P.J., and T.J. Foxon. 2012. A low carbon industrial revolution? Insights and challenges from past technological and economic transformations. Energy Policy 50: 117–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelling, M. 2011. Adaptation to climate change. From resilience to transformation. Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. 1944. The great transformation. New York: Rinehart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, B.L., K. Dow, and F. Berkhout. 2013. The climate adaptation frontier. Sustainability 5: 1011–1035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redclift, M. 2005. Sustainable development (1987–2005): An oxymoron comes of age. Sustainable Development 13: 212–227.

  • Reganold, J.P., D. Jackson-Smith, S.S. Batie, R.R. Harwood, J.L. Kornegay, D. Bucks, C.B. Flora, J.C. Hanson, et al. 2011. Transforming U.S. agriculture. Science 332: 670–671.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. 2004. Squaring the circle? Some thoughts on the idea of sustainable development. Ecological Economics 48: 369–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidl, R., F. Brand, M. Stauffacher, P. Krütli, Q. Le, A. Spörri, G. Meylan, C. Moser, et al. 2013. Science with society in the Anthropocene. AMBIO 42: 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheffer, M. 2009. Critical transitions in nature and society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shove, E. 2010a. Beyond the ABC: Climate change policy and theories of social change. Environment and Planning A 42: 1273–1285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shove, E. 2010b. Social theory and climate change: Questions often, sometimes and not yet asked. Theory, Culture & Society 27: 277–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shove, E., and G. Walker. 2007. CAUTION! Transitions ahead: Politics, practice and sustainable transition management. Environment and Planning A 39: 763–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shove, E., M. Pantzar, and M. Watson. 2012. The dynamics of social practice: Everyday life and how it changes. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Steffen, W., P.J. Crutzen, and J.R. McNeil. 2007. The anthropocene: Are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature? Ambio 36: 614–621.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Strunz, S. 2012. Is conceptual vagueness an asset? Arguments from philosophy of science applied to the concept of resilience. Ecological Economics 76: 112–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunderlin, W.D. 1995. Global environmental change, sociology, and paradigm isolation. Global Environmental Change 5: 211–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sztompka, P. 1993. The sociology of social change. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, T., and A.V. Bahadur. 2013. Distilling the characteristics of transformational change in a changing climate. Paper presented at the International Conference Transformation in a Changing Climate, 19–21 June, 2013, University of Oslo.

  • Thompson, P.B. 2007. Agricultural sustainability: What it is and what it is not. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 5: 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschakert, P., and A.L. St. Clair. 2013. Conditions for transformative change: The role of responsibility, solidarity, and care in climate change research. Paper presented at the International Conference Transformation in a Changing Climate, 19–21 June, 2013, University of Oslo.

  • Turnpenny, J.R. 2012. Lessons from post-normal science for climate science-sceptic debates. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 3: 397–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unmüßig, B., W. Sachs, and T. Fatheuer. 2012. Critique of the green economy. Publication series on ecology. Berlin: Heinrich Böll Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Vuuren, D., N. Nakicenovic, K. Riahi, A. Brew-Hammond, D. Kammen, V. Modi, M. Nilsson, and K. Smith. 2012. An energy vision: the transformation towards sustainability—Interconnected challenges and solutions. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 4: 18–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B.H., C.S. Holling, S.R. Carpenter, and A. Kinzig. 2004. Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems. Ecology and Society 9: 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westley, F., P. Olsson, C. Folke, T. Homer-Dixon, H. Vredenburg, D. Loorbach, J. Thompson, M. Nilsson, et al. 2011. Tipping toward sustainability: Emerging pathways of transformation. Ambio 40: 762–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiek, A., B. Ness, P. Schweizer-Ries, F. Brand, and F. Farioli. 2012. From complex systems analysis to transformational change: A comparative appraisal of sustainability science projects. Sustainability Science 7: 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I am grateful to Mark Charlesworth, Ika Darnhofer and Chuks Okereke for their comments on a previous version of this manuscript, and to two anonymous reviewers and the journal editor for their insightful and challenging comments during the peer-review process. This research was funded by a British Academy/Leverhulme Trust research grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giuseppe Feola.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 136 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Feola, G. Societal transformation in response to global environmental change: A review of emerging concepts. Ambio 44, 376–390 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0582-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0582-z

Keywords

Navigation